June 18, 2010
Dear Ms. Lynch:
On June 17, 2010, you posted on your blog a letter to the Cambodian Red Cross protesting what you believed to be entertainer Leonard Cohen’s intention to give a charity concert there to benefit the Cambodian people on the BOGUS grounds that (according to you, without any evidence, and despite the denial of the alleged “victim”) Cohen allegedly molested his daughter in Greece in 1979.
Actually, if Cohen wants to press this issue I will absolutely subpoena Freda Gutman. Ann Diamond has already confirmed that Freda Gutman advised her that Lorca Cohen publicly informed her classmates at Concordia that her father molested her.
You posted your letter under a post heading additionallyfalsely implying that Cohen, who has a lifetime history of charitable giving, is simply giving the benefit to obtain a tax deduction.
You posted your letter under a post heading additionallyfalsely implying that Cohen, who has a lifetime history of charitable giving, is simply giving the benefit to obtain a tax deduction.
Well, since I did work as Cohen’s personal manager for approximately 17 years I do happen to know this lying con artist fraud and thief. His obsession with stock deals, avoidance of ordinary income tax, avoidance of gift tax, and his deranged insistence that his donation of his body of work to the University of Toronto in exchange for a U.S. tax credit does lead me to wonder if his charitable concert has a tax deduction attached to it. Cohen is one of the greediest men I’ve ever met on this earth. Furthermore, one charitable gesture every few years is really not particularly impressive.
In response we wrote to the same Red Cross official you did, pointing out that it has been proven in a court of law that you were fired as Cohen’s manager in 2004 for embezzling millions from him, that Cohen has a $7.3 million 2006 judgment against you related to your theft, that you have a history of psychiatric hospitalizations, that you have restraining orders against you and in Cohen’s favor in California and Colorado, and that you have six (6) outstanding bench warrants for your arrest issued by the Los Angeles courts.
In response we wrote to the same Red Cross official you did, pointing out that it has been proven in a court of law that you were fired as Cohen’s manager in 2004 for embezzling millions from him, that Cohen has a $7.3 million 2006 judgment against you related to your theft, that you have a history of psychiatric hospitalizations, that you have restraining orders against you and in Cohen’s favor in California and Colorado, and that you have six (6) outstanding bench warrants for your arrest issued by the Los Angeles courts.
It would be hard for Gianelli to “point out” anything about me and Cohen since he didn’t know me or Cohen when I refused to meet with Cohen and Westin to unravel their deranged tax planning, corporate structures, etc. Cohen’s the THIEF and the fraud default judgment and wrongful conversion of my property to him is evidence of that. It is also evidence of his attempts to cover up and conceal his criminal tax fraud. I don’t have a history of psychiatric problems and the doctors that I saw were clear about that. Law enforcement appears to have a vested interest in the outcome of Cohen’s criminal tax fraud matter and appears to have wanted the opportunity to interrogate me in a controlled environment about Phil Spector en route to Killer King. Perhaps that’s where Cohen and law enforcement had their meeting of minds. See evidence that Cohen, Lindsey, Kory, and Superfon conspired to have me falsely arrested; Robert Kory’s declaration in my minor son’s custody matter that is evidence of criminal witness tampering on the part of Cohen and Kory; and the evidence Daniel Scheid wrote me about – he told me he has evidence that Cohen and Kory engaged in criminal witness tampering and also has evidence against Lindsey and Superfon.
Three of the bench warrants are clearly evidence of fraud at LA Superior Court. One relates to the UD matter that I was unaware of. I wasn’t served that lawsuit either. Therefore, the judges in four matters before LA Superior Court don’t have jurisdiction which is really quite shocking but seems to be par for the course. I intend to litigate the three garbage, unlawful, and unconstitutional misdemeanor citations with Santa Monica and SMPD. City Attorney Marsha Moutrie should understand that and she should have been able to read the 9th Circuit Court’s decision but Santa Monica thinks it’s above the law and their police department absolutely targeted me and criminally harasses people. They also advised me that they were playing a game and understood that I knew Phil Spector.
We also wrote directly to you in blunt terms pointing out that charity donated services are not tax deductible so this could not have been the entertainer’s motive, as well as the fact that Cohen has a long history of charitable giving.
We also wrote directly to you in blunt terms pointing out that charity donated services are not tax deductible so this could not have been the entertainer’s motive, as well as the fact that Cohen has a long history of charitable giving.
Cohen’s charitable donation of stock to Mt. Baldy was audited by the IRS and should be revisited by the IRS since his accountant, Ken Cleveland, thought it was a miracle that it flew with the IRS. The IRS really was beginning to audit quite a lot of Cohen’s deranged tax planning, stock deals, and corporate entities. Since K1s Cohen personally received in the amounts of $1 million and $7 million from Sony. They miraculously transformed into $0 1099s. Only Cohen benefitted from that activity. Cohen seems to have a long history of criminal tax fraud and tax evasion in the U.S. There’s apparently no good news in Canada which explains why Canada’s national treasure can’t live in Canada. The IRS, according to Cohen, doesn’t ask where you paid taxes the prior year while Canada Revenue does.
The bottom line is this: Setting aside the morally reprehensible nature of your attempt to derail a benefit concert for needy, third world people based on false, malicious and untrue allegations of pedophilia—and that you have made those very same preposterous, false and untrue allegations against this blog—once you take a controversial stand regarding a public figure and post it on the internet you are quite literally inviting public comment and controversy. In other words, you then become fair game for criticism.
I have been clear – any adult male stranger who attempts to lure a minor into privately communicating with him should be viewed as a potential sexual predator. To say otherwise is preposterous. Malicious lies and slander is NOT criticism.
In subsequent posts on your blog you repeat the false allegation that we are working for Leonard Cohen (we are not now, nor have we ever been so affiliated) as well as the reckless and maliciously motivated FALSE AND MANUFACTURED accusation that Cohen is a pedophile.
In subsequent posts on your blog you repeat the false allegation that we are working for Leonard Cohen (we are not now, nor have we ever been so affiliated) as well as the reckless and maliciously motivated FALSE AND MANUFACTURED accusation that Cohen is a pedophile.
I didn’t manufacture Freda Gutman’s remarks to Ann Diamond about Lorca Cohen’s public declaration at Concordia that her father molested her. I also didn’t manufacture Cohen’s comments to me that he had sex with his 15-year old nanny and asked me to contact Van Penick about the statutes of limitations with respect to that in Canada. There apparently aren’t any statutes of limitations.
We again remind you that you have also falsely accused this blog and its editor of serious crimes, transparently to get even with us for banning you from Blogonaut Law Blog and also to retaliate against our constitutionally privileged communications about your controversial public statements regarding public figures Phil Spector, Leonard Coehn, Alan Jackson, and others, and that those false allegations have included the undersigned allegedly being a member of a notorious pedophile organization—again with zero evidence to back the allegation up; Just your malicious desire to damage someone’s reputation by stating the worst accusation possible in our culture.
We again remind you that you have also falsely accused this blog and its editor of serious crimes, transparently to get even with us for banning you from Blogonaut Law Blog and also to retaliate against our constitutionally privileged communications about your controversial public statements regarding public figures Phil Spector, Leonard Coehn, Alan Jackson, and others, and that those false allegations have included the undersigned allegedly being a member of a notorious pedophile organization—again with zero evidence to back the allegation up; Just your malicious desire to damage someone’s reputation by stating the worst accusation possible in our culture.
Apparently Gianelli (who is NOT a “blog”) doesn’t think criminal witness tampering, criminal harassment, intimidation tactics, threats, blackmail/extortion, cyber-bullying, malicious lies and slander, etc. are serious crimes. Gianelli also doesn’t view lying to the FBI as a serious crime. I haven’t made any controversial public statements regarding Phil Spector. I have said that I had dinner with Phil Spector after the Clarkson incident at his house. At that time, Phil Spector advised me that Clarkson was dancing around in his foyer, waving a gun, and shot herself. That’s precisely what five major forensic experts concluded. Leoanrd Cohen and Alan Jackson’s actions are most definitely controversial. In fact, controversy seems to be the name of their game. They have similar tactics – malicious lies, slander, targeting innocent people, character assassination, bullying people, lying, attempting to intimidate people, etc. Any adult male stranger who attempts to lure a minor into privately communicating with him (via the internet and by email) should be viewed as a potential sexual predator. Many people have advised me that they view Gianelli as a dangerously unstable lunatic and feel he is sadistically obsessed with me.
In other words you have a years-long demonstrated pattern of reaching into thin air to trash those that displease you with the made-up accusations you believe will cause the targets of your anger and displeasure the maximum pain and reputation damage.
In other words you have a years-long demonstrated pattern of reaching into thin air to trash those that displease you with the made-up accusations you believe will cause the targets of your anger and displeasure the maximum pain and reputation damage.
Cohen didn’t “displease” me. He committed criminal tax fraud and I reported that to the IRS and provided them with evidence. I also reported it to the State of Kentucky, California State Franchise Tax Board, and the District Attorney’s aptly named Major Fraud Unit. Cohen is a lying con artist fraud and thief who maliciously slandered me, targeted my family, and stole from me. He is a maniac.
Of course, it is also quite ironic that you—who has spent the last 5 years and the last 14 months, respectively, serially accusing Leonard Cohen and this blog of criminality—have not only an extensive arrest record as well as six (6) outstanding WARRANTS FOR YOUR ARREST issued by different Los Angeles superior Court judges in six different matters.
Hardly an “extensive arrest record” but I have asked the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury to investigate all activity with respect to me and law enforcement. I have also asked the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury to investigate Cohen’s lawsuit against me and the custody matter – as well as Greenberg’s companion lawsuit in Colorado. Very clever of Cohen to forget to name Greenberg to his fraud lawsuit against me while sneaking in two companies not named in his lawsuit (and clearly not under Freeman’s jurisdiction) into what I believe is a highly illegal default judgment and evidence of criminal conduct. Cohen has no qualms, apparently, engaging in criminal conduct – see illegal and criminal K1s that were transmitted to the IRS and State of Kentucky. The man lies as easily as he breathes. He must really impress these judges who appear to bend over backwards for lying celebrity frauds.
You, and the persons whom you attempt to sway with your false allegations, would do well to keep in mind that neither Leonard Cohen, nor the undersigned, nor anyone else that you have accused (and there have been many) have ever been prosecuted for any crime, and that it is you—and only you—who has suffered multiple civil judgments, restraining orders, psychiatric hospitalizations, arrests, has embezzled millions, and also has warrants out for her arrest.
You, and the persons whom you attempt to sway with your false allegations, would do well to keep in mind that neither Leonard Cohen, nor the undersigned, nor anyone else that you have accused (and there have been many) have ever been prosecuted for any crime, and that it is you—and only you—who has suffered multiple civil judgments, restraining orders, psychiatric hospitalizations, arrests, has embezzled millions, and also has warrants out for her arrest.
Who are the persons I’m attempting to sway? The IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and Dennis Riordan? Should they keep in mind that Cohen hasn’t been prosecuted for a crime. Perhaps the IRS is aware of this and perhaps they sent agents from the Treasury to meet with me because they have a probable prosecution of Leonard Cohen pending. Perhaps that’s why I’ve heard from the FBI on more than one occasion. I’ve asked the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury to investigate the hospitalizations – including the one where the IRS shows up in the medical records which is precisely why I called Agent Bill Betzer from the nurse’s station. This was discussed with the Treasury agents – as was the custody matter which clearly relates to Cohen’s criminal tax fraud matter and Phil Spector’s matter. I am assuming that the DA had the power and motive to have me dragged to Killer King but have asked the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury to investigate that.
You are the one wanted by Los Angeles Police on six bench warrants; not Cohen and not this blog; and you are the one who has been proven to have embezzled millions of dollars; who has a motive to lie and a demonstrated propensity to lie; who has been frequently arrested; and who has a history of involuntary psychiatric hospitalizations.
You are the one wanted by Los Angeles Police on six bench warrants; not Cohen and not this blog; and you are the one who has been proven to have embezzled millions of dollars; who has a motive to lie and a demonstrated propensity to lie; who has been frequently arrested; and who has a history of involuntary psychiatric hospitalizations.
Really? I’m wanted by LAPD? Do they now have a wanted poster out? A default judgment PROVES nothing except for the fact that Cohen used that to commit THEFT, wrongful conversion, fraud, etc. I have no propensity to lie. Gianelli, however, clearly has MOTIVE and that should absolutely be investigated together with what I view as his engagement in extremely serious criminal conduct.
Add to that resume yesterday's demonstrated willingness to deprive an entire country of needy people charity aid to serve your own sick agenda of getting revenge against your crime victim.
Add to that resume yesterday's demonstrated willingness to deprive an entire country of needy people charity aid to serve your own sick agenda of getting revenge against your crime victim.
Give me a break. Leonard Cohen is a common criminal.
Your arrest and (hopefully) subsequent psychiatric treatment could not come soon enough for us.
Your arrest and (hopefully) subsequent psychiatric treatment could not come soon enough for us.
What arrest (hopefully)? LAPD knows how to contact me. Cohen has a history of very serious psychiatric problems. He has a history of drug addiction and abuse – as well as problems with alcohol. He is a calculated fraud and liar. He has a history of THEFT with respect to his advisers. He is a dangerously unstable fraud. When people see through this lying thug criminal he targets them … that includes Phil Spector. Cohen’s sick agenda with respect to Phil Spector SHOCKS the conscience. I believe he waited in ambush after Phil Spector refused to finish his album or work with him. Cohen was humiliated (according to him) that he had to telegraph Phil Spector in an attempt to have him finish the album. Phil Spector found working with Cohen miserable. I know for a fact that working with Cohen is a miserable experience. He’s a control freak, lying con artist, and one of the greediest men I’ve ever met in my life. He uses his money to buy people’s silence and friendship. The man’s PATHETIC. He hires high paid liars to destroy innocent people’s lives and targets children. One must wonder why the detectives I met at Cohen’s house think it’s acceptable that his good rock ‘n roll comments ended up as testimony in the Phil Spector matter. They seemed professional to me. Cohen apparently thought using the Phil Spector matter would help him save his proverbial ass and cover up his criminal tax fraud, etc. The man has a criminal mind. He has no remorse. He is obsessed with himself. He’s a revolting excuse for a man.
Very truly yours,
Blogonaut Law Blog
Very truly yours,
Blogonaut Law Blog
LABELS: ARREST WARRANTS, GRINCH WHO WOULD KILL A CHARITY CONCERT FOR NEEDY PEOPLE, KELLEY LYNCH,LEONARD COHEN, PHIL SPECTOR
8 COMMENTS:
Anonymous said...
Pure white trash C is threatening Walsh again after sending her yet another blowhard e-mail. Then e-mails her again. Walsh will send that to Michelle Rice who the lying kelley is claiming: Is Playing With The Big Boys - And Attempting To Intimidate And Threaten My Sons, Etc. - Make No Mistakes About This Thug..
What big boys would they be? the ones in your dirty underwear? Who would want this nasty vile thug writing to their sons?
LAPD, your sons, Michelle..etc. can see you.
What big boys would they be? the ones in your dirty underwear? Who would want this nasty vile thug writing to their sons?
LAPD, your sons, Michelle..etc. can see you.
Can LAPD see me and my sons? They should be focused on Cohen, Kory, Rice, and the cyber-terrorists and bullies who have decided to engage in an organized campaign of criminal harassment, witness tampering, threats, intimidation tactics, etc.
mongochili
mongochili
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
LEGAL NOTICE
Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. Section 230(c)(1) neither Blogonaut nor its editor are responsible for any content authored by third parties, including but not limited to posted comments.
BLOGONAUT FEATURES
QUESTIONS? NEWS TIPS? CONTACT BLOGONAUT:
UPDATED 03.21.13
Here is Robert Kory’s mass email reply:
First please accept my personal apologies for my failure to foresee the disasters that led to cancellation of the Cambodian concert. Second, I am planning to make a statement on the forum, but I am waiting to sort out all the damage.
In the interim, here is the simple explanation. The local promoter is inexperienced, and failed to account properly for the cost in presenting the concert in such a remote location. The technical hallmark of a Leonard Cohen concert on this tour is its sound; we do not compromise the standards, and we have a very detailed technical rider that we send to every promoter prior to signing a contract as to the technical requirements. Many less advanced countries do not have the equipment which must be shipped in by freight. Even in the famous Israel concert last year, we had to ship in truckloads of equipment from Germany. In the case of Phnom Penh, we verified, through an independent European tour manager living in Thailand, that the required equipment existed in SE Asia and could be shipped in. Over the course of the last few months, I relied on AEGLive in London to monitor progress along with our our crew. AEGLive is responsible for all promotion contracts and for verifying the financial integrity of all local promoters. About four weeks ago, I became concerned that our crew was not getting answers from the local promoter about equipment arrivals, load in schedules, etc, Ticket sales were not great, but were adequate. When I finally pressed the issue on equipment, however, it became clear that the local promoter had not anticipated either the full cost of renting equipment and not any cost of freight. Equipment production costs alone rose to over $500,000. That cost is not feasible for a 2,000 person concert, The venue only holds 3,500. In addition to the equipment production costs, you have to add air charter, security, hotels, etc for 40 people. Total show costs would reach over $800,000. In short the concert would have been a financial disaster even if every ticket were sold; there would not only be no money for charity, but the local promoter would be bankrupt and we would no doubt have incurred great travel and hotel expense for which we would not be reimbursed.
What took so long for me to discover these matters? The local promoter was less than forthcoming, and AEGLive became so emotionally committed to seeing the historic concert happen that they failed in their oversight duties. This is a very rare error of judgment. I was the final line of defense in unearthing the facts, and when I smelled a problem, I pushed until I got answers, as I am not just a manager, but a lawyer. So my due diligence efforts included personally calling the local promoter every hour for several days while I was in New Zealand and sending increasingly forceful and compelling emails demanding the truth whatever the truth might be. In AEG’s defense, the local promoter stopped returning AEG’s calls, probably as panic set in as the local promoter realized that the concert meeting our technical standards was not financially feasible.
The success of our tour over the past two and one-half years may lead some fans to believe that the whole enterprise is or has been easy to manage and coordinate. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Managing and promoting a tour of this magnitude and quality is extraordinarily difficult because we absolutely never compromise quality. Some artists would say, “go ahead, rent the cheap local equipment, too bad if the audience can’t hear, they can’t hear in most concerts anyway.” That approach is anathema to us. Leonard has given me the honor and the privilege to manage a tour of unprecedented quality. Between ourselves, we call it “the no compromise tour.” That has been our premise from day one, and I take some satisfaction that the whole crew has adopted a standard of excellence. That means we turn down many offers. In retrospect, we should have declined the Phnom Penh offer.
I deeply regret the inconvenience our “no compromise” attitude has had on your plans. I can only console myself with the knowledge that I would have been even more horrified to walk the stadium and hear muddled sound that made it impossible to hear the music and lyrics.
We remain committed to playing Asia; I have explored many avenues; our technical rider is a deterrent to many Asian promoters who know their business; nevertheless, Leonard plans to tour next year after the release of his new record. I will continue to try to organize a tour in Asia.
Please let us know if there is any way we can assist you in seeing one of the remaining concerts in Australia or North America. Tickets will be our gift.
By the way, we are making a donation to charity in Cambodia from revenues earned in Australia because we told the Cambodian public that a charitable donation would be made. That donation will come directly from my pocket and from Leonard’s.
Kind regards,
Robert
Robert Kory
RK Management, LLC
9300 Wilshire Blvd.
Suite 200
Beverly Hills,CA 90212
(t) 310-285-1620 ext 601
(f) 310-278-7641
Robert
Robert Kory
RK Management, LLC
9300 Wilshire Blvd.
Suite 200
Beverly Hills,CA 90212
(t) 310-285-1620 ext 601
(f) 310-278-7641
http://1heckofaguy.com/2010/11/10/robert-kory-on-cambodian-concert-cancellation-and-plans-for-2011-leonard-cohen-tour/
