Leonard Cohen's Lunatic Operative-Lawyer Continues To Criminally Harass Me - Over Phil Spector Now, Naturally

From: The Dogster <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:53 AM
Subject:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

A human being, possibly, impersonating a dog continues to criminally harass me over my appeal and writ of habeas corpus.


As you can now see from my prior emails - a SUCCESSFUL  habeas application has many complex and technical attributes and limitations that are almost impossible for a pro se filer to navigate.

I don't see anything complicated here - apart from LA County's inability to hold anyone accountable for their conduct and what appears to be egregious corruption involving politicians, elements of law enforcement, celebrity justice, the abuse of fraudulent restraining orders, the failure to serve people - possibly in an attempt to entrap them, etc.  Sounds terribly Pellicano.

It may not be premised on any issue that could have been raised on direct appeal.

"New" evidence must have been discovered AFTER the verdict and must be supported by an affidavit from the proposed witness showing materiality.

All alleged error must be a "game changer" likely to have affected the verdict. Excluded impeachment material must go to the heart of the case and not be collateral - like the Cohen email giving an inconsistent version of some gun incident 33 years ago. (Yawn.)

Leonard Cohen's pattern of perjuring himself and lying is absolutely material and there's nothing boring about the fact that he now has three versions of his good rock and roll story about Phil Spector before LA Superior Court.  These are not inconsistent stories.  The man wrote the prosecutor on April 5th (at the beginning of a trial) and said Phil Spector held a gun to his neck.  At trial, he said the gun was held to his head.  Spector prosecutors have used a version (see readily available prosecution motions online at LA Superior Court) that involves a different weapon and a gun held to the chest.  As someone noted last night - Cohen sounds like one of the mobsters in Casino, lying about things in a preposterously farcical manner.  Leonard Cohen's perjury at trial was and remains excessive.  Regardless of what happens with this writ in LA, it will be appealed to a higher court.

 
All supporting evidence must be attached to the petition.

All issues must be thoroughly briefed in the attached points and authorities.

The Court has 30 days to simply deny the petition or to ask for a response from the People.

You getting beyond this preliminary stage of the process is a ten thousand to one shot.

Fascinating.  It definitely gives the appearance that the judges and appellate division cover for the trial courts. 

I hope when your petition is summarily DENIED you will see that as confirmation that you are not seeing the world accurately.

I'm seeing the world accurately - and that includes the evidence Leonard Cohen concealed from LA Superior Court in his retaliatory lawsuit against me.  My attorney sees this as well.  Leonard Cohen is simply used to lying and getting away with it and that includes with respect to Phil Spector.
--The Dogster