From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:41 PM
Subject: Fwd: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request
To: ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, police <police@cityofberkeley.info>
Hello DOJ,
Case Type: Civil Petition - TRO/Dom Violence (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending
Future Hearings
None
Documents Filed | Proceeding Information
Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information
Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@ gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:59 AM
Subject: Your serial false claim that the Colorado protection order was registered on May 25, 2011 as a "domestic violence restraining order"
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: karen@softwheresolutions.com, PAULETTEBRANDT8@gmail.com, blind <distribution@gmail.com>
Gianelli is simply lying to my sister, Paulette Brandt, and a blind distribution list that should be investigated.
The Court order says that the original Boulder order cannot be modified by anyone other than the Boulder Court. However it was. That's why it turned into a fraudulent domestic violence order.
REDACTED THE PSYCHOPATH'S RANT.
Let's look at the totality of circumstances re. the Los Angeles Superior Court fraudulent registration of the foreign Boulder, Colorado order. See the Boulder Court's email below and their attached evidence. Here's LA Superior Court's case summary. The Civil Petition was registered as domestic violence on May 25, 2011. The out of state order was registered as DV (Domestic VIolence). It's fraudulent and cannot be enforced. Do you think Leonard Cohen, Michelle Rice, Robert Kory, and others, understood they were dealing with the City Attorney's Domestic VIolence Unit? It's willful. Someone just looked at LA Superior Court's website and immediately concluded that it is a "domestic violence" order and is evidence of fraud. That includes entering it into CLETS which involves "wire fraud."
Why is Gianelli criminally harassing me over this, and anything to do with Cohen, and LYING to me, my sister, Paulette Brandt, and his blind distribution list? Who is on that list? That demands an investigation.
On April 4, 2012 someone requested copies of this order. I wonder who that might be? The Judicial Commission advised me that you cannot use DV-600 for a non-domestic violence foreign order because that form is "Domestic Violence." That's why it is "DV."
I would like an official DOJ opinion on all of this. And, the domestic violence related orders Vanderet, without the benefit of a hearing, provided Kory and Rice, and others. I only realized that when Korn raised these orders in an attempt to argue that they prevent me from effecting service on Kory/Rice, the registered agent of LCI. It's twisted. Someone just asked me why Leonard Cohen has done all of this. Your guess is as good as mine - including the activity with respect to the fraud FTB and IRS refunds.
All the best,
Kelley
Case Number: BQ033717
LEONARD NORMAN COHEN VS KELLEY ANN LYNCH
Filing Date: 05/25/2011LEONARD NORMAN COHEN VS KELLEY ANN LYNCH
Case Type: Civil Petition - TRO/Dom Violence (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending
None
Parties
COHEN LEONARD NORMAN - Petitioner
LYNCH KELLEY ANN - Respondent
RICE MICHELLE L. - Attorney for Petitioner
Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)
04/04/2012 Request-Copies
05/25/2011 Order-Reg. of Out-of-State DV [Domestic Violence]
Filed by Petitioner
Filed by Petitioner
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:59 AM
Subject: Your serial false claim that the Colorado protection order was registered on May 25, 2011 as a "domestic violence restraining order"
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: karen@softwheresolutions.com, PAULETTEBRANDT8@gmail.com, blind <distribution@gmail.com>
Ms. Lynch,
The September 2, 2008 Colorado protection order was NOT registered on May 25, 2011 as a “domestic violence restraining order”, it was registered as an “Out-of-State Restraining Order”.
And the order that Anthony S. Jones signed says “The attached out-of-state restraining order is registered and enforceable in California, and can be entered into CLETS, unless it ends or is changed by the court that made it”.
NOTE: The BQ case number means downtown LA Courthouse; Family Law Domestic Violence Restraining Order. Perhaps ANthony Jones would like to explain how this can be entered into CLETS without raising issues related to wire fraud? It's not the original order. The Boulder order was NOT domestic violence. It couldn't be entered into CLETS - it was modified when it was registered as a domestic violence order.
Here is the order: http://www.scribd.com/ doc/111041974/California- Registration-of-Leonard-Cohen- s-Restraining-Order-Against- Kelley-Lynch-Filed-May-2-2011 Read it yourself.
As the order itself says, if you want the Colorado order vacated or terminated, you need to ask the Colorado court that made the order to do that.
REDACTED THE PSYCHOPATH'S RANT.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Boulder Combined Court Email
REDACTED
3. This case is not a domestic violence case which can be verified on the top right of the first page of the ICON; noted as "Type: Protection Order". On the motion for civil protection order, the Petitioner only checked off Stalking and Physical Assault, Threat, or Other Situation but not Domestic Abuse.
3. This case is not a domestic violence case which can be verified on the top right of the first page of the ICON; noted as "Type: Protection Order". On the motion for civil protection order, the Petitioner only checked off Stalking and Physical Assault, Threat, or Other Situation but not Domestic Abuse.