From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: Traditional Holdings - Richard Westin Letters - March 2002
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rwest0@gmx.com, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>
IRS,
Van's letter to me was referred to in my Motion to Vacate Declaration/Case History (Exhibit A; Rutger's Declaration is Exhibit B and that is quite clear on the documents; the Declaration/Case History was signed].
I have provided IRS with this extremely relevant letter. It is the reason Cohen chose not to return to Canada and then had to reapply for U.S. residency status. That's evidently also hearsay so perhaps you can address it with DOJ.
All the best,
Kelley
1988
Van Penick letter to Kelley Lynch dated October 26, 1988
Canadian Residence
It doesn’t speak too well of me to have my first communication with my sister-in-law to be a start-fronted exposition on Canadian residency (and I hope you will let us make amends when you visit Halifax), but here it is. NOTE: Korn’s Objection document refers to this as hearsay; sent to IRS. Not relevant to matters before Hess.
