Date: Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:07 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Dan Bergman <dbergman@bergman-law.com>, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov, AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov
Hello Senate Judiciary,
Most of the sealed documents are available on PACER, through the State of Kentucky's website, or attached to Greenberg's lawsuit. This is the Complaint Greenberg filed and my own document affirming what I agree with or witnessed. I've reviewed Pacer and it is of interest to note that Cohen didn't move to seal the identical documents with Judge Babcock. Judge Babcock wondered if their "thuggery" worked. The answer is no although LA Confidential is all a federal tax matter. The custody lawyer who destroyed my sons' lives is now representing Cohen. That looks weird and evil to people.
I bought the attached documents (many under seal in LA) on Pacer. I'm not clear on why LA Superior Court has sealed Pacer documents.
Kelley Lynch
Greenberg says Cohen pressured him to go after his firm's insurance company for the money to repay him. "Be a man," Cohen told Greenberg, the suit says. By threatening his reputation, it appeared to Greenberg that Cohen, on Kory's advice, had decided to target Greenberg's and his insurance company's deep pockets. Then, alleges the lawsuit, Cohen and Kory began to pressure Lynch to join them in "their extortion scheme." From November 2004 to April 2005, the lawsuit says, Kory repeatedly let Lynch know, sometimes directly, sometimes through friends or other intermediaries, that Cohen was ready to "forgive" Lynch's obligations to him, and that she in fact could receive a hefty cut of "whatever funds could be extorted from Greenberg and other advisers with her co-operation."
Greenberg's suit alleges that when Lynch refused to participate, Kory and Cohen vowed to "crush her." It goes on to say their "tactics to terrorize, silence, or disparage Lynch" included threatening her that she would go to jail.
Lynch's response, to all of this has been bitter, scattered and in some cases difficult to comprehend. In a rambling exchange of emails with Maclean's last week, she denied any wrongdoing. She also declined to discuss the Agile Group's lawsuit, describing it as "bogus" and "slanderous," while promising to file her own complaints against Cohen and other principal players in the case. She added her phone had been disconnected because she lacked money to pay the bills.
Greenberg's suit alleges that when Lynch refused to participate, Kory and Cohen vowed to "crush her." It goes on to say their "tactics to terrorize, silence, or disparage Lynch" included threatening her that she would go to jail.
Lynch's response, to all of this has been bitter, scattered and in some cases difficult to comprehend. In a rambling exchange of emails with Maclean's last week, she denied any wrongdoing. She also declined to discuss the Agile Group's lawsuit, describing it as "bogus" and "slanderous," while promising to file her own complaints against Cohen and other principal players in the case. She added her phone had been disconnected because she lacked money to pay the bills.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
IRS,
The attachment was inadvertent. That was not the redacted declaration. I have asked Bergman/Rice to email me a copy. It was already served so there's no issue apart from their tactics. In any event, due to all of Cohen's bad faith/frivolous court filings, I have too many documents to go through right now. You have the original declaration which was submitted to IRS well in advance of my submitting it to Judge Hess. The seal, from my understanding, is temporary. I have never heard anything so weird in my life. I was evidently defrauded and have a/c privilege. If Judge Hess seals these permanently, I will appeal and this will become an issue in my federal matters. That will include legally challenging Cohen's refunds from IRS and FTB. He's not using an entirely fabricated complaint to blame me for his wrongdoing. LA Superior Court certainly permits endless shenanigans. Usually they don't even require evidence.This declaration Cohen submitted supporting the default is entirely perjured. The Complaint, now that it was submitted to IRS, is entirely perjured.I am working on my Reply which will be filed soon and will submit that to IRS as well. It's amazing that a Canadian citizen thinks he can get away with this. I still want to know why I wasn't notified when Cohen used my information to obtain these fraud refunds. That deprived me of due process.
Kelley
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
IRS, FBI, and DOJ,
I view this as blatant obstruction of justice and will address it as such. It is Paulette and my understand that these documents were sealed temporarily to permit Judge Hess an opportunity to review them. I attach hereto the redacted version of my declaration (prepared for IRS and then submitted to Judge Hess). Please feel free to obtain many of these documents from Pacer.
Kelley
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:
Daniel Bergman and Michelle Rice,
I received your fedex package with the documents authorizing me to serve you by email and the notice of ruling re. Plaintiff's ex part application to grant motion to seal portions of the court's record.It was my understanding, and Paulette concurs, that Judge Hess said he would seal these documents temporarily as he did not have a chance to review them. I tend to doubt records available on Pacer, attached as exhibits to court filings (which remain unsealed) in other jurisdictions, etc. can be sealed. I also tend to doubt that corporate documents belonging to me can be sealed. I have, as you know, provided these documents to IRS in 2005 and they relate to a federal tax matter. That matter includes the wrongful use of the fraudulent complaint to file Cohen's 2005 tax returns, amend his 2003 and 2004 returns, and obtain a refund for items he is not entitled to receive.Would you please confirm that your understanding is that this seal is temporary. I did agree with Judge Hess that the documents could be sealed temporarily while he reviewed them. I absolutely will not agree to a permanent sealing of these documents. I had no attorney/client privilege with Westin (or others) and Leonard Cohen - not I - was Westin's client. The IRS is in receipt of Westin's letter confirming he only represented Cohen. He did not represent the entities alone.I will file your "redacted" version of my declaration with a federal court in the not too distant future to explain precisely what - vis a vis these entities - Cohen is attempting to conceal.
Kelley Lynch
