From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:34 PM
Subject: Fwd: Your attorney was not "late" for oral argument - he failed to show up at all
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
--
Date: Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:34 PM
Subject: Fwd: Your attorney was not "late" for oral argument - he failed to show up at all
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
To the FBI,
I don't know if this is Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson (as the Sheepdog wrote and advised me was the case) with Cohen's fan copied in here but the individual is certifiable and continues to contact members of my family which I view as blatant witness tampering and witness intimidation tactics, regardless of what this lunatic has to say.
I'm aware that there was no argument on the brief. I am also
aware that the City Attorney's Reply Brief contains additional lies.
The obsession with my appeal and writ continues. The Court advised my
attorney that there was no need to file a Motion to Consolidate. I have
an Order from the judge accepting the Writ and granting permission for
the oversize document. If they want to lie about the judge, sobeit.
Who am I to argue?I don't know if this is Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson (as the Sheepdog wrote and advised me was the case) with Cohen's fan copied in here but the individual is certifiable and continues to contact members of my family which I view as blatant witness tampering and witness intimidation tactics, regardless of what this lunatic has to say.
This individual seems to have insider information re. the
lunatics in LA Confidential I've been dealing with since reporting
Cohen's tax fraud and being dragged into Phil Spector's matter. The
DA's investigator showed up at my house unannounced after they received
an anonymous tip about my friendship with Phil Spector. If they don't
like the fact that Cohen lies about Phil Spector, that's their problem.
I've been honest about that and Cohen now has three different versions
of his highly embellished good rock and roll stories re. a Phil Spector
gun incident before LA Superior Court. The threat to Streeer (her
family - I'd hate to be her husband and had no idea someone would
actually marry a sycophant gushing about Leonard Cohen, etc.), Jackson,
Cooley, Dixo, and others is probably a brain. That's the actual threat
to these people: A BRAIN.
I'm on with an investigator now.
All the best,
Kelley
Kelley
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The Dogster <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:02 PM
Subject: Your attorney was not "late" for oral argument - he failed to show up at all
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: Susanne Walsh <sanneka@esenet.dk>
Ms. Lynch,
Your claims of "perjury, fraud and concealment" during your trial are so ridiculous that your own attorney could not argue them with a straight face - so he elected to submit the matter on the briefs with NO ARGUMENT AT ALL.
Nor was he "15 minutes" late - the record is clear that NO APPEARANCE was made on your behalf at oral argument.
"Apparently there was traffic"?
That's his excuse for lying to you and saying he was in court? Ha! When hasn't there been traffic during rush hour in LA?
Francisco WAS NOT THERE I and no writ or motion to consolidate was filed.
The LAPD and the City Attorney Workplace Violence Unit are on your blog to assess the threat level you pose to Sandra Jo Streeter, her family, Jackson, Cooley, Dixon and other officers of the court and judges you have sent disturbing emails to and about.
But here is the bottom line: Not even your attorney could bring himself to raise the utter bullshit you instructed him to argue.
Traffic my ass. Lawyers make allowances for traffic and if something comes up they call the court and have the matter called 15 minutes later.
What unmitigated BS.
--The Dogster
From: The Dogster <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:02 PM
Subject: Your attorney was not "late" for oral argument - he failed to show up at all
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: Susanne Walsh <sanneka@esenet.dk>
Ms. Lynch,
Your claims of "perjury, fraud and concealment" during your trial are so ridiculous that your own attorney could not argue them with a straight face - so he elected to submit the matter on the briefs with NO ARGUMENT AT ALL.
Nor was he "15 minutes" late - the record is clear that NO APPEARANCE was made on your behalf at oral argument.
"Apparently there was traffic"?
That's his excuse for lying to you and saying he was in court? Ha! When hasn't there been traffic during rush hour in LA?
Francisco WAS NOT THERE I and no writ or motion to consolidate was filed.
The LAPD and the City Attorney Workplace Violence Unit are on your blog to assess the threat level you pose to Sandra Jo Streeter, her family, Jackson, Cooley, Dixon and other officers of the court and judges you have sent disturbing emails to and about.
But here is the bottom line: Not even your attorney could bring himself to raise the utter bullshit you instructed him to argue.
Traffic my ass. Lawyers make allowances for traffic and if something comes up they call the court and have the matter called 15 minutes later.
What unmitigated BS.
--The Dogster
In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.
--
In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.
