Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Leonard Cohen's "Kelley Lynch Is A Slut" Defense


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:27 PM
Subject: 
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>


Hello IRS,

No word from Alan Jackson yet.  I would like to interview him for my book.  Cohen can threaten me from here to eternity.  I will post the book online for free.  I also intend to address the federal tax matters that have arisen in a federal lawsuit.  I am curious to see how much perjury LA Superior Court views as acceptable.  That should be the most interesting aspect of the motion I am about to file.

I do wonder what Cooley, Jackson, Streeter, et al. thought all the information about Cohen's tax fraud related to?  Perhaps they felt the IRS, FBI, DOJ, etc. were engaged in a "prank" with me?  Investigator Frayeh did not seem to think so.

All the best,
Kelley

P.S.  Here's Leonard Cohen's defense to not serving me; wrongfully converting my property to himself; and the allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud.  He essentially calls me "ugly" or a "slut."  His operatives, Gianelli and Walsh, use these tactics.  Very amateur agent provocateur conduct.

How long have I been ugly?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvXzuI10JuI




From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:52 PM
Subject: Leonard Cohen's Perjury
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>


Mr. Riordan,

I am attaching the [Spector] prosecutor's Motion in Limine that is readily available online at LA Superior Court.  Marty never described the alleged incident at the Beverly Hills Hotel in this manner and said it was highly exaggerated.  However, Ed Lozzi was clear:  the valet loves to talk to journalists and authors about this incident.


In this Motion, Phillip allegedly held a semi-automatic to Cohen's chest.  Under oath, in my so-called 2012 trial, Cohen testified that Phillip held an automatic to his head.  This Motion also addresses Ogden becoming Phillip's assistant when I was.
The prosecutor is the individual who introduced Leonard Cohen, Steve Cooley, and Alan Jackson into this situation.  She intentionally elicited testimony about these individuals.  Here's where Streeter questions Cohen about Phil Spector and the gun incident.

Streeter:  Do you recall if also in that voice mail message there was any mention of Phil Spector?  Cohen:  Yes, Phil Spector’s name was mentioned.  Cohen:  And his attorneys; is that right?  Cohen:  I believe so.  Streeter:  Now, is the discussion of Phil Spector something that is common in the voice mail messages that Ms. Lynch has left you?  Cohen:  It’s almost routine.  RT 157-158  Streeter:  What about the email messages that Ms. Lynch has sent you, particularly in the time period of February 2011 to February 2012?  Is the topic of Mr. Spector a common topic? Is the topic of Mr. Spector a common topic?  Cohen:  Yes, it is.  Streeter:  Would you say that that is almost routine as well?  Cohen:  Yes, it is.  Streeter:  Did you have any involvement in the Phil Spector trial?  Cohen:  None, whatsoever.  RT 158 Cohen:  May I qualify that?  Streeter:  Yes.  Cohen:  At the very beginning of the trial, after the – the death of Lana Clarkson was made public, I was visited by two Sheriffs from the LA County.  And they interviewed me as to my relationship with Phil Spector.  My attorney, Mr. Cron, was present at the time.  I told the detectives that Phil Spector had produced an album of mine in 1977, and they asked me about some stories that were circulating in the newspaper about his use of guns in the studio. I told them of my experience.  Then they asked me when I’d last seen Phil Spector.  I said the last I’d seen him was shortly after the record was released, which I think was 1977 or 1978, and I hadn’t seen him since.  When they discovered that I hadn’t seen him since, they were no longer interested in interviewing me and left.  So that has some connection I did have with the trial.  Subsequent to that, I’ve had nothing to do with the trial whatsoever.  Streeter:  Now, when you spoke to the detectives do you know where Ms. Lynch was?  Cohen:  My attorney, Mr. Cron, asked Ms. Lynch to leave the room, so that I think the attorney/client privilege would not be challenged.  Streeter:  But she was somewhere around?  Cohen:  She was in my house.  RT 159

I wasn't at Cohen's house and the detectives should recall meeting me as I was leaving.  Steve Cron was not Leonard Cohen's lawyer.  Cohen gave a BBC interview saying he had recently spoken to Phillip and he wasn't mad any longer.  This is a link to the actual interview.  During my alleged trial, Cohen testified that he never spoke to Phillip again after they recorded together in 1977 so how did he speak with him in 1994?  I can assure you that this never happened.

http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/radio4/r4music/r4music_20140129-0800a.mp3

Posted by at