Monday, October 22, 2012

Bruce Cutler - In His Hearsay Letter - Did Not Request A Restraining Order & The Letters Were Signed "All the best, Kelley"

MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL should have contained the fact that I had only
found out – at trial – that Cohen received refunds totally nearly
$700,000 based on false accusations to the IRS.


NOTE:  Francisco, the Constitution demands a fair trial which does not
end prior to Sentencing.  How did Cooley prove I sent that email?  I
have conceded, after the fact, that I did send satirical emails and
they concealed the original email which makes that abundantly clear.
While the judge didn’t provide Cooley with a restraining order (which
is unconscionable governmental conduct – based on the facts and
totality of circumstances) that action needs to be raised in the
appeal.  Bruce Cutler’s letter was hearsay and that restraining order
must be challenged – Cutler did [CORRECTION - DID NOT]
ask for a restraining order and the judge has no jurisdiction over Cutler
and there was no evidentiary hearing.  There must have been communications
between the City Attorney and District Attorney’s office and that has been concealed
from me – as well as the name of the investigator sitting in the
courtroom while Leonard Cohen testified about another version of the
alleged Phil Spector gun story that does not coincide with the
prosecutors’ version of events.  To say that the DA didn’t have his
investigator there for this (and other sinister) reasons is absolutely
farcical.  Who would believe that?  Captain Jack Horvath?