The Usual Suspects On Phil Spector - The LA Times, Harriet Ryan, Sprocket, Stephen Gianelli ... It's A Coordinated Effort And Has Been Throughout The Trials ... It's Unfortunate Ron Burkle Wasn't Able To Buy The LA Times - Perhaps Some Of The Corruption In Los Angeles Would Be More Transparent

POINTING PEOPLE TO SPROCKET'S BLOG.  SPROCKET IS NOW EVIDENTLY A FRIEND OF LA SUPERIOR COURT'S DARK SHADOWS SOAP OPERA SYSTEM

lynda360 at 3:12 PM March 22, 2013

For those without a specific agenda and for those with an genuine interest in knowing more about the trial, including documents involved, etc., I strongly recommend checking out Trials & Tribulations, a great blog but entertaining as well as informative.

Here's the link to the Spector case:

http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/2008/10/phil-spector-trial-links.html

And 'Sprocket' didn't just cover this case, she's covered and continues to cover other cases from a personal but factual approach.

IS THIS MY STALKER, STEPHEN GIANELLI, SETTING UP REASONABLE DOUBT THEORIES ABOUT PHIL SPECTOR THAT CAN THEN BE ATTACKED AND REFUTED?  I'DBET THE FARM THAT IT IS AND I SEE RIGHT THROUGH STEPHEN GIANELLI WHO WAS MOST DEFINITELY CONSPIRING WITH MICHELLE BLAINE ABOUT ME AND TARGETING MY BLOGS AND EMAIL ACCOUNTS. THAT'S WHEN I REALIZED - PERHAPS ALAN JACKSON IS SOMEHOW CONNECTED TO STEPHEN GIANELLI ...

StephenG2010 at 6:19 AM March 22, 2013

Harriet,

By questioning the accuracy of the verdicts in the Jackson and Blake trials, you do more undermine confidence in the jury system than a hollywood movie ever could.

Some of us believe that Phillip Spector - guilty or innocent - did not receive a fair trial. No trial movie can be 100% accurate in detail (trials are essentially tedious affairs and there were no cameras in Spector's mansion), but at their best they caputure the essence.

I'll reserve judgment until I have seen the film.

http://discussions.latimes.com/20/lanews/la-et-st-phil-spector-reporter-notebook-20130321/10

Evidence That Michelle Blaine And Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut Conspired To Target Kelley Lynch's Blog Titled "philspectorandkelleylynch.blogspot.com"

Exceprts From Michelle Blaine's Utterly Revolting Blog About Phil Spector With Posts From Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut.  Michelle Blaine is a woman who stole from Phil Spector.  Like Leonard Cohen, the District Attorney's office did not charge her.  I have no idea why that would be the case.  I call Michelle Blaine the female Leonard Cohen.  Cutler called her a bald-faced liar and thief.  That's precisely what I have to say about Leonard Cohen.  Both filed fraudulent lawsuits and both have obvious motive.  These are the types of moves liars and thieves make to cover their  own actions.  See below for Blaine and Gianelli/Blogonaut's comments re. the targeting of my Blog.  Clearly, they conspired together and Gianelli/Blogonaut also aligned himself with Leonard Cohen - after hearing from his lawyer in 2009 - and has relentlessly targeted and slandered me since that time.  Attorney David Moorhead - Colorado - thought Boulder PD might have targeted me after hearing from Cohen's lawyers.  I recently heard that Cohen's lawyers had also been in touch with SMPD.  Due to the conduct of these two police departments, I began copying the Department of Justice in on my emails.  The City Attorney of Los Angeles thinks the DOJ is irrelevant.  That tells me all I need to know about the City Attorney of Los Angeles.  

NOTE:  Michelle Blaine was posting on Stephen Gianelli'/Blogonaut's Blog when I posted the truth about Leonard Cohen and noted that I was convinced Phil Spector was innocent.  Thereafter, Gianelli began relentlessly targeting me, members of my family, etc.  Blaine also decided to slander and target me.  As I've stated, this is a highly coordinated campaign of cyber-terrorism and seems to include Sprocket of Trials & Tribulations.  My Norwegian roommates were quite brilliant, attended UC Berkeley, and figured out this social media aspect of the high profile Phil Spector trial; understood Gianelli was engaged in an ad hominem attack on my character; and did a presentation on this at UC Berkeley.  

February 6, 2007 10:56

Phil Spector to receive $900,000 settlement

Legendary producer’s former assistant has to pay up

Read more at http://www.nme.com/news/phil-spector/26263#5crif3ytRxzZpDbh.99 


mControl Blogs

http://mcontrolblogs.blogspot.com/

Updates

Something kinda interesting... Henry Lee does NOT list the Spector case in his 'Famous Cases' listing.

Updated! Kelley Lynch Blog Is GONE! Blogger finally listened and has pulled the flagged blog. Thanks to all who flagged and especially to Blogonaut for initiating the pull.

Blog has been removed
Sorry, the blog at philspectorandkelleylynch.blogspot.com has been removed. This address is not available for new blogs.

June 21, 2009 3:16 PM

Blogonaut said...

DING DONG THE WITCH IS DEAD

http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/06/ding-dong-witch-is-dead.htm
NOTE: lBoulder PD has apparently been asked to target Kelley and possibly arrest her.

We have confirmed that the spam/hate blog of the person currently living in Boulder, Colorado, has been removed by Google.

We consider this the end of the matter, and unless and until there are actual additional criminal or civil court filings related to this matter, we will not be reporting further on this sadly demented person.

June 22, 2009 3:05 PM

mControl said...

Well I am pleased that this saga is finally put to bed. Now we can all get a bit of rest from her constant diatribes and rants.

Peace be with her...

June 22, 2009 5:29 PM

New comments have been disabled for this post by a blog administrator.

About mControl

Some days, I fall off the face of the planet and forget to brush my teeth and, more importantly, even forget to tell my kids to brush their teeth, because holy shit there are people inside my computer that are calling for me day and night, longing for me to write, thinking, sometimes mistakenly, that I am witty and funny! I can’t let them down!So here I am, neglecting my real life, one blog at a time.

Wanna get in touch?

Don't have a comment? Want to comment in private? Just want to reach out and say hello? If you want to email me, you can! Right Here!
I personally respond to all of my messages... So take a moment and drop a line to say hello!

From Where They Come

*Live Traffic Feed *  Los Angeles, California arrived from sprocket-trials.b logspot.com on "mControl Blogs: Guest Blog from Fergie concerning Rachelle and her LACK of a fanbase!" *  Boulder, Colorado arrived from google.com on "mControl Blogs" *  Saint Louis, Missouri arrived on "mControl Blogs" *  Palm Desert, California left "mControl Blogs" via feedproxy.google.com *  Van Nuys, California left "mControl Blogs: Kelley Lynch - extraordinary." via blogger.com *  Palm Desert, California arrived on "mControl Blogs" *  Wooster, Ohio arrived from sprocket-trials.b logspot.com on "mControl Blogs" *  Van Nuys, California arrived from google.com on "mControl Blogs: Kelley Lynch - extraordinary." *  Silver Spring, Maryland arrived on "mControl Blogs: But Why?" Ridiculous Disclaimer mControl Blog Disclaimer (ya know - the legal mumbo jumbo) This is a personal weblog. The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of any other people, unless otherwise noted. This is a blog. That fact means nothing. It is not a peer-reviewed journal, a final archive of my writing, a sponsored publication, or the product of gatekeeping and editing. That does mean something…it means that while the ideas and thoughts are often vital and the product of a long gestational period, the writing itself is not. It is essentially as it came from the keyboard: spontaneous, unproofed, unrevised, and corrected afterward only when necessary to address mistakes that grossly effect the intent. All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. Michelle Blaine and mControlblogs.blogspot.com makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis. Feel free to challenge me, disagree with me, or tell me I’m completely nuts in the comments section of each blog entry, but I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason whatsoever (abusive, profane, rude, or anonymous comments) - so keep it polite, please. Just in case. If I say something stupid in the future, it’s better to be able to point out that the stupidity is mine, and mine alone. My stupidity! You can’t have it! :) Thank you, Michelle B. (blog master)

http://mcontrolblogs.blogspot.com/2009/06/please-flag-hate-blog.html

I Had No Female Co-Occupant - Not Jane Doe, Not Jihad Jane, And Not Bob's Your Uncle

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:27 PM
Subject: Gianelli Moves Onto The Proof Of Service Re. Cohen's Complaint I Wasn't Served
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>


Hello,

Gianelli must have a lot of time on his hands to spend on his obsession - me.  For the record, I didn't live with anyone called Jane Doe. I had no female co-occupant, ever.  Jane Do or Jihad Jane.  It doesn't matter what name you want to make up - I had NO FEMALE CO-OCCUPANT.  The proof of service is perjured.  I've reviewed it with attorneys and a bounty hunter also weighed in and noted that an actual name was needed.

I don't care if she had one or two black eyes.  I didn't have a female co-occcupant.  I wasn't served the complaint.  I wasn't served or notified of the default judgment in May 2006.  The judgment is VOID.  

All the best,

Kelley

 Blogonaut said...

Oh, and Kelley, when a legal document refers to "Jane Doe", it does not mean that her name is literally Jane or Ms. doe.

And when a proof of service describes "black eyes" the process server did not mean to say the female handed the papers had "one or more" shiners.

Good Lord, how obtuse.

March 22, 2013 at 9:11 PM

 Blogonaut said...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29620753/Cohen-vs-Kelley-Lynch-Proof-of-Service-Complaint

March 22, 2013 at 9:11 PM

Another Attempt Of Gianelli's To Infiltrate Phil Spector's Defenses Or Witness Tamper? That's A Real Probability.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:21 PM
Subject: Fwd: CEASE AND DESIST GIANELLI
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>


Hi,

I was just looking for some documents and found this unopened insane email from Gianelli, copying in one of my trial lawyers, Captain Bornman (a man I know; Gianelli doesn't - Captain Bornman has not advised me not to contact him and Gianelli's a liar so I don't care what he says); and Dennis Riordan about Rutger and David Moorhead's view that he's a material witness for Phil Spector.

All the best,

Kelley

From: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: CEASE AND DESIST GIANELLI
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: mlbornma@lasd.org, NRamnaney@pubdef.lacounty.gov, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>

NOTE:  GIANELLI COPIES IN RAMNANEY BUT DOES NOT COPY IN BOCHE OR KELLY.  RAMNANEY IS MY FORMER TRIAL LAWYER AND GIANELLI HAS ATTEMPTED TO INSERT HIMSELF INTO MY TRIAL MATTERS.  THE APPEAL IS NOT RESOLVED YET.  WHY HE'S WRITING CAPTAIN BORNMAN - A MAN I KNOW - IS BEYOND MY ABILITY TO EXPLAIN.  AND THEN THERE'S DENNIS RIORDAN.  GIANELLI JUST FEELS COMFORTABLE COPYING IN MY FRIEND PHIL SPECTOR'S APPELLATE ATTORNEY?  WELL, I WILL WRITE TO PHILLIP ABOUT THIS AND HAVE ALREADY ADDRESSED STEPHEN GIANELLI WITH PHILLIP IN GREAT DETAIL.  

Ms. Lynch,

No one from my office – including me – has ever spoken with attorney Phillip Boche. Your claims to the contrary and the bizarre manner in which you are addressing this issue – via emails to public figures whom you have never met, to the IRS, FBI etc. – all people with zero jurisdiction or authority over your imagined impropriety on the part of your public defender – are strong indications that you are a very sick woman who needs psychiatric intervention.

Gianelli publicly posted that he was communicating with one of my lawyers.  Since Phil Boche's conduct was so bizarre (and even his office agreed and I have witnesses to what unfolded at the so-called probation hearing) I thought it might be Boche.  But perhaps it is Mike Kelly who communicated - per Gianelli - with Gianelli about what my witnesses did or did not corroborate.  This completely shocked the Public Defendér's office when I brought it to their attention.  I also read Gianelli's public comments to Agent Tejeda/IRS who I called from the so-called probation hearing due to the outrageous conduct on the part of public defender Phil Boche.  Stephen Gianelli has no idea who I have or haven't met.  This stark raving lunatic who has targeted me and my familiy relentlessly since 2009 does NOT know me.  I've brought everything about this situation to the attention of the IRS and FBI.  I have, after all, been documenting everything I've gone through since reporting Cohen's tax fraud - in 2005 - to the IRS and for the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and others.  

Your apparent assumption that “Phil Spector’s legal team” (including attorney Dennis Riordan who you don't know either but have emiled thousands of times since 2009 without a response)  would have any interest in speaking to David Moorehead – a court-appointed lawyer who briefly represented you in Boulder, Colorado in 2007 when you were arrested in Juanita’s Restaurant (after making a scene and refusing to leave) – about what your son Rutgar Penick  (allegedly) told him during a 2007 conversation – is equally disconnected from reality.

Stephen Gianelli has no idea who I know or don't know and that includes my friend Phil Spector's appellate attorney.  I think Phil Spector and his legal team will want to speak with David Moorhead who was very clear about his views that Rutger was a material witness for Phil Spector and he felt the DA had the power and motive to have me taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector.  He didn't really think the cops acted on their own.  I agree with his assessment, have spoken to Homeland Security - and others - about this matter.  It's an outrage and no one can ever explain away the fraudulent Killer King file or explain why I was taken to South Central from Brentwood when UCLA was right down the street.  

I saw a man at Juanita's who I thought had his penis out in front of a child.  I went outside to find a police officer and came back to an unconscionable situation.  I won the "obstructing a police officer" arrest issue on trial.  Period.  

Why is Gianelli writing me and copying in Dennis Riordan about Phil Spector and Rutger.  He doesn't know us.  He definitely doesn't know Phil Spector.  But he does, from what I can tell, attempt to infiltrate matters, sabotage them, and engages in witness tampering. So, perhaps that's why he's writing about David Moorhead's views on Rutger as a material witness.  David Moorhead's entitled to his views.

All of the above is readily apparent to every one of your email recipients who are even bothering to read your emails – which are not enhancing your claim that you have no mental health issues. The apparent fact that you cannot see that is further evidence that you need psychiatric help and not the opposite.

I have no mental health issues and do not need psychiatric help but Cohen has a lifelong publicly documented history of legal and illegal drug abuse, psychiatric ailments, and Stephen Gianelli should be formally profiled by the FBI.  He is dangerously unstable.  Who cares if he's in denial.  I still think his conduct has been criminal with respect to me.  David Moorhead did NOT represent me in the Juanita's matter and, as usual, another court permitted a trial to go forward without my witness - the owner of Juanita's.  The manager lied to the Sheriff's Department when he said the owner no longer worked there.  The manager then testified about what he told me - that Boulder PD did not want me in Juanita's and then retracted that testimony.  I have never seen so many liars in my life and seeing a man who may have his penis out in front of a child is a very serious matter, particularly in Boulder with the Jean Benet Ramsey situation and a very serious problem with pedophiles, including in the Boulder Public Library.  

It’s called denial.

Stephen R. Gianelli-SBN 83476

On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Mr. Riordan,

The situation with Phil Boche is disturbing.  I had witnesses present,
spoke to his Supervisor, and contacted Agent Tejeda/IRS as the
situation was unfolding.  The City Attorney signed off on the
probation requirements.  No objection.  I wonder why Gianelli
continues to publicly slander me.  Why does he think I would go to
"jail?"  Did he and Boche engage in some type of unconscionable legal
conduct?  Remains to be seen.  My witnesses have their own opinions on
the situation.  In reality, people are talking about:  the DA's
conduct with respect to me; the outrageous lies told by prosecutor
Streeter - to two judges and my jurors; Phil Boche; and now Stephen
Gianelli.  What unfolded with Boche yesterday was unreal and I am not
alone in that assessment.  I am writing you (copying in Gianelli and
Boche) to let you know that the City Attorney signed off on my
requirements.  Why Boche didn't address all of this at the July 17th
hearing is a very very serious issue for me.  All of this was
documented - and in the file I brought to court - on that day.
Something's wrong.

I will now privately document precisely what unfolded with Boche, his
supervisor, my witnesses, and the fact that I repeatedly contacted
Agent Tejeda/IRS about what was unfolding.  My witnesses believe I had
to force Boche to advise the judge that I had satisfied all
requirements, etc.  They thought he was attempting to provoke me and
undermine me.  They heard my conversations with his supervisor.  And
they witnessed him.  They know people are lying about me.  When I
returned to the Bay Area - the people who heard the story noted that I
have been relentlessly targeted over Phil Spector and due to the fact
that I reported Cohen's criminal tax fraud to the IRS.  The refund in
no way closes the case.  I met with Agent Sopko/Treasury well after
Cohen received the refund notice in the IRS binder.

I will write you and others privately about my latest LA Confidential
moment.  Then, I will do what the Grand Jury Advier instructed me to
do - write you a letter about Cohen's various gun stories.  After
that, I will do what Wendy/Judge Fidler's clerk advised me to do:
write the DA about Cohen's various gun stories before LA Superior
Court and copy in Judge Larry Fidler.

If Boche is the "public defender" who had a 45-minute conversation
with Gianelli - how serious is that issue?  Jail?  I see.  I also
spoke to his supervisor after the hearing and my witnesses are well
aware of that.  David Moorhead is not a public defender.  He advised
me that he was a DDA on high profile matters and has no problems,
whatsoever, testifying in other high profile matters - such as mine.
I want Phil Spector's legal team to speak to him about his meeting
with me and my older son.  He reviewed my older son's "Declaration"
with him.  He then advised me that my older son is a "material
witness" for Phil Spector.  Do you know how extensively Gianelli
targeted him and my then minor son?  It's all well documented.  Is
Gianelli a "co-conspirator" as he wrote on his blog.  Give that some
thought.  Others now are.

Love,

Kelley

On 11/9/12, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
> Francisco,
>
> I've advised Gianelli - again - to cease and desist.  I wonder who the
> former public defender he spoke with might be?  It doesn't appear to
> be Kelly or Ramnaney.  David Moorhead is a private attorney who hired
> a PI, paid for by himself personally, in Boulder, Colorado.  He felt
> the conduct of Boulder PD was directly related to Cohen/Kory,
> understands Boulder PD, but I want more details about LAPD.  Officer
> Storbeck/Boulder PD advised me that LAPD called Boulder PD about me.
>
> I'll write you privately about Phil Boche's conduct yesterday.  I
> phoned his supervisor before and after hearing.  I had witnesses
> present.  I repeatedly contacted Agent Tejeda/IRS to advise him as to
> what was unfolding - mentioned Stephen Gianelli as well.  The
> probation requirements are completed.  Probation was dismissed.  The
> fees are on hold until September 2013.  I explained to the judge that
> you obtained an extension and we are filing an appeal.  She said I
> could relate to the fees through the mail but thought I would want to
> attend one ,last hearing (next September) to address the situation
> with her directly.  She's correct and I agreed.  Phil Boche
> represented me.  His Supervisor told me Mike Kelly was never assigned
> to represent me at that hearing although that's what Boche advised me
> when I called the court, advised them that he would not give me the
> hearing address, and they put me on the phone with him - after
> advising me that I could have witnesses address the court.  My
> witnesses, who know I have no alcohol issues (and witnessed Boche's
> conduct yesterday), advised Boche that they would address the judge
> directly.
>
> I advised Boche that the judge should contact Captain Bornman directly
> with respect to the MERIT program and other issues.  Boche mentioned
> "law enforcement" at my hearing.
>
> I have again advised Gianelli to cease and desist.  I want to speak to
> you personally and privately about Phillip Boche and Stephen Gianelli.
>  They will now be removed from my emails documenting everything.
> Gianelli's pissed - I have "denounced" him to the IRS aned FBI.  I
> don't know if Agent Tejeda/IRS would view my perspective as a
> denouncement.  I have been clear - the man appears to be engaged in
> criminal conduct.
>
> I have sent you the drafts of my Motion to Vacate Cohen's retaliatory
> lawsuit, explained that Gianelli publicly threatened me over my
> intention to file that in 2010, and you have drafts of my Answer to
> Complaint, Declaration addressing all of Cohen's fraud, perjury, lies,
> and concealment, and I will complete those documents in the next week
> or two.  I have to review what evidence I will attach.  A lawyer
> advised me to address Gianelli's slander.  The man's obsession with me
> is outrageous and I think what happened with Boche is a legal outrage.
>  I called to thank his Supervisor after yesterday's hearing.  We did
> indeed address "Stephen Gianelli" and his public post about having a
> 45 minute conversation with my former public defender.
>
> All the best,
> Kelley
>
>
> On 11/9/12, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Captain Bornman,
>>
>> I think that's about it for now.  As you know, I am addressing LASD in
>> my Motion to Vacate and other legal documents that will be filed in
>> Leonard Cohen's retaliatory lawsuit against me.  I brought witnesses
>> to the court with me and they thought Boche's conduct was as suspect
>> as I did.  I spoke to his Supervisor before and after the hearing.  In
>> any event, stark raving lunatic and dangerously unstable, obsessed
>> "lawyer" - Stephen Gianelli - has publicly stated that he talked to my
>> former public defender before yesteerday's trial.  If that was Phil
>> Boche, there are serious legal issues on the horizon.  Gianelli is,
>> according to Investigator Frayeh, a "shady character" who may have
>> found a sympathetic ear with Alan Jackson about me.  He has definitely
>> aligned himself with Leonard Cohen.
>>
>> The great news - after forcing Boche to address everything with the
>> court this time, my judge dismissed the probation issues, found that
>> all requirements were completed, and understands the MERIT program.
>> That's the best news I've had all year.  My witnesses were reviewing
>> your curriculum and the lesson plans and were truly intrigued and even
>> learned things they were unaware of previously.  They think your EBI
>> program is extraordinary.  I ran into one deputy - who was very kind
>> to me at trial (he witnessed my intereaction with the DA's
>> "investigator" at my trial) - and thanked him for his professionalism.
>>  My witnesses saw that encounter and were truly delighted.  I do not
>> want anyone to think that I have it out for law enforcement because I
>> have the greatest respect for you and many men and women at LASD.
>>
>> Have a great day.  Does Gianelli speak for you?  Are you on my spam
>> list?  Or is this man a bald-faced liar with motive?  Mick Brown's not
>> on my email list.  He and I have privately been communicating about
>> Cohen's various gun stories before LA Superior Court and I just wrote
>> him about my latest adventures in LA Confidential.
>>
>> Have a great day.  If you're interested in Gianelli's slander - see
>> attached or below.  I contacted Agent Tejeda/IRS repeatedly from
>> yesterday's hearing.  Boche's Supervisor and I spoke before and after
>> the hearing.  My witnesses think something extremely sinister is
>> playing out here.  They are extremely intelligent men.
>>
>> Take it easy.  Gianelli's pissed - I've asked the IRS and FBI to
>> investigate his probable criminal witness tampering, criminal evidence
>> tampering, harassment, stalking, etc.  I haven't really "denounced"
>> him to the IRS and FBI but he seems fixated on those two agencies.
>> For the record, Captain Borman, no one has ever said "corruption" is
>> intelligent.  It is, however, revolting.  This situation reminds
>> people of LA Confidential and is an indictment of Los Angeles Superior
>> Court and not me.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Kelley
>>
>> On 11/9/12, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> To the IRS and FBI,
>>>
>>> See attached.  I've mocked up Gianelli's latest round of slanderous
>>> allegations about me.  I will now privately address what unfolded with
>>> Phil Boche at the hearing.  I brought three witnesses to that hearing.
>>>  The probation requirements are complete and my witnesses thought I
>>> had to force Boche to properly address this situation with the court.
>>> I phone Agent Tejeda/IRS as the situation was unfolding.  I'll write
>>> you all the details later.  I also spoke with Boche's Supervisor
>>> before and after the hearing.
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>> Kelley
>>>

Kelley Asks The Dallas FBI Why Dangerously Unstable Stephen Gianelli Thinks My Emails To The Dallas FBI Are Responses To Him And Thinks A Formal FBI Profile Is In Order

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:01 PM
Subject: Stephen Gianelli
To: "fbi.dallas" <fbi.dallas@ic.fbi.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>


Hello Dallas FBI,

Gianelli has now published my email to you.  My letter to you was not a response to Gianelli who I view as a dangerously unstable individual.  My appellate attorney is presently dealing with some of this insanity and has filed documents noting that Cohen owes me millions.  I won't be addressing with Gianelli.  But, for reasons I cannot understand, Gianelli appears to think my email to the Dallas FBI is a response to his assertions about anything.  In other words, a stark raving lunatic with motive relentlessly targeted me and my famiily.  Well, the Dallas FBI is the field office that was investigating the murder, Aryan Nation, Cartel, meth labs, and meth cooks that Cohen thinks is an implied threat to him.  

Stephen Gianelli should be formally profiled by the FBI.  His Holiness Kusum Lingpa already profiled Cohen and concluded that he's an asshole who is going to hell.  Cohen left out the fact that His Holiness actually made this assessment about him and he knew him.  

All the best,

Kelley

 Blogonaut said...

What is Kelley Lynch’s response to our assertion that she cannot (or won’t) focus on whether SHE duly reported the $10M+ in deposits/transfers to her two accounts during 1998-2004?

Kelley responds with yet another email sent to another FBI office, of course!


To the Dallas FBI,

REDACTED - See original below.

Leonard Cohen's Fraudulent Expense Ledger

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:53 PM
Subject: Fraudulent Ledger
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>


To the IRS Commissioner's Staff,

I just pulled out the fraudulent expense ledger that was in the IRS binder the prosecutor handed to my public defenders during the trial.  There are many serious problems here and I've addressed many of them with you.  The ledger is deranged.  I have never seen anything like it in my life.  Just lists of lists of numbers.  And then a handful of checks.  

First of all, Neal Greenberg provided the ledgers for the Cohen Family Trust (where the income from sale of assets I also own were deposited) and Traditional Holdings.  They are non-audited.  He has committed serious fraud and was sued by the SEC.  He's lost all his clients money and his statements were insane.  Co-mingled and outrageous.  I thought he engaged in churning; there are unidentfired wires; and while this ledger was being prepared (Kory testified that this is the ledger he gave Dale Burgess) so many items that didn't belong to me were in my column that it was an outrage.  I trust nothing Neal Greenberg prepared.  

There's no back-up documentation.  There are no royalty statements proving what was income or not.  And I don't understand how Leonard Cohen can suddenly say, ,for example, that there was a $500,000 payment made from TH to the IRS re. the $1 million ordinary income deposit he received from Sony in 1999, did not pay taxes on and most certainly not while I worked with him from TH on that amouont, and it has been recharacterized.  Same issue with Richard Westin's legal fees.  Same issue with $200,000 payment to CAK which never happened.  These people are lying.

In any event, this doesn't even resemble a ledger and the fact that LA Superior Court thinks this is evidence shocks the conscience.  I would like a formal IRS opinion on how Judge Ken Freeman concluded that Leonard Cohen was the beneficial owner of TH and BMT without corporate records.  

I have nothing further to say about the fraud expense ledger and believe the IRS should prepare an accounting that takes into consideration all assets, liabilities, equity, corporate ownership interests, etc.  

All the best,

Kelley

NOTE:  It was nice of LA Superior Court to toss in 10% interest which is nothing other than illegal damages from my perspective.  

My Email To The Dallas FBI Was Not An Attempt To Have A Discourse With Dangerously Unstable Stalker, Stephen Gianelli

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:40 PM
Subject: Gianelli, Dallas FBI, And Fraudulent Expense Ledger
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>
Cc: "fbi.dallas" <fbi.dallas@ic.fbi.gov>


To the Dallas FBI,

When I write you, do you think I'm having a discourse with Stephen Gianelli.  This man is a stark raving lunatic.  He actually called my elderly parents in Dallas.  He refused to cease and desist after my sister's Dallas attorney advised him to.  He is unstoppable.  The man is totally out of control.  

What is the issue here?  If I hear information that pertains to a murder, the Aryan Nation, the Cartel, meth labs, and meth cooks, am I supposed to keep that a secret?  Two young men were concerned this man would murder them.  I contacted the Department of Justice with my young acquaintance copied in.  

The expense ledger, as I've said, is fraudulent.  I wasn't served Cohen's lawsuit.  The proof of service re. the complaint is perjured.  I had no female co-occupant named Jane Doe witih one or two black eyes.  I wasn't served or notified of the default.  Therefore, it's a void judgment.  Beyond that, it's evidence of theft.  My ownership interest in all of Cohen's intellectual property - dating back to 1967 - is all in writing.  The corporate books and records are willfully disregarded and were concealed from the court but that seems to be a pattern with LA Superior Court from what I can tell.  The figures bantied around are always in flux, ever changing, and I owe the IRS nothing. Gianelli decided to retaliate and filed a fraudulent form with the IRS about me.  Last I heard, that's criminal activity.  He's acknowledged his motive online.  He's as arrogant as the day is long.  He's aligned with Leonard Cohen; heard from Michelle Rice in 2009 (and she's a lunatic who wrote and lied to me, copying in the IRS and FBI), and has relentlessly targeted me since.  Did he find a sympathetic ear with Spector prosecutor about me?  I would assume so.  Investigator Frayeh seemed to know what he was talking about and he was an investigator on Phil Spector's matter.  Why did Gianelli call him?  To see if Investigator Frayeh actually thinks Pat Dixon (a possible friend of Pellicano's according to a friend in a news media gathering agency who has reviewed Gianelli's Blog and thinks these people are sick and insane) is good looking?  

I filed an appeal re. the City Attorney's IRS sabotage case that involves Leonard Cohen's various versions of the Phil Spector gun stories.  Fortunately, it doesn't involve his insane comments about going to Israel to join the military during the Yom Kippur War.  I just spoke to a woman who ran into him at a temple in LA and that's exactly what he mentioned to her.  Who can join the mlitary without training?  The man embellishes stories and he lies.  In any event, after my appeal was filed Sandra Jo Streeter decided to llie to LAPD's Threat Management Unit about me.  My lawyer believes that is criminal obstruction of justice, retaliation, and understands - my trial was an IRS case that demands an investigation.  That's before we get into the DA and Phil Spector and some sleazy investigator hanging out in the courtroom and lunching with Cohen.  We are attempting to abandon the appeal due prosecutorial misconduct, retaliation, concealment of evidence, etc.  Who wants to be involved with these lunatics who cannot stop lying? 

For the record, I wrote the Dallas FBI (copied in other agencies and Dennis Riordan) and am not having a discourse with my dangerously unstable stalker who is engaged in a slanderous ad hominem attack on me in an attempt to discredit me.  Fortunately, people view him as a psychopath and sick and vile man.  

All the best,

Kelley

 Blogonaut said...

Here is how Kelley Lynch interprets our last posted comment:

"Stephen Gianelli Again Weighs In On The Dallas FBI's Investigation Into A Murder, Aryan Nation, Cartel, Meth Labs, Meth Cooks, Etc. "

Rather than address the issue: Did she report the entire $10M+ flowing into her personal and business accounts in her 1998 through 2004 1040s, she spews nonsense we never even mentioned.

NOTE:  This outrageous amount is constantly in flux.  I've seen $5 million, $7 million, $9 million, $11 million, and the same is true with respect to the fraudulent default judgment that is evidence of THEFT on the part of Leonard Cohen who has willfully disregarded all corporate governance, concealed all evidence from LA Superior Court, and appears to believe he is entitled to steal from his personal managers.  I've been clear - my taxes are paid in full.  What I'm not clear about is why Leonard Cohen thinks I should make huge charitable donations to the IRS with respect to a corporation he LIED to the court about - he is not the sole beneficial owner of Traditional Holdings and this wasn't held in trust for this man.  Blue Mist Touring Company wasn't held in trust for Leonard Cohen but he has concealed all corporate books and records.  

No wonder she is incapable of doing anything at this point to initiate or cogently defend against legal proceedings. She is incapable of simple discourse.

I don't engage in any type of discourse with people I view as criminals with serious motive and a mind that is actually nothing other than MENS REA.  This man is so insane - he actually views my email to the Dallas FBI (re. their investigation into very serious matters that prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter and Leonard Cohen attributed to an implied threat against Cohen which is DERANGED) as a discourse with him?  My God.  This man is so dangerously unstable.  I wonder if he called Bruce Cutler up and proposed yet?  He seems to be in love witih Phil Spector's disgraceful former lawyer.  He likes to ask men like Investigator Frayeh (who viewed him as a SHADY CHARACTER) if Pat Dixon's good looking.  He or Dixon think Eminem wants to dry hump Dixon because I quoted the lyric to Eminem's Puke and that caused Dixon to fear for his life.  And, he relentlessly tried to lure my then minor son into communciating with him.  This man has serious psychological problems.  His pal on his blog is Cohen fan, Susanne Walsh, and some lunatic by the name of Kelly Green who reminds me of Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson.  Green was also on the Darwin Exception, a social media tool used to trash Phil Spector and glorified Alan Jackson.  I see right through these people.  It's called LA Confidential with some satellite clowns with motive.  In other words, I am dealing with LA Confidential Meets The Insane Clown Posse.  

March 22, 2013 at 3:25 PM