Date: Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:18 PM
Subject: Re:
To: Paulmikell.A.Fabian@irscounsel.treas.gov, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, rkory <rkory@rkmgment.com>
Mr. Fabian,
I would like you to review Robert Kory's declaration in response to my motion to vacate Cohen's fraud default judgment that is evidence of theft, inserted suspended corporations (Cohen continues to argue that corporate property is his personal property), and ongoing embezzlement attempts. That includes with respect to Cohen's latest attempt to extort approximately $14 million from me. I was not served this lawsuit and I can assure you Cohen felt the default was a sure thing - with the understanding that I was not served. That's why he rushed to IRS, filed his 2005 return, amended his 2003 and 2004 return, applied for and obtained fraud tax refunds (six months before the entry of default), and ultimately used the fabricated Complaint (that is not supported by the evidence) to defend himself with Agent Tejeda.
Why is Kory arguing federal tax matters before LA Superior Court? Why did the City Attorney lie about federal tax matters to my jurors in my so called 2012 trial? Kory's declaration is quite clear: he supervised the fraudulent financial ledger and took the position that the corporations should be willfully disregarded. Cohen is arguing alter ego, self-dealing, and money laundering. Kory didn't work for Cohen for the 20 years I knew and did so his views on Cohen's personal "transaction fees" are irrelevant. He probably wanted to serve as Cohen's personal manager and lawyer. I don't think that's too difficult to figure out. Cohen personally signed the annuity agreement, that he is now attempting to conceal, which clearly states that his loans (totaling approximately $6.7 million) had to be repaid to TH with interest - within 3 years. He understood this entity bypassed his estate and this had nothing to do with me. BMT was not used to pursue the deal because of their concerns about collapsible corporations. That doesn't involve me. That also doesn't mean I do not own 15% of this now suspended corporation or the IP assets that Cohen has illegally converted to himself. I remain unaware of any case law that permits THEFT via default judgment. Nothing was assigned to LCI so it might be impossible for Cohen to explain why he and LCI collect royalty income (or did) with respect to assets owned by BMT.
The main issue, as I understood it from my lawyers, involved TAX CONSEQUENCES. I have a letter informing me that Kory and Mesnick, Cohen's accountant, were afraid to even order a copy of TH tax returns lest it provoke an IRS inquiry. Kory wrote, in January 2005, that they failed to report TH income of $8 million. I had nothing to do with that and did not handle IRS matters or anything Cohen is attempting to blame on me. The man is shameless and this situation remains evil. That includes the ongoing targeting of my sons. I view that as criminal witness tampering. The custody matter was coordinated. Cohen didn't pay taxes on the $8 million so why is Kory lying to LA Superior Court about that issue? He stole the $1 million prepayment. Mesnick included a copy of the fraudulent, fabricated narrative that is not supported by the evidence. This is the reason they filed the Complaint apart from a need to confront Greenberg's accusations and Cohen/Kory's understanding that I reported the allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud to IRS and other tax authorities. These refunds have been challenged as fraudulent with IRS and FTB. I now have to sue for IRS required tax and corporate information that was due me well in advance of Cohen's filing the retaliatory lawsuit.
Kory details a meeting with Agent Tejeda where further lies were transmitted to IRS. This is a fabricated narrative and Cohen needed to argue fraud/rescission to explain away his role in these entities and transactions. He is the one that demanded complex stock deals. His declaration in the CAK bond deal (sealed with LA Superior Court but available through the SDNY) proves that he demanded these deals and made the decisions. Cohen is attempting to conceal that fact.
Who is Kory to advise LA Superior Court that I "failed to persuade" IRS. I am in possession, and so is IRS, of his memorandum confirming that they failed to report $8 million in income. They also shifted income to me that was not distributed and rectified, in hindsight and secretly, a mistake in my ownership interest in TH after including me on 2001, 2002, and 2003 federal tax returns. The annuity obligation was extinguished from the 2003 federal tax return, without my knowledge or awareness, and Cohen has received in excess of $2 million over the annuity obligation amount.
Who is Kory to advise LA Superior Court that the IRS is not taking the TH 1099 seriously? Cohen wasted these assets and is now engaged in theft and embezzlement.
Kory signed this declaration under penalty of perjury. I assume they'll argue that "Hazel-Atlas," or possibly some corrupt government actor in LA, protects them.
People belong in prison over this situation. Gianelli is most definitely an unofficial member of Cohen's legal team who attempts to infiltrate matters. He also engages in the targeting of witnesses and inconceivable slander. I will remind you that this man lured my then minor son into communicating with him. Ray witnessed a conversation with Kory about Cohen's tax fraud, missing state tax returns, commissions due me, Cohen's theft of intellectual property, and their threats. That's part of the reason for the coordinated custody matter. Greenberg's lawyer has evidence, and confirmed this in writing, that Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and others conspired to have me falsely arrested on May 25, 2005 and engaged in criminal witness tampering. It is my position that IRS, FBI, and DOJ should obtain that information and investigate the Killer King/SWAT incident. These people are completely out of control and insane from my perspective.
Kelley
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Fabian,Does the Criminal Stalker, who appears to be part of Cohen's legal team and attempts to infiltrate matters while slandering me, speak for you or IRS? Kory speaks for IRS. Of course, he's usually lying.KelleyOn Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:IRS, FBI, and DOJ,I can assure you that people need to be arrested over this situation.KelleyOn Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Michelle Rice and Robert Kory,If you have any questions about my communications with Mr. Fabian, IRS Chief Trial Counsel's office, or the Tax Court matter, hit reply all and ask Mr. Fabian your questions.Kelley LynchOn Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:Mr. Fabian,Another criminally harassing email over you and the Tax Court matter.KelleyWhether your letter to Alan Jackson addresses “federal tax matters” or not it is of no interest to Mr. Fabian.His job is to respond to tax court petitions. According to the manual that guides his representation of the IRS in such matters he was required to initially assess your petition for tax court jurisdiction. Since your petition was not in response to a required notice by the IRS he (rightly) concluded that the tax court lacked jurisdiction over your petition. At that point the manual required him to raise the jurisdictional issue asap via motion. He did. The court found that the petition had facial merit and ordered you to file an objection. You did. The matter awaits a decision.If the court grants the motion, that’s it. It’s over.Therefore, there is no point to be served by Mr. Fabian doing any more work on the file until there is a decision on the motion.End of story.---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:06 PM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.comMs. Lynch,Whether your letter to Alan Jackson addresses “federal tax matters” or not it is of no interest to Mr. Fabian.His job is to respond to tax court petitions. According to the manual that guides his representation of the IRS in such matters he was required to initially assess your petition for tax court jurisdiction. Since your petition was not in response to a required notice by the IRS he (rightly) concluded that the tax court lacked jurisdiction over your petition. At that point the manual required him to raise the jurisdictional issue asap via motion. He did. The court found that the petition had facial merit and ordered you to file an objection. You did. The matter awaits a decision.If the court grants the motion, that’s it. It’s over.Therefore, there is no point to be served by Mr. Fabian doing any more work on the file until there is a decision on the motion.End of story.
