Gianelli & Cyber-Terrorist Slanders & Lies - Kelley's Response
|
| ||||||||
15 Comments -
COMMENTS 12-15 ADDRESSED (1-15 REDACTED)
We all know the Lynchness Monster is bat-shit crazy--but what is her attorney's excuse? And how in hell can she afford to pay him? Regarding the IRS matter: since the IRS is squared away with Mr. Cohen, how can she possibly believe antagonizing the IRS is going to help her in any way? Oh, well, perhaps the IRS can put her away for a very long time?
How can I afford to pay my attorney? Well, that’s none of Kelly Green’s business. The IRS has not said it is squared away with Cohen and I have asked the IRS to review all testimony in my trial and weigh in on whether or not their filing and reporting requirements demand that citizens go to extraordinary lengths to obtain tax, financial, and accounting data they need to properly file their tax returns. I am not antagonizing the IRS and when my lawyers were speaking with Agent Tejeda/IRS during the trial he never once mentioned this. The judge refused to allow him to take the stand. My lawyer advised me that a number of jurors (in the juror debrief) wanted to hear more about the IRS matter. Why would the IRS put me away? They flew agents in from Washington to meet with me and I have heard from the FBI numerous times. Agent Tejeda/IRS also advised my lawyers that he would be willing to assist with future hearings, trials, and possibly sentencing. I am waiting to hear the exact statements he made to my lawyers during my trial as I was not privy to those conversations for obvious reasons.
Suzanne, I, too, have wondered why the sentencing judge didn't order her to stay away from computers and the internet. Afterall, the internet is her preferred means of harassing others.
Suzanne, I, too, have wondered why the sentencing judge didn't order her to stay away from computers and the internet. Afterall, the internet is her preferred means of harassing others.
Interesting that the cyber-terrorists have revenge fantasies – including Kelly Green who I believe may be Alan Jackson, affiliated with Jackson, and was on the Darwin Exception in 2007 that is a blog hostile to Phil Spector and glorifies Alan Jackson. Green’s Phawker.com comments were sent to the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and Dennis Riordan. That would include, but is not limited to, his/her questions about Dr. Michael Baden and Dr. Henry Lee. The judge noted I have a First Amendment right to post on the internet and the truth is the defense to slander so people shouldn’t get too cozy yet because my appeal has not been filed and will address the totality of circumstances that were CONCEALED during my trial – including the fact that orders, judgments, and verdicts have been obtained via fraud, perjury, lies, and concealment.
October 24, 2012 1:08 AM
The only one threatening Kelley Lynch with a return trip to jail, the only one destroying her life and that of her family, the only one causing her to loose credibility and the only one lying and slandering, is Kelley Lynch herself. Every time she touches a keyboard she creates more havoc to her already chaotic situation and life. Stephen “Jihad” Gianelli has threatened me with a return to jail and I have sent that to the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, Dennis Riordan, and my own lawyers. I haven’t lost credibility with anyone I know in reality and the phrase “smear campaign” has been raised with respect to the unconscionable attempts to discredit me and destroy my reputation. I am not lying or slandering anyone and Walsh has never reviewed the evidence. Boies Schiller has. They understood this – Cohen owes me millions, is a Hollywood fraud who has attempted to blame his wrongdoing on me, that he would go into court and prove that he has committed tax fraud, and further advised me that Cohen and Kory were asking me to engage in criminal conduct when Kory and I schedule a meet that was not approved by any lawyer of mine. Kory is a bald-faced liar. His lies and perjury are excessive. Agent Bill Betzer/IRS can prove that I did not find an ad that instructed me to report my employer to the IRS. Agent Bill Betzer/IRS advised me to bring the tax fraud into the IRS – first via the Fraud Hotline.
I do agree with KL on a few points. Yes, Leonard Cohen has never made a secret of his alcohol and drug use, so why he was upset about that accusation from Lynch, I don't know, but it has nothing to do with the charges against KL, Mr. Cohen was not on trial,Kelley Lynch was.
Leonard Cohen lied to the court when he testified that I assailed his reputation by referring to his drug use. I have known this man for 20 years, know what I witnessed, and a great deal of his psychiatric ailments, drug and alcohol abuse, and tendency to embellish stories (including about Phil Spector and a gun which he addressed in his emails with Streeter – he noted that they were embellished and that is now in evidence). That, his admission of perjury, and extensive lies has a great deal to do with the juror instructions (in my trial) admonishing them to disregard testimony of people who lie. Cohen should be prosecuted for perjury and that is going to be an issue on appeal – the objection, after Cohen testified that the changed a story at a prior hearing under oath, was sustained.
I also agree that I do not know much about the American legal systems, but I have lived long enough in USA to know that the IRS do not take tax cheaters or tax frauds lightly, they will find them and procecute them, therefore it is ridiculous for KL to keep on harassing them about "Cohens criminal tax fraud". they have had close to ten years to investigate Mr. Cohen's legal and tax-situation, and I am very confident that with the focus there has been on exactly Mr. Cohen's taxes and with the kind of money he has made, and still make, they would not ignore him and his taxes. The facts that he got a refund for the taxes he had paid on the money stolen from, proves that they are fully aware of his status.
I know this about the American legal system – the IRS should investigate why Cohen abandoned a green card after Marty Machat’s death and re-obtained one – and advised me that the IRS does not ask where you paid taxes the prior year while Canada Revenue does. Cohen had off-shore accounts, where royalties were collected, when he had the first green card, and a Swiss bank account. I have advised the IRS of this and the fact that he had numerous social security numbers that his accountant sorted out after Mr. Machat’s death.
I have lived in the U.S. my entire life and I have worked for a company that worked with the IRS and State taxing authorities. I have NEVER IN MY LIFE seen a situation where the IRS and Treasury flies agents in from Washington; has an agent in criminal intelligence instruct me to take the allegations of Cohen’s tax fraud to Agent Tejeda/IRS (a man Kory testified is the head of fraud for the Western U.S.), etc. NOR have I ever seen a situation where the FBI emails me personally and neither the IRS or FBI have advised me that they are pursuing me. Kory cannot speak for the IRS or FTB but he testified that they were pursuing me and I have spoken personally with Doug Davis/FTB who didn’t think I did volunteer work for Cohen on “Dear Heather.” Cohen testified that the income from “Dear Heather” was addressed on the “forensic accounting” that is a ledger. That is a bald-faced lie. No income or assets are addressed on that fraudulent ledger. I reported the tax fraud in 2005 so that is 7 years. Why would Walsh be confident about Cohen’s taxes. He knows that my brother-in-law (an attorney in Canada) took the position that Cohen had residence and tax issues in Canada. I don’t think the IRS is ignoring Cohen and I believe Agent Tejeda/IRS should have been permitted to take the witness stand at my trial. The fact that Cohen got a refund based on lies, fraud, perjury, concealment, etc. is now a serious legal issue that I discovered at trial. I have brought my views about this matter to Agent Tejeda/IRS. I have also advised the IRS Commissioner’s Staff that Cohen clearly believes he is the “alter ego” of these corporate fictions. I also happen to believe the IRS is fully aware of Cohen’s tax situation and the very serious allegations that he has committed criminal tax fraud – this is fraud and not negligence. As Cohen’s own former attorney said to me: the IRS Commissioner should or would come in after Cohen and his lawyers, accountants. This man, as Cohen and his representatives were well aware, was concerned about personal service contracts being assigned to the trusts I had nothing to do with setting up. That’s why he was hired. I had never heard of the man in my entire life. The IRS should also audit the two charitable remainder trusts.
That Kelley Lynch feel it is perfectly acceptable for her to lie about and slander Mr. Cohen, Mr. Kory, Mr. Gianelli and hundreds of others, on her blog, but a crime that should be investigated, procecuted and result in jail time for Mr. Gianelli, Kelly Green and myself, when we write on another private blog, is also a theory that can only be created in a very disturbed mind.
I haven’t slandered Cohen or Kory but they have lied extensively on the stand including, from what I could tell, about the IRS. I have asked the IRS and FBI to investigate Jihad Gianelli and have been clear about that. I personally believe Gianelli should be arrested by the FBI but I do not work for the FBI so they will have to decide for themselves. I have no idea who Kelly Green is but it’s interesting that Walsh thinks that an investigation could result in jail time for Gianelli, Green, and herself. There is nothing private about Gianelli’s Blogonaut Law Blog which is why – when I searched for a transcript of the Boulder hearing earlier today – his latest article slandering me and falsely accusing me of matters with respect to my tax returns (which he would have no access to so these allegations should prove disturbing to the IRS and FTB) showed up in the search results. The cyber-terrorists targeting me and lying about me are obviously dangerously unstable and appear to have disturbed mines. I have brought this to the attention of the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, my lawyers, Dennis Riordan, and others.
October 24, 2012 4:56 AM
Comment deleted
This comment has been removed by the author.
Seems odd since Gianelli personally moderates all posts on his Blogonaut Law Blog.
October 24, 2012 7:50 AM
kellygreen:
Welcome back to the discussion.
Welcome back to the discussion.
Kelly Green is back in the discussion. Kelly Green was in the discussion on The Darwin Exception blog in 2007. That blog is hostile to Phil Spector and glorifies Alan Jackson.
It is interesting that Lynch has now fallen back on her old argument that the Colorado restraining order (issued by the Hon. Carolyn Enichen on September 2, 2008) - this would be the order, later registered by Cohen's attorneys in California that Lynch was convicted of violating in 2012 - was "fraudulently" issued.
It is interesting that Lynch has now fallen back on her old argument that the Colorado restraining order (issued by the Hon. Carolyn Enichen on September 2, 2008) - this would be the order, later registered by Cohen's attorneys in California that Lynch was convicted of violating in 2012 - was "fraudulently" issued.
The Colorado order was procured, when Cohen filed his declaration, by fraud. I discovered that perjury and fraud AFTER the hearing and it was addressed in my Motion to Quash which I have asked my lawyer to review. Some of the following comments have been redacted.
The point is that by showing up at the September 2, 2008 Colorado hearing and REQUESTING judge Carolyn Enichen to make the temporary protective order permanent, Kelley Lynch not only stipulated and agreed to the order, she has thereby waived any objection to service or to the factual basis for the order. It is not "fraudulent", Lynch got exactly what she asked Judge Enichen to give her!
The point is that by showing up at the September 2, 2008 Colorado hearing and REQUESTING judge Carolyn Enichen to make the temporary protective order permanent, Kelley Lynch not only stipulated and agreed to the order, she has thereby waived any objection to service or to the factual basis for the order. It is not "fraudulent", Lynch got exactly what she asked Judge Enichen to give her!
I discovered the fraud and perjury AFTER the hearing so it might have been difficult to stipulate to it and I would not stipulate to fraud in any event. I didn’t waive an objection to service. I reviewed the proof of service AFTER the hearing and at that time noted that the process server also perjured himself in my Motion to Quash. Judge Enichen told me she would be disturbed if she were me. She also raised the IRS as an issue on the record so I have asked the IRS to review the entire file and record. This was raised prior to my taking the stand.
And she has now accused three different judges (one in Colorado and two in California) of being corrupt and "star struck", even though in the case of the default judgment she never opposed the case and in Colorado the judge simply did what Lynch asked her to do. And in the latest case, the jury decided her guilt, not the judge.
And she has now accused three different judges (one in Colorado and two in California) of being corrupt and "star struck", even though in the case of the default judgment she never opposed the case and in Colorado the judge simply did what Lynch asked her to do. And in the latest case, the jury decided her guilt, not the judge.
My words – and not Jihad Gianelli – speak for how I feel. I have no idea what the problem with Judge Vanderet is. I know this – he concealed Agent Tejeda/IRS from the jurors when he refused to permit him to testify. I have addressed, with my lawyers, Gianelli’s public threats regarding my intention to file a Motion to Vacate Cohen’s lawsuit and the default judgment. They are now in receipt (as are the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and FTB) of my draft Motion to Vacate and declaration addressing all of Cohen’s fraud, lies, perjury, and concealment that was drafted in May 2010 AFTER Gianelli posted the legal documents and I finally had a chance to review them. I was not served Cohen’s lawsuit, the proof of service is perjured, and I was not served notice of the default. I was homeless and it was mailed to my former Brentwood home. I wonder why my jurors thought Leonard Cohen was testifying about Phil Spector and an alleged gun.
To answer your questions “What is her attorney's excuse? And how in hell can she afford to pay him?”, a. see the above post (need we say more?) and b. he is court appointed at taxpayer expense.
To answer your questions “What is her attorney's excuse? And how in hell can she afford to pay him?”, a. see the above post (need we say more?) and b. he is court appointed at taxpayer expense.
Gianelli is now answering questions about my lawyers. Berkeley PD and I discussed Cohen’s wasting taxpayer dollars. They also were not particularly clear about why they were arresting me – based on Viramontes/LAPD’s arrest warrant which I have now requested from Viramontes.
One would think that, given the canceled checks showing Lynch’s siphoning off of Cohen’s nest egg to the tune of $5M appended to the declaration of Cohen’s forensic accountant appended to Cohen’s application for the original $7M default judgment (this declaration + canceled checks is also available on Scribed.com), that at a minimum the United States Attorney’s Office would at least charge Lynch with failing to file her ’94 and ’95 tax returns with the intent to evade taxes. She admits she never filed the returns, and this should be a slam dunk prosecution good for 10 years in a federal joint.
One would think that, given the canceled checks showing Lynch’s siphoning off of Cohen’s nest egg to the tune of $5M appended to the declaration of Cohen’s forensic accountant appended to Cohen’s application for the original $7M default judgment (this declaration + canceled checks is also available on Scribed.com), that at a minimum the United States Attorney’s Office would at least charge Lynch with failing to file her ’94 and ’95 tax returns with the intent to evade taxes. She admits she never filed the returns, and this should be a slam dunk prosecution good for 10 years in a federal joint.
The cancelled checks prove nothing other than Cohen is in possession of my bank statements and his lawyers should understand spoliation because Boies Schiller did. There is no forensic accounting attached to Cohen’s retaliatory lawsuit. The default amounts are constantly in flux and the interest will be addressed as I view that as illegal damages. Cohen procured that judgment by fraud, perjury, concealment, and lies. The IRS Commissioner’s Staff, and others, are in possession of evidence that will allow them to prosecute Cohen and others for this egregious situation. I haven’t failed to file my 1994 or 1995 tax returns with the intent to evade taxes so the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and FTB must now understand how extensive this man’s lies about me are. I have advised him to cease and desist.
Granted, Lynch blames the “fraudulent restraining order”, and Cohen’s alleged failure to give her the information she allegedly needs to file, but the forensic accounting + cancelled checks was posted by us and brought to Lynch’s attention in 2009. And the last time we checked, “I forgot how much money I stole” or “I forgot how much money I made” is not a defense to tax evasion.
Granted, Lynch blames the “fraudulent restraining order”, and Cohen’s alleged failure to give her the information she allegedly needs to file, but the forensic accounting + cancelled checks was posted by us and brought to Lynch’s attention in 2009. And the last time we checked, “I forgot how much money I stole” or “I forgot how much money I made” is not a defense to tax evasion.
NOTE: Gianelli posted the cancelled checks which prove nothing and the chain of evidence has not been addressed. Cohen obtained a TRO in Boulder based on perjury, fraud, lies, and concealment that I addressed in my Motion to Quash. Gianelli posted the legal documents in 2010 and attempted to threaten me when I publicly stated that I intended to file a Motion to Vacate Cohen’s retaliatory lawsuit and default judgment. I spoke with Judge Ken Freeman’s court reporter about this intention. I emailed the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and Dennis Riordan a draft copy of the Motion to Vacate and my Declaration addressing Cohen’s fraud, lies, perjury, and concealment. I have just forwarded the draft to my appellate attorney. I haven’t misappropriated or stolen any monies and I haven’t forgotten to pay my tax returns – therefore I don’t need a defense to tax evasion but Gianelli clearly has motive for these lies. Cohen doesn’t appear to have a defense for his criminal tax fraud but his lies and perjury are now on the record – as are Kory’s and Rice’s.
NOTE that Lynch claims that this is not a “forensic accounting” because it does not account for the intellectual property percentages that Lynch claims Cohen owes her. But that is claim has zero to do with Lynch’s total income for 1994 and 1995 (which is whatever she made legitimately – in excess of $1.5 million, including her 15% of the Sony sale) + the $5M she stole.
Seems pretty easy to calculate to us.
NOTE that Lynch claims that this is not a “forensic accounting” because it does not account for the intellectual property percentages that Lynch claims Cohen owes her. But that is claim has zero to do with Lynch’s total income for 1994 and 1995 (which is whatever she made legitimately – in excess of $1.5 million, including her 15% of the Sony sale) + the $5M she stole.
Seems pretty easy to calculate to us.
My income for 1994 and 1995 was addressed on my tax returns that were filed. Taxes have been paid. I have advised Gianelli to stop lying about me and, in particular, to stop publicly stating that I have attempted to evade taxes. I have no idea what the $1.5 million including my 15% of the Sony sale means but I know this – I own 15% of the intellectual property and the non-revocable assignments date back to 1967. The “forensic accounting” is a ledger and it does not account for my share of intellectual property, commissions withheld, etc. There are no asset valuations. Cohen testified that income from “Dear Heather” was contained on that “forensic accounting” but that is a bald-faced lie. No assets appear on that ledger which is not an “accounting,” forensic or otherwise. I stole nothing. Gianelli’s a bald-faced liars and my public defenders were clear – the default judgment I wasn’t notified of (in a matter I wasn’t served) proves nothing. Only Cohen’s version of events was presented to the court and I have the right to a fair trial and due process.
But let Lynch take the tax case to a federal jury and see how credible THEY find her to be. Ha!
But let Lynch take the tax case to a federal jury and see how credible THEY find her to be. Ha!
I’ll pass this suggestion onto the IRS and FBI.
October 24, 2012 7:51 AM
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4410281564721246856&postID=944918924070951935
