From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: Case No. BC341120
To: Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, rkory <rkory@rkmgment.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, tips@radaronline.com
Senate Judiciary,
One last point: my case history addresses the fact that I phoned Scott Edelman after receiving his letter demanding that I "return" Cohen's property. Cohen was advised to pick up any and all property from me as of October 27, 2004. This was addressed in my lawyer's letter (quoted in the Case History) to Richard Westin. Cohen's threats were also addressed. That letter addressed the precise issues being addressed at that time. Edelman refused to speak to me and most of the items in Cohen's declaration (now submitted to Los Angeles Superior Court with the RJN) were not at my home. Cohen understood I worked from home and stored old boxes of documents as a courtesy for him. He also understood that he and his daughter went into my offices and removed all of his property as well as my business files which they refuse to return. Leonard Cohen is a chronic liar. He also has a history of falsely accusing his representatives of ripping him off to breach contracts; withholding commissions due his representatives; and stealing his representatives share of IP or corporations they have an ownership interest in. Steven Machat is quite clear about that fact and believes Cohen uses corporations to evade taxes. He also spoke to Sony and confirmed that he was involved in the deal negotiations with respect to the Cohen/Spector album. Steven informed me that Sony confirmed that Cohen sold them Spector's master tapes. The master tapes belong to Phil Spector. The royalties were not supposed to be used to recoup Cohen's account. That same issue arose with respect to the $1 million prepayment at is at issue before Tax Court. Leonard Cohen views corporate property as his own personal property. I will also note that, after abandoning his green card and prior to obtaining a new one, Cohen continued to have an ownership interest in Stranger Music, Inc. although the law does not permit a Canadian to have an ownership interest in a C corporation.
Leonard Cohen and his lawyers continue to argue federal tax matters before LA Superior Court. Please review Robert Kory's entirely perjured declaration submitted in response to my Motion to Vacate. Do you see any service related issues in there? I am awaiting Kory & Rice's response to my request for evidence proving Agent Tejeda exonerated Leonard Cohen. I have seen no such evidence and I have not seen the IRS holding Streeter referred to during my trial that evidently relates to the default judgment. I have discovered Cohen's fraudulent tax refunds obtained in or around December 2005 - six months before the default - and have challenged those refunds with IRS and FTB as fraud.
Kelley
P.S. Here is Robert Kory's entirely perjured declaration. I will address these matters extensively in my RICO suit. Kory is arguing that Cohen's personal business expenses are corporate expenses. They were not addressed as corporate expenses on the federal tax returns. Cohen refuses to advise me how my ownership interest in TH was a "mistake" rectified secretly and in hindsight by him and his personal tax and corporate attorney. That would indicate that they filed fraudulent tax returns 2001, 2002 ,and 2003. The annuity obligation was extinguished from those returns. I did not handle IRS matters, tax matters, tax returns, etc. and was quite clear with Cohen/Westin about that fact in my email to them that Hess has under seal. That email is not Leonard Cohen's a/c privileged document. It is a complaint on my part about the handling of certain matters and addressed the inadvertent $1 million and $7 million 1099s. Why is Robert Kory arguing federal tax matters with LA Superior Court? Why is he quoting Agent Tejeda or informing LA Superior Court about IRS positions without providing evidence to support those positions? It is my personal opinion that they are arguing federal tax matters with LA Superior Court (including extensively during my so-called trial), because that was the reason for the default judgment - as well as retaliation and Cohen's need to confront Greenberg's allegations. Those allegations have not been litigated and I most certainly did advise Judge Babcock, as Rice confirmed, that I refused to participate in the Colorado matter due to my concerns about tax fraud. Judge Babcock would not have had jurisdiction over me when I was added to that matter re. the interpleaded funds. Traditional Holdings was not a party to that suit and Judge Babcock relied on the California judgment that illegally converts my share of property to Cohen and transfers the property of SUSPENDED CORPORATIONS to Leonard Cohen. Those corporations remain suspended and I was unclear about Rice's incoherent argument that Judge Babcock's 2008 order is why Cohen felt entitled to insert SUSPENDED CORPORATIONS into a 2006 judgment. Perhaps the Senate Judiciary can follow that rotten logic. In any event, Cohen needed to argue fraud/rescission to explain away his role in these transactions and entities. Cohen demanded the complex stock transactions. He has simply come up with a fraudulent, fabricated narrative that willfully disregards the evidence that he is now attempting to conceal. The wrongful sealing of those documents will be addressed on appeal and appeals have been filed in four Cohen related matters - including the fraudulent domestic violence order. The VAWA funding fraud will be addressed extensively in my RICO suit against the City and County of Los Angeles. The same is true for the City Attorney's lies about federal tax matters, etc. LAPD's report concludes that my alleged emails were generally requests for tax information. Obviously, that's a very serious matter now. The City Attorney is unaware of the U.S.Constitution and Supremacy Clause and had no evidence (submitted to LA Superior Court) that I was in possession of IRS required tax and corporate information - including 1099s or K-1s that Streeter lied about extensively. She is the individual that raised the federal tax matters in her opening statements. She is also the individual who elicited testimony about Phil Spector and a gun. She accomplished that by eliciting perjured testimony. Leonard Cohen was not a recipient of the April 18, 2011 email and Streeter concealed the portion of that email to IRS Commissioner's Staff and Rice re. legitimate federal tax matters. The trial was a disgrace.
P.S. Here is Robert Kory's entirely perjured declaration. I will address these matters extensively in my RICO suit. Kory is arguing that Cohen's personal business expenses are corporate expenses. They were not addressed as corporate expenses on the federal tax returns. Cohen refuses to advise me how my ownership interest in TH was a "mistake" rectified secretly and in hindsight by him and his personal tax and corporate attorney. That would indicate that they filed fraudulent tax returns 2001, 2002 ,and 2003. The annuity obligation was extinguished from those returns. I did not handle IRS matters, tax matters, tax returns, etc. and was quite clear with Cohen/Westin about that fact in my email to them that Hess has under seal. That email is not Leonard Cohen's a/c privileged document. It is a complaint on my part about the handling of certain matters and addressed the inadvertent $1 million and $7 million 1099s. Why is Robert Kory arguing federal tax matters with LA Superior Court? Why is he quoting Agent Tejeda or informing LA Superior Court about IRS positions without providing evidence to support those positions? It is my personal opinion that they are arguing federal tax matters with LA Superior Court (including extensively during my so-called trial), because that was the reason for the default judgment - as well as retaliation and Cohen's need to confront Greenberg's allegations. Those allegations have not been litigated and I most certainly did advise Judge Babcock, as Rice confirmed, that I refused to participate in the Colorado matter due to my concerns about tax fraud. Judge Babcock would not have had jurisdiction over me when I was added to that matter re. the interpleaded funds. Traditional Holdings was not a party to that suit and Judge Babcock relied on the California judgment that illegally converts my share of property to Cohen and transfers the property of SUSPENDED CORPORATIONS to Leonard Cohen. Those corporations remain suspended and I was unclear about Rice's incoherent argument that Judge Babcock's 2008 order is why Cohen felt entitled to insert SUSPENDED CORPORATIONS into a 2006 judgment. Perhaps the Senate Judiciary can follow that rotten logic. In any event, Cohen needed to argue fraud/rescission to explain away his role in these transactions and entities. Cohen demanded the complex stock transactions. He has simply come up with a fraudulent, fabricated narrative that willfully disregards the evidence that he is now attempting to conceal. The wrongful sealing of those documents will be addressed on appeal and appeals have been filed in four Cohen related matters - including the fraudulent domestic violence order. The VAWA funding fraud will be addressed extensively in my RICO suit against the City and County of Los Angeles. The same is true for the City Attorney's lies about federal tax matters, etc. LAPD's report concludes that my alleged emails were generally requests for tax information. Obviously, that's a very serious matter now. The City Attorney is unaware of the U.S.Constitution and Supremacy Clause and had no evidence (submitted to LA Superior Court) that I was in possession of IRS required tax and corporate information - including 1099s or K-1s that Streeter lied about extensively. She is the individual that raised the federal tax matters in her opening statements. She is also the individual who elicited testimony about Phil Spector and a gun. She accomplished that by eliciting perjured testimony. Leonard Cohen was not a recipient of the April 18, 2011 email and Streeter concealed the portion of that email to IRS Commissioner's Staff and Rice re. legitimate federal tax matters. The trial was a disgrace.
