Stephen Gianellil's Lies And Obsession With Me, Leonard Cohen's Tax Fraud Matter, And Phil Spector Are Astounding

CALIFORNIA LAW:  Leonard Cohen and I had none of the following types of relationship.  It is shocking what this man will lie about.  

To obtain a Domestic Violence Restraining Order you MUST have, or have had, a close personal relationship with the party you are asking to have restrained. Under the law, a relationship is defined as "close" if at least one of the following is true:

• You are married or were formerly married to the other party.
• You have or formerly had an engagement or dating relationship with the other party.
• You and the other party have a child or children together.
• You are related to the other party by blood, marriage or adoption, e.g., (mother, father, in-laws, siblings, adult children).
• You and the other party are living together, or formerly lived together, as members of a "household."

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:45 PM
Subject: Stephen Gianelli
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>


To the FBI,

This man's obsession with me is outrageous.  Does he do anything other than target me?  See comments in the text.  It requires a dating relationship.  Just read the statute.  Gianelli's a bald faced liar with motive.

All the best,

Kelley

 Blogonaut said...

KL:
“I never harassed Leonard Cohen. I wasn't served or notified of the California order and the court cannot have jurisdiction over me. That's how courts obtain jurisdiction. Furthermore, the order was fraudulently registered as a domestic violence order. The Colorado order, that I requested, cannot be modified except by the original court. LA Superior Court told me it can't be registered as a domestic violence order and Cohen and I weren't in a dating or intimate relationship. He simply perjured himself and admitted to that on the stand.”

1. I was copied with some of the emails that you sent to Leonard Cohen. Some of these emails were 40 pages long. You sent Cohen 70 emails in one 24 hour period. Some of the emails contained profanity and commented on his penis. You left Cohen messages on his home answering machine saying he should be shot. By any reasonable measure this is harassing behavior. Unsurprisingly, the jury found you guilty of all charges. You may not believe that you “harassed” Cohen, but you did.

One of the elements of intent to annoy - which is the psychotic crime I was charged with - is that I had to have the intent to annoy Leonard Cohen.  He's right about this - I don't believe I had the intent to annoy Leonard Cohen.  I know for a fact that I reported his tax fraud to the IRS and he retaliated against me.  He also decided, while engaging in this conduct and advising Brian Johnson/MacLean's that he was facing a major tax hit and he wasn't accusing me of theft, to steal my share of intellectual property, withhold commissions he owes me for work I've done, and perjure himself excessively by stating that he is the sole beneficial owner of two entities in the default.  He is not and no trust exists.  Leonard Cohen simply lied.  And then there are the issues with respect to the illegal K-1s I received (transmitted to the IRS) stating that I am a partner on an entity that I am not.  The illegal K-1s undermine the entirely fraudulent default judgment.  

The Colorado order was wrongfully registered as a domestic violence order.  That's why the Domestic VIolence Unit at the City Attorney's office prosecuted the matter.  Leonard Cohen and I never had a dating relationship which is required per the statute.  My emails to Cohen were NOT 40 pages long.  These were threads for my own purpose.  They were sent to parties such as the IRS, FBI, Steven Machat, etc. and Cohen was questioned about this on the stand and acknowledged that the threads weren't emails to him.  He also acknowledged that he simply thought he was on certain emails when he wasn't.  Coincidentally, one related to Phil Spector and a gun.  He had reviewed that email the day before.  Therefore, I am convinced he lied and my lawyer nailed him in that lie.  Not giving me the IRS required 1099 and other documents is harassment.  This situation is called Entrapment and that's why I wasn't served or notified.  The document says, right on there, that there has to be a proof of service in California.  One is not attached.  My lawyers were clear about this during the trial and I cannot imagine how the judge thought he had jurisdiction over me.  

Leonard Cohen shouldn't bath in front of his personal manager, and have read legal and business documents to him while he's in the bubble bath, if he's so sensitive about his penis.  I explained this sexual harassment to a friend of mine and responded to their question.  Sexual harassment is not annoying Leonard Cohen.  That is deranged.  The fact that the LA CIty Attorney believes that is outrageous.  

Cohen lied on the stand and said I said he was an asshole going to hell.  His Holiness Kusum Lingpa said that and when the judge had him read the whole sentence, he had to acknowledge that.  Leonard Cohen published a book in Canada considered one of the most obscene books every published there.  This man is not offended by an expletive.  He also curses.  He's a liar.  He committed tax fraud.  I reported it.  He has stolen from me, withheld commissions, and retaliated relentlessly.  My former accountant - who was not fired - advised me to confirm for the IRS and Treasury that he will take the stand and testify that Cohen offered me 50% community property.  He worked for the IRS and thinks they do intend to prosecute Cohen and advised me that Criminal Intelligence/IRS should be involved in the investigation/prosecution.  I suppose Cohen finds that amusing.  He took the stand and lied about the IRS.  He obtained a fraudulent refund and my 15% ownership interest in intellectual property is supported by corporate books, records, etc.  

2. The 2009 Colorado Protective Order was NOT registered as a “domestic violence order”. It’s California registration was specifically authorized by California Family Code sections 6401 and following. Although the Legislature decided to place the relevant statues in the Family Code, in addition to domestic violence restraining orders and family violence restraining orders, a third category of out of state (referred to as “foreign”) orders may be registered here: “an injunction or other order, issued . . . by a tribunal under the . . . antistalking laws of the issuing state, to prevent an individual from engaging in violent or threatening acts against, harassment of, contact or communication with, or physical proximity to, another individual.” 

I've addressed the fraudulent domestic violence order registered in California.  The original civil harassment order I requested in 2009 cannot be modified by anyone other than the original court.  You have to be in a dating relationship and we weren't and this wasn't raised as an issue in Boulder.  In any event, I don't take legal advice from Gianelli and every lawyer I've had represent me and spoken with knows 1) I had to be served the California regisetered order in 2011 and 2 you can't registered the civil harassment order I asked for in 2009 as a domestic violence order.  Who would have this lunatic represent them?

The 2009 Colorado Protective Order was such an order and was properly registered in California. This has NOTHING TO DO WITH whether you and Cohen were ever “intimate” or in a “dating relationship”.

Of course you have to be in a dating relationship.  That's why Streeter and Cohen attempted to straighten out his testimony when he said we had a purely business relationship at the March 23rd hearing.  At the trial, he confessed to perjury.  The statute requires a dating relationship.  Gianellil's a bald faced liar.  

March 24, 2013 at 10:22 PM