Kelley Lynch's Email To The Lawyer Representing Sam Manning's Daughter In Another Karina Von Watteville Fimbel Matter

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:27 PM
Subject: Sam Manning - Karina Von Watteville
To: rschachter@hbsattorneys.com, Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>

Mr. Schachter,

One other point, if you would like to speak with me, Paulette Brandt, or Linda Carol, please feel free to call us.  I will absolutely be filing Linda Carol's declaration (which she is writing) with Judge Hess (Case No. BC338322).  It will be attached to my Motion to Vacate Leonard Cohen's fraudulent domestic violence order.  He uses restraining orders to discredit me.  And, it will be submitted to the Small Claims Court in the Paulette Brandt rental arrears case.  A Bay Area lawyer, I do not know, has relentlessly targeted me, slandered me, witness tampered, and stalked me - and many others - for six straight years now.  That includes my sons.  This is a declaration my younger son wrote.  Gianelli's vile emails made him physically sick.  Gianelli has targeted every single individual who provided me with a declaration.  My son's declaration can be found in this document.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/157116027/Kelley-Lynch-Leonard-Cohen-IRS-Ray-Lawrence-Stephen-Gianelli-Etc

Please review my riverdeepbook.blogpost.com site for further details.  Karina Von Watteville has attempted to argue, through Stephen Gianelli, that I harassed her.  That is a bald faced lie.  I sent her a handful of cease and desist letters and copied IRS, FBI, and DOJ in on those emails.  Cohen's tax fraud is egregious and neither he, his lawyers, nor this Criminal Stalker Gianelli speaks for IRS.  LA Superior Court refused to permit me to put Agent Luis Tejeda, head of fraud for Western Division of U.S., on the witness stand.  I don't think that will be true in my federal RICO lawsuit.  If Karina Von Watteville attempts to sue me or argues that I harassed her (when she is the person who became obsessed with me and began slandering me and lying about me) in a Court of law, that will become perjury and ICE will be formally notified.  I have had it with people I view as lying con artists.  

Stephen Gianelli is now writing Von Watteville's legal documents.  I've enclosed his argument submitted to the Small Claims Court where he and Von Watteville are attempting to defraud Paulette Brandt of rental arrears totaling $6,700.  The Court ruled in her favor but Gianelli began representing her.  He is now arguing directly with the Court over this matter.  

In any event, I am documenting everything and want to know why, after receiving Paulette Brandt's rent demand letter, Von Watteville contacted Leonard Cohen's lawyer.  She probably smelled cash but that's just my educated guess.

All the best,

Kelley Lynch

P.S.  Gianelli generally argues that I'm a drunken slut.  I rarely have a glass of wine.  He doesn't know me but has motive.  Here's Linda Carol's declaration that is still in draft from.  She thinks the information Von Watteville told her is relevant because it disturbed her and that's one of the reasons she wanted to rent a room from Paulette Brandt.  Gianelli is now threatening us over this declaration although it is being filed in Court and the truth is the defense to slander.  I don't know Von Watteville either and do not intend to know this woman.  The mediator in Small Claims told me to bring her conduct to the attention of the Small Claims judge.  I will and I will also send him Gianelli's criminally harassing and slanderous emails where he confirms that he is representing Von Watteville and writing legal documents for her.

Paulette Brandt Elliot vs. Karina Ingeburg Von Watteville Fimbel

Case No. LAM 14M09452

DECLARATION

1.      Paulette Brandt is the plaintiff in this action and is also the moving party.

2.      Through her “motion for a new hearing” Brandt seeks to overturn the judgment of this court in favor of defendant Karina Von Watteville following the trial on the merits of Brandt’s complaint.

3.      Brandt seeks to avoid the clear statutory policy in favor of the finality of a small claims judgment in favor of the deendant provided by CCP Section 116.710(a) [plaintiff in a small claims action shall have no right to appeal the judgment on plaintiff’s claim], by filing a purported “motion for a new hearing” (trial) – which is a procedure that does not exist in the Code provisions applicable to small claims proceedings, based on grounds that are unknown in the law (inadvertent error by the court”).

4.      When the legislature enacted the less formal statutory scheme applicable to small claims proceedings (Code Civ. Pro. Sections 116.201 – 116.798), the intent was to render the post-trial motions applicable to unlimited jurisdiction civil cases, such as Brandt’s motion for a new trial on the merits.  INAPPLICABLE to small claims actions  (See Eloby v. Superior Court (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 973, 975-976 [new trial motion procedure inapplicable to small claims proceedings the very purpose of small claims law – proving a summary means of resolving eligible disputes – would be frustrated if all of the normal post-judgment proceedings were to be made available in small claims cases; moreover, it would be incongruous, where the plaintiff had no right of appeal (citing Parada v. Small Claims Court (1977) 70 Cal.App.3d 766).

5.      While Brandt could have filed a “motion to correct a clerical error in the judgment or to set aside and vacate a judgment on the ground of an incorrect or erroneous legal basis for the decision” (see Code Civ. Pro. Sections 116.725; Judicial Council form SC-135), A.  Brandt DID NOT MAKE THAT MOTION, B.  Brandt is not asserting  clerical error” in the judgment (such was where the court intended to award $1,000 but mistakenly typed “$100” on the judgment form); and C.  Nor is Brandt complaining of an error of law.  Indeed Brandt implicitly conceded that the applicable statute of limitations for breach of an oral rental agreement is two years from the date of breach, she takes issue with the court’s fact finding function and his decision – after hearing all of the evidence – that the contract was breached when Von Watteville moved out of the apartment, instead of the date that Brandt now urges the contract was breached (when Von Watteville alleged received her social security check). 

6.      Granting a motion to vacate here would completely abrogate the finality provided by Section 116.710(a).

Date:  May 6, 2015

Signed:  Karina Von Watteville

Paulette Brandt Elliot vs. Karina Ingeburg Von Watteville Fimbel

Case No. LAM 14M09452

DECLARATION OF LINDA MURPHY

I, LINDA MURPHY, declare:

1.        I am a citizen of the United States who currently resides in Los Angeles, California.  I am Paulette Brandt’s roommate.  I am over the age of 18 years.  I have personal knowledge of the facts contained in this declaration and if called upon to testify I could and would testify competently as to the truth of the facts stated herein.
2.         At some point in or around October 2013, I began an apartment search in the Los Angeles area.  Marie Jones posted an ad and I rented a room from her for the months of November and December 2013.  At that time, I met Karina Von Watteville a/k/a Karina Fimbel.  Ms. Watteville was living with Marie Jones and that is how I became acquainted with her.
3.         Problems arose between Marie Jones and Karina Von Watteville related to monies allegedly owed Ms. Jones.  The argument involved issues related to Ms. Watteville’s cats who were using the apartment as their kitty litter box and money owed Marie Jones.  Karina Von Watteville, who picks through people’s trash and brings items home, infested the apartment with bed bugs and cock roaches.  An argument arose over money allegedly due Marie Jones and the police were called.  This incident occurred in or around November/December 2013.
4.         I continued to look for a permanent and more appropriate room to rent.  Karina Von Watteville advised me that she previously lived with a woman by the name of Paulette Brandt who had an available guest room for rent.  Although prior to moving in with her, Karina Von Watteville did not know Ms. Brandt, she explained that she prevented her from ending up homeless after being evicted from the place where she was living at the time.  Ms. Von Watteville appeared to like Ms. Brandt very much, was complimentary about her, noted that she enjoyed living with her, and strongly encouraged me to contact Ms. Brandt about the room.  Ms. Von Watteville also explained that the apartment was clean, pretty, and assured me that Paulette Brandt was an excellent roommate and friend.  Ms. Von Watteville explained that Paulette Brandt was incredibly generous with her during the period of time she rented the guest room.

5.         Because I needed to know the amount of rent that I would be expected to pay, Karina Von Watteville and I discussed the fact that Paulette Brandt charged her $500/month rent and $50/month utilities.  Von Watteville confirmed that she owed Ms. Brandt this amount; intended to pay her when she received a lump sum social security payment; and mentioned that she felt bad about the situation.
6.         I contacted Ms. Brandt, visited the apartment, rented the room, and have lived here for over a year now.  Paulette Brandt and I get along extremely well.  The apartment is well kept and very pretty.  I have my own room and enjoy my privacy.
7.         At some point in or around June 2014, Karina Von Watteville advised me that she had received her social security check.
8.         Karina Von Watteville also explained to Paulette Brandt that she received her lump sum social security payment.  She made no attempts to reimburse her for the rental arrears. 

In June 2014, Paulette Brandt sent Ms. Watteville a rent demand letter.  She asked a friend of ours, Kelley Lynch, to email a copy of the letter to Von Watteville to ensure that it was received.  At that point, Karina Von Watteville began slandering Paulette Brandt and seemed obsessed with Kelley Lynch.  I have known Kelley Lynch for over a year and she is a very nice, courteous, and respectful individual.  Karina Von Watteville does not know Ms. Lynch but became increasingly upset with her over Paulette Brandt’s rent demands.  After receiving the rent demand letter, Von Watteville began slandering Kelley Lynch.  She specifically informed me that she intended to get Kelley Lynch in “trouble.”  Because she was calling me frequently about Kelley Lynch, I became somewhat alarmed and passed this information onto Ms. Lynch.  Karina Von Watteville also began looking for ways to harm Paulette Brandt.  She mentioned that she would like to find a way to force Ms. Brandt into homelessness.  I was shocked by her vindictiveness.
9.         In or around November 2014, Paulette Brandt filed a Small Claims Complaint against Karina Von Watteville addressing the rental arrears due and owing.  I personally served Karina Von Watteville the Small Claims Complaint.  She was extremely angry but did confirm that she had an agreement to pay Paulette $500/month rent and $50/month utilities.
10.         Karina Von Watteville has a habit of infesting apartments and properties with cock roaches, bed bugs, and leaving mounds of garbage and trash piled up.  In or around June 2014, Karina Von Watteville was living in a commercial space she rented under the name of Cover Girl Models.  She lived in the space with her cats.  I visited on one occasion and was shocked to note that garbage and trash was piled around the room and the cats were using the entire space as their kitty litter box.
11.       Karina Von Watteville evidently permitted her cats to use her room at Paulette Brandt’s apartment as a kitty litter box as well.  She informed me that, after receiving the formal two months notice from Ms. Brandt (asking her to vacate the premises), she retaliated by leaving bags of garbage and trash behind and intentionally permitted her cats to urinate and defecate in the room.  She also apparently infested Paulette Brandt’s apartment with cock roaches.

12.       I became friendly with the man who rented Karina Von Watteville an apartment immediately before she moved in with Paulette Brandt.  He explained that he was forced to ask her to leave because she infested his property with cock roaches and owed him $4,000 in back rent.  To the best of my knowledge, he has not been paid. 
13.       I do see Karina Von Watteville from time to time but she no longer speaks to me.  I am aware that, after receiving Paulette Brandt’s paperwork, she contacted Leonard Cohen’s lawyer.  Kelley Lynch was Cohen’s personal manager, is involved with legal matters related to him, and reported allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud to Internal Revenue Service. 
14.       Since I have known Kelley Lynch she has informed me that a man by the name of Stephen Gianelli has criminally harassed and stalked her, members of her family, and others.  He is now sending Kelley Lynch, and others, highly slanderous emails about me, Paulette Brandt, and Kelley Lynch.  I do not know this individual.  It is my understanding that he has offered Karina Von Watteville legal assistance with the Small Claims matter involving Paulette Brandt.  Neither Kelley Lynch nor I are parties to that matter.  I am aware that Karina Von Watteville communicated with Robert Kory (Leonard Cohen’s lawyer), and was legally assisted by Stephen Gianelli, because I have seen some of the slanderous and false emails he has sent Ms. Lynch and have had numerous discussions with people who were present at both Small Claims hearings.  At those hearings, Karina Von Watteville evidently attempted to use Kelley Lynch’s cease and desist letters to defend herself although her conduct with respect to Ms. Lynch has nothing whatsoever to do with the rental arreas she owes Ms. Brandt.  This is simply Karina Von Watteville’s attempt to retaliate over monies she personally owes for rent. 

15.       The following is an excerpt of Stephen Gianelli’s email confirming that he provided Karina Von Watteville with legal advice and addressing her phone call to Cohen’s lawyer.  This email confirms that Von Watteville did contact Leonard Cohen’s lawyer, Robert Kory, after receiving Paulette Brandt’s rent demand letter and Gianelli is providing Von Watteville with legal advice:

“Ms. Von Watteville followed my advice and never even had to get to the other two defenses I specified; she won the hearing with the first issue out of the box:  The claim is time barred under CCP § 339 as arising from the breach of an alleged oral contract. Simple and elegant. No credibility issues to resolve. The shortest distance between point “A” and point “B”.  Game, set match … In contacting Robert Kory with advice about what to do ... “

16.       I was copied in on Kelley Lynch’s cease and desist letters addressing Ms. Von Watteville’s slanderous comments I (and others) repeated to Ms. Lynch.  Karina Von Watteville does not know Kelley Lynch, as I’ve said, and simply began bad mouthing her, told me she planned to have her investigated and get her in trouble, posted a Gold Record Leonard Cohen gave Kelley Lynch (that Von Watteville photographed) on her Google Plus account, and advised me that Ms. Lynch is an alcoholic.  Kelley Lynch does not have a substance abuse problem and is most definitely not an alcoholic.  These are merely slanderous allegations meant to undermine her credibility. 

17.       On May 4, 2015, Stephen Gianelli wrote Paulette Brandt (copying in Kelley Lynch) a letter that clearly relates to the Karina Von Watteville Small Claims matter.  He has falsely accused me of being involved with a vicious and malicious slander campaign against him.  I do not know this individual and have simply addressed the fact that he suddenly launched a slanderous campaign against me, Paulette Brandt, and Kelley Lynch.  It is my personal opinion that he is attempting to intimidate us.  He has been harassing and stalking Kelley Lynch for the entire time I’ve known her and this has apparently gone on for years now.  He seems crazy and his emails are threatening, slanderous, and vicious.  This man appears to be obsessed with legal matters that involve Phil Spector and Kelley’s former business partner, Leonard Cohen.  Paulette Brandt and Kelley Lynch are both close friends of Phil Spector’s, recently participated in an internet radio program about him, and Kelley Lynch is involved with ongoing litigation matters with Leonard Cohen.  This is an excerpt of Stephen Gianelli’s May 4, 2015 email falsely accusing me of slandering him and advising us that he will support any party opposing us. 

One  downside (of several)  to you signing on to Kelley Lynch’s vicious and malicious slander campaign against me (and many others) is that any non-lawyers who you and/or Ms. Lynch and/or Linda Carol are harassing or slandering and find yourselves opposing in litigation of any kind will have technical litigation support from a top Californian trial lawyer of 35 years’ experience who retired at the top of his game in 2013 – for free.

In any legal matter you and/or Ms. Lynch and/or Linda Carol may initiate or find yourselves otherwise involved in, you will find me supporting the other side at no charge.

18.       When Karina Von Watteville and I stayed with Marie Jones, I frequently heard conversations where Von Watteville would provide us with details about her former life as a ADDRESS THIS WITH SPECIFICITY FOR THE COURT.  She was incredibly graphic regarding what she would do with men and it sounded as though her activity was recent and took place in California.  I also heard many details about the elderly men in Von Watteville’s life and her litigation matters involving their estates.  I personally found these details upsetting and disturbing and this is one of the main reasons I wanted to look for a new place to live.  I believe this information is relevant because it addresses Ms. Von Watteville’s character.  She is an individual who appears to take advantage of others; gossips relentlessly; and does not have what one might call a life of her own.

ADD IN GIANELLI’S NEW EMAILS HARASSING LINDA CAROL DIRECTLY.
19.       I have spent most of my adult life working as a model and actress and am now pursuing a college degree.  

I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

This declaration is executed on this 5th day of May 2015 in Los Angeles, California.

                                                                        ______________________________________

                                                                        Linda Carol

Is Leonard Cohen, Whose Nickname Was "Captain Mandrax," Interested In Discussing Reefer Madness? Sobeit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbjHOBJzhb0

Kelley Lynch Was Falsely Accused Of Creating A "Wanted Poster" Of Karina Von Watteville [A Woman She Does Not Know & Whose Photograph She Did Not Have] But If She Had These Are The Photographs She Would Have Used

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:18 PM
Subject: Fwd: Sam Menning
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov

Hi IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

This is a photograph of Karina Von Watteville with Sam.  I just want to be clear - if I created Von Watteville's "Wanted Poster," which I did not, I would have used this photograph.  I think a picture tells a thousand words.  Von Watteville has sued Sam's estate for a house she believes she is entitled to.

All the best,

Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------

Some Of The Exhibits Weren't Double Spaced?

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:33 PM
Subject: Fwd: Kelley Lynch email dated Thursday, May 07, 2015 9:15 AM
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>

Jeffrey,

I checked LA Superior Court's website and you are the attorney of record in Case No. BC338322.  While, Stephen Gianelli (who appears to be an informal member of Leonard Cohen's defense team) has written this email, I feel it's appropriate to address it with the attorney of record since the issues relate to Leonard Cohen and this case specifically.

First of all, I would like to point out that Leonard Cohen, after spending approximately 10 months attempting to force me into a settlement (that included an offer of 50% community property) is the individual who retaliated against me by filing this lawsuit on August 15, 2005.  He and Robert Kory, and I have evidence of this fact, were well aware that I reported the allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud to IRS on April 15, 2005.  Agent Bill Betzer appears in Neal Greenberg's June 2005 lawsuit.  I also spoke with the Kentucky Revenue Cabinet prior to that.  They assured me that Traditional Holdings, LLC is a partnership and I am a partner.  They also advised me to place the non-revocable assignments in a safety deposit box.  Those are the assignments Leonard Cohen signed transferring all intellectual property assets into Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc.  He personally (and his wholly owned LC Investments, LLC) collected royalties related to those assets but he failed to address this fact in the Complaint or fraudulent financial ledger submitted to the Court.  I was not served Leonard Cohen's lawsuit.  The proof of service is evidence of fraud.  The perjury and lies over this matter continue to mount and I do believe Judge Hess should address these issues.  

The reason it took me so long drafting the Motion for Terminating Sanctions is due to the fact that this is a 10 year old case and the lies are inconceivable.  A tremendous amount of evidence was concealed.  And, it took me approximately two years to obtain the March 23, 2012 hearing transcript where Cohen testified that I never stole from him - just his peace of mind.  Gianelli and Walsh's harassing arguments excusing this testimony is absurd.  The ledger covers the year 2004 as well as many other years.  I personally believe that Judge Hess should understand precisely what has gone on here.  How could he rule otherwise?  

My legal documents were double spaced.  Some of the exhibits were single spaced.  It's fascinating that perjury and fraud are acceptable but issues related to single or double spacing are now the problem.  Leonard Cohen has tactics.  He has willfully attempted to run statutes.  He has abused the litigation process and used fraudulent restraining orders to silence, discredit, and undermine my credibility.  I am not interested in your client.  We were not lovers.  Sexual harassment and indecent exposure, regardless of what the City Attorney's office believes, are not elements of a dating relationship.  The registration of the Colorado domestic violence order is fraudulent.  The original Colorado order is not a domestic violence order.  The original order, which I found out after the hearing, was based on fraud and perjury.  I addressed that in my Motion to Quash and the judge should have vacated the order I asked her to enter based on the "insanity" I was witnessing.  I didn't agree to any order based on fraud or perjury and was unaware of Cohen's declaration at the time of the hearing.  Cohen was in the midst of a European tour when he flew into Boulder Colorado the day after he threatened to sue journalist Ann Diamond.  I worked with Cohen for 20 years and never once saw any evidence that she was stalking him.  I was privvy to details about the incident that took place with Freda Guttman in Montreal.  That matter did not involve me and I am not the individual who raised those allegations.  

It's fascinating that Gianelli knows how many words are contained in the documents filed with Judge Hess.  The Motion for Terminating Sanctions was filed on or about March 17, 2015.  The hearing is scheduled for June 23, 2015 so I think five months is enough time for the Court to have the opportunity to review the documents.  The declarations are quite straightforward.  Perhaps that's why Stephen Gianelli and Susasnne Walsh have criminally harassed every witness who provided me with a declaration.  I was under the impression that witness tampering and intimidation were criminal acts.  In fact, FBI confirmed that for me personally.  We also discussed the evidence Neal Greenberg's lawyer has proving that Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, and others engaged in criminal witness tampering and conspired to have me falsely arrested on May 25, 2005 when SWAT rolled by and concluded that my dog was my hostage and they were taking precautions.  That matter will be addressed more fully in my federal RICO lawsuits.

The Motion to Terminate, based on the binder fasteners I used, easily total 4 volumes.  I was forced to address all of the perjury and fraudulent information presented to Judge Hess.  You and your co-counsel raised what I thought were inconceivably bizarre responses to my Motion to Vacate that addressed a failure to serve me the lawsuit.  I provided the Court with a Case History so that the Court understood what had actually unfolded.  You and your co-counsel raised Neal Greenberg's lawsuit in Colorado (raising issues related to extortion, conspiracy, bribery, witness tampering, etc. related to your client and Robert Kory), and many things - including IRS and federal tax matters.  Therefore, I was forced to address those matters.  You and your co-counsel raised the fraudulent domestic violence related orders the Court (without the benefit of a hearing) granted two of Cohen's lawyers.  Those will now be addressed in my motion to vacate the fraudulent domestic violence order.  Your client raised the issues or referred to many documents - such as the Complaint itself, fraudulent financial ledger, original declarations, and so forth.  Therefore, the Court must understand this because Judge Hess appeared to have read the documents you and your co-counsel filed.  If the Court does not understand this then I will be only too happy to go through the documents with him at the hearing and explain it.  The corporate documents are attached because Leonard Cohen's declaration falsely accuses me of misappropriating monies from him and receiving overpayments for my services as his personal manager.  That is a bald faced lie.  I have an ownership interest in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., Traditional Holdings, LLC, and Old Ideas, LLC.  I do not have an ownership interest in LC Investments, LLC and the K-1s transmitted to IRS and State of Kentucky are evidence of fraud.  The summary of fraudulent misrepresentations could have been clearer.  I will grant you that.  However, I do not have the rest of my life to spend on this matter and given the fact that every word in the Complaint, and every other document, is a lie I think I've done a fairly decent job of responding in a relatively straightforward manner.  There are six additional declarations and many of them address the fact that I was not served and did not resemble the individual in the proof of service.  If you continue to lie about this issue, and LA Superior Court does not address it, there are more witnesses (including Tibetan lamas who visited me), Chad Knaak, etc. who can provide me with declarations for my federal RICO lawsuit proving that the lies continue to mount.

Leonard Cohen placed the burden on the Court when he retaliated against me with this Complaint and moved offensively in the news media with one of the most ridiculous set of accusations I have ever heard.  Then again, as Phil Spector always asked with respect to hit singles - is it dumb enough?  I suppose the answer in this case is yes because the news media has regurgitated Leonard Cohen's lies endlessly.  That would include the lies that he was broke when he was not and he personally borrowed (or caused to be expended - on his personal transactions fees, etc.) at least $6.7 in assets belonging to the so-called retirement account.  Leonard Cohen is NOT the corporate entity.  His fraudulent tax refunds have been challenged as fraud.  These issues will be litigated in federal court.  Federal tax matters have been implicated.

I intend to file Linda Carol's declaration with Judge Hess; with the motion to vacate the fraud domestic violence matter; and it will be filed in Paulette Brandt's Small Claims matter.  The mediator in the Small Claims matter, after witnessing Karfina Von Watteville screaming about Leonard Cohen and Robert Kory (other matters that were not "evidence" in the Small Claims matter), advised me personally to address this with the Court.  She seemed to know what she was talking about.  And, Karina Von Watteville did phone Robert Kory, Cohen's lawyer, after receiving Paulette Brandt's rent demand letter.  We will now address that situation with Judge Hess in a supplemental declaration to be filed before the hearing in June.  

The Answer to the Complaint was filed with these documents.  I'm sure Judge Hess can see that when he reviews the exhibit index I provided as a courtesy to the Court.  I was certain to provide the Court with a case index.  I know you're a real stickler for details although you appear to have problems with service, failure to uphold your promises, and seem to serve me documents that were not filed, or file documents you failed to serve me.  You argue that I had not agreement to serve the Motion to Vacate electronically but feel that Michelle Rice had the right to serve me - without an agreement - other documents.  I was not served Leonard Cohen's complaint.  I find it outrageous that Michelle Rice, who does not know me, provided the District Court in Denver with Phil Spector's address for me.  I did not provide that information to the Court and she knew I resided in Colorado.  I asked the Court - in the alternative - to permit me to file a Motion for a New Trial.  

Karina Von Watteville infests apartments with cock roaches.  She trash picks.  I can assure you that this is not my problem but it is a fact Linda Carol addressed in her declaration.  I have no idea why Von Watteville was screaming about Leonard Cohen and Robert Kory at both hearings or waving around my cease and desist letters (with IRS, FBI, and DOJ copied in) based on her conduct following receipt of Paulette Brandt's rent demand letter.  If you have any thoughts, let me know.  I don't intend to speculate because I do NOT know this woman.  I did not write Linda Carol's declaration.

The City Attorney was more than happy to lie about me through my alleged 2012 trial.  I will repeat that my public defender informed me that he felt the City Attorney was attempting to sabotage IRS; discredit me; and the DA was involved because they don't want the Phil Spector verdict overturned.  He also told me he felt there might have been a jury plant on the jury; at least one jury relied on the prosecutor's lies about corporate assets (after being advised by the judge not to); and the jurors wanted to hear from IRS.  Unfortunately, Judge Vanderet did not seem to believe that i was entitled to present defense or impeachment witnesses.  That would include, Agent Luis Tejeda of IRS.  Your client and Kory are clear - Agent Tejeda is the head of fraud for the Western Division of the United States.  And, I am now clear - your client used the fraudulent Complaint to defend himself against allegations of criminal tax fraud with Agent Tejeda.  The Complaint was presented to him.  IRS is not a Court so that's not fraud - the entire Complaint is perjury before iRS and will be addressed as such in my federal RICO lawsuit.  Since I discovered these facts during my 2012 trial (when Streeter blindsided my lawyers, mid-trial, with the "IRS Binder") I am well within the RICO statutes.  

While Stephen Gianelli, my stalker who criminally harasses and attempts to intimidate many LA residents (and others), doesn't know where I live, do use Paulette Brandt's mailing address for service or simply email me.  We have agreed to email service and discussed the fact that it wasn't necessary to mail the documents as well - unless someone had a problem opening them.  You assured Paulette Brandt recently that you received all the documents I asked her to serve and confirmed with you.  

Let me know if you have any other questions.

Kelley Lynch

P.S.  The reason Linda Carol's declaration will be submitted to Judge Hess is because I want him to understand what Leonard Cohen, and the Court itself due to the default, has exposed me to.  It has exposed me to people like Karina Von Watteville who concerned Linda Carol when she became obsessed with me after receiving Paulette Brandt's rent demand letter.  That was before I sent her the handful of cease and desist letters copying in IRS, FBI, and DOJ.  If she wants to lie about that in Court - sobeit.  I will present that evidence to ICE.  I personally people who have been granted green cards should not engage in misconduct with our court system.  That's just my personal opinion.

Case Number:  BC338322
LEONARD NORMAN COHEN ET AL VS KELLEY A LYNCH ET AL

Filing Date:  08/15/2005
Case Type:  Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction)
Status:  Default Judgment Pursuant to Decl. 05/09/2006

Parties

COHEN LEONARD NORMAN - Plaintiff/Petitioner

EDELMAN SCOTT A. ESQ. - Former Attorney for Pltf/Petn

KORN JEFFREY W. ESQ. - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

LEONARD COHEN INVESTMENT LLC - Plaintiff/Petitioner

LUCAS NANCY E. ESQ. - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

LYNCH KELLEY A. - Defendant/Respondent

WESTIN RICHARD A. - Defendant/Respondent

http://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/casesummary.aspx?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:13 AM
Subject: RE: Kelley Lynch email dated Thursday, May 07, 2015 9:15 AM
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Ms. Lynch,

It is not difficult to draft lengthily law and motion papers. The hard part is editing the entire filing down to the minimum you need to establish the grounds for the relief you are requesting and nothing more.

The rules of court require that all pleadings – including declarations – be produced with 13 point font and be double spaced. Your 109 page declaration is  almost novel length. It contains 43,977 words (without exhibits).

To put this into perspective,  a brief on appeal to the California Court of Appeal may not exceed 14,000 words. (CRC, rule 7.204(a).) Your declaration is more than THREE TIME that length.

In contrast to an appeal, where the court of appeal and its staff devote many hours reading an analyzing the pleadings filed by the parties, in a law and motion matter the court has a large number of matters to prepare for a day or two before each law and motion calendar and typically devotes an average of a maximum of half an hour to each motion. A complex motion, like a summary judgment motion, typically requires a bit more court time but not much more.

You have already filed lengthy points and authorities, a 43,977 word Declaration of Kelley Lynch with over 60 exhibits, many described as entire “binders”. And your initial filing also includes numerous additional pleadings, some of them quite lengthy, including your summary of the unadjudicated allegations of a federal district court complaint, a so called “summary of fraudulent misrepresentations”, magazine articles, corporate documents, and six additional declarations.

Moreover, you have made no effort to reference this oppressively voluminous material by page and line number in your legal arguments, nor does your legal memorandum provide a factual summary supported by page and line references to your submitted evidence.

The burden you would place on the court, to cull through all of this material – much of it extraneous and irrelevant to your motion – and attempt to locate relevant passages is already impermissibly great.

Now you are suggesting that you are going to file the Linda Carol declaration, which is a character assassination of a stranger to your lawsuit with Leonard Cohen in a supplemental filing with the court in support of your motion to vacate and dismiss, and in the alternative for leave to file your proposed answer?

And you expect this information that someone named Karina Von Watteville, who you claim not to know, invested various apartments with cockroaches and bedbugs is somehow relevant to your pending motion to vacate because she allegedly spoke with Leonard Cohen’s manager  Robert Kory about you earlier this year?

And you think that the City Attorney needs to take time out of his busy day to read up on all of this?

You have always been, and continue to be, your own worst enemy.

Stephen R. Gianelli

Attorney-at-Law (ret.)

Crete, Greece

From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 9:15 AM
To: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI; *IRS.Commisioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; lrohter; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; stan.garnett; USLawEnforcement@google.com; Feedback; mike.feuer@lacity.org; mayor.garcetti
Subject: Re: Kelley Lynch and Linda Carol emails of today

Mike Feuer,

The criminal harassment continues with respect to many LA residents.  I've privately sent you the updated version of Carol's declaration.  That will be submitted to Judge Hess, Small Claims Court, and attached to my motion to vacate the fraud restraining order.  It is relevant for a number of reasons and one of those is that it has exposed me to ever scumbag liar on earth.  The truth is the defense and the truth is on my side here.  Furthermore, Linda Carol wrote an honest declaration.  She has advised this Criminal Stalker to cease and desist.  Your office also exposed me to this insanity.  Leonard Cohen will also be sued over Gianelli's latest blog lying about me.  He shouldn't rely on anyone in my life to support his deranged insanity.  This man has engaged in egregious criminal witness tampering.  He is obviously an unofficial member of Cohen's legal team and I agree with Investigator Frayeh - he probably found a sympathetic ear with "Alan Jackson" about me.  Stephen Gianelli, as everyone knows, is a criminal who belongs in prison.  His obsession with me is out of control.  Too bad we're not celebrities with motive and a checkbook.  If we were, LAPD's TMU would be working over time for the citizens of LA who are being criminally harassed, stalked, slandered, and threatened.  Karina Von Watteville will legally rue the day she called Robert Kory.  She's not the only person who can file a lawsuit.  She's currently busy attempting to gain a home from an elderly man's estate.  She has a hearing coming up in that matter and I intend to subpoena any discovery.

Kelley Lynch

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

I intend to file Linda Carol's declaration with my supplemental declaration for Judge Hess; it will be attached to my motion to vacate the fraud domestic violence order; and will now be submitted with the declaration I intend to provide the Court in the Small Claims matter.  The mediator advised me to bring Karina Von Watteville's insanity to the Court's attention - that includes her statements about Leonard Cohen and Robert Kory that she evidently viewed as "evidence' since that is what she was supposed to be discussing with the mediator.

For the record, I didn't create the Wanted Poster, am not in third grade, but if I did, I think this photograph is more appropriate based on what I've heard from numerous witnesses.  Gianelli has once again been advised to cease and desist.  The Criminal Stalker has a new client that totally fits his insane personality that includes being a chronic liar and stalker. This man belongs in prison.

Kelley

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Gianelli,

For the record, if you're not clear why this is going to be attached to my motion to vacate the fraud domestic violence order, that's your problem.  This situation has exposed me to dangerous lunatics like yourself and Von Watteville.  It will also be submitted with my supplemental declaration to Judge Hess.  I see your a lawyer who lies when his fingers are typing.  I didn't create the Wanted Poster, psychopath.  I wouldn't include an old, out of date photograph of your client.  I think anyone creating a Wanted Poster would include this photograph from your client's blog.  Cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch

2. You previously stated that Ms. Carol’s declaration was prepared for you to file in support of your “motion to vacate the fraud domestic violence order” (as you put it) issued by a Colorado Court in 2008 and registered in California pursuant to Family Code §§ 6401 and 6404(a), and you did not claim that the Carol declaration was filed in support of Paulette Brandt’s small claims proceeding until I pointed out to you that registration of the Colorado order in California on May 25, 2011 was a ministerial act, and that expunging it from CLETS would turn on a legal question not a factual one, let alone the alleged character of a third party who you did not even know until two years later. Therefore, should Ms. Watteville file suit as I have advised her she has a right to do, your transparent change of stories about why the declaration was created will be damaging to your credibility.

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

FBI,

Since the Criminal Stalker is lying, this is also a lie.  Gianelli belongs in prison.

Kelley

A copy service receipt formerly in Ms. Brandt’s possession for the production of the flier (52 known copies of which were gathered and returned to Ms. Von Watteville, with many more distributed) also establishes Ms. Brandt’s involvement not only in the production and distribution of the flier, but in the larger effort to damage Ms. Von Watteville’s reputation in aid of persuading her to pay the alleged back-rent. 

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Gianelli,

I didn't create the "Wanted Poster."  You've got the perfect client - a degenerate liar from what I can tell.  Cease and desist, Criminal.  I've heard Von Watteville has defrauded other people so she seems to have what you might call enemies.  Von Watteville doesn't look like that photograph however.  That's why I believe it's possible she actually created it.  What person attempting to slander her would make her look glamorous when she's old, out of shape, and totally unattractive from my perspective.

ICE certainly grants green cards to people willing to defraud others and lie in courts.  That is completely obvious to me.  Your criminal witness tampering with witnesses will now be addressed further with Judge Hess.

Kelley Lynch

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

I had nothing to do with this insanity.  In front of the mediator, Von Watteville blamed Paulette Brandt.  I think she created it herself.  Gianelli, the stalking liar, is now falsely accusing me and Linda Carol.  That is a bald faced lie.  Every word out of this Criminal's mouth is a bald-faced lie.  The so called "Wanted Poster" will now be addressed in my declaration to Small Claims Court.  The mediator, and I will advise the judge of this, told me to bring this situation to the attention of the Court.

All the best,

Kelley.

  

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

DOJ,

Are you following this insanity?  Gianelli continues to harass me, Paulette, and Linda.  The declaration will be submitted to Judge Hess, Small Claims Court, and attached to the motion I am filing re. the fraud domestic violence matter.  Isn't fraud a deportable offense?  Gianelli is the scum of the earth.  Unfortunately for him, every word in Linda Carol's declaration is factual and there are other witnesses who can support these facts.  I've now provided you with an updated version.  Linda Carol has advised this Criminal Stalker to cease and desist.  Von Watteville has been advised to cease and desist.  

All the best,

Kelley

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Cease and desist, Gianelli and Von Watteville.  

Paulette Brandt didn't allow me to do anything.  Linda Carol advised you to cease and desist.  Paulette Brandt has done the same.  I am not involved in this matter and have every right to put a factual declaration, that will be submitted to more than one department at LA Superior Court, on my evidence blog.  This declaration is covered by the litigation privilege and the mediator (after hearing Von Watteville ranting about Leonard Cohen and Robert Kory) advised me to bring this to the attention of the Court.  Von Watteville clearly condones this criminal harassment since she has been copied in on many emails.  I do not know this woman who has lied about and slandered me.  Is she now providing you with photographs?  How vile.  A woman Paulette helped who was about to end up homeless joined forces with you and Robert Kory and then defrauded Paulette Brandt of $6,700.  

You have not entered a formal appearance in the fraudulent domestic violence order.  I have provided Judge Hess with evidence that Cohen/Kory planned to use fraud restraining orders to discredit me as early as June 2005.  LA Superior Court already advised me that Cohen was not permitted to register a non-domestic violence order (I requested prior to reading his perjured declaration) as a domestic violence order in California.  Share your research with Cohen's lawyers since you are clearly an informal member of his defense team.

Tell it to the Judge, Gianelli because the declaration will be presented to the judge in Small Claims Court, Judge Hess, and the fraud restraining order matter.  Von Watteville's targeting me over this issue (and contacting Cohen's lawyer) is a serious legal issue.

Cease and desist.

KelleyLynch

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:48 PM, STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:

Ms. Lynch,

1. If, as you say, Linda Carol prepared a declaration at the request of Paulette Brandt, and Ms. Brandt allowed you to post it on your blog and then to email it to the media and to others, Ms. Brandt is legally responsible for the unprivledged publications of the email.

2. You previously stated that Ms. Carol’s declaration was prepared for you to file in support of your “motion to vacate the fraud domestic violence order” (as you put it) issued by a Colorado Court in 2008 and registered in California pursuant to Family Code §§ 6401 and 6404(a), and you did not claim that the Carol declaration was filed in support of Paulette Brandt’s small claims proceeding until I pointed out to you that registration of the Colorado order in California on May 25, 2011 was a ministerial act, and that expunging it from CLETS would turn on a legal question not a factual one, let alone the alleged character of a third party who you did not even know until two years later. Therefore, should Ms. Watteville file suit as I have advised her she has a right to do, your transparent change of stories about why the declaration was created will be damaging to your credibility.

3. At the time the declaration was created, there was no small claims action involving Ms. Von Watteville pending, and Ms. Brandt’s rent claim against Ms. Watteville had already been dismissed “with prejudice” by the court pursuant to the applicable statute of limitations. Moreover, even if Ms. Von Watteville’s  alleged propensity to live in filth and to infect her living quarters with bugs was somehow logically connected  to Paulette Brandt’s prior claim for back rent (it wasn’t), the litigation privilege would not apply to its publication outside the litigation, including to Kelley Lynch, and its foreseeable  republication by Ms. Lynch in emails to the national media and to others and on her blog. (See Rothman v. Jackson (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1134, 1145-1146 [The “communicative act . . . must function as a necessary or useful step in the litigation process and must serve its purposes.” Statements outside the litigation to the press are not subject to the privilege either.]

4. Ms. Carol (according to your email communications, copied to her – which she has not denied) -  additionally published to you additional scurrilous and defamatory statements about Ms. Watteville, which, as you helpfully point out, were not included in the declaration at all. There is therefore no arguable litigation privilege for Ms. Carol’s defamatory assertions that Ms. Von Watteville is a prostitute, involved in the porn industry, is guilty of fraud and (allegedly) habitually fails to pay her bills or your foreseeable republication of them on your blog and in mass emails to the media and to others.  

5. Some of these allegations predated Ms. Carol’s move into Ms. Brandt’s  apartment and appear to have originated with Ms. Brandt, including the allegation that Ms. Von Watteville brought garbage and cockroaches into the apartment and that Ms. Von Watteville was defrauding the estate of an elderly man, which is also false. Moreover, the attached false and malicious flier was distributed in Ms. Von Watteville’s neighborhood and has a unique photograph embedded in it taken by Ms. Brandt that could only have been supplied by her. A copy service receipt formerly in Ms. Brandt’s possession for the production of the flier (52 known copies of which were gathered and returned to Ms. Von Watteville, with many more distributed) also establishes Ms. Brandt’s involvement not only in the production and distribution of the flier, but in the larger effort to damage Ms. Von Watteville’s reputation in aid of persuading her to pay the alleged back-rent. The allegations in the flier are very similar to the general allegation that Ms. Carol, acting through Ms. Lynch, have made in mass emails and in blog posts that Ms. Von Watteville is guilty of “fraud”.

6. For all of these reasons, I have advised Ms. Von Watteville that she has a good and meritorious cause of action against Paulette Brandt, Kelley Lynch and Linda Carol for libel per se. Whether or not Ms. Von Watteville decides to devote the time and energy to pursuing this meritorious cause of action in a court of general jurisdiction is up to Ms. Von Watteville and remains to be seen. Because I am retired and living abroad I cannot appear in any such action on her behalf, but have offered my technical legal assistance with any such lawsuit until such time as she retains counsel.

7. As for the small claims action, for the reasons stated in Ms. Von Watteville’s Answer to Ms. Brandt’s “motion for a new hearing” filed and served by mail on Ms. Brandt yesterday, that proceeding has been finally determined and is over. The court lacks jurisdiction to hear, let alone grant Ms. Brandt’s new trial motion.

8. Regarding Ms. Carol’s emailed statement of today, stating: “I don’t have any idea what you are talking about”, playing dumb and denying the obvious are not likely to immunize Ms. Carol from a likely substantial damage award for her participation in the malicious effort to damage Ms. Von Watteville’s reputation.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli

Attorney-at-Law (ret.)

Crete, Greece

From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 12:40 AM
To: linda carol; Stephen Gianelli; *IRS.Commisioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; lrohter; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; stan.garnett; USLawEnforcement@google.com; Feedback; mike.feuer@lacity.org; mayor.garcetti
Subject: Re: (no subject)

Stephen Gianelli,

I am advising you to cease and desist harassing me and my friends.  I do not know Karina Von Watteville.  You have no idea where I live.  I view this email to Linda Carol as blatant witness tampering.  Your slander, threats, intimidation tactics, etc. will now be brought to the attention of the Court.  Linda Carol prepared a declaration for Paulette Brandt and you have relentlessly harassed us over this matter.  Karina Von Watteville did not know you.  She contacted Robert Kory, after receiving Paulette Brandt's rent demand letter, and ended up being legally assisted by you - in defrauding Paulette Brandt.  Linda Carol's declaration will have litigation privilege as it is being submitted to the Court in the Small Claims matter.  It is factual.  

Your threats are also going to be reported to the State Bar since you are the individual, with Von Watteville, who is lying and who has targeted me (and others - including my sons) for six straight years now.  You definitely appear to be part of Cohen's informal defense team.  That would explain your legal research and opinions I am constantly harassed with related to Cohen matters.

Cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:53 PM, linda carol <lindacarol184@gmail.com> wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "STEPHEN R. GIANELLI" <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: May 5, 2015 11:10 AM
Subject:
To: <lindacarol184@gmail.com>
Cc:

Ms. Carol,

1. The fact that some of the more salacious defamatory statements you have uttered were omitted from your “declaration” does not affect your civil liability. Even verbal, nonprivileged,  defamatory statements published  to a third party can get you sued for libel – especially when made to someone like Kelley Lynch who is notorious for maliciously using her blogs and mass emailing’s (routinely copied to the national and Los Angeles media and others) as a platform to attempt to ruin the reputations of those who she feels have crossed her in some way (in this case by “calling Robert Kory”). Stated another way, a reasonable person who has been living in close quarters with Kelley Lynch since 2013 would have foreseen that your verbal and written defamatory statements about Karina Von Watteville would  be re-published by Ms. Lynch to a mass audience in mass emails and on the world-wide-web – which is exactly what happened, and Google, as they say, is forever.

2. Do you really want to spend the next years of your life slogging it out in court with Kelley Lynch, as Ms. Lynch has for the past few years? For what? To get even with Ms. Von Watteville? Respectfully, where is the upside for you in all of this?

3. If you do get sued, you only have yourself to blame.

Stephen R. Gianelli

Attorney-at-Law (ret.)

Crete, Greece

Kelley Lynch - Leonard Cohen Hearing Before LA Superior Court June 23, 2015

PRESS RELEASE

Will IRS prosecute singer-songwriter Leonard Cohen for criminal tax fraud?

Was Leonard Cohen a participant in CIA’s MKULTRA program?

            On June 23, 2015, in Department 24 of Los Angeles Superior Court, Judge Robert Hess will determine whether or not he will vacate singer songwriter Leonard Cohen’s default judgment against his former personal manager, Kelley Lynch, and refer Cohen together with his lawyers, Robert Kory and Michelle Rice, to the appropriate authorities for perjury prosecutions and disciplinary actions.  Judge Hess will, of course, be acting without personal jurisdiction over Kelley Lynch as she was never served Leonard Cohen’s legal complaint or summons. 

Los Angeles Superior Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

111 N. Hill Street

Department 24

Los Angeles, California 90012

Hearing:  8:30 AM

            The details of the salacious story involving Leonard Cohen, his former personal manager, allegations of criminal tax fraud, and Cohen’s three versions of his famous Phil Spector gun incident now before LA Superior Court can be found at riverdeepbook.blogspot.com.  Journalist Ann Diamond’s article, Whatever Happened to Kelley Lynch, gives a very nice, concise overview of what actually unfolded when Leonard Cohen heard (in the fall of 2004) that his trusted personal manager planned to report his tax fraud to Internal Revenue Service.  After publishing this article (enclosed below) on her blog, Leonard Cohen and his lawyers promptly threatened to sue Ms. Diamond.  To date, the media coverage has been limited to Leonard Cohen’s highly fictional narrative that Kelley Lynch was his disgruntled ex-lover who embezzled his retirement funds, stalked him for no reason whatsoever, and may have wanted to attend his concert.  While this rather entertaining story has a fairy tale ring to it, the reality of the situation is far more scandalous. 

In addition, Kelley Lynch was actually prosecuted for, among other things, annoying Leonard Cohen by addressing the fact that he falsely accused her of having sex with Oliver Stone to stir up a custody matter (that was successful although essentially a default judgment); explaining to journalist Glenn Greenwald (the Intercept) that Cohen exposed himself to Lynch and routinely sexually harassed her; repeating what Mick Brown (UK Telegraph) advised her – that Cohen’s statements/testimony were presented to Phil Spector’s Grand Jury;  requesting IRS tax and corporate information that Cohen is required to provide her; and violating a fraudulent restraining order (primarily used to discredit and silence Lynch) that the Court repeatedly told her (and Phil Spector’s former personal assistant, Paulette Brandt) had expired in 2009.  It was during Kelley Lynch’s 2012 trial for annoying Leonard Cohen that she understood he, former District Attorney Steve Cooley (who prosecuted Phil Spector), and City Attorney Carmen Trutanich had publicly joined forces to target and discredit her.  Lynch has now notified Cohen, the City of Los Angeles, and County of Los Angeles that she will be litigating these issues in federal court.

Kelley Lynch, Paulette Brandt, and Ann Diamond’s interviews for Truth Sentinel internet radio program can be found at the following links:

Truth Sentinel Episode 39 (Leonard Cohen, truth, lies, guilt, innocence, law, MK ULTRA)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVXTY0ATTR8

Truth Sentinel Episode 40 (Phil Spector, truth, lies, guilt and innocence, murder trial)

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB1WMxTwnHg

 

For those of you interested in the latest legal documents, including declarations, filed in Case No BC 338322, many of them can be found at this link:

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2015/04/kelley-lynchs-motion-for-terminating.html

Thursday, July 3, 2008
Whatever Happened to Kelley Lynch?

Ann Diamond

Kelley Lynch is the woman accused in 2005 of skimming millions from singer Leonard Cohen’s retirement fund. I knew of her through friends of Leonard Cohen, and had heard her described in glowing terms as the agent who, singlehandedly, saved Cohen’s career in the 1990s.

In early May of this year, Lynch suddenly contacted me. She said she was mainly interested in my perceptions of Cohen as a former friend and next door neighbour in Montreal. At one time I also studied with his Zen Master in California, and had spent time with him on Hydra, Greece.

Not having heard her side of the story (I doubt that anyone has, apart from a circle of her closest friends), I was curious. Over the next few weeks, she shared several documents pertaining to the case including an affidavit written and signed by her older son, Rutger.

Together, they paint a picture very much at variance from the sketchy media image of Lynch as a reckless, delusional woman on the brink of a career meltdown. Lynch's own timeline also includes disturbing behind-the-scene dealings that suggest she may have been set up to take the blame for Cohen's tax situation.

The following account is based on what Lynch has sent me --

Since 2005 when she became the object of media gossip, little if anything has been heard from Kelley Lynch.

A single mother with two sons, Lynch was Leonard Cohen's personal manager from approximately 1988 to 2004, and was known for her skill, hard work, and dedication. Until 2004, Kelley lived and worked in Los Angeles where she still has many friends and acquaintances in the entertainment world including Phil Spector and Oliver Stone.

Her own account of the events that wrecked her career, varies widely from the media portrait of a reckless, delusional woman in the throes of a personal meltdown. The meltdown was real, however. By late December, 2005, Lynch had lost custody of one son and was homeless and living on the streets with her older son, Rutger, who witnessed the chain of bizarre events that had begun a year earlier. 
In 2004, Lynch owned a house in Brentwood, and still worked for Cohen, who owed her money for royalties and other services, but was increasingly involved with his new girlfriend, Anjani Thomas, ex-wife of Cohen’s attorney, Robert Kory.

In retrospect, Lynch believes she was set up by Cohen and his representatives to help cover up a tax situation which made the IRS “nervous.” In September 2004, Cohen’s attorney Weston told Lynch that a financial entity known as Traditional Holdings, LLC could be overturned by the IRS. Lynch, who had been selected as a partner on the entity, became uneasy and consulted a new accountant, who referred her to tax lawyers, who found irregularities in Cohen's tax history, both in the US and Canada where he has residences.

Rattled by what she was hearing – that she was being dragged into criminal tax fraud -- Lynch called the IRS in Washington and also contacted their website. An IRS collection agent advised her to call the Fraud Hotline, which she did.

Told that any further action on her part might implicate her in fraud, Lynch refused to meet with Cohen or turn over the corporate books. At that stage, Cohen’s advisers began claiming that certain payments, distributions, or advances made to her were actually "over-payments." Lynch says their accounting was incomplete and ignored her share of intellectual property, unpaid commissions and royalties, and share in Traditional Holdings, LLC. Apparently Lynch had also been issued K1 partnership tax documents and made a partner on another Cohen investment entity, LC Investments, LLC, without her permission or awareness.

Lynch says an increasingly nervous and desperate Cohen was pressuring her to agree to mediation and told a friend of hers that Lynch was "the love of his life." She and Cohen had had a brief affair in 1990, but Cohen now was offering her 50% of his "community property" as well as "palimony" through lawyer Robert Kory at a meeting attended by Lynch's legal representatives and her accountant, Dale Burgess. To Lynch, none of this made sense at the time.

Meanwhile, the Los Angeles District Attorney's office received an anonymous tip informing them that Lynch was a friend of producer Phil Spector, whom Lynch maintains is innocent. Cohen, on the other hand, had given an interview in which he described a gun-waving Spector who threatened him during recording sessions in 1977.

At around the same time he was offering her “millions”, Lynch says, Cohen was also circulating slanderous stories about her. She believes Cohen encouraged Los Angeles record producer Steve Lindsey, the father of her son Ray, to initiate a custody suit – on May 25, 2005, the same day a 25-man SWAT team from the LAPD, acting on a bogus 911 call, suddenly cordoned off her street and surrounded her home in response to a "hostage taking."

Earlier that morning, Lynch says, her 12 year old son Ray woke up not feeling well. She sent an email to his school informing them she was keeping him at home. When the boy's father found out Ray was home he became agitated and abusive over the phone to Lynch.

Lynch says she had young people who worked for her coming and going that day, and did not want Ray’s father coming to the house and attacking her, as he had in the past. She called her older son Rutger, who was visiting a friend nearby, and asked him to pick Ray up and take him down the hill where actress Cloris Leachman waited in her car. Leachman, a friend of Lindsey, took charge of Ray – just as seven LAPD squad cars came speeding up Mandeville Canyon Road in the direction of Lynch’s house. With them was Ray’s father, Steve Lindsey.

Lynch says she looked out the window and saw armed men on her lawn. Her son Rutger and his friends were telling police there was no hostage-taking, that they had spent the morning with Lynch, and that there must be some mistake. For reasons no one understands, LAPD/Inglewood PD decided to believe Steve Lindsey, who had left the scene.

Police later gave varying explanations about what led up to the incident. West LAPD said they responded to a report that someone heard "shots fired." But a company that oversees SWAT said Lynch would have to have a superior caliber weapon to warrant such a high risk entry. A member of the SWAT team claimed to have seen a note that Lynch’s sister had placed the call stating Lynch posed “a danger to herself and everyone around her.” Her sister denies this.

Lynch stayed inside her house and called her former custody lawyer, Lee Kanon Alpert. She also called Leonard Cohen, assuming he had played a role in the events unfolding on her lawn. Lynch says she knew Steve Lindsey had also been meeting with Cohen and his attorney, and had recently told their son Ray that Lynch was “going to jail,” upsetting the boy. She says Cohen taped the phone call later used in his successful court case against her – for which, Lynch says, she never received a summons.

Lynch says, “Police were on my hillside and crouching under my kitchen window.” She says the standoff on her lawn continued for several more hours, disrupting the neighbourhood. Members of Inglewood Police Department also participated in the operation.

Eventually, she decided to go into the back yard. Seeing her son Rutger acting as a “human shield and hostage negotiator,” Lynch ventured out front with her Akita on leash and joked to the cops: "Who am I supposed to be holding hostage? My dog?"

The police responded by telling her son they would only shoot Lynch and her dog if necessary.

“That was when I dove into the pool.”

SWAT team members searched her house. As they entered, Lynch's African Grey parrot, Lou, called out: "I see dead people!" – further alarming the nervous cops.

Offering her a hand out of the pool, one officer said they were only there to help her and not to hurt her.

“No one asked me if I was all right; no one questioned me about my well-being.” The Medical Examiners Office later wondered how the police had evaluated her. After stating they were not arresting her, they handcuffed Lynch, still in her bikini. On her way out the door, her son managed to hand her a brocade jacket.

Although she lived near UCLA Medical Center, she was taken in a squad car to King-Drew Medical Centre in Watts, 40 miles away and a three-hour drive in traffic. Known as one of America’s worst hospitals, King-Drew was recently closed down as a place where patients routinely die from neglect and medical errors. During the long ride through South Central Los Angeles, Lynch says she was questioned closely about her relationship with Phil Spector, who had been charged with first degree murder of Lana Clarkson. In the car, Lynch voiced concern over what awaited her at the hospital but was told by a woman cop: "This will be good for you."

“I felt I was being kidnapped”.

At Emergency, the admitting psychiatrist administered anti-psychotic drugs without authorization and left Lynch in the waiting area for hours, still in her bikini and brocade jacket, and handcuffed to a chair. A nurse advised her she would be transferred – but did not tell her where. Examining her file, the nurse noticed it listed her as 19 years old with wrong social security number, wrong date of birth, wrong religion, and her name misspelled as "Kelly Lynch" Lynch thinks it was the same file she had seen, several months earlier, in the hands of the Special Investigator who came to question her about Spector.

A second doctor told her to wait her turn to ensure no further harm would come to her, and assured her that nothing in the King Drew report could cause her to lose custody of her child. The following day, she was released after nearly 24 hours in the psych ward.

Back home, Lynch learned that while she was being held at the hospital her younger son's father, Steven Clark Lindsey, had filed for custody of her son Ray Charles Lindsey and obtained a restraining order denying her access to the boy. She says Lindsey attempted to convince doctors at King Drew that she was dangerous, in order to have her committed, She says Lindsey also threatened the psychiatrist who had her released.

On that same day, Cohen’s attorney Robert Kory filed a Declaration in the custody matter, as did Betsy Superfon (a friend of Cohen, Kory and Lindsey who had befriended Lynch a few months earlier ). Superfon later told Lynch she didn't realize what she was signing, and that Cohen had offered Lindsey money “or something else” to take Ray away from Lynch.

Her older son alleges Lindsey offered him money to go to Leonard Cohen's lawyer's office and transfer or sign over Lynch’s house to Cohen or his attorney Robert Kory. Rutger refused and phoned his own father, who advised him to contact a lawyer.

Two weeks later, in early June, as she drove down her street to buy dog food, a Mercedes sped out of a neighbouring driveway and rear-ended her car, Lynch was thrown forward, fracturing her nose against the steering well, and was knocked unconscious. Later, she says, as she drove back up the hill to her home, the same driver was standing in his driveway and called out: “We are watching you” as she passed.
Seeing his injured, bleeding mother enter the house, her older son again phoned his father, who may have called 911. Accounts vary as whether the call referred to an incident of "domestic violence" or a "drug overdose." Either way, police arrived at Lynch’s door for the second time in two weeks. Over the protests of her son, they entered while she was on the phone to a friend, Dr. Wendi Knaak who stayed on the phone talking with Rutger while police again handcuffed Lynch. This time they took her to UCLA hospital where her obvious head injuries were ignored. Instead, she was once again drugged and placed in the psychiatric unit where she remained for several days.

Lynch and her advisors maintain these events were coordinated by Cohen, Kory and Lindsey, with the help of former LA District Attorney Ira Reiner in a well- orchestrated plan to traumatize and discredit her – paving the way for media stories which accused her of skimming millions from Cohen’s retirement fund.

In the summer of 2005, as Lynch was struggling to save her home and protect her child from a father her friends describe as "viciously anti-social" and “violent”, reports of Leonard Cohen's financial troubles hit the press. They alleged the 70-something singer had been scammed by his personal manager, Kelley Lynch, who colluded with an advisor at the AGILE Group in Colorado to send him false financial statements while emptying his accounts of millions of dollars.

Although listed as the owner of Traditional Holdings, the entity in question, Lynch says she never received any statements from the AGILE Group -- who instead had been sending them to Cohen -- having changed her mailing address to Cohen's home in Los Angeles. She has since filed a complaint with the US Post Office for mail tampering.

NOTE:  It appears that Leonard Cohen, or his representatives, attempted to change Lynch's mailing address from her home in Brentwood, California to his home in Los Angeles, California.  A Complaint was filed with USPS.

She insists Cohen sued her because she went to the IRS about his tax situation. She says he is not, and never was, "broke" and that missing funds went to buy homes for his son Adam Cohen and girlfriend, singer Anjani Thomas, ex-wife of Robert Kory. Noting Cohen is famous for his financial largesse and once gave Zen Master Sasaki Roshi $500,000 as a gift, Lynch also cites hefty payments to advisers, various transaction fees, personal taxes, and other monies which may have been sent offshore.

While Cohen and Lindsey attempted to persuade others, including LA Superior Court, that she intended to flee to Tibet or another non-extradition country, Lynch was isolated and penniless and still in Los Angeles. Lynch was former personal secretary to the late Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche, a flamboyant Tibetan spiritual teacher who founded Naropa Institute in Boulder, Colorado in the 1970s, and died in 1987. She says various Tibetan lamas are praying for her safety.

NOTE:  Lynch was a student of Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche; resided with his son (her nephew) for years; and was Kusum Lingpa Rinpoche's personal assistant and is his chos kyi dags mos and lineage holder.

Journalists covering the story were either unable, or didn't bother, to track Lynch down, and most reported Cohen's statements as fact. The NY Times contacted Kelley for a quote which they never printed

By July 2005, Lynch had lost her custody battle and Ray went to live with his father. On December 28, she and Rutger were evicted from the house in Brentwood, and ended up homeless in Santa Monica, which has no resources for the homeless. The Police Department gave her no help and, she claims, laughed when she brought in evidence that she was being stalked by a known serial killer while she camped on the beach.

In 2006, Cohen was awarded a symbolic $9 million settlement in a civil suit against Lynch, who still does not have a lawyer representing her. Corporate books and other evidence of fraud appear to have been overlooked by Judge Ken Freeman in his judgment, Lynch says, although she admits she has not read the court documents and was never served a summons. At the time of the decision, she told reporters she lacked the money to make a phone call. That same year, her older son lost his fingers in an accident with a meat grinder while he was working at Whole Foods in Los Angeles and Lynch could not afford a bus ticket to visit him in hospital.

Lynch heard through a journalist that Cohen later testified for the District Attorney’s office in a secret grand jury relating to the Phil Spector case with former District Attorney Ira Reiner acting as his lawyer. Reiner is a personal friend of Cohen, and as D.A. presided over some high-profile cases including the “Night Stalker” serial killer and the McMartin Day Care scandal.

Recently, on June 17, 2008, Cohen's lawsuit against the Agile Group was thrown out of court for lack of evidence. In response the AGILE Group dropped its counter-suit accusing Cohen of defamation and fraud. AGILE still claims to be shocked that a singer of Leonard Cohen's talent and stature would engage in false accusations against his own representatives.

Lynch believes Cohen and AGILE colluded to defraud her. She continues to deny all allegations against her, and remains hopeful that Phil Spector's lawyer, Bruce Cutler, will represent her in recouping damages to her livelihood and reputation. She now lives in another state and recently learned her younger son, 15, whom she has not seen since July 2005, stopped attending school last January.

These days Cohen’s fans seem to have expended their rage at Kelley Lynch for driving their idol into bankruptcy. Some now say she unwittingly did them a service -- by forcing him to go on tour for the first time in nearly two decades.

At 74, singer-songwriter Leonard Cohen continues to ride a wave of sympathy, gathering wide support from the music world and even some British royalty. Unquestionably, his career and finances have benefited from news reports that he is too impoverished to retire.

From his tower of song, Cohen has written:

I smile when I'm angry
I cheat and I lie
I do what I have to do
To get by

And I’m always alone
And my heart is like ice
And it’s crowded and cold
In my secret life

My Secret Life. Leonard Cohen
His many admirers need to listen closely.