Kelley Lynch's Email To Leonard Cohen's Lawyer Re. Motion

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:30 AM
Subject: Fwd: No hearing date, no "motion", no "federal lawsuit" - not now, not ever.
To: Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org

Jeffrey,

You may phone Brenda in Judge Hess' department and confirm the hearing date scheduled for June 23, 2015.  Paulette has had car troubles and just picked her car up last night.  We will file this motion today, drop a copy off for Agent Tejeda (as I've advised Judge Hess in the document), and serve you.  I have also asked Judge Hess to order you to advise Gianelli and Walsh to cease and desist harassing me over this case and Leonard Cohen matters.  We shall see what unfolds.  I didn't argue against the "drunken slut" accusations because that matter is not before Judge Hess.  Paulette Brandt is also being slandered and she, Investigator Frayeh, and "Swanigan" were copied on this email.  It's actually irrelevant what Hess does.  I want to see how much fraud and perjury is acceptable before LA Superior Court before filing a federal lawsuit.  The federal tax matters have not been adjudicated.  I've also asked Hess to clarify the judgment and explain how it subverts IRS reporting and filing requirements.  Also, whether it is retroactive and, if so, to what date.

If Cohen wants to argue that the tax returns filed are fraudulent, I find that rather mind boggling.  Westin worked for him and I had nothing whatsoever to do with tax matters, accounting, corporate matters, legal documents, loan documents, etc.  See the February 2002 email thread between me, Cohen, and Westin.  Transaction fees were not at issue at that time.  Cohen had authorized them, and signed the authorization himself, immediately following the close of the deal.  Does Leonard Cohen think he's entitled to an extinguished annuity obligation, loans totaling approximately $6.7 million, and another $4.7 million in payments?  That's not the agreement, Jeffrey.  I am aware that Cohen has benefited from his wrongdoing.  

If there are any more shenanigans, I will file another motion, ask for a hearing, and have Hess order that all communications are handled through the Court.  There's no lawsuit here, Jeffrey.  Just tactics.  That would include the outrageous situation whereby Rice gave the wrong information to the District Court in Colorado about me.  She had no authority to do so and I didn't enter an appearance.  I advised Judge Babcock that I viewed the lawsuit as an attempt to obstruct justice and cover up criminal tax fraud.  I've asked Hess to remove Rice from this case as she is conflicted and now serves as a lawyer and paid witness.  You can read the documents later tonight.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:37 AM
Subject: No hearing date, no "motion", no "federal lawsuit" - not now, not ever.
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: PAULETTEBRANDT8@gmail.com, "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov

Ms. Lynch,

You even lied about reserving a date for the “motion”. Nothing is currently calendared for the 23^rd or any other date in BC338322. Obviously, you would rather email and blog about your “motions” and “federal lawsuit” than actually file something that would then be ADJUDICATED at some point, resulting in yet another LOSS.  

For the record, this is what you have been doing for ten years, and therefore exactly what I expected.