From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:29 AM
Subject: Fwd: Kelley Lynch's email to the FBI and Dept of Justice dated Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org
CIA, NSA, and FSB,
The amateur agent provocateur/infiltrator is obsessed with my blog and continues to write me on Truth Sentinel.
Cohen's lawyer evidently gave the Colorado Court Phil Spector's address. She knew I didn't live in California and it is merely
evidence of further abusive litigation tactics.
Gary Spector has aligned himself (and I've studied the online cyber-campaign) with Michelle Blaine and Gianelli. It is truly appalling. Phil Spector has a wonderful relationship with Nicole who testified on his behalf. These three men appear to be opportunists. Their conduct is unconscionable. I didn't impute financial motive. I said Gary Spector, having trashed his father online, probably thinks he should be in Phillip's Last Will and Testament. I've noticed that Gary Spector and his brothers are relatively obsessed with Rachelle Spector who has been demonized using the same 3rd grade girl "drunken slut' argument.
I don't need to create an impression that I am close with Phil Spector. He is one of my dearest friends. Paulette is extremely close with Phil Spector. However, Gianelli (who may be moonlighting for Cooley and Alan Jackson while aligned with Cohen) doesn't know us so it's none of his business.
This man's obsession with me and my family is obscene.
I wouldn't attend Phil Spector's railroading if you paid me. Paulette did and was extremely upset and felt the judge had pre-determined that Phillip was guilty. PS introduced her, and they had lunch, as one of the most important people in his life.
Gianelli was on Pacer again. Maybe he received a bonus. This man is a criminal who belongs in prison. I can assure you that he's talking to himself. I don't care if he copies GOD in on his emails trashing me.
All the best,
Kelley
P.S. I don't need Phillip to file a federal lawsuit. They have fee waivers.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:18 AM
Subject: Kelley Lynch's email to the FBI and Dept of Justice dated Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: blind <distribution@gmail.com>
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:18 AM
Subject: Kelley Lynch's email to the FBI and Dept of Justice dated Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: blind <distribution@gmail.com>
Ms. Lynch,
I have no idea what Gary Spector’s relationship was or is with Phillip Spector, but whatever that relationship is Gary Spector is Phillip Spector’s son, which trumps your attenuated relationship with Mr. Spector as a former employee hands down.
Moreover, to my previous observations (that you did not attend a single day of either of Mr. Spector’s two trials to show support, even though you were not working at the time, and have not been to see your alleged “dear friend” him once in the six years that he has been behind bars) I would add the following:
The district court docket in the Agile litigation reflects that you gave your address as:
“C/o Phil Spector
Phil Spector International
686 South Arroyo Parkway
Penthouse Suite
Pasadena, CA 91105”
But the record also reflects that every time the court sent you a notice to that address, Phillip Spector REFUSED TO ACCEPT DELIVERY on your behalf. See the following docket entries:
à08/28/2006
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 116 Receipt Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (rlp2, ) (Entered: 08/29/2006)
| |
09/08/2006
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 118 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (rlp2, ) (Entered: 09/08/2006)
| |
11/17/2006
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 126 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (rlp, ) (Entered: 11/17/2006)
| |
11/27/2006
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 129 Order, Addressed to Kelly Lynch. (rlp, ) (Entered: 11/27/2006)
| |
12/18/2006
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 131 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (rlp, ) (Entered: 12/19/2006)
| |
01/04/2007
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 137 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (rlp, ) (Entered: 01/04/2007)
| |
01/23/2007
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 140 Order on Motion for Leave Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (rlp, ) (Entered: 01/23/2007)
| |
02/06/2007
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 144 ORDER Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (dln, ) (Entered: 02/06/2007)
| |
05/22/2007
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 151 Order, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (mrs, ) (Entered: 05/22/2007)
| |
05/25/2007
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 154 Order, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (gms, ) (Entered: 05/25/2007)
| |
05/29/2007
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 155 Order on Motion to Stay Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (gms, ) (Entered: 05/29/2007)
| |
06/21/2007
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 165 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (mrs, ) (Entered: 06/21/2007)
| |
07/02/2007
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 168 Order Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (mrs, ) (Entered: 07/02/2007)
| |
04/02/2008
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 182 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (sah, ) (Entered: 04/02/2008)
| |
05/21/2008
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 193 Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (sah, ) (Entered: 05/21/2008)
| |
06/06/2008
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 200 Order, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (sah, ) (Entered: 06/06/2008)
| |
06/09/2008
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 179 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (pap, ) (Entered: 06/09/2008)
| |
06/09/2008
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 189 Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (pap, ) (Entered: 06/09/2008)
| |
06/09/2008
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 177 Order on Motion for Order, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (pap, ) (Entered: 06/09/2008)
| |
06/21/2008
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 204 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (sah, ) (Entered: 06/23/2008)
| |
à07/01/2008
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 205 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (sah, ) (Entered: 07/01/2008)
|
See Greenberg & Associates, Inc. et al v. Cohen et al, Civil Docket for #: 1:05-cv-01233-LTB, available on-line through PACER.
Clearly, you have always wanted to convey the impression that you were close to Phillip Spector, but – obviously, your behavior (including your failure to attend his trial or visit him in jail) and in this instance his behavior in returning your mail as undeliverable, tells a far different story.
Moreover, you have a lot of nerve imputing a financial motive to Phillip Spector’s son Gary, in view of your attempts to sell the idea of Phil Spector on essentially funding your desired lawsuit against the City of Los Angles and Leonard Cohen by among other things Spector loaning you his “legal team”. Moreover, Gary Spector has not exactly been sucking up to his father as one would expect a son seeking to protect his expectation of an inheritance would – unlike you, who panders to Phil Spector at every opportunity. Which opportunities are limited, because Spector will never see you, and you don’t even have his wife’s email address – because if you did you would not need to pester Spector’s appellate counsel with your incessant personal emails. Not that she would let you anywhere near her husband now or ever.
Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece
