Kelley Lynch Letter to Phil Spector Prosecutor Alan Jackson

January 16, 2010 - Updated

September 21, 2009

Hand delivered to DA Steve Cooley, DDA Alan Jackson, & DDA Truc Do by Investigator William Frayeh

Alan Jackson
District Attorney’s Office
County of Los Angeles
210 Temple Street
Suite 18000
Los Angeles, California 90012-3210

Re:   Kelley Lynch vs. the District Attorney of Los Angeles, et al.

Alan Jackson:

I am in receipt of your email dated September 9, 2009 demanding that I remove you from my “recipients list.” My emails, as I have repeatedly stated, document the destruction of my life, the destruction of my children and parent’s lives, the targeting of my family, etc., due solely to the fact that I was told Leonard Norman Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and reported that to the IRS and others.

I can assure you that all matters involving Cohen and myself are IRS matters and there is no need to “convert” anything into a tax matter. I would not be in an adversarial position with Cohen had I not reported his tax fraud and, instead, accepted 50% community property or whatever “bribes” I was being offered – presumably to lie and say Cohen was defrauded by his advisers.  He does address his “massive tax hit” in the interview he gave Brian Johnson for MacLean’s Magazine in Canada.

I am absolutely convinced that Cohen’s tax fraud relates to the Phil Spector murder trial. I refused to cave into extremely vicious coercive tactics – such as Ray Charles Lindsey’s custody matter that was coordinated with the SWAT incident of May 25, 2005 and my being dragged to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector.  I mailed Detective Silva documents  including relevant portions of the Killer King file.  That file relates to Kelly Annette Lynch.  Nearly every detail in the file is falsified – excluding my street address and Steven Clark Lindsey’s cell phone number.  The conversation “Erma Oppenhein” alleged had with my son, as recounted in her report, is a lie.  I have repeatedly attempted to determine why I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector – by LAPD.  This seems to upset your office.  It clearly upsets Marko who has threatened me and instructed me to tell the FBI in Denver “Merry Christmas.”  It is extremely coincidental that Marko posted on citypages.com on Christmas Day.  I do not know if this is Steve Cooley’s investigator Marko but intend to find out.

marko says:

THE ONLY SOUND FROM THE WALLS NOW IS-"COUNT TIME"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted On: Friday, Dec. 25 2009 @ 10:15PM

http://blogs.citypages.com/gimmenoise/2009/06/phil_spectors_l.php

Leonard  Cohen’s lawyer, Robert Kory, submitted a Declaration filed in my minor son’s alleged custody matter but he does not know my son. He did, however, note that he and Cohen did not want to be “identified” as the individuals encouraging Steven Clark Lindsey to take Ray away from me.  My minor son accompanied me to Kory’s office sometime in the spring of 2005.  I documented the conversation my minor son witnessed for Boies Schiller and others at the time.  Kory and I discussed the allegations raised that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, used me as an unwitting pawn, and exposed me to that tax fraud.  We also discussed the missing State of Kentucky tax returns, my intellectual property that has been stolen – by Cohen, and their threats.  Kory apparently did not like the fact that I stopped by “unannounced” after our luncheon where he advised me that he and Cohen were going after every one of Cohen’s advisers, confirmed that there was tax fraud on every entity, confirmed that the holding periods relating to certain assignments were illegal, told me I had a cause of action against every one of Cohen’s advisers, mentioned the mediations I thought were illegal and an attempt to cover up tax fraud, and told the waitress that he and I were there to discuss a divorce and taxes.  This is the meeting Boies Schiller suggested flying in for.  They also suggested that I have Investigator Brian Bennett of your office wire me for that luncheon.  Why?  Because they felt I was being asked to participate in illegal activity and assured me that recording the encounter was not illegal in that context.  I would like to note, at this point, that my lawyers felt Brian Bennett actually rolled by my house “unannounced” about Cohen’s tax fraud.  I found that inconceivably bizarre given the fact that Brian Bennett told me the District Attorney received an anonymous call from a woman about my friendship with Phil Spector.  He took a letter Phil Spector faxed me after the Lana Clarkson incident and is well aware of the date of that letter and the fact that Mr. Spector invited me to the Alhambra castle.  I have asked that this letter be returned and have been threatened over that request – by your office.  I have, of course, brought these threats to the attention of the FBI.

 I am absolutely convinced that I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector in an attempt to prevent me from testifying against Cohen in any IRS matter - whether it is currently “pending” or not or an attempt to undermine my credibility as a witness.  Many parties were well aware of my conversation with Agent Betzer/IRS on April 15, 2005.  It seemed to concern Norman Posel of Boies Schiller who later wrote me that Cohen and/or Kory were going to destroy me and/or my children.  I mailed that email from Boies Schiller to the Denver FBI with other evidence of matters I believe crossed state borders and related to the accusations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud.  I do not know how would anyone, other than the IRS, would know what is or or is not a pending matter? The IRS seems to have a policy that does not include revealing pending matters.  The IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Agent Sopko of the U.S. Treasury Department are copied in on my public emails.  These emails document the destruction of my life since reporting the allegations regarding Cohen to the IRS and others.  I am not convinced the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and/or the Treasury Department are engaged in a major prank and feel it would be prudent to assume that there may very well be serious issues at hand. I discussed this with Investigator William Frayeh of your office.  He didn’t seem to think these federal agencies were engaged in a prank either.  As you should know, I also reported the allegations relating to Cohen to the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Major Fraud Unit.  I spoke to Jeff Jonas in that office about my Complaint.  I was then threatened by Brian Bennett.  I view a threat to “report” me in connection with a Complaint filed with your Major Fraud Unit as a very serious matter.  In fact, I view it as witness tampering.

I intend to litigate these issues once I receive the Opinion Letters I have requested from the IRS and State of Kentucky with respect to the entities related to Cohen and my “instant legal matters.”  I am also waiting to hear the results of an investigation into the SWAT incident, the Killer King incident, and so forth.  Once I have this information I intend to file lawsuits addressing everything my children, family and I have been dealing with since approximately 2004.  At  the very heart of my lawsuit will be the fact that my life was destroyed due to the fact that I am a friend of Phil Spector’s, was dragged into his murder trial, told by Investigator John Thompson of your office that I was probably a witness in Phil Spector’s murder trial, and had the audacity to report Cohen’s tax fraud  to the IRS and State of Kentucky.  It is my opinion that the District Attorney office needs to keep Leonard Norman Cohen credible.  He does, after all, appear in your Motion in Limine and Mick Brown/UK Telegraph wrote me that he was in possession of the grand jury transcripts and advised me that Cohen testified against Phil Spector in his grand jury.  Cohen personally told me and Steve Cron, and then confirmed this for me after his interview with the detectives I met, that his comments about Phil Spector over the years were good rock ‘n roll stories.  Here’s one example of Cohen’s rock ‘n roll stories about Phil Spector.  Was Leonard Cohen actually biting into a revolver in a hamburger and can he prove that Phil Spector put that revolver in his hamburger and forced him to bite into it?  That sounds preposterous.  For the record, Leonard Cohen didn’t produce Death of A Ladies’ Man with Phil Spector.  Phil Spector produced that album and Cohen did not like the way Mr. Spector handled his vocals.  He personally calls the record “grotesque” and has, from what I could tell, held a grudge against Mr. Spector since 1977.  The hamburger incident seems to relate to the incident you raised in your Motion in Limine in Phil Spector’s matter and yet it has not been addressed.  I cannot imagine why you wouldn’t want to address the totality of circumstances and intentionally overlook what Cohen discussed with the detectives and other comments that are readily available on the internet.  Cohen, from my perspective, is a calculated fraud and a pathological liar.

Leonard Cohen

My first album came out in, I think it was 1967, and I worked with John Hammond Senior and John Simon on that record, subsequently with Bob Johnson. My most bizarre experience with a producer was with Phil Spector, with whom I worked in 1977 or 78, and we produced that grotesque album called Death of a Ladies' Man.

Don't Go Home With Your Hard-On

Leonard Cohen

That happened at a very curious time in my life because I was at a very low point, my family was breaking up, I was living in Los Angeles which was a foreign city to me, and I'd lost control, as I say, of my family, of my work, and my life, and it was a very very dark period … so you were slipping over bullets, and you were biting into revolvers in your hamburger.

http://www.webheights.net/speakingcohen/bbctrans.htm

Not only do I believe Cohen committed tax fraud with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., LC Investments, LLC, Traditional Holdings, LLC, possibly Old Ideas, LLC, personally and in connection with other entities, I believe he may have a lifelong history of tax fraud in the United States and Canada. In fact, I emailed the IRS Commissioner’s Staff a 1977 tax memo prepared specifically for “Cohen” advising him that he did not have to pay taxes anywhere he had residences (United States, Canada, and Greece) but cautioning him not to have a green card. Cohen had a green card and informed me that he abandoned it because the IRS does not ask where you paid taxes the prior year while Canada does. This might explain why he applied for and obtained a new green card in 1991. It might also explain the social security number insanity his accountant, Burt Goldstein, sorted out after Marty Machat’s death in 1988. Cohen had more than one social security number.  Marty Machat was Phil Spector and Cohen’s attorney and I worked for him from approximately 1984 until his death in April 1988. The lengths Cohen went to obtain a new green card were extraordinary and I personally believe, based on conversations I had with Cohen, he intended to blame Mr. Machat for any issues the IRS and/or Canada might raise with respect to his residence issues and/or tax issues.  My former brother-inlaw, an attorney in Canada, advised me that there was no good news with respect to Cohen’s residence (and attendant tax problems) in Canada either.

Cohen’s tax fraud, that I was told is criminal, appears to follow him from adviser to adviser. He also has a pattern of blaming advisers and stealing from them. I provided Boies Schiller (who I permitted to review a great deal of evidence relating to the Leonard Cohen Tax Fraud Matter) with Marty Machat’s letter to Irving Trust transmitting a $30,000.00 final payment for his and Bob Johnston’s respective 15% shares of Stranger Music, Inc. Unfortunately, when Cohen sold Leonard Cohen Stranger Music, Inc. and Bad Monk Publishing Company (a d/b/a of Cohen’s) to Sony he did not inform me that he was selling Mr. Machat and Mr. Johnston’s shares. I do not know what he personally advised Sony and/or his advisers with respect to this matter.  I believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff should review that sale and, specifically, look into why Cohen and Westin were concerned about issues relating to the assignments of copyrights into Bad Monk Publishing. I also believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff should look into the failed C.A.K. bond deal (that apparently concerned Robert Kory) and the formation of Cohen’s two charitable remainder trusts. Ed Dean, Cohen’s lawyer, was concerned about personal service contracts being assigned to these trusts and other legal issues relating to the assignments. Kory emailed me on May 24, 2005 that the IRS would demand answers to questions, relating to Cohen’s taxes, going back many years. I was told by Steve Blanq of Hochman, Rettig that Richard Westin, Cohen’s tax lawyer, made the IRS nervous with his evasiveness. I can understand why. He made me nervous – particularly when he wrote that Neal Greenberg was going to screw me over and he would stand up for me. I have no idea what that means but intend to find out.   Steve Blanq also emailed me and asked if I was being blamed for Richard Westin’s actions?  I am being blamed for the actions of Leonard Cohen, Neal Greenberg and Richard Westin who were wrapped in attorney/client privilege – essentially leaving me in the dark.  I also want the IRS to investigate why Robert Kory personally told me that I have a cause of action against every one of Cohen’s advisers.  Fortunately, Westin confirmed – via email – that Traditional Holdings, LLC was a “real entity” (although I personally believe it is a “sham”) and the annuity obligation was real.   Unfortunately, Westin – on behalf of Cohen - had already extinguished the annuity obligation from the tax return in 2003. He extinguished the promissory note on the 2002 tax returns and did not report the Sony sale on the 2001 tax returns. He used two separate tax identification numbers which was probably done intentionally to deceive the IRS. Westin also confirmed – via email – that he only represented Leonard Norman Cohen. Truer words have rarely been spoken.  My advisers informed me that the annuity and promissory note were extinguished.  They advised me that the income from the Sony sale was not reported on the tax returns.  Leonard Cohen is well aware that he signed an Indemnity Agreement relating to my involvement with Traditional Holdings, LLC.  I did not understand the structure and I did not understand how one invested in anything using a promissory note and therefore requested an Indemnity Agreement.  I believe it will be difficult for Cohen to address the corporate documents, minutes signed by him, documents signed by him and notarized.  Cohen personally responded to CAK’s lawsuit against him and in his Declaration acknowledges the income related to royalties on intellectual property, etc.  Is Cohen going to take the legal position that he is functionally illiterate? 

My advisers, DiMascio & Berardo and Dale Burgess, confirmed that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and “exposed” me to that fraud. In our last meeting, inexplicably, DiMascio & Berardo wanted to figure in a “settlement” amount for my exposure to Cohen’s fraud.   In our first meeting, however, they advised me that once fraud is brought to one’s attention no deals can be made and explained that I had two choices: report the tax fraud to the IRS and/or amend the tax returns.   Reporting tax fraud to the IRS turned out to be incredibly dangerous for me and my family but I did not trust anyone to amend the returns.  I felt a better course of action would be to report what I was told to the IRS, the State of Kentucky, and others.   DiMascio & Berardo calculated the penalties and interest – as of the fall of 2004 – with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC at approximately $10 million. This is what they told me Cohen would have to pay if he personally wanted to report the tax fraud.  I suppose this is what Cohen is referring to when he publicly addresses his “massive tax hit” that I view as his motive as it relates to me.  I also believe that were Cohen’s allegations that his advisers defrauded him realistic,  he would have gone to the IRS with me.  My advisers wrote me that Robert Kory was concerned about requesting copies of certain tax returns from the IRS lest it raise unwanted inspections into Cohen’s finances and these entities.  He was particularly concerned about the IRS and Traditional Holdings, LLC.

DiMascio & Berardo seemed to understand that similar penalties and interest were accumulating with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and LC Investments, LLC. Dale Burgess, my former accountant advised me that there was fraud on three entities and both he and Ken Cleveland, Cohen’s former accountant, believe the intellectual property is still in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. or should be.  I own 15% of that intellectual property – wherever it has gone - and have repeatedly requested a complete and proper forensic accounting with all assets on the table.  I would like the IRS Commissioner’s Staff’s Opinion on that issue and others.  Due to the extreme lengths Cohen has gone to silence me I have now concluded that the IRS will be forced to undertake the complete and proper forensic accounting I have attempted to request since approximately 2004.   Agent Betzer, a Collection Agent with the IRS, also believed I owned 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and 99.5% Traditional Holdings, LLC. He advised me to go get what was rightfully mine and appeared to be an exceptionally helpful and brilliant man.  Agent Betzer understood that I paid approximately $165,000.00 in taxes on a company that Cohen has ultimately attempted to prove I did not own.  I did not pay taxes on that entity because I was making a charitable donation to the IRS on Cohen’s behalf.  I believed I owned it and I believed there might be something suspect about that entity and the promissory note – which is why I demanded and received an “Indemnity Agreement” from Cohen. For these reasons, one might imagine, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Agent Kelly Sopko of the U.S. Treasury Department are copied on my emails.

DiMascio & Berardo were apparently impressed with and/or intimidated by the fact that Cohen was represented by former District Attorney Ira Reiner and perhaps this is why they encouraged me to participate in what I believe would have been an illegal deal, illegal meditation, and possibly insurance fraud.  Ira Reiner was brought in, according to Kory, to handle the mediation because Kory does not understand litigation.  I would like to point out that Dale Burgess asked me to confirm for the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Treasury Department that my lawyers understood this was criminal tax fraud and confirmed that he would answer a subpoena and testify to the fact that I was offered 50% community property by Cohen – presumably to lie and say he was defrauded by his advisers.  DiMascio & Berardo told me Cohen wanted me to say his advisers defrauded him.  That is not what I witnessed.  Cohen, Greenberg and Westin are the three parties that set up these structures and demanded that the sale of intellectual property be handled as stock sales.  In fact, that is the precise reason for Greenberg introducing Richard Westin to Leonard Cohen – to structure the first stock sale.  That ultimately led to an IRS audit of Cohen’s donation of stock to the Mt. Baldy Abbot’s Fund which I personally believe the IRS should revisit.  I also think the IRS should look into why Cohen received 1099s from Sony for $1 million and $7 million, respectively, which were then turned into $0 1099s.  The IRS also audited the deposit Cohen claimed as a loan on his tax returns – after consulting Westin about this.  I think there was a reason that this $1 million was treated as a loan rather than a deposit.  There are also other issues that the IRS might want to look into with respect to that deposit involving recoupments if I recall correctly. 

The IRS Commissioner’s Staff and Department of Justice are referenced in the subject line of the email you responded to and it seems odd that you would permit yourself to be copied in on so many emails from odzerchenma@gmail.com and twiggy.ahmadinejad@gmail.com (and other email accounts) and only now ask me to “immediately” remove you. I have asked you to explain why I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector.   My email accounts and Blogs, I might add, have been targeted by Michelle Blaine (who confirmed this publicly and thanked Blogonaut for his assistance in targeting them), Gianelli, Blogonaut, Belark, and others – including someone who posts as “Bird.” That is the “crowd” you are apparently associate with which is unconscionable – given what has gone on and what is going on with those Blogs. 

What has gone on with these Blogs – particularly with respect to Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Law Blog, from my perspective, is an attempt to sabotage a Denver FBI investigation.  I brought this to the attention of the Denver FBI.  Gianelli-Blogonaut has a signature from what I can tell – sabotage.  That is precisely why I believe he communicated with Leonard Cohen’s legal representatives, contacted Investigator Frayeh in your office about HIS off-the-cuff remark that Pat Dixon is good looking, contacted Agent Sopko/Treasury Department in an attempt to determine if I was “spamming” Agent Sopko who is now being referred to by Gianelli-Blogonaut as my “pet” agent which is outrageous, contacted Agent Wynar of the Oakand FBI in an attempt to determine (I suppose) if I was spamming Agent Sopko (he must not have trusted Agent Sopko), has targeted both of my children and refused to cease communicating with my older son, has received a private email from my minor son, contacted the custody lawyer representing my minor son’s father and offered to provide a Declaration about me athough he doesn’t know me, may have been involved in providing Boulder PD with an email dictated by my older son’s father, and is all over my instant legal matters.  Gianelli-Blogonaut clearly likes to play high stake games and may want to lay off the white wine.  He also contacted Bruce Cutler in what I view as an attempt to determine if Mr. Cutler still represents Phil Spector.  That was discussed.  Bruce Cutler confirmed that his office sent me a fax and received my faxes.  Gianelli-Blogonaut is very interested in my sex life.  He publicly alleged that I have sexual fantasies about Pat Dixon.  That is preposterous.  He publicly wrote that Pat Dixon  “fears for his life” because I quoted the lyrics to Eminem’s live version of “Puke” and made a reference to Larry Fidler’s remarks about what he does or does not wear under his robes. 

Investigator William Frayeh, of your office, felt Gianelli might have found a sympathetic ear – yours.  That is truly appalling and I absolutely believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Invetigation, Treasury Department, DEA, Immigration, Phil Spector and his legal team should investigate what is going on here and what has gone on.  Stephen Gianelli has, from my perspective, lied to Special Agent Wynar of Oakland FBI. He had the audacity, from what Belark-Gianelli-Blogonaut advised me, to go to the FBI with allegations that I am spamming Agent Kelly Sopko of the United States Treasury Department as I have just stated. It would seem that Gianelli now has the FBI investigating the Treasury.  Given the fact that Agent Sopko was able to call me, fly into see me in Santa Ana, California, and email me Agent Tejeda’s information (IRS-Fraud Unit-Los Angeles), one can safely assume that she personally can determine whether or not I am spamming her and advise me to stop.  I remain unconvinced, as has been publicly posited on public Blogs, that Agent Sopko’s email to me was innocent and/or benign.  I would not characterize it in that manner.  Agent Sopko advised me to take the accusations that Leonard Cohen committed criminal tax fraud to Agent Tejeda/IRS and advised me to provide Agent Tejeda/IRS with the evidence she, her partner, and I discussed.  This evidence has now been used to publicly threaten my older son who is absolutely a witness to much of what has unfolded.  Please see comments from Phawker.com enclosed.

Gianelli is apparently extremely eager to determine what’s on Bruce Cutler’s mind and has name-dropped Mr. Cutler ad nauseum.  In fact, he advised me that Bruce Cutler and Pat Dixon had a conversation about me which is quite startling.  I do not know Pat Dixon and would like the IRS and FBI to investigate why I was being discussed.  One thing that should be on Bruce Cutler’s mind is the fact that Nat McBride, an acquaintance of Nicole Spector’s, received a “death threat” from one Brian Peterson (bpeterson999@yahoo) and received at least one email from someone purporting to be Bruce Cutler. I, naturally, have been accused of sending that email. I can assure you that I would not criminally impersonate Bruce Cutler and have now reported those threats and the criminal impersonation of Mr. Cutler to the Department of Justice and Interpol.  Nat McBride resides in the U.K.

Gianelli phoned Investigator Frayeh to determine, from what I can tell, if William Frayeh thinks Prosecutor/Judge Pat Dixon is “good looking.” Please keep in mind that this is a murder trial. Gianelli/Blogonaut is all over this story and his role seems sinister – particularly given the fact that Blogonaut publicly stated (and emailed me) that “it” had been in contact with Cohen’s advisers on three separate occasions, was communicating with people who knew me in Los Angeles, and offered to put me in touch with Cohen who is apparently willing to help me. All I have to do in order to get my life and children back is lie. I have captured much of the activity on Blaine’s Blog, Blogonaut’s Blog, the Hartford Courant’s website, my own Blogs, and so forth because I thought some of the slander and malicious allegations might ultimately be pulled down which is precisely what has occurred. I have forwarded the captured Blog content to Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Agent Sopko of the U.S. Treasury and others.  Lying seems to be the name of the game. I refused to lie in any mediation with Cohen and I refuse to lie the IRS in connection with any defense alleging that Cohen was defrauded by his advisers.  The idea of Cohen being defrauded by his advisers is laughable. His disdain for “ordinary income taxes” may be unprecedented. He had similarly disdainful views of gift taxes.  His estate planning  lawyer,  Reeve Chudd, emailed me that he was not an “alchemist” when Cohen attempted to donate his body of work to the Toronto Library in exchange for a United States tax credit.  I realize this may complicate matters for the District Attorney as it seems that Cohen is a pathological liar with motive.

 but let me state, for the record, what Boies Schiller advised me to do when they realized I was meeting Robert Kory for our luncheon: Call Brian Bennett and have him wire me. They seemed to believe I was being asked to participate in criminal activity and were clear – in their emails – that recording Kory would not be a “set up” because what I was being asked to do was illegal. Betsy Superfon, who was apparently negotiating (on my behalf) with Cohen and Kory (without my knowledge, awareness and/or consent) ultimately spoke to Cohen/Kory. Yongzin Rinpoche, who was visiting with his wife, advised me to have her drop by. I asked her to have Cohen/Kory put the terms of their “deal” in writing and fax it to me. Kory advised Superfon that this is not the type of deal that could be faxed and suggested that he, Superfon, and I meet for lunch. Later, Superfon told me the type of deal Cohen wanted me to make was an illegal one and advised me that Lindsey took my son away from me to keep him out of Cohen’s tax fraud and there was something – like money – in it for him. There must have been. Why else would my “ex-husband” meet with Cohen and Kory and accede to their requests to take Ray away from me. I was initially told that Cohen and Kory went into Lindsey’s office and accused me of having sex with Oliver Stone. I remain unconvinced that this is defense to tax fraud and tend to doubt it’s a “crime” in any event. The focus on my sex life – by Cohen, Lindsey, Kory, Gianelli/Blogonaut, etc. - is perverse and obsessive. My son’s grandfather, Mort Lindsey, even inserted himself into this situation when he contacted Cohen and/or Kory and phoned me in an attempt to have me make what I was told would have been an illegal deal. Cohen thought I was close with Mort Lindsey, a man I viewed as my father-in-law, and thought he could coerce me into a deal. That is precisely what I was told by Lindsey. Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon have been “named” in Greenberg’s lawsuit against Cohen. The FBI in Denver told me they would be brought in if there was witness or evidence tampering and explained that it is criminal. Dan Scheid, Greenberg’s lawyer, apparently has evidence relating to criminal witness and evidence tampering. He confirmed that this evidence relates to Cohen, Kory, Lindsey and Superfon – who apparently “conspired” to have me falsely arrested. The next question one must ask is “by whom. Clearly they couldn’t, on their own, have me “falsely arrested.” Ed Dean informed me that if the IRS Commissioner believes this is fraud and not negligence he will come in after the lawyers and accountants as well. One can only hope and pray that Kory is at the top of the list of lawyers – together with Scott Edelman/Gibson, Dumb and Dumber who had no qualms “seizing” evidence they understood I intended to send to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. Of course, I wasn’t served that lawsuit and have noticed that rotten lawyers who lie for a living think they are above the law and tend to ignore due process. In light of what has happened it was shocking to read that you view my emails as “spam.” It made me realize that you are a vicious and sadistic individual who is capable of anything. I realize my emails may be unwanted but they are definitely not “spam.”

I would strongly suggest that you review the police reports of Cohen’s interview with the detectives Steve Cron and I met at his house. He either lied to them or, if Mick Brown was accurate when he advised me that Cohen testified before Phil Spector’s grand jury, perjured himself. That would seem to raise issues having to do with obstruction of justice as well. The detectives I met seemed professional so perhaps they too will be confused about Cohen’s testimony before the grand jury – or, possibly, that you referred to an incident between Cohen and Phil Spector in the Motion In Limine. For the record, Cohen advised me that he confirmed – for the detectives – that his comments, over the years about Phil Spector, were good rock ‘n roll comments which is precisely what he told me over the course of 20 years. He also told me that he did not like his vocals and felt humiliated that Phillip did not want to mix the album – putting him in the position of being forced to telegram Phillip. Phillip told me he received hate mail from all 8 of Cohen’s fans and found working with Cohen depressing. I can assure you that I found working with Cohen unbelievably depressing. Cohen certainly did not mind his daughter, Lorca Cohen, accompanying me to visit Phil Spector one night at the Bel Air Hotel. In fact, he seemed rather delighted and intrigued. That is precisely how he felt when he heard that I was having dinner with Phillip in Beverly Hills after the Clarkson incident.

I also reported Cohen’s tax fraud and the fact that he has defrauded me of millions to the District Attorney’s Major Fraud Unit. Please speak to Jeff Jonas about this Complaint. He may be the same Jeff Jonas whose name appears in your office’s Internal Memorandum relating to King Drew and questioning the credibility of coroner Luis Pena. Apparently my Complaint to your Major Fraud Unit was problematic for the District Attorney as it resulted in Brian Bennett threatening to report me to someone. To whom I cannot say. I can say this though - I spoke to Brian Bennett about the fact that I filed the Complaint with your Major Fraud Unit. I also spoke to Brian Bennett about the fact that I felt Cohen was attempting to blackmail me and the fact that I thought he perjured himself and should be arrested.

Why have I been emailing you and Truc Do and leaving messages for various people at the District Attorney’s Office? I can assure you this is not “harassment.” Your office dragged me into the Phil Spector murder trial – not I. On May 25, 2005, I was held hostage by a S.W.A.T. Team comprised of Los Angeles Police Department and Inglewood Police Department. Sergeant Joe ___________/LAPD, who monitored my only visit with Ray Charles Lindsey since May 25, 2005, told me Beverly Hills Police Department may have been present as well. I was taken to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and ultimately determined that the entire King Drew file was falsified. In fact, the individual in that file is apparently one Kelly Annette Lynch who would have been 19 at the time. Rutger and I did not spontaneously manifest on this planet at the same moment in time – which is basically what would have needed to occur were Kelly Annette Lynch actually his mother. She is, however, the woman that seems to have lost custody of my son Ray Charles Lindsey. The bizarre part of the King Drew report is that my address is correct. My name, however, is spelled incorrectly and on one page alone the following details are false and/or wrong: the social security number, my place of birth, date of birth, religion, and the insurance number. I was born in Pennsylvania and while I consider myself a devout Christian I am also His Holiness Kusum Lingpa’s lineage holder and generally note – in medical documents – that I am “Buddhist.” The primary reason for this has to do with how I want my body handled should I die. Very little, if anything, in that file relates to me. A nurse informed me that there was fraudulent information in the file and someone was planning to transfer me. Fortunately, after requesting a new doctor, Dr. D’Angelo took my file and determined that I was not dangerous to myself and/or others. Most people who are held at gunpoint by approximately 30 armed men aren’t dangerous – particularly when they are alone in their homes wearing a bikini which is what I was wearing.

A custody matter was obviously coordinated with my “visit” to Killer King and Steven Clark Lindsey’s cell phone number appears in the attendant falsified police report. For the record, the actual conversation Rutger had with “Erma Oppenhein” after the S.W.A.T. incident was limited to two questions: Is your Mother on any medication and are you ok? His answers: Yes, heart medication and yes, he was ok. Steven Clark Lindsey is my younger son’s father and, after inserting himself into the Leonard Norman Cohen Tax Fraud Matter, filed Robert Kory’s Declaration in that matter. My son, Rutger, was asked to go in and sign over/transfer/sell my former house to Cohen/Kory – by Lindsey – while I was en route to Killer King. I would like to point out that there is no signature permitting anyone to treat me at King Drew and Steven Clark Lindsey had no legal right, whatsoever, to speak to any doctor or medical provider on my behalf. His lawyer, Daniel A. Bergman, apparently faxed Superfon’s Declaration to her while I was being taken to King Drew. When I have the money I intend to obtain a complete copy of the custody file – including transcripts of hearings – and will turn that over to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, and – most definitely - Phil Spector. For now, I am living in a homeless shelter in Houston and Blogonaut/Gianelli have “urged” Boulder Police Department and Los Angeles Police Department to further target me. Law enforcement is all over this story and it is revolting. This is why I contacted the Department of Justice and the FBI.

I have brought the fraudulent use of someone else’s social security number (in the King Drew file and in the so-called “police report”) to the attention of the Social Security Administration, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – Treasury Department, the FTC, the Postal Inspector Phil Spector and his legal team, and others. The Social Security Administration advised me to file a criminal complaint with the Houston Police Department after I discussed, with a representative, the fact that Cohen issued illegal K1s using my Social Security number and with respect to the number that appears in the King Drew file. Apparently it is also identity theft. This might be a good time to note that Leonard Norman Cohen seems to have attempted to change the address where I received my mail (at my home) sometime in 2004/2005 to his address on Tremaine. I filed a Complaint with the Postal Inspector about this matter which I assume is “mail fraud” and gave the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others the details.

I advised Agent Sopko and her partner, in our meeting, that I believe the custody matter arose from Cohen’s tax fraud – that I was told is criminal and relates to the Phil Spector murder trial that I definitely view as a set up. I have provided the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Phil Spector, and others, with Robert Kory and Betsy Superfon’s Declarations that were filed in the custody matter. I intend to provide them with a transcript of the “ex parte hearing” as well. Ray Charles Lindsey, my son, “witnessed” a conversation between me and Kory about 1) Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal; 2) the missing state tax returns; 3) my intellectual property that appears to have been stolen (see Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and evidence I filed in Boulder, Colorado with my Motion to Quash Cohen’s fraudulent restraining order – meant to silence me and prevent me from contacting Kory with respect to 1099s, illegal K1s issued me by LC Investments, LLC, my intellectual property, a complete and proper forensic accounting, etc. – all of which is an “IRS matter”); and, 4) their threats. I would like to point out that I discussed Cohen and Kory’s threats to put me in jail with Agent Sopko and her partner. Agent Sopko asked me how “they” intended to do that. I have no idea and would have demanded a jury trial in any event. At this point, I would like to underscore this fact: I did not enter an appearance in Cohen’s bogus lawsuit with fraudulent financials attached because I believe it is an attempt to cover up criminal tax fraud and/or criminal conduct – an attempt to obstruct justice. The financial “ledger” attached thereto is fraudulent. Please see Dale Burgess’ fax to DiMascio & Berardo (also filed with my Motion to Quash in Boulder, Colorado) setting forth – after meeting with Kevin Prins/Moss Adam’s (Cohen’s accountant) – the tremendous amount of missing back-up documentation (including asset valuations).

Leonard Norman Cohen has gone to extraordinary lengths to silence me and has noted, for the news media, the massive tax hit he will take in connection with his creative tax planning. In other words, Cohen has publicly stated his motive. Cohen and Kory were going to “destroy” me and my children and I can assure you that when you are talking about destroying children you are not speaking legally. I mailed Norman Posel’s email (from Boies Schiller) regarding one of these threats to the FBI in Denver. Boies Schiller felt Cohen was attempting to silence and terrorize me and wondered why he would make me an enemy. His tax history is the correct answer. Let me explain how DiMascio & Berardo saw these entities: Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. owns the assets; LC Investments and Leonard Cohen personally collect the income; and Traditional Holdings, LLC sold something it did not own. I was not part of the team of legal and accounting professionals who tended to the tax planning (while I tended to Anjani Thomas’ garden …) and/or corporate structures but I do know this: Cohen’s tax lawyer, Richard Westin, wrote that Cohen’s level of borrowing from Traditional Holdings, LLC was “dangerous” and felt the IRS could overturn the entity if it noticed a disregard for substance and/or form. There seems to be a disregard for everything – including a “business purpose” as Mr. John Maunts/Kentucky Revenue Cabinet pointed out. I was not a trustee – constructive or otherwise – on any of these entities and am awaiting Opinion Letters from the IRS and State of Kentucky on that issue. There is no way I am in a position to respond legally to the allegations raised by Leonard Norman Cohen and/or Neal Greenberg in his “companion suit” filed in the U.S. District Court in Denver until I have the Opinion of the appropriate tax authorities. In the meantime, I have dissolved Traditional Holdings, LLC and filed final tax returns – so that nothing else can be done in my name.

After receiving your email I phoned Investigator William Frayeh. It seems inconceivably bizarre that Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut would know what you wrote me. They were not copied in on that email. I tend to doubt “it” reads minds, has a crystal ball, or hacked into your email account. I have previously spoken with Investigator Frayeh regarding the Phil Spector murder trial. As you, no doubt, are aware Detective Brian Bennett came by my former house to interview me after the District Attorney received an anonymous call (from a woman) in connection with Phil Spector and my friendship. Phil Spector and I have known one another for approximately 25-years and I believe it is safe to say that we are dear friends. I worked for Mr. Spector, as an intern, in 1988 and 1989 (and at times thereafter) after Marty Machat’s death in 1988 and have remained friends with Mr. Spector and the Mother of his children, Janis Zavala Spector. Investigator John Thompson told me I was probably a witness in that matter when I met with him and Detective Silva in Santa Ana, California. At that time, we also discussed the fact that I was taken to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and the outrageous fact that “Inglewood Police Department” was present at my home on May 25, 2005. A sadistic police officer told my son that they intended to shoot me and my dog. Ultimately, they ended up informing Rutger that my dog was my hostage and they were merely taking precautions. That is ludicrous and absurd. The police were told, by Rutger and his friends, that my younger son Ray had been taken down the street and left with Cloris Leachman and there was no hostage situation.

Based upon what has unfolded it is nearly impossible for me to believe that you feel I am “spamming” you – as Gianelli stated. Apparently you and Gianelli/Blogonaut have this in common and, I suspect, you are or were communicating with Gianelli and Blogonaut. That seems like a very reasonable conclusion. It is shocking, however, given the attempts Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark-Blaine, and others, have gone (on Blogonaut’s Blog, mControl’s Blog, the Hartford Courant’s site and elsewhere) to undermine my credibility through slander, malicious gossip, libel, defamation, bald-faced lies, etc. Of course, it is impossible to undermine someone based on lies that must now be proven – as fact – in a court of law. I have brought these Blogs to the attention of the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Sopko – Treasury Department, Agent Wynar-FBI Oakland, Doron Weinberg, Esquire, Dennis Riordan, Esquire, Ron Burkle, Robert MacMillan, Lee Kanon Alpert, Bruce Cutler, Esquire, Kyabje Thinley Norbu, Karmapa, Sharmapa, Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche, and others. I am convinced that Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark, Blaine, - and, of course, you and others - have attempted to obstruct justice and have engaged in witness tampering, witness retaliation, witness intimidation, harassment, stalking, and a coordinated campaign of cyber-terrorism clearly designed to silence and undermine my credibility. Gianelli/Blogonaut “have” also lied to the FBI in Oakland. Furthermore, “they” have publicly confirmed their communications (on at least three separate occasions) with Leonard Norman Cohen’s advisers and/or legal team. I am assuming this is the Law Offices of Robert Kory. They mentioned Kory and his associate Michelle Rice in some of their posts and/or emails to me. Blogonaut’s Blog appears to be affiliated with Michelle Blaine’s mControl Blog which is a vile, filthy site that was public but is now invitation only or private. I was also slandered on that Blog (as were the Karmapa, Sharmapa, Jigme Rinpoche, and Lama Karma Wangchuk) – that is obviously affiliated with Sprocket’s Trial & Tribulations Blog. It has been suggested, to me, that Sprocket’s Blog is the “mouth-piece” for Donna Clarkson.

Needless to say, this is an outrageous, outlandish, and unconscionable situation that has exposed Phil Spector, me, our families, and others, to the whims of possibly unstable people and vigilantism. I am absolutely convinced that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the FBI, the DEA, the Social Security Administration and Immigration should look into the role – if any – the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office played in having me dragged to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and falsifying the file. It is my opinion that there was a two-fold reason for taking me to King Drew: 1) to determine what, if anything, I knew about Phil Spector and guns. Officer Maurice Hampton/LAPD and Erma Oppenhein/SMART questioned me about this en route to Killer King; and, 2) to prevent me from successfully reporting Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS and serving as a credible witness.

I informed Agent Bill Betzer/IRS on April 15, 2005 that I believed I had been exposed to tax fraud and he advised me to bring the fraud into the IRS with a lawyer. Agent Betzer then advised me to call the IRS Fraud Hotline – which I did. Ultimately, I contacted the IRS via its website – reporting the tax fraud – and called the IRS in Washington, D.C. I asked Miss Hall, who advised me that she could not talk to the public, that I was in a very dangerous situation and she took down my name and certain information. Sometime thereafter I received an email from the IRS and began emailing the IRS Commissioner’s Staff evidence – including the corporate indexes, and other documents, that I filed with my Motion to Quash in Boulder, Colorado. I also gave the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Phil Spector and his legal team, and others the passwords to my tsimar@aol.com and ekajati@aol.com email accounts. The reason I did this is so the IRS, primarily, could make an independent determination – based on emails between me-Cohen-his advisers, etc. – as to what actually occurred. I thought this might prove helpful in conjunction with the evidence I sent them and the evidence I intended to send them – which was, from my perspective, unlawfully seized by the Sheriff’s Department on behalf of Cohen, Gibson Dumb & Dumber, and others.

Investigator Frayeh advised me to stop emailing you [for ten days while he investigates the situation with Gianelli and Alan Jackson]. I have stopped. I am, however, transmitting this letter to you via email. Investigator Frayeh also suggested that I ignore Blogonaut, Gianelli, and Belark. They have since removed the slanderous and vile articles and comments on their Blog but the lie disguised as an article (written by Joff Belark) remains and I would like to determine who released my so-called “booking” photograph to Belark in connection with some of the insanity I dealt with in Boulder, Colorado. I called Investigator Frayeh to inform him that I was being accused of having sexual fantasies about Pat Dixon. This is preposterous. I sarcastically put a photograph of Dixon and Judge Larry Fidler in one of my extremely public emails and quoted Eminem’s live version of “Puke.” Please review the lyrics to Eminem’s live MTV performance of “Puke.” He, not I, refers to “dry humping.” Larry Fidler’s own remarks, about what he may or may not wear under his robes, have even come back to haunt me – as inconceivable as that may be.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0AmCIryu6Q

Blogonaut publicly announced that Pat Dixon actually fears for his life because I informed government, law enforcement, and the news media – via my public emails documenting the destruction of my life – that every time I think of “Dixon” I want to “Puke.” Most parents would. I personally believe it is going to be impossible to prove I have a pattern of sexual fantasies involving Pat Dixon and other lawyers or judges. In any event, sexual fantasies – real or imagined – do not appear to constitute a predicate act under R.I.C.O.

Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark targeted my son Rutger as well and sent him vicious and malicious emails (such as “Ding Dong the Witch Is Dead”) and – for reasons I cannot imagine – forward Douglas Penick’s dictated response to Boulder Police Department. Boulder Police Department is all over this story. After attempting to leave “Officer Maurice Hampton” a message with “Officer Garrin – LAPD” – some time ago – Officer Storbeck of Boulder Police Department rolled into Deneuve Construction (with the Police Chief’s secretary) to determine if I was dangerous to myself or others. He was armed and clearly far more dangerous than I. The Denver FBI instructed me to contact the Boulder District Attorney’s Office and the Attorney General of Colorado. To date, I have heard nothing from either with respect to their investigations into this deadly serious matter. Rutger has witnessed a tremendous amount of insanity during this ordeal and was actually asked by Steven Clark Lindsey (immediately following the S.W.A.T. incident) to go in to Cohen/Kory’s office and sign over/transfer/sell my house to Cohen and/or Kory. He also had his fingers ripped off in a meat grinder incident at Whole Foods. OSHA felt there might be criminal negligence on the part of Whole Foods and thought the District Attorney could look into that. Perhaps the phone messages I left regarding that “incident” were misconstrued as “harassment” by Pat Dixon. The targeting of children is inconceivably brutal and I personally believe Steve Cooley and you are involved. No one on earth can convince me otherwise. I also believe the slander, etc. on Blogonaut’s Blog was timed to coincide with the Phil Spector appeal and the Clarkson civil suit. In any event, I view Rutger as a witness and am convinced that Gianelli-Blogonaut-Belark (and others) have engaged in witness retaliation, witness intimidation, and worse, with respect to my son. Since Lindsey emailed me that Cohen/Kory were encouraging him to take Ray away from me (after the conversation he witnessed) it is clear that he too is the victim of witness retaliation and intimidation. The entire custody matter appears to be nothing other than an attempt to coerce me into a deal with Cohen and an attempt to obstruct justice.

Blogonaut publicly noted that he/Gianelli made an “educated guess” about the content of your email to me. I find that absurd. Blogonaut noted that you contacted its Blog with respect to my extremely public emails. Investigator William Frayeh, who will receive a copy of this letter, said he would look into this situation. I will, of course, copy in the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – the Treasury Department, Phil Spector, Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan. Irrational hardly begins to describe the following comment posted on Blogonaut’s Blog with respect to your email to me. It begins shamelessly with “Uh.” That sets the tone. Blogonaut then publicly declares that the Department of Justice is on my “spam list” although I don’t believe I have spammed anyone – least of all the Department of Justice. I don’t know if I received a “substantive communication” from you but the reason I was focused on Blogonaut’s Blog is due to the fact that I thought you, the District Attorney of Los Angeles, and possibly the Clarkson family or their lawyers, might somehow be associated with and/or communicating with this Blog. Leonard Cohen’s advisers were and Blogonaut has publicly noted that. Nothing about you, as Phil Spector’s “prosecutor,” can be viewed as “simply nothing more than” anything. You are communicating with a Blog that is dead set on maligning me – based entirely on lies. Why did Blogonaut have to point out, to you, that it would “endeavor” when it hit “reply all” (to my emails). Endeavor means “to attempt” or “to make an effort.” That makes absolutely no sense – whatsoever – in this context and Blogonaut/Gianelli, I might point out, is a lawyer and a liar. This is blatant legal maneuvering at its most shameless. There was no “educated guess” about your email to me. You wrote Blogonaut and I confirmed what you said in your email to me. This did not send me into a tizzy. It confirmed my worst suspicions. It did generate emails to “high places” – to quote Blogonaut/Gianelli in all his arrogant glory: the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – Treasury Department, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and others. It also prompted a phone call, by me, to Agent Wynar/Special Agent FBI who has apparently been asked – by Blogonaut/Gianelli – to investigate whether or not I am “spamming” the Treasury. In conclusion, I would like to point out something that I feel strongly about – that is not only frivolous, probably criminal, it is a waste of resources that the FBI could better spend on things like protecting our citizens from terrorism. I do not like phoning Agent Wynar, or the FBI in Denver, actually. It seems preposterous to me but I have been forced into this position and do not have a choice. Beyond that, there is official misconduct and law enforcement conduct that crosses state borders at hand. You might understand the seriousness of this situation better than I.

Blogonaut said...

Uh, the reason that we knew that Alan Jackson's email to KL, that KL was touting to the DOJ (and her usual spam list) as a substantive communication from the Spector prosecutor was simply nothing more that a request to drop him from the cc list--was that we received the same request from Mr. Jackson yesterday, we pointed out that the only one that could do this was Lynch—but we said that we would endeavor when we hit “reply-all” to one of Lynch's emails to make sure he was not copied with our reply.
No, we cannot read minds; it was an educated guess—and a correct one at that—sending KL into a tizzy, and generating a half dozen emails to “high places” (cc to this blog).

http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/07/phillip-spector-appeal-update-record-on.html

For the record, Phil Spector and I had dinner and drinks after the Lana Clarkson incident and I asked him – point blank – if he shot Clarkson. He told me that he did not. Rather, Clarkson was apparently dancing around in his foyer singing “Da Doo Run Run” prior to shooting herself. This “theory” is supported by forensic science and the expert opinions of Dr. Henry Lee, Dr. Michael Baden, Dr. Werner Spitz, and Dr. James Pex. To assume that these men would conspire to lie and destroy their careers is blatantly ridiculous. Furthermore, I know Mr. Spector, believe he is absolutely innocent, and will continue to stand by him come hell or high water. That is what friends do. They do not betray people, sell stories to the news media, and fabricate or revise the past for their own suspect reasons and/or motives.

I await your response to this question: why are my emails documenting the destruction of my life spam and did Pat Dixon personally authorize Blogonaut/Gianelli to publicly state that he feared for his life when I quoted Eminem’s live version of “Puke?”

Sincerely,

/s/ Kelley Lynch

Enclosures

P.S.  I cannot imagine the type of person or people who would target a Mother and her children.

Kelley Lynch Letter to IRS Chief Trial Counsels' Office - July 25, 2004

Kelley Lynch

419 N. Larchmont Blvd., Suite 91

Los Angeles, California 90004

323.935.9939

                                                            July 25, 2004

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Office of Chief Trial Counsel

Small Business/Self Employed Division Counsel

3018 Federal Building

300 N. Los Angeles Street

Los Angeles, California  90012

Re:  Leonard Cohen vs. Commissioner (Docket No. 7024-02)

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing with respect to the above referenced Tax Court case and related matters.  I am Leonard Cohen’s personal manager and have an ownership interest in three entities with him.  Those entities are Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., Traditional Holdings, LLC, and Old Ideas, LLC.  These three entities either own or sold intellectual property. 

For the year 1999, Sony Music issued a 1099 to Leonard Cohen in the sum of $1 million.  On January 8, 2002, IRS issued Letter No. 3219 (SC/CG) to Leonard Cohen for the year ending December 31, 1999 showing a deficiency in connection with tax form 1040.  This situation was initially handled by Leonard Cohen’s personal tax and corporate attorney, Richard Westin, who then referred Cohen to Hochman Rettig. 

I became particularly concerned with respect to the conduct of Leonard Cohen and his representatives in January and February 2002.  The reason for this is due to hysteria that arose in connection with the “inadvertent” 1099s Sony issued to Leonard Cohen personally in the amounts of $1 million and $7 million respectively.  Leonard Cohen’s tax accountant wrote and advised him that he shuddered to think of the penalties and interest due.  Leonard Cohen called his tax accountant after receiving his letter to discuss the matter.  This matter was then discussed, both telephonically and in emails, with Leonard Cohen, Richard Westin, and Neal Greenberg (Cohen’s financial adviser and investor).  These 1099s related to a deal that Sony pursued which closed in 2001.

What concerns me specifically is the fact that the Sony deal was done with Traditional Holdings, LLC and not Leonard Cohen.  The $1 million non-refundable prepayment should have either been paid to Traditional Holdings, LLC or transferred to Traditional Holdings, LLC.  To complicate matters even further, the assets that were sold to Sony belong to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and were not assigned to Traditional Holdings, LLC.  The reason for this is due to the fact that, while Sony initially pursued this deal with Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. (and began their due diligence with that entity), Cohen’s accountant and tax lawyer raised issues related to collapsible corporations.  Richard Westin represents Leonard Cohen.  He does not represent me or the entities themselves.  I did provide Westin with a very limited power of attorney authorizing him to prepare and file the Traditional Holdings, LLC formation documents with the State of Kentucky.  I also agreed, after Cohen instructed him to do so, to permit Richard Westin to prepare my Indemnity Agreement with respect to my investment in Traditional Holdings, LLC via a promissory note.  I do not understand how an individual invests in a company via a promissory note and, at the same time, receives distributions with which to the payments.  I am enclosing Richard Westin’s March 6, 2002 letter summarizing this matter. I  specifically requested that he write this letter to avoid any future confusion between me and Leonard Cohen.  According to the corporate records, I receive $20,000 and $24,000 which pays the promissory note and taxes.  I also receive $240,000 year (from profits) to pay whatever taxes Westin advises are due with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC.  Richard Westin handles the Traditional Holdings, LLC tax returns and prepares the K-1s.  While I am to receive 100% of the profit (and this was the agreed upon amount Cohen and Westin arrived at), I am unable to obtain financial statements and/or profit and loss statements from Neal Greenberg.  And, while Richard Westin and Neal Greenberg are supposed to handle all loan documentation (Greenberg would have those details), most of Leonard Cohen’s loans (totaling millions) from Traditional Holdings, LLC remain undocumented.  I would also like to note that Neal Greenberg’s financial statements are incoherent and originally co-mingled Leonard Cohen’s personal accounts; his charitable remainder trusts; and the Traditional Holdings, LLC accounts on one statement prepared for Leonard Cohen personally.  Greenberg also provides a courtesy monthly email that includes the loans which he and Westin have repeatedly confirmed are assets of Traditional Holdings, LLC.  I am alarmed by the complete lack of attention to corporate governance.  I also enclose herewith Neal Greenberg’s January and June 2004 letters to Leonard Cohen raising “IRS warnings” and dangers.  I’ve reviewed these letters with Leonard Cohen and he advised me not to inform Neal Greenberg of any future income.  That would include the studio album that will be delivered; his plans to tour behind that album; and the third intellectual property deal we are pursuing.  That deal is also complicated because Leonard Cohen is once again demanding unattractive stock deals.  Leonard Cohen continually advises me that he does not want to pay ordinary income taxes.  I find these comments alarming in light of some of the other activity.

I have no expertise in IRS or tax matters and find a great deal of the discussions about tax matters thoroughly confusing if not downright deranged.  Some of the information I receive is incoherent.  I do not handle IRS, tax, accounting, financial, investing, legal or inadvertent 1099 matters.  I also do not handle financial statements, financial reports, loan documents, or promissory notes.  Leonard Cohen has a team of professional representatives handling those matters.  I am enclosing an email dated February 12, 2002 between me, Leonard Cohen, and Richard Westin that is self-explanatory and addresses some of my concerns.

On January 17, 2003, Hochman Rettig wrote David R. Jojola of the Los Angeles Office of the Chief Trial Counsel.  This matter was handled by Steve Blanq at Hochman Rettig.  I had concerns about Traditional Holdings, LLC and the private annuity agreement.  I am enclosing many of the corporate records for these entities; the Annuity Agreement; and my Indemnity Agreement.  I am also enclosing the stock certificates, non-revocable assignments, and other documentation related to my ownership interest in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., Traditional Holdings, LLC, and Old Ideas, LLC which was formed in June 2004 in Delaware (by Richard Westin) and owns the intellectual property associated with Cohen’s forthcoming studio album.

After I addressed my concerns with Steve Blanq, I sent him some of the Traditional Holdings, LLC documents and the Annuity Agreement.  I then mentioned to Richard Westin that I spoke to Steve Blanq about these matters.  I received a phone call from Steve Blanq advising me that he spoke to Richard Westin who informed him that I do not have attorney/client privilege and therefore Steve Blanq may not discuss these matters with me.  Given the fact that I have an ownership interest in Traditional Holdings, LLC, I find that statement alarming.  Leonard Cohen personally wrote Richard Westin and Neal Greenberg wrapping them in attorney/client privilege and excluding me. 

Hochman Rettig’s letter addressed the factual and legal analysis of the Cohen v. Commisioner matter (Docket No. 7024-02) as follows:  “Leonard Cohen, through his representatives, began negotiations in 1999 with Sony Music International ("SMI") for a buyout of his SMI master recordings catalog. In an effort to secure that SMI was serious about the buyout and to secure future performance, Mr. Cohen demanded a deposit of $1,000,000. Ultimately, SMI agreed to this request and on November 5, 1999, wired Mr. Cohen $1,000,000.  Accompanying the wire transfer was a Ietter dated November 5, 1999 which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The letter from Paul Gilbert of SMI provides:  ‘This amount is deemed a partial prepayment against the proposed $8 million buy-out of Leonard's future royalty interests in his master recordings and compositions under all of his agreements with Sony Music and Sony/ATV.’  The factual basis for treatment as a deposit is further supported by Mr. Gilbert's letter dated April 1, 2002 (attached hereto as Exhibit B) which provides: ‘. . . this letter is to confirm that the $ 1,000,000 paid to you by Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. (“SMEI") in November of 1999 was a deposit towards a possible royalty buyout …’”

This is not my understanding with respect to the $1 million prepayment.  I would like to keep this letter confidential because I am convinced that I would lose my job if Leonard Cohen, or his representatives, were to find out that I contacted IRS.  There has been so much paranoia and hysteria on the part of Leonard Cohen and his representatives over this matter that I can conclude nothing other than some type of egregious tax fraud has occurred. 

The history of this deal, and specifically the $1 million non-refundable prepayment, actually began when Leonard Cohen actively began pursuing intellectual property deals.  He closed the first deal, with Stranger Music, Inc., in 1996.  He then actively began pursuing other intellectual property which included a possible bond securitization deal.  As of November 1999, Leonard Cohen planned to close a bond securitization deal with CAK.  In order to pursue that deal, Cohen formed LC Investments, LLC.  CAK demanded a bankruptcy proof entity.  However, SOCAN (the Canadian performing rights society) refused to pay writer share of royalties to a company not owned 100% by the writer, Leonard Cohen.  Therefore, it was decided and agreed (by Cohen and his representatives) that LC Investments, LLC would collect the SOCAN royalties.  These assets are owned by Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. which is true for all intellectual property excluding the forthcoming the intellectual property related to the forthcoming studio album that will be delivered to Sony in the near future.  I am enclosing Leonard Cohen’s declaration in the CAK litigation that ensued and IRS can review the CAK litigation documents that were filed in the Southern District of New York (Docket No. 1:00-cv-01068-CBM).

What concerns me about the letter Hochman Rettig wrote is this paragraph:  The legal authority is derived from the Supreme Court decision in Commissioner v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co., 493 U-S. 203, I 10 S. Ct. 589 (1990). The Court created a distinction between the taxation of advance payments and the taxation of refundable deposits, although the Court confirmed that advance payments are generally taxable and defined "advance payment" as a non-refundable payment.  The Court, however, held that deposits are not taxable. The Court defined "deposits" as refundable payments that are made to secure the payor's performance of its legal obligations under the contract. Please note that the Court also found that a deposit is not taxable even if the payor elects to apply the deposit against amounts owed to the payee. Thus, if the payor fulfills its obligations under the contract, the deposit is refunded. That is the exact scenario presented in this matter.  This analysis is also consistent with the United States Tax Court's longstanding treatment of real estate lease deposits where the Court has distinguished between a sum designated as a prepayment of rent (taxable upon receipt) and a sum deposited to secure the tenant's performance of a lease agreement. J & E Enterprises, Inc, v. Commissioner.”

The reason this paragraph concerns me is that Sony personally contacted me about pursuing the 2001 intellectual property deal with Leonard Cohen.  Stuart Bondell, Sony Music Business Affairs, explained to me that Sony did not want Leonard Cohen pursuing a bond securitization deal.  Evidently they had concerns about establishing artist precedent for these types of deal and were specifically concerned about not having the ability to pay artist record advances.  As Stuart Bondell explained, advances are the currency of the music industry and permit Sony (and others) to encourage artists to submit their contractually obligated albums.  I phoned Leonard Cohen and explained that Sony wanted to pursue the intellectual property deal with him.  Cohen was somewhat worried that Sony was making an offer and could later change their minds.  Therefore, he advised me that he would be willing to forfeit the CAK bond securitization deal if Sony paid him a substantial non-refundable prepayment against the $8 million deal price.  The contractual details had to be resolved and negotiated.  I phoned Stuart Bondell back and passed along Cohen’s message and Sony agreed to pay the $1 million non-refundable prepayment Cohen requested.  Therefore, from my perspective, Cohen received $1 million in income from Sony in 1999.  However, the assets were owned by Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. at the time.  As of 2001, Richard Westin had formed Traditional Holdings, LLC who ultimately pursued the stock deal Leonard Cohen personally demanded. 

Your October 8, 2002 letter to Richard Westin requests all documents related to the $1 million payment including correspondence, contracts, agreements, royalty obligations, loan documents, emails, letters, and checks.  While I am enclosing a substantial amount of evidence, IRS would literally have to make arrangements to come into my management offices and go through the files.  They are voluminous and include the corporate files and corporate books and records.  While I am not involved with this IRS and/or Tax Court matter at all, I do believe that information is being concealed from the IRS and that makes me extremely uncomfortable. 

It was my understanding that Richard Westin and Ken Cleveland, Cohen’s accountant, decided to handle the $1 million as a loan on Cohen’s personal tax return.  I was not involved in that discussion but was on a conference call when they two of them confirmed this and asked me to call Leonard Cohen to see if he agreed.  I then phoned Leonard Cohen personally; he confirmed that he wanted the $1 million handled as a loan; and I called Westin and Cleveland back and confirmed this with them. 

This essentially sums up my concerns about the $1 million prepayment; $7 million inadvertent 1099s; and the fact that the assets are owned by Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc.  Initially, after the non-revocable assignments were executed by Cohen and me, Richard Westin advised us to begin depositing all royalty income to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc.  At a later date, he advised me (and some of this is in writing) that those deposits should be explained as inadvertent.  This situation also causes me concern because the income was deposited to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and Westin determined that Leonard Cohen personally should issue the 1099s.  Richard Westin also advised me to rip up the SOCAN and writer share assignments with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc.  I took copies home and enclose copies herewith. 

Another ongoing issue relates to where the offices for these entities are.  There are no offices.  I have continuously advised Richard Westin that my personal management offices are not the corporate entities’ offices.  These entities use my P.O. Box for their corporate office addresses.  Traditional Holdings, LLC’s corporate office is listed as Richard Westin’s home address in Kentucky.  Most of these entities are Delaware entities.  I do not know why Leonard Cohen and his representatives decided to form Traditional Holdings, LLC in Kentucky.  I am enclosing letters Richard Westin prepared for Leonard Cohen and me with respect to the initial proposals with respect to the use of an annuity.  Leonard Cohen rejected the first proposal and did not want his adult children involved in any entity he has an ownership interest in.

Please see evidence enclosed.

Thank you for your attention to this matter and, if I uncover additional information, I will submit that to Internal Revenue Service as well.

                                                                        Very truly yours,

                                                                        Kelley Lynch

                                                                       

Kelley Lynch's RICO Suit Against Leonard Cohen & His Lawyer's Recommendation that KVW File A Fraudulent Lawsuit

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:01 PM
Subject: 
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Would you please review this "wanted poster" of Karina Von Watteville.  I did not create, distribute, or do anything with respect to this.  I believe KVW made this poster.  I can assure you that she doesn't look like this and only someone with motive would create such a glamorous "wanted poster."  I think this was all pre-meditated, obviously.  Cohen, Kory & Rice are being sued over this.  It is being raised in my RICO suit and whatever damages KVW asked for, those are new injuries and will be addressed as such.  If KVW relied on any fraud or perjury in Cohen's fabricated Complaint, fraudulent expense ledger, perjured declarations, or the trial - filled with lies about federal tax matters, etc. - KVW will be forced to prove those allegations and Cohen will be sued over them.  

Gianelli wrote today and harassed me over PB's alleged inheritance.  I have now sent you the inadvertent email I sent to Linda Carol.  So that is how this information was allegedly transmitted to KVW and Gianelli. 

As for any emails mentioned in her law suit, the court will be informed - and that includes the federal court - that I am documenting everything for IRS, FBI, and DOJ and this woman has attempted to interfere with a federal tax controversy; lied about Cohen's alleged criminal tax fraud; and has falsely accused me of stealing from Cohen.  

If I'm not served in the next few days, I'll pick up the Complaint and file an answer and declaration.  I don't trust KVW and her ambulance chaser, Stephen Gianelli.  A case management conference will be schedule for somewhere around 120 to 180 days.  I want to prepare interrogatories for Ms. Von Watteville.  She's on social security but what other income does she have?  She evidently hasn't worked in years.   

I will prepare the interrogatories once my RICO suit against Cohen, et al. is filed. KVW's complaint will be attached as evidence of wire fraud.  It's on LA Superior Court's website and the court is relying on it.

Kelley

LA SUPERIOR COURT IS NOW SELLING FRAUD ABOUT KELLEY LYNCH.  THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED IN HER RICO SUIT AS WIRE FRAUD.

DID KVW WRITE HER OWN LAWSUIT?  IF NOT, WHO WROTE IT?  A QUESTION TO BE PURSUED DURING DISCOVERY.  SHE CANNOT WRITE.  SEE RESPONSE TO SMALL CLAIMS COMPLAINT.

Case Number: BC614279 Case Title: KARINA FIMBEL VON WATTEVILLE VS PAULETTE BRANDT ET AL Case Type: Defamation (Slander/Libel) (General Jurisdiction) Filing Date: 3/17/2016 The following documents are available electronically. Click on the corresponding checkbox to select a document to download. You may select up to 10 documents for each download. Click on the "Submit" button to continue.

Select Date Filed Document Pages Selected Total Pages 3/17/2016 SUMMONS 1 3/17/2016 VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR: 1. MALICIOUS PROSECUTION; ETC 28 3/17/2016 Unknown

Did Karina Von Watteville Rely On Cohen's Fraud Default Judgment, Fabricated Complaint Allegations Or the Lies Told During Kelley Lynch's Trial?

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 6:21 PM
Subject: 
To: Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>

Mike Feuer and Mayor Garcetti,

If Von Watteville used my 2012 trial in her fraud and blackmail lawsuit, I will sue the City and County over that issue as well.  This situation, including the fraud defaut judgment and fraud DMV order, has exposed me to lowlifes, hustlers, con artists, criminals parading as state bar members, etc.  The same is true for the default judgment custody matter based on the SWAT incident.  I've asked IRS, FBI, and DOJ to investigate that matter.  

How many times have I advised LA county and city authorities that I am being stalked, harassed, my sons were being terrorized, witnesses are being intimidated, etc?  A federal court can make that determination.  I also would like to know how Cohen's "case" ended up with LAPD's Threat management unit.  The chain of evidence did NOT establish that fact.

Kelley Lynch

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2016/03/from-kelley-lynch-date-sun-mar-27-2016.html

Kelley Lynch's Email to IRS, FBI & DOJ Re. Karina Von Watteville's Extortionate Lawsuit & Leonard Cohen's Role In That Lawsuit

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:00 PM
Subject: 
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

This lawsuit, which I have not been served, demands an investigation.  Robert Kory advised this woman to sue me, following my cease and desist letters and Paulette Brandt's demand for rental arrears, and this woman ended up represented by Gianelli.  The lawsuit, Small Claims case, and all fraudulent emails to IRS, FBI, DOJ, ICE, etc. also warrant an investigation.  That includes, but it not limited to, Kory, Gianelli, et al's communications with the DA, City Attorney, LAPD's TMU, and everything before LA Superior Court including the fraud judgment and fraud DMV order.  Cohen testified before that court that I never stole from him and we were in a purely business relationship so what is going on?

Stephen Gianelli is writing legal opinions about the KVW matter now?  If this woman sued for $1 that is extortion.  I am asking, in my RICO suit, that Cohen, et al. pay any and all damages awarded with respect to this suit to KVW.

Kelley

P.S.  I'm dying to see the damages.  KVW probably asked for millions.  David Geffen was sued for $2.5 million recently and, as Gianelli wrote, he has a net worth of approximately $7 billion.  In any event, Cohen, Kory & Rice will pay any damages this woman manages to extort from me through "LA Superior Court."  By the way, if you look at articles on David Geffen, you can prove that Gianelli lied when he wrote that he doesn't meet with writers, etc.  

From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:08 AM
Subject: Your incorrect claims in mass emails and on your blog about the applicability of the litigation privilege to your libel about Ms. Von Watteville
To: kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com
Cc: ahootnick@yahoo.com

Ms. Lynch,

The litigation privilege applies to the publication statements and writings inside the courthouse and among parties and their lawyers – but only if the communications are reasonably related to the issues at stake in the lawsuit.

Posting those same statements and writings on a blog, in the media or verbally outside court to third parties is NOT privileged – even the publication would have been privileged if made in court. If it made outside the court proceedings to non-parties to the litigation, NO PRIVILEGE APPLIES.

Therefore, even IF Linda Carol’s declaration was filed in the small claims action, the emailing of that unsigned declaration by you, the posting of that declaration on the internet, and the transmission of that unsigned declaration to opposing counsel to Ms. Von Watteville’s opposing counsel in the (entirely unrelated) probate case were not privileged – none of those many communications were.

In addition, if the publications are false, everyone who subsequently republishes the libelous claims (prostitute, dominatrix, bug infested, con, cheat, rent deadbeat, dirty) is just as libel as the person who originally made them. Meaning you are just as libel as Linda Carol (if she is the one who made them first). (Jackson v. Paramount Pictures Corp. (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 10, 26 [“[W]hen a party repeats a slanderous charge, he is equally guilty of defamation, even though he states the source of the charge and indicates that he is merely repeating a rumor.”].

Therefore, the litigation privilege does not protect or immunize any of YOUR publications of the draft declaration or your mass emails or blog posts repeating some of these allegations to third parties and the public.

As a final observation, it is doubtful that even Linda Carol’s signing of the declaration or Paulette Brandt’s (or your) publication of the declaration in the small claims action would be privileged either, because 1. It was filed after the case was over and 2.  None of the allegations about Ms. Von Watteville was reasonably related to any issues in the small claims action – which was a breach of contract action that did not turn on Ms. Von Watteville’s character, whether she had ever worked as a prostitute or a dominatrix, was dirty or had defrauded others. The only issues were was a contract made, what were its terms, was it breached and was it time-barred. Since the allegations in the declaration were totally irrelevant to those issues, there was no privilege even as to Linda Carol’s and Paulette Brandt’s involvement in it. (See Silberg v. Anderson (1990) 50 Cal. 3d 205, 212 ["any communication (1) made in judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings; (2) by litigants or other participants authorized by law; (3) to achieve the objects of the litigation; and (4) that have some connection or logical relation to the action. [Citations.]"

YOUR republication of the accusations OUTSIDE the litigation to non-parties were not even arguably litigation privileged.  (Silberg v. Anderson, supra, at 2012; GetFugu, Inc. v. Patton Boggs LLP (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 141, [litigation privilege does not apply to communications made to non-participants to the litigation, such as the general public through a press release]; Rothman v. Jackson (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1134, 1138 [litigation privilege does not protect statements made to non-litigation participants]).

Therefore YOU are the one who needs to learn a thing or two about the litigation privilege afforded by Civil Code section 47, not I.

However, if no doubt you will learn an important lesson about making vicious, false statements concerning people you are angry with and want to wound in the pending litigation.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli

Attorney-at-Law (ret.)

Crete, Greece

THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THIS EMAIL ARE MINE ALONE AND ARE NOT EXPRESSED ON BEHALF OF ANY OTHER PERSON, ASSOCIATION OR ENTITY. THEY ARE IN RESPONSE TO YOUR ATTEMPTS TO TRY YOUR VARIOUS CLAIMS AND LEGAL ISSUES IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION AND INTENDED TO CORRECT YOUR PUBLIC MIS-PRONOUNCEMENTS OF THE APPLICABLE LAW. 

Kelley Lynch's Cease & Desist Email to Karina Von Watteville Re. the Ongoing Harassment

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 4:09 PM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Karina Von Watteville, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>

Karina Von Watteville,

I have not been served your lawsuit, no attempts to serve the suit have been made, you and Gianelli have harassed me over this, and you and Gianelli harassed Jules Zalon and demanded information from him although neither of you know him.

As LA Superior Court's website permits a preview (of half a page) of documents, I am aware that you filed this Complaint pro se and have a fee waiver.  Therefore, my criminal stalker Stephen Gianelli is not representing you.  However, he is writing me - in response to an email I sent to the City Attorney about your baseless, fraud lawsuit (because that's what I am convinced it is) - about authenticating evidence.  I look forward to reading this Complaint as I have your legal writing sample.  I look forward to how you handle evidence, discovery, etc. since at the Small Claims Court hearing - in front of the mediator - you were screaming about Leonard Cohen and Robert Kory and advised all of us that you phoned Kory.  

I think Gianelli is referring to my grandfather - not my uncle.  I just want to correct the factual mistake.

This harassment over your lawsuit should cease and desist.  If I am not served within 30 days of March 17, 2016 (when you filed this lawsuit), I will respond to the court accordingly. 

If you want to communicate with me, re this lawsuit, hit reply all. I am also pro se.  Therefore, we are opposing counsel until Gianelli enters a formal notice of appearance on your behalf.  

Kelley Lynch

EMAILS PARTIALLY REDACTED

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>Date: Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 1:16 PM
Subject: Re:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>

You may wish to read California Evidence Code sections 1200 and following.

Specifically, if YOU are the one offering your own emails into evidence they would be considered inadmissible hearsay, unless you can articulate an applicable statutory exception to the hearsay rule.

How are you in a position to "assure" anyone as to the admissibly of anything?

Your law degree? No.

Your bar admission? No.

Oh, I remember, your uncle was a federal magistrate judge in another state.

And you feel the rules should be whatever you think they should be.

Leonard Cohen's co-conspirator, the Criminal Stalker, Continues on with the Campaign of Harassment

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:50 AM
Subject: Fwd: Kelley Lynch forward of Jules Zalon email to the IRS/FBI/DOJ/Tabloid Press/Media Outlets on Sunday, March 27, 2016 12:05 AM
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Why would Jules Zalon, an old friend of mine, direct this email to me?  In any event, I believe Mr. Zalon has been quite clear about this situation.  Nevertheless, the criminal stalker continues to harass him.  

Actually, I didn't "put" Jules Zalon into anything.  Stephen Gianelli and his client, Karina Von Watteville, began harassing me over her baseless, fraudulent lawsuit I have not been served.  Gianelli, I will note, terrorized Linda Carol over her declaration.  Is that acceptable to LA Superior Court?  We shall find out because this man intimidates and terrorizes witnesses.  Gianelli and Von Watteville then decided to write and harass Jules Zalon.  This followed Gianelli's insane, slanderous emails to me about Dr. Dre.

Gianelli also demanded that Jules Zalon inform him if he represents me.  I advised Mr. Zalon that he should handle that situation as he saw fit.  I did not email Gianelli about any "potential representation."  He is a bald faced liar and criminal.  

Ann Diamond's piece on this dangerous clown is extremely insightful and will be submitted to the federal court introducing the stalker.

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2015/06/ann-diamond-on-stephen-gianelli_25.html

Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 10:52 PM
Subject: RE: Kelley Lynch forward of Jules Zalon email to the IRS/FBI/DOJ/Tabloid Press/Media Outlets on Sunday, March 27, 2016 12:05 AM
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: Jules Zalon

Mr. Zalon directed the email to you (that you now forward to the National Enquirer, the IRS etc.)  as well, jointly.

YOU are the one who put Jules Zalon in conversation and you are the one who touted his friendship, support, legal skills, and potential representation and also invited me to email him directly.

From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 12:05 AM
To: *IRS.Commisioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; Harriet RyanLA times; hailey.branson; Stan Garnett; Mike Feuer; mayor.garcetti; Opla-pd-los-occ; Kelly.Sopko; Whistleblower; Attacheottawa; tips@radaronline.com; alan hootnick; Stephen Gianelli
Subject: Fwd: Your Recent Blizzard of Emails

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Here is Jules Zalon's response to Gianelli and Von Watteville's harassing emails.  Gianelli demanded that Mr. Zalon advise him if he represented me, provide him with information re. vacating a fraudulent default judgment, and simply decided to harass him with KVW.  

Kelley