From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:23 PM
Subject: Fwd: Your latest spin
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>
None of the issues to which you refer (who owns what; the IRS) were at issue during your 2012 criminal trial.
As your public defender has stated, the only issues concerned whether there was a valid court order in effect, whether you were aware of the order OR were served with it (either will support your conviction), and whether you violated that order.
A jury of 12 UNANIMOUSLY found you GUILTY on all charged counts.
The credibility of your defense that you were only seeking tax information and pursuing valid claims was undermined at trial by the abusive tone of your communications, their frequency and the many issues raised by you therein totally irrelevant to your business dealings with your victim (e.g., everything from the size of his penis to his alleged "testimony" before the Phil Spector grand jury).
Ultimately, the jury chose to disbelieve your defense and convicted you.
This is NOT an issue that can be corrected with a thousand writs or appeals.
Date: Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:23 PM
Subject: Fwd: Your latest spin
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>
To the IRS Commissioner's Staff,
I continue to be criminally harassed by this individual who wrote me that he is Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson.
Let me repeat this: The record is replete with lies by the prosecutor; false and perjured
testimony etc. Evidence has been concealed (including with respect to
my ownership interest in various corporate entities and the fact that
Cohen owes me millions and retaliated against me over the IRS, and
possibly Canada Revenue), etc. I was not served the restraining order
and had no idea, until after the trial when I phoned LA Superior Court,
that Cohen took out a domestic violence restraining order."None of the issues to which you refer (who owns what; the IRS) were at issue during your 2012 criminal trial.
Leonard
Cohen's tax fraud was most definitely an issue at my alleged trial in
2012. The prosecutor handed my lawyers and IRS binder with new evidence
(that I was unable to review until I was released - and I have now
challenged the fraudulent refund and illegal K-1s that Kory testified he
understood I asked to have withdrawn); the prosecutor lied to the judge
(which I did not discover until after my appeal was filed and my lawyer
sent me the transcripts) regarding an IRS holding re. Leonard Cohen's
default judgment (that is void because the court has no jurisdiction
over me due to the fact that I was not served and the proof of service
is evidence of extrinsic fraud); the trial court denied me the
opportunity to call Agent Tejeda/IRS to the witness stand, etc. The IRS
was at the heart of this case. In fact, in opening Streeter mentioned
tax fraud. She then lied to the jurors when she advised them that Cohen
does not have the information for the IRS required form 1099 and I was
in receipt of this. There's Cohen's testimony about the IRS refund and
many lies on the part of Kory: Agent Betzer advised me to bring the tax
fraud to the attention of the IRS Fraud Unit and he did not give my
lawyers a 1099 from Cohen to me for the year 2004. The K-1s completely
undermine the fraudulent expense ledger in Cohen's retaliatory lawsuit -
as do other things, such as the K-1s from TH that I paid taxes on.
As your public defender has stated, the only issues concerned whether there was a valid court order in effect, whether you were aware of the order OR were served with it (either will support your conviction), and whether you violated that order.
Read
the transcript for what my public defender actually had to say. For
instance, I had to be served the California order; Cohen and Kory were
engaged in a conspiracy and extortion attempt; they planned to use
fraudulent restraining orders against me to prevent me from
participating in the litigation matters; I wasn't served the default
judgment; etc. This man is simply lying about my public defenders. The
record proves otherwise. In fact, let me quote my public defender:
The prosecution is attempting to sabotage the IRS; the DA does not want
the Phil Spector verdict overturned; there may have been a prosecution
plant on the jury; one juror relied on Streeter's lies about the assets
left re. TH; and, the jurors wanted to hear from the IRS.
A jury of 12 UNANIMOUSLY found you GUILTY on all charged counts.
The credibility of your defense that you were only seeking tax information and pursuing valid claims was undermined at trial by the abusive tone of your communications, their frequency and the many issues raised by you therein totally irrelevant to your business dealings with your victim (e.g., everything from the size of his penis to his alleged "testimony" before the Phil Spector grand jury).
The
credibility of my defense was not undermined by any of this. It was
undermined by prosecutorial misconduct, fraud, perjury, concealment of
evidence, misstatement of facts, distortion of evidence, etc. Leonard
Cohen seems to think it was acceptable to have me read business and
legal documents while he soaked in a bath tub and exposed his penis to
me. That is an outrage - including on the part of the City Attorney.
Mick Brown/UK Telegraph has confirmed that he is the one that brought
Cohen's statements/testimony re. the Grand Jury to my attention. He's
reviewed the testimony/transcripts in Phil Spector's grand jury. I was
able to read the prosecution motions filed in Phil Spector's matter
online at LA Superior Court. They have used a totally different version
of Leonard Cohen's highly embellished good rock and roll stories about
Phil Spector than he testified about at my trial.
Ultimately, the jury chose to disbelieve your defense and convicted you.
This is NOT an issue that can be corrected with a thousand writs or appeals.
If everyone is so confident why do I continue to be criminally harassed over the issue?
All the best,
Kelley
Kelley
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The Dogster <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:00 PM
Subject: Your latest spin
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
"The record is replete with lies by the prosecutor; false and perjured testimony etc. Evidence has been concealed (including with respect to my ownership interest in various corporate entities and the fact that Cohen owes me millions and retaliated against me over the IRS, and possibly Canada Revenue), etc. I was not served the restraining order and had no idea, until after the trial when I phoned LA Superior Court, that Cohen took out a domestic violence restraining order."
None of the issues to which you refer (who owns what; the IRS) were at issue during your 2012 criminal trial.
As your public defender has stated, the only issues concerned whether there was a valid court order in effect, whether you were aware of the order OR were served with it (either will support your conviction), and whether you violated that order.
A jury of 12 UNANIMOUSLY found you GUILTY on all charged counts.
The credibility of your defense that you were only seeking tax information and pursuing valid claims was undermined at trial by the abusive tone of your communications, their frequency and the many issues raised by you therein totally irrelevant to your business dealings with your victim (e.g., everything from the size of his penis to his alleged "testimony" before the Phil Spector grand jury).
Ultimately, the jury chose to disbelieve your defense and convicted you.
This is NOT an issue that can be corrected with a thousand writs or appeals.
--The Dogster
From: The Dogster <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:00 PM
Subject: Your latest spin
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
"The record is replete with lies by the prosecutor; false and perjured testimony etc. Evidence has been concealed (including with respect to my ownership interest in various corporate entities and the fact that Cohen owes me millions and retaliated against me over the IRS, and possibly Canada Revenue), etc. I was not served the restraining order and had no idea, until after the trial when I phoned LA Superior Court, that Cohen took out a domestic violence restraining order."
None of the issues to which you refer (who owns what; the IRS) were at issue during your 2012 criminal trial.
As your public defender has stated, the only issues concerned whether there was a valid court order in effect, whether you were aware of the order OR were served with it (either will support your conviction), and whether you violated that order.
A jury of 12 UNANIMOUSLY found you GUILTY on all charged counts.
The credibility of your defense that you were only seeking tax information and pursuing valid claims was undermined at trial by the abusive tone of your communications, their frequency and the many issues raised by you therein totally irrelevant to your business dealings with your victim (e.g., everything from the size of his penis to his alleged "testimony" before the Phil Spector grand jury).
Ultimately, the jury chose to disbelieve your defense and convicted you.
This is NOT an issue that can be corrected with a thousand writs or appeals.
--The Dogster
