From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: Your serial false claim that the Colorado protection order was registered on May 25, 2011 as a "domestic violence restraining order"
To: "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao@nsa.gov, fsb@fsb.ru, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane@caa.com, blourd@caa.com, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, police@cityofberkeley.info
Hi Berkeley PD,
I was arrested for violating the fraudulently registered "domestic violence" order. The Boulder Combined Court has written to confirm their order wasn't domestic violence. Please review the information about the order used to arrest me on LA Superior Court's website. BQ, according to the Court, means downtown LA Superior Court, Family Law Domestic VIolence restraining order. Leonard Cohen's lawyers have written IRS and testified that the fraud order prevents me from requesting and receiving IRS required information. They perjured themselves during my trial and said Cohen provided me with IRS required form 1099 for 2004. I am sitting here with IRS transcripts proving they lied. They also transmitted K-1 partnership documents to IRS indicating that I am a partner on a company I was not a partner in - and showing $0 income. They also transmitted to IRS, with the tax returns, K-1 partnership documents related to another entity showing income. I paid taxes on that income. Cohen has now taken the position that i am not a partner. IRS, FTB, and State of Kentucky view me as a partner on numerous Cohen-related entities. I have now been falsely arrested and imprisoned twice. Who prosecuted me and retaliated against me? LA City Attorney's "Domestic VIolence Unit." LAPD's report confirms that my emails were generally requests for tax information and forwarded that report to the City Attorney's office. I suppose all you need to be to win your lawsuit is a fraud celebrity with lying lawyers that will do anything. It helps if the DA and CIty Attorney join forces and lie to the Court, jurors, etc. They shock the conscience.
I would like to point out that I never received an extradition hearing and was never appointed a lawyer for any extradition hearing. I was just kidnapped by employees of Los Angeles County.
All the best,
Kelley Lynch
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:
Stan,
Why do you think it was "irrelevant" to Enichen that Cohen, a non-Colorado resident (with no ties to Colorado), wasn't present for the hearing. Does she view the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution irrelevant?I am being criminally harassed over this and have been since May 2009 when Gianelli communicated with Michelle Rice. He also written you and is now criminally harassing my sister, whose lawyer advised him to cease and desist, and Paulette Brandt, a woman he does not know who was Phil Spector's personal assistant. The order was registered in California as a "domestic violence" order. It's right there on LA Superior Court's website. Boulder Combined Court wrote me that the original is NOT domestic violence. The provided me with Cohen's Verified Motion that does not check off "domestic abuse." We were not in a statutory required dating relationship. Sexual harassment and indecent exposure, raised in Neal Greenberg's lawsuit, are not a dating relationship.My emails to the IRS Commissioner's Staff were raised as an issue. And now, Cohen's lawyers have written IRS and testified that this fraud order prevents me from requesting and/or receiving IRS required information and corporate tax and accounting information. That will be litigated in federal court and Detective Viramontes of LAPD's TMU told me that Cohen did not feel comfortable with my requests for tax information, the order prevents me from requesting IRS information, and felt the IRS should obtain this information for me. That sounds highly illegal.In any event, Gianelli also wrote Boulder PD. I would like that evidence maintained.Kelley LynchCASE SUMMARY
Case Number: BQ033717Filing Date: 05/25/2011
LEONARD NORMAN COHEN VS KELLEY ANN LYNCH
Case Type: Civil Petition - TRO/Dom Violence (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:59 AM
Subject: Your serial false claim that the Colorado protection order was registered on May 25, 2011 as a "domestic violence restraining order"
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: karen@softwheresolutions.com, PAULETTEBRANDT8@gmail.com, blind <distribution@gmail.com>
Ms. Lynch,The September 2, 2008 Colorado protection order was NOT registered on May 25, 2011 as a “domestic violence restraining order”, it was registered as an “Out-of-State Restraining Order”.And the order that Anthony S. Jones signed says “The attached out-of-state restraining order is registered and enforceable in California, and can be entered into CLETS, unless it ends or is changed by the court that made it”.Here is the order: http://www.scribd.com/doc/111041974/California- Registration-of-Leonard-Cohen- s-Restraining-Order-Against- Kelley-Lynch-Filed-May-2-2011 Read it yourself. As the order itself says, if you want the Colorado order vacated or terminated, you need to ask the Colorado court that made the order to do that.However, given your recent history of being convicted and jailed for violating the Colorado order, and then being jailed for violating your probation following release from your original jail sentence, I cannot imagine the Colorado court doing that.One thing is certain, the California court doesn’t have that power. (See linked order.)
