Date: Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 11:01 AM
Subject: Fwd: LYNCH: "May I attack this later as fraud and perjury?" THE COURT: "No." (Nice try changing the subject to everting but the transcript that proves you a liar, Lynch.)
To: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com
Alan Hootnick,
Do you think this man is also a drug addict or just a common criminal. Carolyn Enichen retired and this is now a federal matter so a federal court will decide if the rest of the sentence said "I cannot give you legal advice." Perhaps the federal judge will understand why a discussion about directly v. indirectly and insane people (Cohen and his witness lawyers) led to a fraud domestic violence order in Cali. I have no details about the temporary orders or Cohen's testimony. I know he made an extraordinary flight into Colorado in the midst of his European tour the day after his lawyers threatened Ann Diamond and raised criminal tax fraud as one of the issues. Only a sycophant or narcissist would conclude that I want to have contact with the aggressive thief, con artist Leonard Cohen. Or, certain local government actors that have careers to advance.
One thing is certain - Gianelli will not be the federal judge. And, Cooley retaliates and the federal court is well aware of that fact so I'll ask the federal court to take judicial notice of the lawsuit Cooley's deputies filed against him.
Discord, complaints of intimidation under DA Cooley
http://californiawatch.org/dailyreport/discord-complaints-intimidation-under-da-cooley-3935
Kelley
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:50 AM
Subject: LYNCH: "May I attack this later as fraud and perjury?" THE COURT: "No." (Nice try changing the subject to everting but the transcript that proves you a liar, Lynch.)
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Cc: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:50 AM
Subject: LYNCH: "May I attack this later as fraud and perjury?" THE COURT: "No." (Nice try changing the subject to everting but the transcript that proves you a liar, Lynch.)
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Cc: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>
1
2 because the Plaintiff appeared on August 19, 2008,
3 requesting a temporary protection order, and upon sworn
4 testimony review of the attached affidavits the Court
5 granted that. The purpose of today 's hearing is for the
6 Court to determine whether or not that temporary order
7 should become permanent.
[***]
12
13
14 hearing, Mr. Steinberg has indicated that he wishes to go
15 forward on behalf of his client. And you have a decision
16 to make. Your decision is either one
17
18
not ever have any contact with him, or secondly to object
2 to it and to request an evidentiary hearing.
3
4 hearing.
5
6 to do and we 're going to start right now.
[…]
15
16 ahead and make the restraining order permanent, okay?
17
20 MS. LYNCH: I really can 't.
21
22 MS. LYNCH: These people are insane.
23
[…]
16
17 to have a hearing and do you want to agree that the
18 temporary order should become permanent?
19
20 because I think he 's dangerous to me but may I ask
21 something? May I attack this later as fraud and perjury?
22
[…]
I'm just asking you the question of whether or
2 not you agree that the temporary order that was
3 previously issued today --
4
5
6
7
8
9
[…]
THE COURT: And she'll bring it in and give
2 each side a copy. So these are the restrictions. You 're
3 to have absolutely no contact with the Plaintiff,
4 Leonard Cohen. You 're to keep a distance of 100 yards
5 away from him. So if you just randomly run into him you
6 can't approach him within 100 yards.
[…]
8 In addition, you're not to have any contact with the law
9 office that' s located at 9300 Wilshire Boulevard, Los
10 Angeles, California, 80212. And finally you may not
11 contact the Plaintiff by phone, mail, email, text
12 messaging or through a third party. As an example if you
13 contact Mr. Steinberg about Leonard Cohen --
14
15
16 this protection order. If you violate the protection
17 order in any way --
18
19
20 Class I misdemeanor punishable with up to 18 months in
21 jail and a $5,000 fine or both.
[…]
THE COURT: Okay. Do you have any questions about the meaning of the protection order?
MS. LYNCH: The actual meaning of it for the purposes of the Court right now on their side?
THE COURT: Do you understand what this means? MS. LYNCH: I understand deadly seriously what
17 it means.
THE COURT: Okay.
19
20
21
22
23 made permanent.
24
