From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: Delaware Division of Corporations
To: IRS, FBI, DOJ cc: Multiple Recipients
IRS,
I cannot tell if Cohen has taken the position that all formation documents are fraud; all stock units are fraud; all agreements are fraud; and all state and federal tax returns are fraud. I'm extremely unclear about that. I'm clear about the tactics, fraud, perjury, and ongoing legal conspiracy.
Kelley
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Jeffrey,
Another serious point: has your client taken the position that these entities themselves are fraudulent; the stock was fraudulently issued; all agreements were fraudulent; and the federal and state tax returns were fraudulent? It seems that way? He just signed everything and with a background in business, commerce, and law, had no idea what he was signing - including one page stock certificates. Is that the theory? As I've said, people are fortunate I'm not IRS Commissioner.I would like a response. I have no idea what has occurred. I view it as an elaborate conspiracy, spanning years, and crossing many state borders. That I am very clear about. I am clear about the abusive tactics. And, I'm clear about the further lies re. service in your response documents. I am also aware of this - courts cannot undo their insanity. They just get further into it and waste taxpayer dollars. No court is going to extort $10 million from me so Cohen can wrongfully convert my property to himself. The interest accrues yearly so that's an issue that bypasses all the statute defenses Gianelli has posed on Cohen's behalf. The interest is illegal and evidence of serious financial fraud.Kelley Lynch
DOJ,
I find it creepy that LAPD's TMU, City Attorney, etc. could determine what is NOT a federal tax matter with respect to my alleged emails. Vanderet, of course, weighed in. As I just addressed with Cal DOJ (and copied you in), the IRS obviously is the party to contact re. the fraudulent abuse of restraining orders to subvert their requirements. The City and County are not. The idea is absurd.Kelley
IRS,
I would like you to give me a formal opinion on what you do NOT believe related to a federal tax matter in the emails LAPD's celebrity unit, City Attorney, etc. illegally reviewed. Also, they were altered. Cohen's forwarding information was not included and that's evidence altering. LA Superior Court does not care about that. I have never seen such shabby evidence and/or foundation requirements. Anyway, Rice, Gianelli, etc. have emailed me about collateral estoppel, etc. They should research it: the case must be litigated and heard on the merits. Gianelli's role here must be investigated.Kelley
Hi DOJ,
I've sent you my research on that issue.Kelley
Jeffrey,
In case you're thinking of further harassment claims, I would like to remind you that I was not served and preclusions do not apply to default judgments where the case was not litigated or heard on the merits. If you want LAPD's celebrity unit to illegally review my emails re. serious federal tax and corporate matters, I want that on the record.Kelley Lynch
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi DOJ,
I think the truth is difficult for LA Superior Court. In any event, I do not know if the judgment is a California Court's dissolution of Delaware entities.Kelley
