Kelley Lynch<kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> | Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:18 PM |
To: "SandraJo.Streeter" <SandraJo.Streeter@lacity.org>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, *irs.commissioner@irs.gov, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, scooley <scooley@da.lacounty.gov>, ajackson <ajackson@da.lacounty.gov>, "Truc.Do" <Truc.Do@mto.com>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>, jthompson <jthompson@da.lacounty.gov> | |
Cc: mkelly@pubdef.lacounty.gov, NRamnaney@pubdef.lacounty.gov, pboche@pubdef.lacounty.gov, David Moorhead <moorheadlaw@qwestoffice.net> | |
Sandra Jo Streeter,
I now represent myself. I have brought Gianelli´s harassment and witness tampering to your attention. You represent the PEOPLE. NOT Leonard Cohen although I saw you gushing in your cell phone about him. You had no right to speak on behalf of the IRS. If you have anything to say to me, or any legal documents to serve me, hit REPLY ALL. Copy in the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and FTB: Gianelli has contacted my taxpayer advocate - Doug Davis-FTB,about me and that is outrageous. He has no idea about my tax filings and neither does Cohen whose perjury is excessive. Did you rehabilitate him when he lied about me? I don´t think so and Francisco Suarez and I are discussing the extent of the perjury and a number of people have advised me to have them call them. That includes, but is not limited to, Detective Viramontes-LAPD (who contacted Agent Tejeda-IRS), DDA Bill Hodgman (who appears in the LAPD report but does NOT recall the meeting that was recounted there), and others. I will now provide Judge Vanderet with the evidence that I have been harassed relentlessly by Gianelli since my so-called release. And, he has contacted you after publicly stating that my lawyer discussed witnesses with him and what they did or did not corroborate. This should be brought to the attention of the appellate court by Francisco Suarez. I will discuss that with Mr. Suarez. Kelley Lynch On 11/20/12, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote: > Mike Kelly, > > For the record, Captain Bornman and Doug Davis advised Gianelli not to > contact them. They did not advise me to do the same. I contacted > Captain Bornman about Gianelli yesterday as well as Judge Robert > Vanderet. I have asked that you be removed from my case due to > Gianelli´s public assertions that a public defender of mine has > communicated with him about my witnesses and what they did or did not > corroborate. That is unconscionable activity and he - NOT I - made > that accusation. People are wondering if Gianelli is actually on > Cohen´s payroll. Perhaps Investigator Frayeh really understands > Gianelli and Jackson since he thought Gianelli found a sympathetic ear > with Jackson about me Does Jackson want to know what my son, Rutger, > witnessed re. SWAT, Killer King, etc. Well, he should do as David > Moorhead advised me to instruct that office. CALL DAVID MOORHEAD. He > knows why he believed Rutger is a MATERIAL WITNESS for Phil Spector. > I didn´t sign my letters to Cutler ¨Love, Kelley.¨ I signed my letter > to Phil Spector, ¨Love, Kelley.¨ He signs his letters to me ¨Love, > Phillip.¨ > > Kelley Lynch > > On 11/20/12, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote: >> P.S. The only advice I have been given, by Kelly, is to contact him >> if anyone advises me to stop emailing them. I have advised Gianelli >> to cease and desist and the same is true for Cohen´s fan who wrote me >> copying in Michelle Rice. Gianelli is a stark raving lunatic and bald >> faced liar. I have followed the advice of counsel. I have also read >> public allegations, posted by Gianelli that I have captured and will >> provide Judge Vanderet, about my public defenders communicating with >> him about my witnesses and what they did or did not corroborate. The >> lawyer at the PD office I am working with is SHOCKED. That is the >> correct reaction. How would this lunatic know what my lawyers have >> advised me and why haven´t my lawyers hit reply all and advised him to >> CEASE AND DESIST. >> >> Clearly, you are going to do what you are going to do and are >>>>>>> incapable >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> following your counsel's advice >> >> >> On 11/20/12, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Messrs. Kelly, Ramnaney, and Boche, >>> >>> Why is Gianelli copying you in on his emails? Have you advised him to >>> cease and desist? I have not waived attorney-client privilege with >>> any of you. Gianelli has now contacted Sandra Jo Streeter, a woman I >>> have filed complaints about with her supervisor, and is clearly >>> dangerously unstable. He has publicly alleged that he spoke to one of >>> my public defenders about witnesses and what they did or did not >>> corroborate. The lawyer at the PD´s office is shocked. The State Bar >>> advised me to bring this to the attention of the court and now >>> Streeter has been contacted. I would like to know if any of you have >>> advised him to cease and desist. This man has harassed everyone near >>> to me. He has called men, like The Scientist, and lied to him. Even >>> Cohen testified that I have a legal background and Streeter famously >>> noted that I can go toe to toe with anyone. I am my counsel of record >>> now. I have advised the PD office to remove Mike Kelly as my trial >>> counsel so Streeter is obliged to speak to me, per the State Bar. I >>> think Gianelli´s conduct violates Cohen´s restraining order - as does >>> Cohen´s fan´s deranged emails to me with Cohen´s lawyer copied in. >>> Michelle Rice LIED under oath when she said she cannot provide me with >>> tax documents because they violate the restraining order. These >>> people will lie about anything. >>> >>> Gianelli has again been advised to cease and desist and none of you >>> will prevent me from communicating with the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, >>> FTB; or the news media about Cohen´s criminal tax fraud, the evidence >>> conealed from my jurors, or anything else. l It is called freedom of >>> speech. Harassing me, etc., is NOT. This is Gianelli´s move because >>> I have once again brought information about him and his activity to >>> the attention of the IRS and FBI with respect to what appears to be an >>> attempt to infiltrate my defense. How low will LA Confidential go >>> now? >>> >>> Phil Spector had a right to know about Cohen´s email to Streeter, his >>> testimony about Phil Spector and a gun, and the fact that Cooley and >>> Jackson were repeatedly raised by Streeter and used against me. I was >>> advised that I was probably a witness in the Phil Spector matter and >>> Investigator John Thompson should have received a subpoena. >>> >>> Kelley Lynch >>> >>> On 11/20/12, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Sandra Jo Streeter, >>>> >>>> I view this as an outrageous situation. This will absolutely be >>>> brought to Judge Vanderet´s attention as will the targeting of my >>>> children, elderly parents, sister and her husband, and many others by >>>> this dangerously unstable individual. The lawyer at the PD office I >>>> read Gianelli´s public allegations to was in SHOCK and the State Bar >>>> thinks there is serious misconduct here as well. No wonder people >>>> view lawyers as liars. >>>> >>>> Gianelli has once again been advised to CEASE AND DESIST. What right >>>> does this man have to lie about me, slander me, relentlessly target >>>> me, etc. for Leonard Cohen. Everything is documented and my CEASE AND >>>> DESIST letters and his allegations about a public defender of mine >>>> speaking to him about their conversation with my witness will be >>>> brought to the attention of the court. It is outrageous. >>>> >>>> Perhaps you think it is acceptable to lie about another human being, >>>> which you have done here, but I do not. If LA Superior Court >>>> tolerates that, it is their problem and it explains a lot of the >>>> corruption in Los Angeles. Of course, Phil Spector´s legal team >>>> should have been contacted. The Grand Jury Adviser took the various >>>> versions of the gun stories Cohen has now told (two different versions >>>> are in my trial alone) - as did Judge Fidler´s clerk. That´s why I >>>> contacted Cutler but have now heard from Phil Spector. I was never in >>>> a dating relationship with Leonard Cohen and he has lied about the >>>> refund, the IRS, and me. I have brought all of this to the attention >>>> of Agent Tejeda-IRS. >>>> >>>> I have again advised Gianelli to cease and desist and question the >>>> fact that he contacted you personally in an attempt to harm me. I >>>> have filed complaints with your supervisor, Will Revera, and will note >>>> that in my letter to the judge. >>>> >>>> Kelley Lynch >>>> >>>> On 11/20/12, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> To the IRS and FBI, >>>>> >>>>> You will be copied in on my letter to Judge Robert Vanderet, as will >>>>> Agent Tejeda. This situation is a legal outrage and appears to be a >>>>> blatant attempt to infiltrate my defense. This man´s lies to the >>>>> prosecutor about me are unconscionable. He has sent me countless >>>>> emails since my release. You have been copied in on them and I have >>>>> repeatedly advised him to CEASE AND DESIST. I will print those emails >>>>> out and attach them to my letter to the judge. There´s no legal >>>>> impediment for my communicating with Streeter. As I just said to >>>>> someone witnessing this situation . this is what LA Confidential looks >>>>> like up close and personal. I am privately, as you know, >>>>> communicating with a criminal litigator. I want to know what >>>>> Streeter´s professional responsbility is with respect to a man that is >>>>> outrageously harassing me and appears to be engaged in misconduct that >>>>> involves my witnesses. >>>>> >>>>> All the best, >>>>> Kelley >>>>> >>>>> On 11/20/12, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Francisco, >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me know if you are unclear that I have advised this man countless >>>>>> times to CEASE AND DESIST. He has now copied in, once again, my >>>>>> public defenders. I think this should be viewed as an absolute >>>>>> attempt to infiltrate my defense. Cohen´s fan, Walsh, has written me >>>>>> with Cohen´s lawyer - Michelle Rice- copied in. I am doing what the >>>>>> State Bar advised me to do. I am writing Judge Robert >>>>>> Vanderet,copying in both judges from the two probation hearings, and >>>>>> others, and bringing this unconscionable activity to their attention. >>>>>> People who are with me are in shock. The other side, Sandra Jo >>>>>> Streeter, will receive a copy of my letter to Judge Robert Vanderet. >>>>>> I think this activity relates to my appeal and the fact that so many >>>>>> lies are on the record, including with respect to the IRS. I would >>>>>> like to speak to you personally about Gianelli and the fact that he >>>>>> has written you as well. Please feel free to speak to my sister´s >>>>>> attorney. He spoke to this man and advised him to CEASE AND DESIST. >>>>>> He does not stop. He harassed my friend and we both filed a criminal >>>>>> complaint with the police department. I want to know if his emails >>>>>> to >>>>>> the prosecutor are now discoverable. I also want to know if this >>>>>> INDIRECTLY violates the restraining order as Gianelli has >>>>>> relentlessly >>>>>> targeted me since communicating with Cohen´s lawyers in 2009. >>>>>> >>>>>> All the best, >>>>>> Kelley >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/20/12, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Gianelli, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My lawyers have advised me of no such thing. One or more of them >>>>>>> appear >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> be >>>>>>> communicating with you - per your public allegations - with respect >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> attorney-client >>>>>>> privileged information and witnesses. That would include my son, >>>>>>> Rutger, whose Whole >>>>>>> Foods matter was dragged into this unconscionable situation. I have >>>>>>> never said that >>>>>>> I thought Cohen ripped his fingers off. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The State Bar advised me to bring your conduct and the allegations >>>>>>> about my court >>>>>>> appointed attorney or attorneys (who you have ONCE AGAIN COPIED IN - >>>>>>> Kelly, Ramnaney, and Boche) to the atttention of the judge. Judge >>>>>>> Robert Vanderet will absolutely receive a letter with printed copies >>>>>>> of your voluminous emails to me and my emails to you advising you to >>>>>>> CEASE AND DESIST. I do not want you to write me legal advice. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As for Sandra Jo Streeter, your communications with her could be >>>>>>> viewed as her attempt to infiltrate my defense. I intend to >>>>>>> subpoena >>>>>>> all communications between you and her. You are aligned with >>>>>>> Leonard >>>>>>> Cohen and his representatives and have relentlessly contacted me, my >>>>>>> family members (including my son who was a minor), and many people >>>>>>> near to me. I believe you contacted Bruce Cutler in an attempt to >>>>>>> determine what, if anything, he has to do with Phil Spector. I have >>>>>>> now personally heard from Phil Spector. Sandra Jo Streeter thinks >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> is appropriate for a man harassing me, potentially engaged in >>>>>>> witness >>>>>>> tampering, witness intimidation, stalking, lying to the IRS and FBI, >>>>>>> etc. to contact her and lie about me. That says more about Streeter >>>>>>> than it will ever say about me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Advising you relentessly to cease and desist is NOT evidence of my >>>>>>> mental health. It is evidence that you are a common criminal who >>>>>>> should be prosecuted by the IRS and FBI and disbarred. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CEASE AND DESIST. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kelley Lynch >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/20/12, STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Ms. Lynch, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As I am sure your attorneys have advised you, it is highly improper >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> to contact your trial judge *ex-parte*, that is other than through >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> noticed motion filed by your counsel of record and your trial judge >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> ethically prohibited from receiving or acting on any such >>>>>>>> *ex-parte*communications; your trial judge many not communicate >>>>>>>> *ex-parte* (without notice to the other side) with any of the >>>>>>>> parties >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> case pending before him or their counsel. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As for your direct communications with your prosecutor Sandra Jo >>>>>>>> Streeter, >>>>>>>> since you are a party to pending litigation who is represented by >>>>>>>> counsel >>>>>>>> and Ms. Streeter represents an adverse party in that litigation, >>>>>>>> she >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> ethically prohibited from communicating with you except through >>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>> counsel of record. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> While there is no legal impediment for you directing unilateral >>>>>>>> communications at Ms. Streeter, in my experience as a criminal >>>>>>>> defense >>>>>>>> lawyer for over 34 years, the rare criminal defendants who are >>>>>>>> foolish >>>>>>>> enough to engage in such direct communications only succeed in >>>>>>>> harming >>>>>>>> their own interests. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Clearly, you are going to do what you are going to do and are >>>>>>>> incapable >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> following your counsel's advice or acting in your own self >>>>>>>> interest. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This (along with the cc list on your emails) is yet more evidence >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> need professional help, which I would again urge you to voluntarily >>>>>>>> seek. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Stephen R. Gianelli-SBN 83476 >>>>>>>> Law Office of Stphen R. Gianelli >>>>>>>> PO Box 475013 >>>>>>>> San Francisco, CA 94147 |
Public Interest, Public Figures, First Amendment, and some celebrity gossip - because, why not?