Saturday, November 1, 2014

Kelley Lynch Email To IRS, FBI, DOJ & FTB Re. The City Attorney Of Los Angeles


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:43 AM
Subject: Fwd: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>


Hello IRS, FBI, DOJ, and FTB,

This is the Statcounter information re. Gianelli and Walsh for the past few days.  Gianelli is reviewing the federal tax and corporate matters issues I wrote IRS about on October 30, 2014.  


Please review my son's declaration in the response I provided Contra Costa Court.  Both of my sons' emails to Walsh and Gianelli are included in that document.  Walsh didn't inadvertently copy my sons and sister on her emails.  


The City Attorney, who directed and instructed Gianelli to further harass me (and communicate official messages from that office to me), wasn't copied in inadvertently. I would assume "Streeter' wasn't copied in inadvertently for an entire year.  

The entire situation obviously demands an investigation and that extends to LA Superior Court.

All the best,
Kelley

Tdc Kabel Tv (80.198.101.100) [Label IP Address]    7 returning visits
Denmark FlagEsbjerg, Syddanmark, Denmark    
  www.google.dk/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
28 Oct05:24:35
  www.google.dk/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
28 Oct15:05:43
  www.google.dk/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
29 Oct10:56:33
  www.google.dk/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
30 Oct01:01:01
  www.google.dk/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
30 Oct14:46:27
  www.google.dk/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
30 Oct22:28:12
  https://www.google.dk/ (Keywords Unavailable) 
31 Oct15:27:38
  https://www.google.dk/ (Keywords Unavailable) 
1 Nov01:35:14
  https://www.google.dk/ (Keywords Unavailable) 
1 Nov07:51:24
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Forthnet Sa (195.74.253.190) [Label IP Address]    0 returning visits
Greece FlagHeraklion, Iraklion, Greece    
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
29 Oct10:34:48
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
29 Oct11:08:03
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
29 Oct12:57:06
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
29 Oct22:43:45
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
29 Oct23:28:49
  
29 Oct23:28:56
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
30 Oct06:28:11
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
30 Oct09:38:53
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
30 Oct10:16:38
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
30 Oct13:14:04
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
30 Oct23:28:48
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
31 Oct03:02:34
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
31 Oct04:27:58
31 Oct04:29:33
  
31 Oct04:29:40
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
31 Oct09:45:51
  
31 Oct11:35:17
  
31 Oct11:37:08
  
31 Oct11:40:14
  www.google.gr/#1 (Keywords Unavailable) 
1 Nov04:22:26
From: susanne walsh <sanneka@esenet.dk>
Date: Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request
To: Rutger Penick
Cc: "STEPHEN R. GIANELLI" <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com, Karen Lynch, "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>


I am sorry Rutger Penick, I did not mean to copy you in on my mail to Kelley Lynch. I have not contacted your mother for a very long time, but still she keeps mentioning my name, with accusations of different crimes and guesswork of what I "maybe involved in" with Mr. Cohen, Mr. Gianelli and others, in order to "target and harass" her, on her very public blog and in e-mails to several different authorities (IRS, FBI, DOJ, different judges, attorneys, medias etc.). I have asked her to remove my name from her from all these publications, she refuses.
However, I am sorry to bother you with this, it will not happen again.
 
Sincerely
 
Susanne Walsh
 
 
From: Rutger Penick
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request

Wow, you guys are ridiculous. What did you do last night? Thinking of things to write? Bravo fruitcakes. Suzanne and Gianelli are meant for each other, thunder buddies?

Sincerely, 

Rutger Penick
IT Support Specialist

On Nov 1, 2014, at 4:56 AM, susanne walsh <sanneka@esenet.dk> wrote:
Mr. Gianelli.
 
I was very tempted to write exactly this to Ms. Lynch, but not in the mood to once again, be accused of "criminal harassment", but Ms. Lynch, as long as you, on a regular basis mention my my name in your public blog, I will continue to monitor it, as I am confident everybody else you slander and accuse of a variety of crimes, will.
 
Furthermore, instead of screaming "criminal harassment" to and about Mr. Gianelli, you ought to thank him for all the free and valuable legal advise he is giving to you. It seems like no practicing attorney wish to have anything to do with you and your many "cases and suits",.
 
Sincerely
 
Susanne Walsh
 
 

Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 12:42 PM
Cc: Karen Lynch; sanneka@esenet.dk ; Rutger Penick ; Ray Lindsey ; Vivienne A. Swanigan
Subject: FW: Re: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request

Ms. Lynch,

If you habitually author emails expressly accusing named persons of criminal conduct (e.g., employees of the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office, Susanne Walsh, the undersigned, a public relations firm that has done work for Leonard Cohen) and then post them on your Google indexed blog,  it is neither surprising nor sinister when the persons you are slandering on the World Wide Web show an interest in your blog.

Indeed, if it weren’t for the people you are slandering reading your blog, you would have virtually no blog visitors at all.

So please, don’t pretend that you are not getting exactly the attention you wanted or that visits to your blog by persons expressly mentioned therein evinces anything illegal or improper.  

Your assumption that the IRS is interested in your blog readership is another issue altogether. Suffice it to say that that it is emblematic of your mental illness and evidence that you are not taking your medication – as is your email reference that is (typical for you) wholly unrelated to the subject matter of  your email (below).


Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece

-----------------------Forwarded email-------------------------
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request
To: ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, police <police@cityofberkeley.info>
Hi IRS,

The criminal stalker has been on my blog quite a lot today.  So has Cohen fan, Susanne Walsh.  What is Gianelli at?  It seems as though he is focused on the IRS and federal tax matters.  In any event, you might want to review these posts and emails.  I'm sure the next round of lies will be fascinating.  And, there are the liars at the City Attorney's office.  Their lies and responses to my federal lawsuit should prove fascinating.  

All the best,
Kelley