Is The Proxy Criminal Stalker Now Handling Leonard Cohen's Appellate Work?

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM
Subject: Fwd: Appeal - Case Number B265753 (It's not so easy to navage the court of appeal as a pro se)
To: Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com

Michelle Rice,

Will Gianelli be handling the appeals?  Please advise.  

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:31 AM
Subject: Appeal - Case Number B265753 (It's not so easy to navage the court of appeal as a pro se)
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

You failed to file case information statements as required by 8/11/2015 – for BOTH appeals.

To do so you will need to attach a copy of EACH (respective) order you are trying to appeal from AND will be required to identify the STATUTE that provides that each (respective) order you are trying to appeal is an APPELABLE ORDER. (Not all orders are appealable.)

If you fail to do this in the time specified in the written notice, each affected appeal will be DISMISSED.

If you fail to identify a proper basis for appealability in your case information statement, your (affected) appeal will be dismissed as from a “non-appealable order”. (As an aside, this happened to me once – even though I was correct that the order WAS appealable. I had to file a timely petition for rehearing to get the appeal reinstated. That alone was 40 hours of work. See here: In re Marriage of Dupre (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1517 “Stephen R. Gianelli, San Francisco, CA, for Appellant … [Appellant] filed a notice of appeal on May 20, 2004. On June 10, 2004, we dismissed the appeal as from a nonappealable order. On June 14, 2004, [Appellant]  filed a petition for rehearing. We granted her petition and reinstated the appeal on June 17, 2004.”)

This is one of the many potential procedural obstacles from the filing of the notice of appeal through decision and if you mess it up a DISPOSITIVE one.

Docket (Register of Actions)
Cohen v. Lynch Division p Case Number B265753 Date Description Notes
08/19/2015		Default letter sent; no case information statement filed.	both appeals