Date: Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:10 AM
Subject: Insurance Fraud: California Insurance Code Section 1871.7(b)
To: Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, Robert Kory <rkory@koryrice.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com
Michelle Rice, Robert Kory, and Scott Edelman,
Not too long ago, my Criminal Stalker (Gianelli) sent me evidence that Cohen and his representatives engaged in insurance fraud with respect to Richard Westin and Lloyd's of London. Insurance Code Section 1871.7(b) permits a civil suit related to insurance fraud. This suit will be filed after my RICO suit is filed within the next few weeks against Cohen, et al. Please maintain all evidence related to the Westin Insurance Fraud matter. It appears that the settlement was based on false accusations about me. I personally think that all parties should stop lying.
Kelley Lynch
Insurance Code Section 1871(b) creates liability for a civil penalty and assessment based upon the presentation of a fraudulent claim when such presentation violates section 550.5 Consequently, it is apparent subdivision (e) which authorizes “bring[ing] a civil action for violation of this section ” authorizes an action based upon the theory a defendant violated either subdivision (a) or subdivision (b). (Italics added.) In other words, the Legislature intended to give private parties the right to sue based upon any act stated in subdivisions (a) and (b) that could subject a defendant to civil penalties and damages.
