Kelley's Email To The FBI Re. Gianelli - Who Is Now Impersonating A Dog - And The Ongoing Criminal Harassment

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:57 PM
Subject: Fwd: "Newly discovered evidence" is defined by statute to exclude that which you admit discovering during trial
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>

Good Evening Washington FBI,

A man who views himself as a DOG continues to criminally harass me.  I did have a long conversation with the Oakland FBI about Stephen Gianelli.  This man is totally out of control, as I explained to the Duty Agent who was going to speak to Agent Wynar,  Gianelli is amused.  This is a game.  He is a dangerously unstable and sick individual.  This activity definitely appears to be coordinated and it is shocking that the prosecutor would permit a man criminally harassing me to continue to copy her in on so many emails but, perhaps, par for the course.  I have invited NO ONE to criminally harass me over my Blog and comments have been disabled due to the insane people who targeted me on Phawker and elsewhere on the internet. 

Why is a man writing to me as a DOG about newly discovered evidence.  I am represented by an attorney and Gianelli knows this because he relentlessly contacted attorney who refused to communicate with him.  We have discussed Gianelli's activity numerous times.  Of course the evidence in the IRS binder was newly discovered during trial.  I have no access to Cohen's persronal information regarding the IRS - AFTER we parted ways due to the fact that I refused to meet with  him and his lawyers, hand over the corporate books and records, unravel their handiwork, and he understood I was going to the IRS.   The judge intentionally suppressed Agent Tejeda/IRS, permitted in an unconscionable amount of irrelevant and immaterial evidence and testimony, and it is a very disturbing situation. 

In any event, Gianelli continues to criminally harass me and NO it is not a free country and you cannot simply criminally harass someone who has advised you to CEASE AND DESIST countless times.  My sister's lawyer advised him to CEASE AND DESIST and he also refused.  The man is unstoppable and completely out of control.  Who would want an out of control madman with probable motive targeting them, their family, and so many people in their life.  He's quite confident.  Emboldened.  He's aligned with Leonard Cohen and may have found a sympathetic ear with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson, per Investigator Frayeh who told me he would investigate the matter and then hand delivered my letter to Alan Jackson (a great deal of which set forth issues re. Gianelli), Steve Cooley, and Truc Do.  What a nasty group of stark raving lunatics.  You would literally have to visit hell to ordinarily run into maniacs like this and that is most definitely my personal opinion.  I have never seen people like this. 

All the best,
Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:24 PM
Subject: "Newly discovered evidence" is defined by statute to exclude that which you admit discovering during trial
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

“Newly discovered evidence” is strictly defined by Penal Code section 119a (6). If you discovered the IRS binder (as you claim) DURING the trial, it is not – by statutory definition – new evidence. It is cut and dried; there is no grey area.

What is the Dogster's interest in all of this?

If you put your legal affairs on the internet for all to see/read, you invite comment.

NOTE:  LA Superior Court put my legal affairs on the internet.  

And it’s a free country; we (unlike you) are not fettered by a protective order of any kind, and therefore free to write whom we wish.

--The Dogster