From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:19 AM
Subject:
To: ICE cc: IRS, FBI, DOJ, FTB & Multiple Recipients
Hello ICE,
I have received Gianelli's slanderous
and defamatory emails to your Trial Counsel with respect to me and the tax
fraud [related to Leonard Cohen] I brought to the attention of IRS on April 15, 2005 and thereafter.
You can confirm that date directly with IRS. The DOJ's Criminal Division
recently advised me that they do not offer legal advice and advised me to bring
these matters to the attention of the Court and State Bar. A criminal
litigator just advised me to do the same. I was NOT served Cohen's
lawsuit. Cohen has taken millions from TH, collected monies for assets
owned by BMT, obtained refunds from IRS and FTB (that have now been challenged
as fraud); and it just goes on and on. In any event, the narrative will
not change the evidence which doesn't rely on a garbage and fabricated
narrative. See corrections to the Proxy Lawyer's emails to you.
I have copied Jeffrey Korn in on this
email since Gianelli raised many relevant federal and state tax and corporate
matters and is now arguing that a 2006 state order subverts IRS reporting and
filing requirements re. me and other entities for 2004 and 2005 ONE YEAR BEFORE
THE JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED. Judge Babcock ONLY addressed the interpleader
funds and referred to the LA judgment.
I have posted Judge Babcock's order
directly below. One problem with Babcock's order. My legal interest
in these entities were NOT held in equitable trust for Cohen. That matter
was not litigated in Colorado. Judge Babcock merely referred to the LA
judgment with respect to the interpleader funds. I didn't enter an
appearance and advised the judge that i was concerned that the case was an
attempt to cover up criminal tax fraud and obstruct justice. I spoke with
him.
There was no dispute between me and
Cohen in Colorado. It was between Greenberg and Cohen and ended up being
about legal fees.
All the best,
Kelley
Natural Wealth Real Estate, Inc. v. Cohen
IN
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
September 5, 2008
NATURAL WEALTH REAL ESTATE, INC., A/K/A GREENBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC., D/B/A AGILE ADVISORS, INC. A COLORADO CORPORATION; TACTICAL ALLOCATION SERVICES, LLC, D/B/A AGILE ALLOCATION SERVICES, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AGILE GROUP, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; GREENBERG & ASSOCIATES SECURITIES, INC., D/B/A AGILE GROUP, A COLORADO CORPORATION; AND NEAL R. GREENBERG, A COLORADO RESIDENT, PLAINTIFFS AND COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS,
v.
LEONARD COHEN, A CANADIAN CITIZEN RESIDING IN CALIFORNIA; KELLEY LYNCH, A UNITED STATES CITIZEN RESIDING IN CALIFORNIA; AND JOHN DOE, NUMBERS 1-25, DEFENDANTS, AND, LEONARD COHEN, A CANADIAN CITIZEN RESIDING IN CALIFORNIA, COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF,
v.
TIMOTHY BARNETT, A COLORADO CITIZEN, COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered
by: Lewis T. Babcock, Judge
ORDER
This matter is before me on Defendant, Leonard Cohen's, Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' Tenth Claim for Relief for Interpleader [Docket # 185], Plaintiffs' response [Docket # 196], and Cohen's reply [Docket # 210]. Oral arguments would not materially assist the determination of this motion.
The
allegations in this case are adequately noted in prior orders of this Court,
and I need not repeat them here. After several years of litigation, each claim
and counterclaim in this case-with the exception of Plaintiffs' interpleader
claim now at issue-has been dismissed. Plaintiffs' interpleader claim concerns
approximately $154,000 in funds ("the funds") belonging to
Traditional Holdings LLC, an investment entity created by Cohen and Defendant
Lynch for purposes of managing Cohen's assets. Plaintiffs disavowed any
interest in the funds, but requested interpleader for purposes of settling the
conflicting positions of Cohen and Lynch regarding ownership of the funds.
Plaintiffs paid the funds into the Registry of the Court pending resolution of
this issue.
On
May 12, 2006, the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, ruled on
the issue of ownership of the funds, and entered default judgment in favor of
Cohen and against Lynch in the amount of $7.3 million in damages and interest.
See Judgment, Cohen v. Lynch, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC 338322
(May 12, 2006) [Docket # 186-16]. In rendering judgment, the California court
declared Lynch was "not the owner of any assets in Traditional Holdings,
LLC" and any interest Lynch had in "any other entity related to Cohen
. . . she [held] as trustee for Cohen's equitable title." The California
court enjoined Lynch from interfering with Cohen's right to receive any such
funds or property or in any other way exercising control over any funds or
property related to Cohen. The California court ruling was not appealed and is
now final.
KL DID NOT HOLD HER OWNERSHIP INTERESTS IN THESE ENTITIES AS "TRUSTEE FOR COHEN'S EQUITABLE TITLE." THE JUDGMENT IS EVIDENCE OF FRAUD, THEFT ....
KL DID NOT HOLD HER OWNERSHIP INTERESTS IN THESE ENTITIES AS "TRUSTEE FOR COHEN'S EQUITABLE TITLE." THE JUDGMENT IS EVIDENCE OF FRAUD, THEFT ....
The
final judgment of the California court settles the dispute between Lynch and
Cohen over ownership of the interpleaded funds. As Plaintiffs are no longer
exposed to multiple liability, Plaintiffs' interpleader claim is now moot. See
FED. R. CIV. P. 22(a)(1). When the dispute underlying an interpleader claim is
mooted, the interpleader claim should be dismissed. See Oldcastle Materials,
Inc. v. Rohlin, 343 F. Supp. 2d 762, 787 (N.D. Iowa 2004); Burningtree v.
Holland,760 F. Supp. 118, 119 (E.D. Mich. 1991).
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiffs' Tenth Claim for Relief for Interpleader is DISMISSED;
2.
Defendant Cohen's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' Tenth Claim for
Relief for Interpleader [Docket # 185] is DENIED AS MOOT;
3.
The interpleaded funds currently in the Registry of the Court-including any
accrued interest, less the Court Registry handling fee-shall be disbursed to
Defendant Cohen within ten days of the date of this Order;
4.
Each party shall bear its own attorney fees and costs related to this motion.
Lewis
T. Babcock, Judge
20080905
SEE KELLEY LYNCH'S COMMENTS IN TAX IN RESPONSE TO THE STALKER LAWYER'S EMAIL TO ICE TRIAL COUNSEL.
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@
Date: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:37 AM
Subject: RE: Kelley Lynch's mass email dated Tuesday, December 09, 2014 9:11 AM - (replied to herein)
To: OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov
Cc: Entire_World@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:37 AM
Subject: RE: Kelley Lynch's mass email dated Tuesday, December 09, 2014 9:11 AM - (replied to herein)
To: OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov
Cc: Entire_World@gmail.com
Dear sirs,
Kelley
Lynch keeps writing to random agencies and people as she has done
since being fired from her last job as entertainer Leonard Cohen’s manager in
1994 [Cohen understood KL was reporting the allegations of tax fraud to IRS in the fall of 2004 - NOT 1994] for embezzling $7.9M from the entertainer, as reflected in a default
judgment entered against Ms. Lynch in 2006. In my case, she started sending me
up to 60 harassing emails a day in approximately May of 2009, and I have
received approximately 20,000 such emails – all falsely accusing me of crimes
(including “harassment”). These emails are typically cc’d to the IRS, FBI, the
CIA, the Russian Federation Security Service, the media and other random people
and organizations.
I reported
the allegations that Leonard Cohen committed civil and criminal tax fraud to
IRS on April 15, 2005. Leonard Cohen’s lawyer, Robert Kory, continues to
lie about that date and has advised two courts that I read an ad and reported
my employer (which never happened) and reported the allegations to Treasury
Agent Kelly Sopko in 2007. I have email evidence proving that Kory lied
about this to Judge Hess in the motion to vacate matter. Leonard Cohen’s
lawyers were copied in on emails to IRS Commissioner’s Staff in 2005.
Kory wrote me in the Spring of 2005 confirming that I intended to report these
allegations to IRS and others. I have now reported the allegations to
IRS, FTB, State of Kentucky, and others. My emails have been documenting
everything that unfolded since reporting Cohen’s tax fraud to IRS on April 15,
2005. LAPD’s report confirms that my alleged emails (they reviewed
without a subpoena or the forwarding information to his lawyers which means
they were “altered” and information was removed) were generally requests for
tax information.
Since hearing from Leonard Cohen’s lawyer, Michelle Rice, in May 2009 (according to public statements Gianelli, a man I do not know, [made]) Stephen Gianelli has criminally harassed, stalked, attempted to intimidate, and threatened me, my sons, family members, Paulette Brandt, and others. People have filed complaints with law enforcement about this matter as it has taken place across this country. Paulette Brandt and I actually met with LAPD detectives to discuss this. She also contacted LAPD’s TMU to advise them that she received a death threat from someone claiming to be Gianelli and threatening to kill her if she spoke publicly about me, Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen, or the IRS matters I have been addressing. I have spoken with LAPD’s TMU, LAPD, LASD, FBI, and others, about this ongoing harassment. My sister’s lawyer spoke to Gianelli and advised him to cease and desist. Friends of mine have filed criminal complaints with various police departments and/or contacted their lawyers.
Gianelli
claims that, in 2013, Cohen’s lawyers asked him to stop engaging in this
conduct. I’ve asked Jeffrey Korn, Cohen’s lawyer in the motion to vacate
matter, if he could assist in bringing this ongoing criminal conduct to an
end. If a letter does exist asking Gianelli to stop, I have no doubt that
it’s a “cover your ass” letter. Gianelli worked with the City Attorney,
two times according to his emails, to have me falsely arrested. I am in
receipt of evidence showing that the City Attorney advised Gianelli to continue
harassing me and instructed/directed him to communicate official messages for
their office to me. This issue has been addressed in my claims against
the City of Los Angeles. See attached letter for some of the
details. Gianelli also works in tandem with Cohen fan, Susanne Walsh, and
Phil Spector’s former assistant, Michelle Blaine, who stole nearly $1 million
from Spector and who has been called a bald faced liar and thief by Phil
Spector’s legal team. She also came up with a narrative about Spector wanting
to marry her. Paulette Brandt does not believe Michelle Blaine. She
was Phil Spector’s girlfriend years ago, worked with him until approximately
2002, was present for the Leonard Cohen sessions (and at Phil Spector’s home
when he and Cohen were writing songs together), and understands that this is a
highly coordinated campaign of harassment that now involves the Phil Spector DA
and prosecutor Alan Jackson. Investigator Frayeh, DA’s office, concluded
that Gianelli may have found a sympathetic ear with Spector prosecutor (Alan
Jackson) about me. Given the fact, that former DA Steve Cooley, Cohen,
and the City Attorney joined forces in targeting me, that seems fairly
obvious.
She then
posts her emails to you on her various blogs, including this blog: http://riverdeepbook.
Other blogs
and email accounts have been targeted by Gianelli, Blaine, Susanne Walsh, and
others. They congratulated themselves publicly. I have asked
Google’s Legal Investigation team what they plan to do about the use of
numerous gmail accounts to criminally harass people.
Evidence
That Michelle Blaine And Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut Conspired To Target Kelley
Lynch's Blog Titled "philspectorandkelleylynch.
http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.
Who
Is Emailing Material From This Blog To Stephen Gianelli & Michelle Blaine?
I do not view
IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, etc. as “random agencies.” The City
Attorney of Los Angeles views them as irrelevant parties. I am
documenting everything for IRS (and others), and have done so since reporting
Cohen’s tax fraud to IRS on April 15, 2005. I have also provided IRS with
substantial evidence and all emails between me and Cohen, me and Cohen’s
representatives, etc. so they could look at the allegations of civil and
criminal tax fraud in a non-biased manner. The evidence speaks for itself.
In the fall of 2004, Cohen heard I was reporting his tax fraud to IRS.
He, and his representative, attempted to coerce me into settlement agreements
that included an offer of 50% community property. My lawyers and
accountant were present for that, put the matter in writing, and my former
accountant (who was NOT fired but finished the 2003 tax return he was
submitting to IRS on my behalf) asked me to advise the Treasury agents I met
with that he recalled being present for this offer. He worked for IRS and
believes their criminal division should be involved in this matter and advised
me to inform the Treasury and IRS that my lawyers understood that Cohen’s tax
fraud was criminal in nature. The Schedule re. Neal Greenberg’s factual
allegations attached hereto addresses much of the conduct on the part of Cohen
and Kory. The allegations re. conspiracy, bribery, extortion, witness
tampering, etc. were not litigated . The Colorado Court agreed that it did not
have jurisdiction over Robert Kory. He had a hard time admitting this on
the witness stand. One of Neal Greenberg’s lawyers wrote to confirm that
they have evidence that Cohen and Kory intended to destroy me and my
children. In fact, one such email is contained in evidence they filed
with LA Superior Court in response to my motion to vacate. That email was
sent by one Norman Posel who worked for Boies Schiller in 2004/2005. I
have forwarded Dan Scheid’s email confirming they have evidence with respect to
Cohen, Kory, Lindsey (my younger son’s father), and Betsy Superfon (a friend of
my younger son’s father).
All
emails are sent to IRS, FBI, and DOJ. I contacted CIA with respect
to a FOIA request I intend to file with respect to the Bay of Pigs, etc.
Leonard Cohen has told the news media for years that he was captured by
individuals who felt he was part of the rebel forces during the Bay of
Pigs. He was allegedly arrested and interrogated. I would like to
know what type of information CIA has with respect to the Bay of Pigs and individuals
captured and interrogated at that time. I’ve also contacted them with
respect to a drone Valentine card that I will get to in a minute. As for
the Russian FSB, I have been accused of “annoying” Leonard Cohen over various
matters. That would include, but is not limited to, IRS required
information he refuses to provide me for the years 2004 and 2005 (BEFORE the
default was entered in May 2006); Phil Spector (see link for the explanation of
the three versions of the gun story Cohen embellishes about Phil Spector – now
before LA Superior Court. Also see my letter to Spector prosecutor Alan
Jackson. An earlier version of this attached letter was hand delivered to
Phil Spector DA Steve Cooley and Spector prosecutors Jackson and Do [attached]. It
addresses a great deal of what has unfolded, evidence, and Gianelli’s criminal
harassment. Although in 2006 I filed a complaint with the DA’s Major
Fraud Unit re. Cohen’s theft, fraud, etc., according to the Los Angeles City
Attorney, the DA elected not to prosecute Cohen. Does that relate to his
testimony on the stand during my [fraudulent] “domestic violence” restraining order matter
re. Cohen? I have no idea if there was a quid pro quo that led to the
City Attorney eliciting testimony from Cohen about Steve Cooley, Alan Jackson, Phil
Spector, and Dennis Riordan. I do know that Cohen lied when he testified
on the stand that he was copied in on an April 18, 2011 email to (among others)
IRS and Dennis Riordan after he was asked to review the email to confirm that
it had been sent to him. It had not but that email, which addresses many
federal and state tax matters (that the prosecutor decided to willfully
conceal, and this is her pattern and practice, from the jurors), confirmed for
Dennis Riordan (Phil Spector’s appellate attorney) that Cohen told me for 20
years that Phil Spector never held a gun on him. More about this
below. At one point in the Spring of 2013, I phoned Steven Segal and was
told he was in Russia. When I googled Segal at that time, I realized that
he was in Russia meeting with President Putin and Russian Security Agency,
FSB. I had previously contacted a Russian agency due to the fact that in
this country you can be imprisoned for annoying someone (including a liar with
motive who takes the stand). There was an uproar about the Pussy Riot and
hooliganism re. the desecration of a Russian Church so I was curious to know
what Russian authorities felt about our laws. The US Supreme Court, and
many other jurisdictions, view the “intent to annoy” statutes as unconstitutionally
vague but LA also uses them to retaliate over criticisms, etc. with respect to
the “government” itself. It occurred to me, due to the fact that LA
Superior Court views its jurisdiction as extraordinary (including in the
matters where I was not served or companies were not named but inserted into a
default judgment), that LA Superior Court may not actually have jurisdiction
over a Russian intelligence agency. I also am watching the situation with
Ukraine unfold. So is Oliver Stone. I feel the political situation,
with respect to NATO leaders, is dangerous and have shared my views with FBI,
CIA, DOJ, NSA, and FSB about this matter. I also have advised NSA that I
personally believe they should monitor this situation because it is completely
out of control. The City and County of Los Angeles monitor my
blogs. They appear to read my criticisms about local LA government
agencies and officials. Gianelli, on the other hand, has written and lied
to IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, NSA, CIA, FSB, and FTB about me. He is
dangerously unstable but clearly believes that because he lives in Greece (as
he has noted in these harassing emails) that no one will prosecute him for
stalking, harassing, intimidating … me, my sons, sister, Paulette Brandt and
others for years now. Evidently Cohen’s fan, Susanne Walsh, lives in Denmark
and feels the same way. As I discussed with LAPD’s TMU Walsh even copied
in Cohen’s lawyer, Michelle Rice, on many criminally harassing emails.
They advised me to maintain all emails and to contact them should these people
copy Rice in on emails harassing me and others. My appellate attorney,
who was criminally harassed for over a year by Gianelli and Walsh, advised me
to forward all Gianelli (and others) emails to FBI, etc. He believes my
2012 trial is an IRS matter that demands an investigation; concluded that the
City Attorney (when they retaliated against me) engaged in criminal obstruction
of justice; and has never seen anything like the conduct of Gianelli and others
in his [entire career. A Lieutenant at LASD has never seen anything like my alleged case in] 26 years in law enforcement. This attorney also phoned DOJ to
discuss the subpoena we issued Agent Tejeda/IRS during the 2012 trial.
Judge Vanderet lied about my knowing about all IRS matters (including the
refund Cohen obtained lying about me and evidence) and refused to permit Agent
Tejeda to take the stand. The jurors, in debriefing, confirmed that they
wanted to hear from IRS and I have asked IRS to investigate that situation.
None of
her emails are in good faith. Instead, she is attempting to embarrass and
harass entertainer Leonard Cohen, the undersigned (a retired lawyer), and many
others, as she has been relentlessly doing since 2009.
All of my
emails are in good faith and legitimate. They are addressing very serious
federal and state tax matters and corporate issues. The 2006 judgment
does not state that it is retroactive; advise anyone that Cohen is not required
to provide me with IRS required 1099 for 2004 (when he personally confirmed in
his legal pleadings that I received legitimate income from him in 2004); advise
me that I should ignore IRS who instructed me to contact Cohen re. the illegal
K-1s LCI transmitted to IRS for 2004 and 2005 (indicating that I am a partner
with $0 income for those periods and completely undermining the fraud expense
ledger used to support the default judgment in a matter where I wasn’t served
and Cohen and his lawyers continue to present perjured statements to the Court
about that matter).
The order also does not state that Cohen and/or these entities should willfully evade filing federal and state tax returns for 2004 and 2005. Those returns were due PRIOR to the retaliation case being filed in August 2005 and well in advance of the default judgment granted Cohen (willfully disregarding all corporate books, records, stock units, agreements and understandings, etc.) in May 2006. I will now ask LA Superior Court to clarify that order since it has been used to prevent me from obtaining IRS required information. IRS will [now] request the required 1099 for 2004 and I will provide IRS with a Statement explaining that I feel as though I am being forced to commit tax fraud with respect to my returns as I do not have K-1s for 2004 and 2005 for various entities and the information Cohen and his representatives have transmitted to IRS contradicts itself.
Most of my emails are not sent to Cohen’s legal representative but addressed privately to IRS, FBI, DOJ, FTB, and others. I am requesting information from Jeffrey Korn as well as clarification of the judgment. I do not see where it states that it is retroactive, subverts IRS reporting requirements for 2004 and 2005, etc. I do see that the judgment itself proves that previously filed federal and state tax returns are evidence of fraud now as are all agreements Cohen signed, many of which are notarized. Of course, I didn’t handle IRS and tax matters and was quite clear about that in emails sent Cohen. His tax lawyer replied and agreed. Those emails (in my possession) also address the fact that I do not handle accounting matters, corporate matters, problems with 1099s (Sony issued two - $1 million and $7 million to Cohen personally and he and his representatives were addressing that at the time I confirmed this for them), loan documents, etc. I was Cohen’s personal manager and never his business manager.
I have asked Korn for information, clarification, documentation, and advised him that I would like to schedule a corporate record and tax return inspection with respect to numerous corporations. Cohen testified that his tax lawyer, Richard Westin, rectified something with respect to my ownership interest in one entity (I believe) but IRS and State of Kentucky have no evidence of this. Corporate formation documents were not amended; amended tax returns were not filed; my name is still connected to these entities; I believe that TH was active in 2004 and 2005; and, I have asked Korn to explain how Cohen intends to handle his nearly $6.7 million in loans and expenditures from TH. Those occurred prior to August 2005 and the default judgment doesn’t address Cohen’s loans/expenses from 2001 through 2005 re. TH. The Complaint doesn’t either. In fact, this information was concealed. Cohen was well aware that this entity could loan money to its members; he signed an Annuity Agreement confirming that he would repay his loans with interest (set at 6%) within 3 years; and he understood that his loans/expenditures had to be documented. He has had 10 years to properly document his loans/expenditures, with promissory notes that he personally knows were required, but has failed to do so. These loans/expenditures now need to be addressed somehow on federal and state tax returns and Cohen appears to believe he has a right to embezzle what now amounts to approximately $10 million (with interest accrued through the present) from TH. The judgment does not confirm that he has that right. Not does it confirm that Cohen has no obligation to any of these entities. Cohen has taken the position that he is the alter ego who has engaged in self-dealing and continues to take that opinion now using the fraud/void default judgment to argue (through lawyer proxy Gianelli) that he may subvert IRS reporting and corporate requirements for 2004 and 2005 (and other periods). The U.S. Supremacy Clause addresses the fact that state laws are nullified when they contradict federal statutes such as federal tax statutes.
Furthermore, as I’ve said – the judgment was entered months and years after the entity’s were legally obligated to file federal and state tax returns for 2004 and 2005. Cohen refuses to provide me with royalty statements showing income for those periods. That would include with respect to LCI (collected royalties re. assets owned by BMT); LC personally (collected royalties re. assets owned by BMT); etc. He has a sense of entitlement and lawyers and others willing to do anything to further his desires.
The order also does not state that Cohen and/or these entities should willfully evade filing federal and state tax returns for 2004 and 2005. Those returns were due PRIOR to the retaliation case being filed in August 2005 and well in advance of the default judgment granted Cohen (willfully disregarding all corporate books, records, stock units, agreements and understandings, etc.) in May 2006. I will now ask LA Superior Court to clarify that order since it has been used to prevent me from obtaining IRS required information. IRS will [now] request the required 1099 for 2004 and I will provide IRS with a Statement explaining that I feel as though I am being forced to commit tax fraud with respect to my returns as I do not have K-1s for 2004 and 2005 for various entities and the information Cohen and his representatives have transmitted to IRS contradicts itself.
Most of my emails are not sent to Cohen’s legal representative but addressed privately to IRS, FBI, DOJ, FTB, and others. I am requesting information from Jeffrey Korn as well as clarification of the judgment. I do not see where it states that it is retroactive, subverts IRS reporting requirements for 2004 and 2005, etc. I do see that the judgment itself proves that previously filed federal and state tax returns are evidence of fraud now as are all agreements Cohen signed, many of which are notarized. Of course, I didn’t handle IRS and tax matters and was quite clear about that in emails sent Cohen. His tax lawyer replied and agreed. Those emails (in my possession) also address the fact that I do not handle accounting matters, corporate matters, problems with 1099s (Sony issued two - $1 million and $7 million to Cohen personally and he and his representatives were addressing that at the time I confirmed this for them), loan documents, etc. I was Cohen’s personal manager and never his business manager.
I have asked Korn for information, clarification, documentation, and advised him that I would like to schedule a corporate record and tax return inspection with respect to numerous corporations. Cohen testified that his tax lawyer, Richard Westin, rectified something with respect to my ownership interest in one entity (I believe) but IRS and State of Kentucky have no evidence of this. Corporate formation documents were not amended; amended tax returns were not filed; my name is still connected to these entities; I believe that TH was active in 2004 and 2005; and, I have asked Korn to explain how Cohen intends to handle his nearly $6.7 million in loans and expenditures from TH. Those occurred prior to August 2005 and the default judgment doesn’t address Cohen’s loans/expenses from 2001 through 2005 re. TH. The Complaint doesn’t either. In fact, this information was concealed. Cohen was well aware that this entity could loan money to its members; he signed an Annuity Agreement confirming that he would repay his loans with interest (set at 6%) within 3 years; and he understood that his loans/expenditures had to be documented. He has had 10 years to properly document his loans/expenditures, with promissory notes that he personally knows were required, but has failed to do so. These loans/expenditures now need to be addressed somehow on federal and state tax returns and Cohen appears to believe he has a right to embezzle what now amounts to approximately $10 million (with interest accrued through the present) from TH. The judgment does not confirm that he has that right. Not does it confirm that Cohen has no obligation to any of these entities. Cohen has taken the position that he is the alter ego who has engaged in self-dealing and continues to take that opinion now using the fraud/void default judgment to argue (through lawyer proxy Gianelli) that he may subvert IRS reporting and corporate requirements for 2004 and 2005 (and other periods). The U.S. Supremacy Clause addresses the fact that state laws are nullified when they contradict federal statutes such as federal tax statutes.
Furthermore, as I’ve said – the judgment was entered months and years after the entity’s were legally obligated to file federal and state tax returns for 2004 and 2005. Cohen refuses to provide me with royalty statements showing income for those periods. That would include with respect to LCI (collected royalties re. assets owned by BMT); LC personally (collected royalties re. assets owned by BMT); etc. He has a sense of entitlement and lawyers and others willing to do anything to further his desires.
In 2005 Kelley Lynch suffered two involuntary psychiatric
hospitalizations, and the first of many restraining orders against her in
favor of Mr. Cohen and others. One such hospitalization occurred after a 4-hour
stand-off between Ms. Lynch and a SWAT unit of the LAPD at her residence.
She became homeless that year, and lived on the beach in Santa Monica where she
was frequently arrested and spent time in jail.
See Ann
Diamond’s article for Rolling Stone that summarizes this situation.
LAPD’s SWAT Unit advised my older son that my dog was my hostage and they were
taking precautions. They willfully disregarded my son’s comments that he
had taken his brother down the street and dropped him off with Cloris
Leachment, etc. They advised my son that they would shoot me, our dog,
and used him as a human shield and alleged hostage negotiator. There was
no stand-off. LAPD didn’t even bother to tell me to come out of the
house. They had Rutger trick me when they had him ask me if I would like
a cigarette. I did come out of the house, with my large Akita on a leash,
to ask “Who is my hostage? My dog?” I also wanted to investigate
how many cops had guns around and behind Rutger. I have Steve Lindsey’s
declaration confirming that he phoned LAPD about that incident. Cohen
testified that I did which is a bald faced lie. I phoned a woman who
works as an expert witness in courts, my former custody lawyer, and
others. I was then taken nearly three hours in traffic to Killer King in
South Central. I was drugged illegally. The Killer King report does
not relate to me however. It has my address and Lindsey’s cell phone
number but the other information relates to someone else. The SSA advised
me that the name is similar to mine but not mine. The report contains
someone else’s SSN, date of birth, place of birth, religious beliefs, medical
number, and medical information. Dr. D’Angelo did not agree with LAPD,
told me to wait my turn, released me, and confirmed for me, Rutger, and his
friends, that there was nothing in the file that could affect a custody
matter. And yet it was used against me.
I was also
questioned about Phil Spector en route to Killer King. The DA’s
investigators I met with about this, and other issues, asked me “Why Phil
Spector?” and I replied “Why not Oliver Stone?” Far more individuals
understood that I knew Oliver Stone as we sponsored a Buddhist center in Los
Angeles together for His Holiness Kusum Lingpa. The DA’s office received
an “anonymous tip” regarding my friendship with Phil Spector and dragged me
into his insane matters. The DA then publicly aligned himself with
Leonard Cohen and had an investigator hanging out with Cohen and his lawyers
throughout my trial. I heard the investigator, paid for by the taxpayers,
was even seen lunching with Cohen. My public defender advised me that he
felt the trial was an attempt to sabotage IRS by the City Attorney for Cohen;
discredit me; and the DA did not want the Phil Spector verdict
overturned. Given the testimony permitted re. IRS matters and Phil
Spector that seems obvious.
The fraud/void default judgment was also used against me and the prosecutor attempted to prove that I was served the default judgment while homeless in May 2006. It has been brought to my attention, by Betsy Superfon, that Cohen’s lawyers contacted SMPD which may explain their conduct towards me. I therefore contacted DOJ to document what was unfolding with names, dates, places, incidents, details, witness information, etc. SMPD was very clear with me that they were playing a game, understood I knew Phil Spector, and realized I repeatedly reported them to Internal Affairs. I was arrested ONE TIME in SMPD. I was arrested at 9 AM in the morning for “camping” although I was not camping and was standing on the beach speaking to my son. I was promptly released. I now also, as LASD confirmed for me, have unverified warrants on my record that do not relate to me. SMPD was very clear. The hateful treatment of the homeless is a serious issue these days with the arrest of a 91 year old man for feeding the homeless. The ACLU sued Santa Monica (and SMPD) for criminally harassing the homeless. I documented everything, at that time, for IRS, DOJ, and others.
The fraud/void default judgment was also used against me and the prosecutor attempted to prove that I was served the default judgment while homeless in May 2006. It has been brought to my attention, by Betsy Superfon, that Cohen’s lawyers contacted SMPD which may explain their conduct towards me. I therefore contacted DOJ to document what was unfolding with names, dates, places, incidents, details, witness information, etc. SMPD was very clear with me that they were playing a game, understood I knew Phil Spector, and realized I repeatedly reported them to Internal Affairs. I was arrested ONE TIME in SMPD. I was arrested at 9 AM in the morning for “camping” although I was not camping and was standing on the beach speaking to my son. I was promptly released. I now also, as LASD confirmed for me, have unverified warrants on my record that do not relate to me. SMPD was very clear. The hateful treatment of the homeless is a serious issue these days with the arrest of a 91 year old man for feeding the homeless. The ACLU sued Santa Monica (and SMPD) for criminally harassing the homeless. I documented everything, at that time, for IRS, DOJ, and others.
In 2007
Ms. Lynch moved to Colorado to circumvent the California restraining orders,
and was arrested and convicted that year for criminal trespass when she refused
to leave a restaurant after demanding that another patron there be arrested for
“child molestation”. (Indeed, her hallmark is falsely accusing others of “child
molestation”, including me, Cohen and anyone who looks disapprovingly at her.)
Leonard
Cohen’s declaration, in support of the Boulder order he obtained in 2008 (after
an extraordinary flight to Boulder in the midst of a European tour, following
his threats to sue journalist Ann Diamond over the Rolling Stone draft article,
and which addressed his desire to prevent me from communicating with third
parties – he testified that those third parties are IRS, FBI, DOJ, Dennis
Riordan, etc), notes that I left LA to avoid law enforcement. Gianelli
has the same story line. However, that is a bald faced lie. My son
lost his fingers in a horrendous accident with a meat grinder at Whole Foods in
February 2007. I stayed with him for a number of months and was then
asked by Yongzin Rinpoche and his wife to visit. They felt the situation
was extremely stressful for me. I stayed with Rinpoche and his wife at
his mother-in-law’s home in Erie, Colorado. Rinpoche and Clea Surkhang
decided to visit Bhutan with their toddler and Clea’s mother was selling her
house and had purchased another. There was no room for anyone including
Rinpoche, Clea, and their son. I, therefore, had to find a temporary
place to reside. I also found a position at Deneuve Construction.
I wasn’t
arrested for “criminal trespass” at Juanita’s. I thought I saw someone
with his penis out in front of a child. Boulder PD advises people that
there are pedophiles in the area and Jean Benet Ramsey was murdered in Boulder,
Colorado. I had just ordered my meal, dropped my change purse on the
ground, and saw what I believed was a man with his penis out. I stood up
and went outside to find Boulder PD and could not. I returned to the
restaurant and the manager, who had not been present when I stood up to walk
out, advised me that I had to leave. I asked him to phone the
police. He did. What unfolded then was absolutely insane. In
any event, I went to trial; the manager of the restaurant told the Sheriff’s
Department (serving a subpoena on the owner of the restaurant) that the owner
no longer worked there; and, the jurors did not believe I obstructed a peace
officer and found me not guilty. The jurors also asked when the “trespassing”
charges were brought and the judge decided to conceal from them the fact that
they were brought approximately 8 months after the incident and two days before
the preliminary hearing. That’s a tactic City Attorneys use.
Concealing the totality of circumstances from the jurors seems to be extremely
problematic. I represented myself at that trial and it was clear:
the jurors did not believe the police. The restaurant owner’s niece was a
friend of mine and advised me that the manager did not handle the situation
correctly. That’s true understatement. The manager, as he had
previously advised me, testified that Boulder PD did not want me in
Juanita’s. He then retracted that statement without explanation for why
he offered that testimony.
As for child
molestation. I have evidence, some in the form of emails from Cohen
personally, addressing the fact that Ann Diamond spoke to Freda Guttman (a
Canadian who knows Cohen). Guttman then advised Diamond that her child
was in class at Concordia in Montreal when Lorca Cohen advised her classmates
that her father molested her. This situation has been well
documented. The individual Cohen needs to speak with about the situation
is his daughter. Ann Diamond’s email confirming this situation is available
online. It simply spells out the facts. In any event, I am not the
party who accused Cohen of this but am in possession of my attorney
brother-in-law’s letters to me personally addressing the situation whereby Ann
Diamond posted comments about this situation online.
I do not know
Gianelli who has criminally harassed me, and many others, for years now.
I view any adult stranger who attempted to lure my then minor son into
privately communicating with them as a potential sexual predator or NAMBLA member.
The prosecutor during my trial attempted to “pretend” that I accused Cohen of
being a NAMBLA member. She’s quite slick in the way she “elicits”
testimony and conceals evidence, etc. In fact, as I discussed with one of
my public defenders, she appeared to be a seasoned pro when it came to lying
about me, the facts, and evidence. Why the prosecutorial misconduct
wasn’t addressed in a motion is a question I have raised. I also
attempted, with my appellate attorney’s blessings and encouragement, to abandon
my appeal over the prosecutorial misconduct, IRS matters, etc.
Leonard Cohen’s indecent exposure and sexual harassment will be addressed below re. Gianelli’s comments about Bill Cosby. My friend, John Perks, was Bill Cosby’s butler/valet in the 80s and John’s wife, Betsy Perks, was Cohen’s assistant and household manager. She also witnessed the process server who was running around Boulder, as numerous people advised me, re. Cohen’s 2008 desperate Boulder restraining order, telling people he had a check for my son’s injuries. I found that, as well as the prosecutor’s attempts to elicit testimony about my son’s horrifying accident, positively evil.
The prosecutor at my 2012 IRS/Phil Spector trial liked Cohen’s poetic statement that I accused him of being the author of my [misfortune]. That’s a bald-faced lie and I do not view the situation as poetic. The man understood I was reporting his tax fraud to IRS, attempted to offer me anything I wanted (and Betsy Superfon confirmed this after speaking with Cohen and told me the type of deal Cohen/Kory had in mind could not be faxed …. She thought it was “illegal.” Greenberg’s lawsuit recounts this as I documented it at the time – with evidence – for Boies Schiller), bankrupted me, withheld monies due for services rendered, and has now stolen my share of IP.
His [Cohen's] tactics work well before LA Superior Court and with local government entities such as the former DA and City Attorney, numerous prosecutors, etc. Boies Schiller advised me to go wired to my meetings with Cohen/Kory. They advised me that they personally felt Cohen/Kory were attempting to engage me in criminal conduct. I agreed. In fact, Investigator Brian Bennett (Phil Spector investigator) recalled my telling him in the spring of 2005 that Cohen and Kory were attempting to blackmail me and confirming that Cohen lies about Phil Spector – see his three highly embellished good rock and roll story about Spector and a gun before LA Superior Court. The Grand Jury legal adviser instructed me to contact Phil Spector’s appellate attorney about the situation.
Leonard Cohen’s indecent exposure and sexual harassment will be addressed below re. Gianelli’s comments about Bill Cosby. My friend, John Perks, was Bill Cosby’s butler/valet in the 80s and John’s wife, Betsy Perks, was Cohen’s assistant and household manager. She also witnessed the process server who was running around Boulder, as numerous people advised me, re. Cohen’s 2008 desperate Boulder restraining order, telling people he had a check for my son’s injuries. I found that, as well as the prosecutor’s attempts to elicit testimony about my son’s horrifying accident, positively evil.
The prosecutor at my 2012 IRS/Phil Spector trial liked Cohen’s poetic statement that I accused him of being the author of my [misfortune]. That’s a bald-faced lie and I do not view the situation as poetic. The man understood I was reporting his tax fraud to IRS, attempted to offer me anything I wanted (and Betsy Superfon confirmed this after speaking with Cohen and told me the type of deal Cohen/Kory had in mind could not be faxed …. She thought it was “illegal.” Greenberg’s lawsuit recounts this as I documented it at the time – with evidence – for Boies Schiller), bankrupted me, withheld monies due for services rendered, and has now stolen my share of IP.
His [Cohen's] tactics work well before LA Superior Court and with local government entities such as the former DA and City Attorney, numerous prosecutors, etc. Boies Schiller advised me to go wired to my meetings with Cohen/Kory. They advised me that they personally felt Cohen/Kory were attempting to engage me in criminal conduct. I agreed. In fact, Investigator Brian Bennett (Phil Spector investigator) recalled my telling him in the spring of 2005 that Cohen and Kory were attempting to blackmail me and confirming that Cohen lies about Phil Spector – see his three highly embellished good rock and roll story about Spector and a gun before LA Superior Court. The Grand Jury legal adviser instructed me to contact Phil Spector’s appellate attorney about the situation.
The
Allegation That Leonard Cohen Molested His Daughter, Stephen Gianelli, And
NAMBLA, Will Be Addressed With The Appellate Division
In 2008 a
Colorado court issued another permanent restraining order against her, linked
here: http://www.scribd.com/
In 2009
Ms. Lynch fled to Texas to avoid being arrested for violating the Colorado
restraining order and resumed her internet harassment from a homeless shelter;
she then returned to Los Angeles and began accusing Leonard Cohen of giving
false testimony against entertainer, Phil Spector, who was convicted of murder
that year (Mr. Cohen never testified in that trial – that is a part of Ms.
Lynch’s delusion).
I didn’t flee
Boulder in 2009 for Texas. Shortly after the 2008 hearing I filed a
motion to quash the Boulder order. I addressed Cohen’s excessive perjury
and fraudulent misrepresentations. The judge refused to vacate the matter
and reminded me that I asked that the order be made permanent. I did ask
her during the proceedings if the order would protect me from Cohen, who I
viewed as dangerous, and noted that due to the insanity unfolding at the
hearing, that the order should be made permanent. I will address the unconstitutionally
vague use of the word “permanent” with respect to orders – such as those in
California – that expire.
Since 2009, numerous parties (including Paulette Brandt) have confirmed what Boulder Court repeatedly advised me: that the order expired on February 15, 2009 and the motion to dismiss was entered on the record in January 2009 after I left Boulder. The Court had a hotel address for me; a friend’s address where I never resided in Boulder; and Cohen was not a resident and did not have minimal ties to Boulder. I have now received written confirmation from the Boulder Court that explains why I was told the order expired on February 15, 2009 and confirming that the order was not a “domestic violence” order although when it was registered in California it transformed into “domestic violence” order fraudulently. That’s why I was arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced using the “domestic violence” statutes and Streeter in her sentencing memorandum (which raises very serious and potentially criminal issue with respect to her conduct and a “domestic violence” counselor who never met me but whose office has confirmed with me and others that she does not diagnose people without meeting them) mentioned that Cohen and I were in a statutory required “dating relationship.” Cohen perjured himself over this issue and testified honestly at the March 23, 2012 hearing when he stated that we were in a purely business relationship and I never stole from him – just his peace of mind. After diligently pursuing the transcript from that hearing for approximately two years, I received it not too long ago. I have a witness who could not believe what I was being told about the court reporter and this transcript, confirmed it herself, and has been unable – for a year or more – to obtain a transcript in a matter she is working on. She has also reported a lawyer’s failure to serve numerous documents to the State Bar. The judge in that matter vacated the judgment and raised fraud as an issue re. that situation on the record. From what I can tell, fraud with respect to service is rampant in Los Angeles but this doesn’t seem to bother LA Superior Court. Evidence is merely replaced with a fraudulent narrative.
Since 2009, numerous parties (including Paulette Brandt) have confirmed what Boulder Court repeatedly advised me: that the order expired on February 15, 2009 and the motion to dismiss was entered on the record in January 2009 after I left Boulder. The Court had a hotel address for me; a friend’s address where I never resided in Boulder; and Cohen was not a resident and did not have minimal ties to Boulder. I have now received written confirmation from the Boulder Court that explains why I was told the order expired on February 15, 2009 and confirming that the order was not a “domestic violence” order although when it was registered in California it transformed into “domestic violence” order fraudulently. That’s why I was arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced using the “domestic violence” statutes and Streeter in her sentencing memorandum (which raises very serious and potentially criminal issue with respect to her conduct and a “domestic violence” counselor who never met me but whose office has confirmed with me and others that she does not diagnose people without meeting them) mentioned that Cohen and I were in a statutory required “dating relationship.” Cohen perjured himself over this issue and testified honestly at the March 23, 2012 hearing when he stated that we were in a purely business relationship and I never stole from him – just his peace of mind. After diligently pursuing the transcript from that hearing for approximately two years, I received it not too long ago. I have a witness who could not believe what I was being told about the court reporter and this transcript, confirmed it herself, and has been unable – for a year or more – to obtain a transcript in a matter she is working on. She has also reported a lawyer’s failure to serve numerous documents to the State Bar. The judge in that matter vacated the judgment and raised fraud as an issue re. that situation on the record. From what I can tell, fraud with respect to service is rampant in Los Angeles but this doesn’t seem to bother LA Superior Court. Evidence is merely replaced with a fraudulent narrative.
In 2008, I
moved to Northern New Jersey. A friend of my family’s, who has known me
since I was a teenager, flew me to NJ, asked me to assist with organizing his
office, and gave me a large 5 bedroom home to live in, car, had me phone two
different lawyers who worked for him to explain what was going on with Cohen,
these corporate entities, etc. In February 2009 (after staying with the
Southard Family and celebrating Thanksgiving, Christmas, etc. – they are very
old friends of my parents and John was my father’s business partner), I decided
to travel to California to meet His Holiness Kusum Lingpa who was planning to
visit at that time. While I was traveling, His Holiness died (he had made
it to Bejing and returned to Tibet very ill). I decided to stop in
Boulder and an acquaintance and I drove to Texas. Gianelli criminally
harassed me and others while I was in Texas. He also contacted the
authorities in Boulder after my son contacted him regarding his slanderous blog
articles. That is when Gianelli began to relentlessly harass my older
son. Both of my sons have addressed this harassment and my older son
recently copied the City Attorney (who was copied in on emails to me, my sons,
sister, and others criminally harassing them) on his email where he nailed
Gianelli and Walsh’s unconscionable conduct. The City Attorney lied
during the March 23, 2012 hearing, to prevent me from being released OR during
my trial, that I was estranged from my sons. My older son wanted to
testify and she was present at a sidebar and I addressed that my older son had
driven to Berkeley to place my belongings in storage and paid my rent in
Berkeley at the time. This was addressed in my letters to Cutler that
Streeter received and attached to her memorandum. Gianelli likes to quote
Bruce Cutler so I always noted that he and Cutler should get married as I have
now heard directly from Phil Spector. Cutler represented Phil Spector and
no one I know thinks I believe I know him – including Paulette Brandt. In
any event, I relocated to Houston, Texas and stayed for a number of months at
the Star of Hope Mission.
As for
Cohen’s statements presented to the Phil Spector Grand Jury, Mick Brown (UK
Telegraph) repeatedly confirmed in writing that he has reviewed the
testimony/transcripts and Cohen’s statements were presented. They also
appear in the DA’s motion in limine filed in Phil Spector’s case. That
version of events involves Phil Spector holding a semi-automatic to Cohen’s
chest. It doesn’t mention the bottle of wine usually included in the news
media accounts. No version involves the “cross bow” Cohen has used in
other versions. The prosecutor elicited testimony about Phil Spector and
Cohen ultimately ended up testifying that Phil Spector held an automatic to his
head. He wasn’t afraid and didn’t feel Spector was “hostile.”
Approximately one week prior to this testimony, Cohen wrote the City Attorney
and advised that he had met with LASD about Phil Spector. I met with LASD
when I was leaving Cohen’s house as they were arriving. I had informed my
lawyer, Steve Cron, that I did NOT want to be dragged into the Spector matter
and feared it would be used to stir up a custody matter. In Cohen’s email
to the prosecutor, he confirmed that the incident with Phil Spector involved a
gun held to his neck. There are now three versions of that alleged gun
incident before LA Superior Court. I have discussed this with the LA
Criminal Grand Jury’s legal adviser and Judge Larry Fidler’s clerk who advised
me to write the DA about the situation. I explained that the DA had
threatened me and was now evidently retaliating. Wendy advised me to
write the DA and copy Judge Fidler in if that felt more comfortable based on
what I told her. It’s impossible to know what version the government
believes.
In 2010
Ms. Lynch fled to Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, and then to Berkeley, California,
where Ms. Lynch was arrested in 2012 for
multiple violations of the 2008 Colorado restraining order (registered in
California in 2011) and for email and telephonic harassment. In April of 2012
Ms. Lynch was sentenced to 18-months in jail for sending thousands of
harassing emails to Mr. Cohen berating his penis size, accusing him of
child molestation, and being responsible for Phil Spector’s murder conviction,
and for leaving scores of intoxicated, angry, and threatening voice messages at
the entertainer’s home telephone number. (See order denying Ms. Lynch’s habeas
petition, attached, explaining that prosecution.)
I did not
flee to Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, but this story continues to unfold and remains
in flux. After visiting my son in 2010, I was invited to Ft. Lauderdale
by a friend of mine. Gianelli then located my ex-husband (who I had previously
discussed this harassment with) and began criminally harassing my friend who
filed a criminal complaint with Ft. Lauderdale PD and also spoke to his
lawyer. My ex-husband wrote that he had no idea what Gianelli was talking
about re. their conversation and was not clear if Gianelli was the individual
who had contacted him previously to advise him that the fraud individual was my
social worker (which I did not have), explained to him that I have a crack
addiction (which I do not), and told him not to help me financially.
Cohen and my testimony on the indecent exposure matter is as follows. I
had written journalist Glenn Greenwald that a gay friend of mine, after hearing
that Cohen forced me to read to him while he bathed (exposed himself, etc.),
thought it was relevant to ask about certain details I may have
witnessed. This is normally addressed as indecent exposure and sexual
harassment but not when a starstruck prosecutor, willing to do and say
anything, is involved. The City Attorney has problems, from what I (Tom
Hanks and others) have experienced, with sycophants and celebrities. They
also appear to assist celebrities who are confronting their own legal issues
and attempt to assist them with those issues.
I was
wrongfully arrested in Berkeley, California and will address that and the fraud
domestic violence order and prosecution (perjured testimony re. “dating
relationship,” etc. in my federal lawsuit and the “domestic violence”
registration with LA Superior Court in a motion I will file soon. Leonard
Cohen also, in a clear attempt to stir up a custody matter, went into my
younger son’s father’s office and advised him (as one of his first lines of
defense in response to the letter he and his lawyer received from my lawyers on
October 27, 2004 re. these entities and my tax liability which is an ongoing
issue) that I was having sex with Oliver Stone when Lindsey and I were
together. This is a bald-faced lie. I also never accused Cohen of
being responsible for Phil Spector’s murder conviction although every article
about Phil Spector, for the most part, addresses one version of Cohen’s highly
embellished gun story. Actually, the prosecutor said I was stone cold
sober. I merely advised her, when she insisted on this fact, that Cohen
is the one who said it. He’s also the one who worked with a sound
engineer. The Scientist will review the evidence I have in my possession
(re. the voice mails that LAPD was clear were not date or time stamped) to
explain how it was altered in terms of sound, speed, distortion, and whether or
not they may have been edited. The denial of my writ, based on a
situation whereby I did not have any evidence or my file from the PD, confirmed
that one of the reasons it was denied was due to the fact that I had not
attached the evidence from the “IRS binder.” I attempted to obtain that
from the City Attorney. I know she freely admitted providing my public
defenders with this information and I was pro per with respect to the writ.
In any event, lawyers have been clear that the appellate division of LA
Superior Court overturns nothing except a possible search warrant/4th amendment violation.
The Prosecutor's Attempt To Turn
Sexual Harassment Into A Leonard Cohen Annoyance Will Be Addressed With The
Appellate Division
Francisco, Leonard Cohen’s sexual harassment of me is not my
intent to annoy this man. He would have me read legal and business
documents to him while he took bubble baths. I explained this to a friend
of mine who then asked me if he had a small penis. The fact that the
Domestic Violence Unit of the City Attorney’s office views sexual harassment as
an attempt to annoy someone is positively inconceivable. If Leonard Cohen
doesn’t want people talking about his penis (or asking about it) then he should
not expose himself to his female personal manager. This is irrelevant to
the prosecutor. She is, from my perspective, a lunatic. Does
Leonard Cohen’s penis interest Cooley or does Cooley think Cohen has a big penis?
What is the issue here re. Cooley and Cohen’s penis? Does Streeter, who
has clearly attempted to sabotage the IRS, think the IRS is actually interested
in Cohen’s penis? Perhaps the sexual harassment and the fact that I was
forced to read documents - such as Grubman Indursky’s memo re. the Traditional
Holdings deal - to this man while he bathed interests them. This incident
seems entirely legitimate. So legitimate that Boies Schiller felt Neal
Greenberg should include it in his lawsuit against Leonard Cohen.
SEXUAL
HARASSMENT
Streeter:
And is there an S. Cooley -- is an S. Cooley one of the recipients?
Cohen:
Yes, S. Cooley is a recipient.
Streeter:
What is the subject, Mr. Cohen, of that email? RT 259
Cohen:
And, yes -- oh, subject. Re: And, yes, Leonard Cohen does
have a small, if non-existent penis …
Streeter:
The first sentence in the email.
Cohen:
Glen [Glenn Greenwald/Guardian UK], Michael asked the crucial -- the
crucial question his week. Does Cohen, who would have me read business
legal documents while he was in the bubble bath, have a small penis? RT
260
Streeter:
Was the IRS one of the recipients?
Cohen:
I’m sorry?
Streeter:
IRS.
Cohen:
Yes, the IRS is a recipient. RT 261
I think
the prosecutor attempted to mislead the jury re. the elements of the intent to
annoy insanity. Cohen’s being annoyed is not an element of this so-called
crime that I view as unconstitutionally vague and overly broad. Who knows
what annoyed means. Furthermore, the judge did not correctly instruct the
jurors on the actual elements of this alleged crime. But, that’s
not prosecutorial misconduct - just a point I’m raising for you, Francisco.
“Both by the volume and the content.” Sounds like someone was
hanging out with lawyers.
MISLEADING -
COHEN’S BEING ANNOYED IS NOT AN ELEMENT OF THE CRIME. JURY INSTRUCTIONS
DID NOT ACCURATELY ADDRESS THE ELEMENTS OF INTENT TO ANNOY.
Streeter:
Were you annoyed by that email?
Cohen:
Both by the volume and the content. RT 262
Streeter:
Were you annoyed by the voice mail messages?
Cohen:
Annoyed and alarmed by the voice mail messages. RT 262
Kelley
Lynch Cross:
Streeter:
And the subject about that email is Mr. Cohen’s penis.
Lynch:
… My gay friend, Michael, asked me, what size Mr. Cohen’s penis was, and
felt that perhaps he’d like to discuss that. RT 506
The
people clearly do not understand why sexual harassment is unacceptable in a
business relationship - and that includes exposing oneself to their female
personal manager.
Streeter:
Are the people correct in understanding that you don’t see that as annoying
to send out a mass email about a gentleman’s penis size?
Lynch:
I have no idea. Mr. Cohen didn’t mind looking at people defecating
on one another in front of me.
Streeter:
Do you consider that annoying, Ms. Lynch.
Lynch:
I have no idea. I would consider it annoying to have to ask for tax
information for six years. RT 508
Francisco,
Leonard Cohen went into my son’s father’s office - with his lawyer Robert Kory
- and falsely accused me of having sex with Oliver Stone. Why would
a prosecutor believe that this was meant to annoy Leonard Cohen? Leonard
Cohen’s conduct appears to annoy Leonard Cohen who dragged Oliver Stone into
this situation for reasons I cannot even imagine. This was evidently one
of his first lines of defense with respect to the allegations that he committed
criminal tax fraud and his full; understanding that I intended to report it to
the IRS.
Lynch:
Because he went into my son’s father’s office and said I had sex with
Oliver Stone.
Streeter:
Okay. So you remember saying that, right?
Lynch:
Because he went into my son’s father’s office and -- after we parted
ways, and said I had sex with Oliver Stone, which I did not.
Streeter;
Do you think that’s annoying?
Lynch:
No I think it’s outrageous that he would go in and lie about that … He
accused me of having sex with his tax lawyer, which I did not. I found
that outrageous. To my son’s father.
Streeter:
You don’t think that’s annoying.
Lynch:
It was indeed annoying to me. Unbelievable. RT 509
Streeter:
Do you think it’s annoying -- would be annoying to Mr. Cohen?
Lynch:
Why would Mr. Cohen accuse me of having sex with his tax lawyer and
Oliver Stone and be annoyed? It seems like I should be annoyed since he
lied. RT 510
Ms. Lynch was released early due to jail overcrowding, moved
to Pleasant Hill, California, and immediately resumed her email and
internet harassment campaign, including transmitting emails to her trial
prosecutor claiming that the prosecutor was on Ms. Lynch’s “kill list”.
I’ve
addressed the situation re. the disposition matrix with CIA and have asked them
to testify in my federal matters regarding the emails sent to FBI and DOJ with
a “P.S.” about Streeter. I didn’t create the drone Valentine card
connected to Glenn Greenwald’s article on a website about drones and a DOJ
white memorandum.
THIS EVIDENCE
(drone card image) is attached for the sole purpose of addressing Gianelli’s
slander and fraudulent allegations to ICE about this matter:
Glenn
Greenwald’s article (linked on the above site directly under the drone card
image) is available online at:
I was also
thinking of using this type of image/saying on greeting cards. I had a
greeting card company that was destroyed over this situation. Hollywood
should pay close attention to my prosecution over someone else’s work, a rapper
who is facing life imprisonment for an album cover, and other incidents like
Coyote Shivers’ situation where he facetiously noted online to phone LAPD if
anyone noticed his wife “stalking” him. The City Attorney’s office, who
does retaliate using probation as well, accused him of engaging in a probation
violation and harassment with respect to that comment and the fact that he ran
into his ex wife inadvertently while dining with his present wife. A
National Men’s Organization has now taken on Coyote Shivers case, advised the
City Attorney and others to preserve evidence, hired an investigator I have
spoken with, filed a complaint with the Criminal Grand Jury of Los Angeles, and
asked DOJ to audit the City Attorney’s domestic violence unit and use of VAWA
funds to prosecute people for celebrities who are lying and have engaged in
perjury on the stand. I have asked DOJ to do the same but also asked them
to audit LA Superior Court as they attempted to extort money from me for
domestic violence “fines” and sentenced me to domestic violence programs such
as anger management, AA, and so forth. Gianelli criminally harassed me
over these requirements which have now been conveniently dropped with
probation. The judge in the probation retaliation matter refused to
review the evidence submitted and simply elected to refuse to address my Brady
Motion which I find unconscionable. He also lied that I was not told, by
the probation commissioner, to represent myself pro per. I asked her to
appoint a lawyer. Someone phoned my appellate attorney, who was livid
over that matter, and he said he could not represent me. Commissioner
Harris, in front of my witness (and this is on the record) advised me to
represent myself. Barela, who belongs in anger management from what I can
tell, told me she didn’t say that. He wasn’t at the hearing where she
did. My witness is well aware of that fact.
http://www.avoiceformen.com/
In 2013
Ms. Lynch was evicted by her Pleasant Hill landlord, who subsequently obtained
a restraining order against her, and after Ms. Lynch again returned to Los
Angeles, the authorities commenced proceedings to revoke Ms. Lynch’s probation
for continued email harassment
Gianelli
contacted the City Attorney and began criminally harassing me, my sons, sister,
and others, while slandering me to the City Attorney and lying about me.
The City Attorney actually encouraged this behavior on his part and expressly
directed him to email me further and asked him to communicate official messages
from the City Attorney’s Office to me. I also had other grievances with
that office, was pro per, and they failed to address my complaints to the City
Attorney’s office and employers in the probation matter. This is a
violation of the professional business code. Furthermore, at least one of
the individuals who retaliated against me retaliated against another individual
and conducted herself in a very similar fashion. He filed a complaint
with the State Bar and also a federal lawsuit.
See response
to Ray Lawrence’s fraudulent allegations together with declarations of Paulette
Brandt and my son who is clear that the criminally harassing emails relate to
IRS, Phil Spector, and Leonard Cohen. He is also clear that I was being
slandered in emails Gianelli, Walsh, and Lawrence sent around (including to
Paulette Brandt), and Cohen’s lawyer (Michelle Rice) was copied in. See
Opposition to Probation document and Brady motion attached.
In
January, 2014 Judge Hess of the Los Angeles Superior Court denied
Ms. Lynch’s (belated) motion to set aside the 2006 $7.9M embezzlement based
default judgment against her, which default judgment also declared that all
interests in which Ms. Lynch formerly held of record in Cohen Related entities
were held in constructive trust for her employer Leonard Cohen, including
Traditional Holdings LLC, which was intended to pay out a private annuity to
Mr. Cohen with his $4M proceeds from the sale to Sony records of his music
catalog, except that by 2004 Kelley Lynch had embezzled all of the money from
Traditional Holdings LLC – along with millions from Cohen’s other accounts.
See shorthand
notes from hearing (attached) rather than listening to Gianelli’s lies and
slander. Korn advised me that he filed something with LA Superior Court
(while I was in jail in January, etc. 2014) but failed to serve me at that
time. Judge Hess’ official order has not been filed with the court and
Korn has failed to provide me with the document. This is a pattern with
respect to Korn who advised me, with a witness present in all instances, that
he would provide me with copies of all documents in the default judgment and
related matter. Cohen abandoned his property for over a year and LA
County decided the taxpayers should pay the bill to deliver it to his
lawyer. I embezzled nothing. Corporate accounts do not belong to
Leonard Cohen who continues to argue alter ego/self-dealing on his part.
IRS views me as a partner re. TH and numerous entities. I have filed an
Identity Theft Affidvait (which IRS recently confirmed) with respect to the
illegal use of my SSN on K1s transmitted to IRS by LCI for 2004 and 2005.
Cohen and his legal representatives refuse to rescind them. This is a
very serious legal issue that has not been litigated and the recent IRS
transcripts I received (on or around December 1, 2014) confirm that these
illegal K-1s were transmitted to them while an IRS required 1099 from Cohen for
the year 2004 was not. So, Cohen’s wholly owned entity can illegally
transmit K-1s to IRS for 2004 and 2005 but Cohen cannot address the legitimate
income he testified I received (and which is addressed in his legal documents
in the default matter). Of course, I also have one email where Cohen
confirmed that I was indeed paid commissions for my fees as personal manager
when he deposited the royalty income (for assets owned by BMT) into his personal
account. Leonard Cohen is the individual who refuses to repay
approximately $6.7 million in loans/expenditures re. TH and refuses to repay
those with interest now in the approximate amount of $4 million. The City
Attorney lied about these assets and attempted to conceal this information from
the jurors. One juror, who should have been reported for misconduct,
relied on her statements after being advised by the judge NOT TO. That
should have provoked an automatic mistrial. However, my lawyers did not even
meet with me and couldn’t get most of the facts straight.
Later that same month, January of 2014, Ms. Lynch was found
to be in violation of her criminal harassment probation and was returned to the
Los Angeles County Jail in Lynwood, California to serve an additional six
months in jail. During that 2014 jail stay, if became necessary to move Ms.
Lynch to the jail psychiatric facility known as “Twin Towers” due to Ms.
Lynch’s unstable psychiatric condition.
Twin Towers
does NOT have a psychiatric facility for women. It has an education
module and I previously worked with their Education Bureau. The judge in
the probation retaliation matter was clear – there were no psychiatric
requirements. Vanderet confirmed the same for the anonymous nut prosecutor
who lies as a first thought from what I witnessed. No one moved me to a
psychiatric facility. That would be at Lynwood and I was only in their
general module for a few days before I was moved to the “education” dorm.
Gianelli wrote me a harassing letter in jail which I found creepy and discussed
with a Sergeant and others who confirmed that they would contact LAPD’s TMU,
FBI, and others, to confirm my complaints to them about this ongoing
harassment. I also explained it to two LAPD detectives Paulette and I met
after my release. I showed them Gianelli’s letter and we discussed his
relationship to Cohen, his representatives and fan the issues, etc. It
was well worth 36 days in jail which ended the fraud probation
requirements. I spoke to the judge who confirmed that, while the
probation department computer shows outstanding fines and fees (related to
domestic violence), he dropped them and the file was closed. More
confusion at LA Superior Court.
I am a
retired lawyer, living on the island of Crete, Greece. I have an unblemished
criminal and professional record without so much as a speeding ticket on my
California DVM record. Nor have I ever been the subject of a restraining order
of any kind.
Now that
Ms. Lynch has found your email address (the other agencies on her cc list have
been ignoring her for a decade now), you can expect many more emails from
this deranged, convicted harasser and criminal.
I will
continue documents matters privately for IRS, FBI, DOJ, FTB, and others.
I will simply send ICE the motions I am filing re. Cohen matters before LA
Superior Court. They address tax fraud, theft in the millions, will
attach evidence and declarations (addressing the fraud before Judge Hess re
many matters including service), and ask Hess to forward this case to the DA
for perjury prosecutions, State Bar for disciplinary action, etc. I will
also ask Hess to clarify that nebulous 2006 Order being used to subvert IRS and
state filing and reporting requirements (including with respect to numerous
corporate entities who have failed to file returns for 2004 and 2005 when my
name was attached to them in the corporate records, agreements, stock units,
and numerous tax returns and K-1s, etc.)
Very
truly yours,
Stephen
R. Gianelli – CAL BAR#83476
Attorney-at-law
(ret.)
Crete,
Greece
This morning
(and last night), I (and others) received numerous harassing emails from
Gianelli. They have been forwarded to IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Google’s Legal
Investigators privately. Gianelli also advised ICE that Babcock’s Order
confirms that Cohen does not have to provide me with IRS required information,
etc. Judge Babcock ONLY addressed the inter-pleader funds that Cohen
demanded were his. That proves alter ego re. Traditional Holdings, LLC.
