Date: Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 5:44 PM
Subject: Fwd: Frayeh
To: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com
Stephen Gianelli,
Let me clarify something for you. I wrote Senate Judiciary about this issue - not you. You are a criminal and someone engaged in stalking, harassment, witness tampering, obstruction of justice, intimidation tactics, and have now retaliated with your client, Karina Von Watteville. I have not been served her lawsuit but I have no doubt it is baseless and filled with fraudulent misrepresentations. When I am served, I will respond appropriately. No one defamed Karina Von Watteville and that includes through Paulette Brandt's Small Claims case, the declaration Linda Carol was preparing, or the retaliation against Carol for providing that declaration. The situation with that declaration is blatant criminal witness tampering and this will be explained to whatever court this matter ends up before. Your lies to federal agencies on behalf of your client will be addressed.
I don't believe a word you utter. You are a pathetic and sadistic liar who has relentlessly targeted me, my sons, and others for years now. I cannot imagine why you are not in prison.
I didn't start talking to you about removal to federal court. I wrote the Senate Judiciary. I can assure you that you are not part of the Senate Judiciary although you have lied to them as well. You routinely lie to agencies, third parties, and others. I will let all courts know that you have once again issued an ultimatum for me to silence myself or submit to your vicious ad hominem attacks, slander, harassment, and blatantly illegal conduct. You are Leonard Cohen's agent and I see right through your rotten tactics. Everyone intelligent does.
Cease and desist.
Kelley Lynch
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>Date: Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:10 AM
Subject: Re: Frayeh
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>Date: Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:10 AM
Subject: Re: Frayeh
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
To clarify, I have not been retained by Karina Von Watteville to handle any aspect of her pending lawsuit against you and Paulette Brandt for defamation.
The views I have expressed are my personal opinions as a Californian trial lawyer for 37 years before I retired and moved to Crete in 2013.
But it is obvious from the statute and case authorities I provided you with that there is absolutely no basis to remove the suit to federal district court - let alone based on emails not referenced on the face of the complaint.
Removal is only proper where a federal law cause of action is pleaded (such as, for example, under 42 USC section 1983) OR where Congress has preempted the substantive legal area implicated by the claim with federal legislation and (as a consequence) the complaint could have been filed in the federal court by the plaintiff in the first instance.
None of that is the case here.
You are the one who started talking about removal to federal court on your blog and in mass emails, Ms. Lynch, and I am only responding with my personal views.
Don't want to hear them? Then don't attempt to try your various legal entanglements in the court of public opinion on your blog and elsewhere.
