Monday, October 19, 2015

Kelley Lynch's Email to Paulmikell Fabian, IRS Chief Trial Counsel's Office Re. the Ongoing Criminal Harassment

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Rice's argument - brilliant!
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, Paulmikell.A.Fabian@irscounsel.treas.gov, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, rkory <rkory@rkmgment.com>


Mr. Fabian,

I am privately forwarding IRS, FBI, and DOJ the ongoing criminally harassing emails I receive from Stephen Gianelli.  Michelle Rice is correct about one point during this hearing:  I was concerned about Cohen's tax fraud and raised that as an issue with Judge Babcock personally.  This appears to be a blatant attempt on Gianelli's part to elicit information.

As for the Colorado issues, I documented that very carefully for DOJ.  That is one of the reasons they are copied on these emails.  Gianelli personally advised me that Spector prosecutor Pat Dixon was behind one of the Boulder incidents.  In any event, the jurors did not believe Boulder PD; the manager lied to the Sheriff's Department about my subpoena to the owner; and I prevailed on the only issue I was falsely arrested over.  I have asked DOJ to investigate the entire situation with respect to me and Boulder PD.  My attorney, David Moorhead, felt Cohen/Kory were behind it somehow.  He actually hired a private investigator on his own and met with Rutger to review his declaration.

Kelley

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Stephen Gianelli,

I have received quite a lot of harassing emails since filing my Declaration with Tax Court.  I find it absurd that you would send me a copy of the October 6, 2015 hearing transcript and view it as your ongoing attempt to infiltrate matters and elicit information that relates to Leonard Cohen's legal positions and defense.


I am once again advising you to cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch

cc:  Michelle Rice and Robert Kory

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:09 PM
Subject: Fw: Rice's argument - brilliant!
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>


‎FYI. 

I don't know who did a worse job - you or Rice.

You certainly didn't mention any of to points you insisted you "already knew about". 

She failed utterly to make her case on sanctions. At times her argument was incoherent. 

As an aside, it occurs to me that YOU have more trial experience than Rice does. You represented yourself pro se in a Colorado criminal court, even winning an acquittal on the "resist, delay or obstruct" charge + a complement from the trial judge. That is one more case than Rice has ever tried.

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 22:23
To: Michelle Rice
Cc: Robert Kory
Subject: Fw: Rice's argument - brilliant!



Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
 "And so it's our, you know, I mean‎ ... basically ... you know, ... So, basically ... It's our sort of feeling that this

motion here was where she waived her personal jurisdiction.· I mean  ... And so, I mean, I think that ...  I mean, they don't have to ... but I think the main point that we're ... trying to make, it's a 128.7B1, which is the purpose of the harassment.· I mean ...". 

-- Michelle Rice
   10/6/2015 oral  argument in support of sanctions motion