From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: Appeal - Oral Arguments
To: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
All the best,
Kelley
Date: Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: Appeal - Oral Arguments
To: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
To the IRS and FBI,
You
will find a witness who says Cohen and I were in a dating relationship
when hell freezes over. He was in NYC - when he says we had a
relationship - approximately once or twice and throwing me up against
the wall at the Royalton, shoving your tongue down my throat and hand
down my pants, is NOT intimate. The next day, he came to Marty''s
office and apologized so I didn't give it a second thought.Kelley
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
All the best,I'll make other notes and send you one document re. relevant issues later today.Therefore, the City Attorney absolutely took the position that Cohen and I had a dating relationship. The testimony regarding this matter is perjured and Cohen acknowledged changing his story while testifying - regardless of his pathetic excuse. He testified honestly at the March 23rd hearing - we had a purely business relationship although we did have a friendship. This is a very relevant point as Cohen registered the civil harassment order (Boulder) that I requested as a domestic violence order in California on May 25, 2011.In the sentencing documents, prosecutor Streeter (page 2-3_ writes: In addition, "victim"would be described pursuant to Family Code 6211(c) as someone "with whom the defendant is having or had had a dating or engagement relationship." Penal Code 1203.097 is applicable for sentencing purposes.According to Cohen, but disputed by appellant, they also had a brief intimate relationship. (RT 49,320)Dating relationship. Respondent's Brief states - page 1:Francisco,There are a number of issues in the Respondent's Brief that I believe should be addressed in oral arguments.
Kelley
