Date: Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:51 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>
IRS,
I will now submit the additionally criminally harassing emails re. the Tax Court matter to the Court. I was the Tax Matters Partner (as brought to my attention by my accountant in September 2004) on the TH 2001, 2002, and 2003 federal tax returns. The $1 million was a downpayment on the TH deal and, as of 2002, Leonard Cohen and his representatives were well aware that this deal had closed with Sony. The assets however are owned by BMT. All of this pre-dates the fraudulent default judgment and Complaint which is nothing other than Cohen's defense to the criminal tax fraud allegations and theft.
This Criminal Stalker has harassed me, Rutger, Ray, my sister, Paulette Brandt, and many others for years now - since he heard from Michelle Rice in 2009. There was and remains no reason for this individual to phone the Chief Trial Counsel's office as he has no involvement in this matter whatsoever. Opposing counsel at the Chief Trial Counsels' office in Los Angeles would have nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that the IRS in Washington, DC was reading my blog.
The fraud default judgment would not be relevant to any IRS matter as the entire Complaint is fraudulent and the documents attached replete with perjured statements. The ledger is evidence of financial and accounting fraud. And, Cohen and his personal tax/corporate lawyer didn't mediate and determine that my ownership in this entity was a "mistake" that they secretly "rectified" until sometime after the Complaint was filed.
I do hope IRS recorded this call because Gianelli must have mentioned my name. There is no way he would have known who opposing counsel is in the Tax Court Petition matter if it were not for the Petition itself. I intend to ask the Tax Court to have this evidence preserved because I assume this Criminal has lied to IRS. The Chief Trial Counsel's office would not be the office that would handle my reports to IRS, FBI, and DOJ re. Gianelli's criminal witness tampering, intimidation tactics, etc.
Kelley
1
Exit Time:
20 Jul 2015 09:27:22
Browser:
IE 11.0
OS:
Win7
Resolution:
1440×900
| Total Visits:
1
Location:
Washington, District of Columbia, United States
IP Address:
Internal Revenue Service (152.220.16.213) [
Search Referral:
www.google.com/#1 (Keywords Unavailable)
Visit Page:
| ||
Total Visits:
1
Location:
Washington, District of Columbia, United States
IP Address:
Internal Revenue Service (152.220.16.213) [
Search Referral:
www.google.com/#1 (Keywords Unavailable)
Visit Page:
|
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:14 AM
Subject:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:14 AM
Subject:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Wrong again!
I didn't say that I had no discussions with the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel. I said those discussions were not about taxpayer information OR your pending tax court petition.
Nor did I say that the discussions were extensive.
They were nevertheless sufficient to form an impression about the courtesy and collegiality of opposing counsel in your matter.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.