Friday, December 6, 2019

Inspiration for Leonard Cohen's Propaganda Bllitz Against Kelley Lynch

Propaganda - Goebbels' Principles

Joseph Goebbels

Dr. Joseph Goebbels, beside being an intriguing character, was the Propaganda Minister for Hitler's Third Reich. He was recognized as a master of propaganda as his work was studied after WWII. Goebbels did not survive to enjoy the recognition; he and his wife committed suicide on 1 May 1945, a week before the final collapse of the Third Reich.
After the war, US personnel discovered a very large diary dictated by Goebbels. In it are his principles of propaganda. Leonard Doob's 1950 article details them from a translation of the diary by Louis Lochner (1948).

Hitler's Basic Principles

These principles are abstracted from Jowett & O'Donnell.
  • Avoid abstract ideas - appeal to the emotions.
  • Constantly repeat just a few ideas. Use stereotyped phrases.
  • Give only one side of the argument.
  • Continuously criticize your opponents.
  • Pick out one special "enemy" for special vilification.

Goebbels' Principles of Propaganda

When reading these propaganda principles, keep in mind that they were applied in wartime (WWII) and involve issues that don't arise otherwise. It's a long list, but Goebbels was dealing with the complexity of an all-out war. While reading them you may realize that some of the principles are generally applicable and not limited to wartime. Some might be quite familiar today. It is interesting to note that Goebbels' principles derive from Hitler's own ideas of propaganda.
  1. Propagandists must have access to intelligence concerning events and public opinion.
  2. Propaganda must be planned and executed by only one authority.
    1. It must issue all the propaganda directives.
    2. It must explain propaganda directives to important officials and maintain their morale.
    3. It must oversee other agencies' activities which have propaganda consequences.
  3. The Propaganda consequences of an action must be considered in planning that action.
  4. Propaganda must affect the enemy's policy and actions.
    1. By suppressing propagandistically desirable material which can provide the enemy with useful intelligence.
    2. By openly disseminating propaganda whose contents or tone causes the enemy to draw the desired conclusions.
    3. By goading the enemy into revealing vital information about himself.
    4. By making no reference to a desired enemy activity when any reference would discredit that activity.
  5. Declassified, operational information must be available to implement a propaganda campaign.
  6. To be perceived, propaganda must evoke the interest of an audience and must be transmitted through an attention-getting medium.
  7. Credibility alone must determine whether propaganda output should be true or false.
  8. The purpose, content, and effectiveness of enemy propaganda; the strength and effects of an expose'; and the nature of current propaganda campaigns determine whether enemy propaganda should be ignored or refuted.
  9. Credibility, intelligence, and the possible effects of communicating determine whether propaganda materials should be censored.
  10. Material from enemy propaganda may be utilized in operations when it helps diminish that enemy's prestige or lends support to the propagandist's own objective.
  11. Black rather than white propaganda must be employed when the latter is less credible or produces undesirable effects.
  12. Propaganda may be facilitated by leaders with prestige.
  13. Propaganda must be carefully timed.
    1. The communication must reach the audience ahead of competing propaganda.
    2. A propaganda campaign must begin at the optimum moment.
    3. A propaganda theme must be repeated, but not beyond some point of diminishing effectiveness.
  14. Propaganda must label events and people with distinctive phrases or slogans.
    1. They must evoke responses which the audience previously possesses.
    2. They must be capable of being easily learned.
    3. They must be utilized again and again, but only in appropriate situations.
    4. They must be boomerang-proof.
  15. Propaganda to the home front must prevent the raising of false hopes which can be blasted by future events.
  16. Propaganda to the home front must create an optimum anxiety level.
    1. Propaganda must reinforce anxiety concerning the consequences of defeat.
    2. Propaganda must diminish anxiety (other than that concerning the consequences of defeat) which is too high and cannot be reduced by people themselves.
  17. Propaganda to the home front must diminish the impact of frustration.
    1. Inevitable frustrations must be anticipated.
    2. Inevitable frustrations must be placed in perspective.
  18. Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred.
  19. Propaganda cannot immediately affect strong counter-tendencies; instead it must offer some form of action or diversion, or both.
These would be principles guiding the conduct of propaganda operations.

References

  • Goebbels' Principles of Propaganda, Leonard W. Doob, Public Opinion Quarterly, Fall 1950 pp. 419-442
  • Propagation and Persuasion; Jowett & O'Donnell


Corey Banks Views on Kelley Lynch, Phil Spector and the propaganda campaign Leonard Cohen, his representatives, Stephen Gianelli have engaged in


DECLARATION OF COREY BANKS
I COREY BANKS declare:
1.                I am a citizen of the United States who currently resides in Los Angeles, California.   I am
over the age of 18 years.  I have personal knowledge of the facts contained in this declaration and if called upon to testify I could and would testify competently as to the truth of the facts stated herein.
2.                I am a friend and business associate of Kelley Ann Lynch.  I understand how she
operates in a business environment, what she is like socially, and view her as family.  Ms. Lynch is someone I care deeply for.  She is the utmost professional. 
3.                At some point, Kelley and I were talking about a variety of business matters.  I
approached her and asked if she would work as my personal manager.  I am a rap artist who formerly had a record label deal with Columbia Records.  I am currently working on a new album that I plan to release on April 9, 2019, my birthday.  On a separate front, as personal managers do not handle publishing, I also asked Kelley if she would assist me in matters related to my own publishing and my parents’ musical catalogue.  Kelley now serves as my personal manager, publishing administrator, and we are working on other projects together as well.  She initially suggested one individual in the music industry for us to initiate dialogues with regarding these projects.  As I am also interested in a P&D deal, Kelley is assisting me with that as well.
4.                 Over time it was obvious that Kelley is an intelligent business woman, has extensive
knowledge of the entertainment industry, and actually cares about my work and that of my family’s.  Due to our conversations, I became aware of the fact that she knew Phil Spector, was a long term friend of his, once worked for him, and was concerned about his imprisonment and welfare.  She shed light on his case that I was completely unaware of.  I immediately questioned his prosecution and conviction.  I explained that my parents, Larry Banks and Joan “Jaibi” Banks  – both entertainers, musicians, and/or songwriters – also knew Phil Spector.  I was unaware of who Leonard Cohen was although Kelley discussed him with me.

Jaibi You Got Me (Corey's mother)


Married to Larry Banks in 1965, after his divorce with Bessie Banks.
JaibiYou Got Me
Mixed By – Rob KeylochWritten-By – Herman Wesley KelleyLawrence Banks*
The high opinion of Jaibi's recordings was endorsed by James McKean of Stylus Magazine, who wrote:
"Were it not for a slightly clumsy fade-out I would try to make a case for this ["You Got Me"] being, quite simply, the perfect record. Although well under three minutes, it is by no means a pop song—it didn't jump out and grab me, and it might not grab you. But give it your full attention and you’ll come to cherish how the voice soars, becoming both the loved and the love, capturing perfectly the point between strength and vulnerability, pulling the two together ‘til they meet as one. The stately pace, the way the horns swell slowly and with such grace behind the melody, the way the bass starts boiling over when she sings "I try to fight this burning desire", the swirling keyboard licks, fuck, even the drums are bursting with emotion. This is the shit. This is AWESOME. I love this song!"

Bessie Banks - Go Now (Corey's stepmother)

Bessie Banks originally recorded this song, written for her by Larry Banks and Milton Bennett, in 1963. It was soon covered by The Moody Blues as well as five other artists.

Corey Banks performs and records under the name Corey Drumz

5.                After hearing about some of the issues related to Kelley, Phil Spector’s case, and Leonard
Cohen, I began searching for information online.  I was curious about the Spector case due to the fact that he and my parents came out of the same generation, had tremendous influence on the music in the 60s, my father’s song “Go Now” (recorded by my stepmother Bessie Banks) was one of the songs (when covered by the Moody Blues) that led to the British Invasion, and Phil Spector is an inconceivable and legendary record producer who has worked with Ike & Tina Turner, the Beatles, John Lennon, and many great artists.  His work had a profound influence on the African American community and music.  I am still not familiar with Leonard Cohen’s musical work but understand he performed and wrote “Hallelujah.” 
6.                I located a variety of blogs and websites related to Kelley, Phil Spector, and Leonard
Cohen.  Some of the blogs and websites I came across were the riverdeepbook.blogspot.com blog, Truth Sentinel (where interviews appear about both Leonard Cohen and Phil Spector featuring Kelley and others), and the Kelley Lynch Fact Check Blog that appeared to be written by professional lawyers interested in defending Leonard Cohen and destroying Kelley.  I continually noticed comments by or references to an individual by the name of Stephen Gianelli.  I therefore decided to write him.  It was my initial impression that he knew Kelley personally and was part of Leonard Cohen’s legal team.
7.                On May 12, 2018, I took it upon myself to send an inquiry about Kelley to Stephen
Gianelli.  I was curious to find out what he personally knew about her and how he obtained his information.  I explained to Gianelli that I saw information he posted on Truth Sentinel You Tube (Cohen/Spector interviews) about Kelley Lynch, that I had recently met her, and she seemed like a good person.  Kelley and I actually met in February 2018 and have spent considerable time together.  We see one another on a daily basis, socialize together weekly, have mutual friends, and I feel I can say that I have a great appreciation of who she is on a personal and professional level.  I have also witnessed her in numerous proceedings before LA Superior Court.  Gianelli’s posts did make me question whether or not Kelley was simply a “good con artist.”  I can unequivocally state that she is not.  Kelley is genuine, straightforward, direct, and fiercely loyal.  I explained to Gianelli that my parents were out of the Spector era, knew Phil personally, and that’s how Kelley and I connected.  I also informed Gianelli that I found his email address on the riverdeepbook.blogspot.com site although, as I explained, I wasn’t clear whose site that was. 
8.                On May 12, 2018, I received responses from Stephen Gianelli.  I would ultimately receive
countless emails from him until I demanded that he stop harassing me.  On May 12, 2018, I responded to Gianelli, explained that the information he provided was informative, and then shared his emails with Kelley.  She explained the situation to me and I believe her completely and wholeheartedly.  She has nothing but my utmost respect particularly after what she has endured.  I attach hereto some of the absolutely libelous emails Stephen Gianelli sent me in an attempt to discredit Kelley and destroy her.  One’s reputation is the basis of a personal entertainment industry manager’s business and career.  It is my understanding that Stephen Gianelli does not know Kelley at all, has never met her, and has spent years terrorizing her, members of her family, friends, and witnesses who submit declarations to courts of law about Kelley or people who support and love her.  In summary, Gianelli seemed bitter.  He was purposefully trying to destroy Kelley.  He went way beyond anything I asked and referred me to people (references), such as attorney Leslie Zigel, who Kelley has never worked with.  Gianelli wanted to blame and attack Kelley rather than answer a question.  He kept sending emails I didn’t ask for.  I couldn’t have picked a better person to do business with.  Kelley is the individual who encouraged me to resume my career as an artist.  When we initially spoke, I was simply considering releasing my old masters.  Exhibit A:  Emails Corey Banks received from Stephen Gianelli, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
9.                I’d like to provide my impressions, as a non-participant, of the Los Angeles Superior
Court proceedings in this case.  It looked or seemed entirely biased and prejudicial against Kelley.  There was more focus given the prosecutors being able to voice their case.  When Kelley attempted to do the same, she was shunned.  When she asked a simple question, such as “a public defender?,” she was shut down.  I have experience with court proceedings and this was overwhelmingly apparent.  From my point of view, Kelley was not disrespectful during the proceedings.  She wasn’t permitted to object throughout the proceedings or do anything else for that matter.
10.            The prosecutor’s bias and prejudice towards Kelley was disturbing.  He doesn’t appear
to care about justice at all.  The prosecutor seemed more interested in going on vacation.  His objection to her request for a continuance, due to the need to have a new investigator appointed, was that he had vacation plans.  The prosecutor was arrogant, cold towards Kelley, and clearly just wants a conviction regardless of the facts or truth of the case.  Kelley cannot get a word in edgewise while the prosecutor rambles on and on.  He also knows that this is a high profile case with high profile celebrities involved as well and prosecutors are known to advance their own careers with high profile cases.  After being forced by the Court to meet in the attorney room with the prosecution, Kelley explained to me that he was aggressive, unhinged, flipped out, and a bully.  I understand that Kelley’s former prosecutor, in a related case, made her way into the newspaper by prosecuting Tupac Shakur and then Kelley on behalf of Leonard Cohen.  Both cases involve domestic violence although Kelley was Leonard Cohen’s personal manager, publishing administrator and so forth, and they never dated.  It seems as though LA Superior Court simply assigned Kelley a dating relationship with Leonard Cohen.  I have heard details of Cohen’s sexual harassment, sexual assault, indecent exposure, and masturbating in front of Kelley.  It is reprehensible conduct.  It reminds me of Harvey Weinstein who is being prosecuted in NY and investigated in LA.  It seems as though certain government entities are protecting Leonard Cohen.  I am aware that, in Kelley’s prior prosecution, Cohen testified against Phil Spector. 
11.            I thought Kelley did an excellent job in court, appeared intelligent, was analytical, and
professional.  I personally couldn’t have done it.  I couldn’t handle the basic research she has done, written the legal documents, let alone handled the proceedings themselves particularly as they appear to victimize her.  Kelley has continuously advised me that she does not want to speak directly to the Court and/or prosecutor and I appreciate and understand her point of view. 
12.            I would also like to state that I saw Kelley leave court at one of the recent hearings.  The
prosecutor attempted to obstruct her path and she was forced to step aside.  I believe he wants her to look bad and provoke her so he can go on vacation.  It also doesn’t appear that the prosecution actually has a case.  They appear to be making the case up and obviously want to pressure her into copping out. 
13.            I was present in court when Ms. Lynch was appointed back-up counsel without a simple
explanation of who he was, why he was specifically appointed, or where he worked.  Kelley asked “A public defender?” and the response from the Court was to shun her.  Kelley shared her communications with the back up counsel with me.  He was unable to respond to her for approximately two weeks.  When he finally did, it was obvious he didn’t bother to read her emails and explained that he had no experience with state court proceedings.  Kelley therefore asked him to withdraw as this case is being heard in state court.  Kelley has continually expressed her disbelief at the public defenders’ handling of her case, the false or confused information transmitted to jurors, and her concern about any affiliation with them in this case and their potential negative influence in federal tax matters she is dealing with and federal lawsuits she intends to pursue. 
14.            It seems like Kelley is actually being targeted over Phil Spector.  He is no doubt still
privately fighting his conviction.  Kelley is publicly drawing attention to the case.  I have witnessed people who thought he was guilty (primarily through press accounts) question his prosecution and conviction.  Cohen’s testimony about Phil Spector and a gun is a more likely reason for the targeting of Kelley.  It seems dubious that federal tax matters, including the need for tax forms and returns, would capture the attention of prosecutors, law enforcement, and/or judges.  I understand that Leonard Cohen has at least three contradictory versions of his gun story about Phil Spector before LA Superior Court.  It is my understanding that Kelley has requested discovery from the prosecution about Cohen’s potential role as an informant in the Spector case and any quid pro quo he may have entered into with respect to his personal wrongdoings. 
15.            I would like to express my personal opinion that I cannot even imagine Leonard Cohen
being someone Kelley was remotely attracted to in a romantic and/or sexual manner. 
16.            Kelley Lynch does not have any mental incompetence issues.  She is an extremely
competent individual.  She does not do drugs and does not even touch marijuana.  I have frequently, together with our social crowd, had drinks with Kelley.  She has a couple of drinks, usually wine or a marguerita, and leaves.  It is all very casual and enjoyable.  When I heard about these types of allegations and the “mental incompetence proceedings,” I immediately thought “It has to do with Spector because it goes to her credibility and she is the main person attempting to vindicate Phil Spector.”  This remains my thinking on this matter.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

                                                            ____________________________________
                                                            COREY BANKS

Filed with Los Angeles Superior Court
As of December 6, 2019 Stephen Gianelli's libelous attacks on Kelley Lynch (all related to Leonard Cohen, Phil Spector, 

Saturday, November 30, 2019

Kelley Lynch Email to MK Ultra Girl Re. Leonard Cohen's Lies About "Cyberstalking" as a Tactical Operation

For the record, Ann Diamond never stalked Leonard Cohen.  He lied about her after a woman in Montreal asked Ms. Diamond if she felt Lorca Cohen's comments (made publicly about her father at Concordia University), that her father "molested" her might be true.  Ann was in LA studying with Roshi.  I am not "disgruntled."  That was Leonard Cohen's PR campaign - with the assistance of his lying lawyers, LAPD's TMU, City Attoney of Los Angeles, and LA Superior Court who assigned me a "dating relationship" with Cohen although we never had one and the notion is farcical.  You don't know me so why are you lying about me?  Cohen said he was in MK ULTRA so I've submitted questions to CIA about that issue since it sounds as preposterous as his stories about Bay of Pigs, Castro's forces, and/or Phil Spector:  Cohen fantisized about "men" holding guns on him.  Maybe that was due to the meth, LSD, or other drugs he's been so public about using.  Try to spell my name correctly.  You sound like a court clerk, cop, or prosecutor.

Declaration of Ann Diamond (submitted to LA Superior Court) confirming what Freda Guttman asked her:


In summer 1995, Freda Guttman, who had been Leonard’s first girlfriend when they were both teenagers, stopped me in the street and asked point-blank if I thought Leonard had molested his daughter from the age of four, as Lorca had told her friends. Based on things I had witnessed over 8 years, I thought it was possible. I went home and didn’t get out of bed for two days – the only time in my life that I experienced that kind of emotional paralysis. I suddenly realized the wild, extreme stories circulating about me were probably a tactic to discredit and isolate me in case I ever talked about Lorca. In fact, I knew very little about Lorca because I almost never saw her, but Leonard feared she had confided in me. He had set me up as a female bogeyman as a useful distraction. The stories about me had spread far and wide, thanks to Hazel’s media contacts including with a gossip columnist. The publishing industry was going through a major spasm from which it has never recovered and I become one of many journalist-casualties.

https://racketeeringact.wordpress.com/2016/04/23/declaration-of-ann-diamond/

Kelley Lynch

Cyber Stalking of Ann Diamond Lunamoth
April 15, 2019 Ellen AtkinMKUltra girl
Ann Diamond is obsessed with me. She has been cyber stalking me since Jan. 2016. She appears to be ramping up attacks on me to gain attention. She stalked Leonard Cohen for years. Even Kelly Lynch, Cohen’s ex disgruntled manager, won’t talk to Ann Diamond any more. Nor will the Cohen children or family. Many […]

Contact

Fill out the form below and I will get back to you soon.
Your message has been successfully submitted. Thank you.

Friday, November 29, 2019

CIA-FSB Documentary Proposal: Captured On The Bridge


Kelley Lynch



                                                                                    1 October 2019



Director Gina Haspel
Central Intelligence Agency
Office of Public Affairs
Washington, D.C. 20505

Re:  Documentary proposal

Dear Director Haspel,

I am writing this letter on behalf of my Russian friend, Stanislav Stankevich.  Mr. Stankevich is a Lieutenant Colonel and veteran of the FSB’s anti-terrorist special forces team “Alpha.”  He and his partner, Pavel Evdokimov, editor-in-chief of the “Spetsnaz Rossii” (http://www.specnaz.ru/) newspaper, would like to invite Martha Peterson to Moscow to participate in a documentary that will center around a conversation between her and Colonel Vladimir Zaitsev, who was part of the KGB operation on the Krasnoluzhsky Bridge. 

According to this proposal, “the meeting of Martha Peterson and Vladimir Zaitsev will be a landmark gesture of peace and a step towards a potentially harmonious partnership in the midst of the new Cold War era currently taking place between the US and Russia.” 

Mr. Stankevich recently met with Oleg Matyveev, head of FSB’s PR Service.  They have been quite positive and supportive of this project.  At the meeting, FSB’s PR Service displayed the materials available for this project, including previously unpublished surveillance videos and audio control tapes.  Additionally, with the assistance of FSB’s PR Service, the co-producers spoke with a production organization that has experience with films about special services and additionally received the warm support of the Deputy General Director of VGTRK (State TV channel “Russia”).  Vladimir Zaitsev has personally consented to participate in the documentary and FSB’s PR Service offered access to a number of veterans of operational units involved in the special operation on the Ogordnick for the documentary. 

I have attached a copy of the documentary proposal for your review.  The authors of the proposal are open to any comments, input, or suggestions CIA might have.  At this point, it is really simply a matter of Martha Peterson and CIA agreeing to participate in the project.

We look forward to your response.  Thank you in advance.

                                                                                    All the best,



                                                                                    Kelley Lynch

Enclosure:  Documentary proposal

cc:  Messrs. Stanislav Stankevich and Pavel Evdokimov

No photo description available.



Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Kelley Lynch's IRS Complaint re. Leonard Cohen


DECLARATION OF KELLEY LYNCH
ADDENDUM TO IRS FORM 211

Kelley Lynch declares:
1.       I am a resident of Los Angeles, California and over the age of 18, and have personal
knowledge of the facts set forth hereinbelow and can competently testify thereto if called as a witness.
Describe the Alleged Violation

2.       On or about April 15, 2005, I reported allegations that Leonard Cohen committed civil and
criminal tax fraud (as confirmed by my legal and accounting representatives) to IRS Agent Bill Betzer in Los Angeles, California.  At that time, my lawyers had reviewed corporate tax returns, corporate records, and other relevant evidence.  They concluded, with respect to only one element of the egregious pattern of fraud, as follows:
“Civil Tax Penalties: There are over 150 civil penalties in the Code. They cover everything from the failure to file or pay a tax, to accuracy-related penalties, to information returns, to special penalties covering the activities of tax return preparers, tax shelter activities and beyond: Focusing solely on the obvious, we see the following potential problems with Traditional Holdings, LLC: (1) Accuracy Related Penalties where the amount of the penalty is 20% of the underpayment, (2) Substantial Understatement of Income Tax where the amount of the penalty is 20% of the underpayment, (3) fraud where the amount of the penalty is 75% of the portion of the underpayment attributable to the fraud, and (4) failure to pay taxes due where the penalty is ½ of 1% for each month the tax is unpaid for a maximum penalty of 25%. Applying these penalties and acknowledging that the math is extremely rough, there is potential approximate tax liability as follows: $880,000 for substantial understatement and accuracy related penalties; $440,000 for fraud and $1,100,000 for failure to pay taxes for total penalties of approximately $7,260,000. This does not include interest which, at a rate of 5% per annum compounded and without effective compounding, equals about $650,000 for a total penalty and interest bill of $7,910,000. In addition, if the transaction is unwound and LC is determined to be the owner of the assets, he would have to pay tax on the sale which is the basis for the penalties and interest which amounts to about $2,500,000 (state and federal combined). Thus and in summary, at the end of the day, if the TH transaction is reported to the IRS, Leonard Cohen will be liable for taxes on the sale in the sum of about $2,5000,000, penalties of $7,260,000 and interest of $650,000 totaling $10,410,000.”

“Additionally, among other issues, there is a tax deficiency resulting from Cohen’s failure to report the income from the Sony sale [approximately $8 million]; an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax; and willfulness involving, among other things, the fact that Cohen caused the annuity obligation to disappear from the 2003 federal tax return; Cohen’s failure to document and repay his loans within 3 years as required [approximately $8 million]; and, Cohen’s failure to report the sale of certain assets to Sony on the 2001 tax return.”

3.       At some point in approximately the Spring of 2005, I contacted the IRS Commissioner’s
Staff in Washington, DC.  This was solely due to the tactics being used against me which included an LAPD SWAT incident.  The IRS Commissioner’s Staff in turn contacted Agent Betzer.  I also reported this tax fraud to other agencies such as the Kentucky Revenue Cabinet and California Franchise Tax Board.
4.       As I have no training whatsoever in tax law or accounting, it would be
impossible for me to describe what the “alleged violation” is.  Leonard Cohen’s tax fraud appears to extend over decades, involves aggressive and complicated strategies, and used off-shore accounts, shell corporations, and sham transactions to achieve the desired result:  either no taxes due or capital gains treatment over ordinary income tax treatment.
5.       As Leonard Cohen entered my personal management offices and removed all of my records,
had the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department illegally seize corporate records and other relevant evidence, I cannot say where any of that evidence ended up.  I have provided extensive evidence to IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others.  I would assume, as Cohen is deceased, that all relevant and material evidence is in the possession of Robert Kory and Michelle Rice who are Cohen’s representatives.
Are you involved with any governmental or legal proceeding involving the taxpayer?  Yes.  Explain in detail.

6.       Since 2012, I have been relentlessly targeted by the City Attorney of Los Angeles and
LAPD’s Threat Management Unit over requests for federal tax information, attempts to comply with federal tax laws, and falsely imprisoned and incarcerated over these and related matters.  At this time, the City Attorney of Los Angeles, who has lied egregiously about federal tax matters, is prosecuting me for allegedly requesting tax information from Leonard Cohen prior to his death.  Evidently, a fraudulent state court restraining order nullifies and/or voids federal tax laws and compliance with same or so the logic goes.

7.       On or about March 1, 2015, I submitted the attached declaration to the IRS Commissioner’s
Staff.
8.       My RICO complaint, which was the subject of a federal fee waiver issue, contains the
operative facts.  The RICO suit will actually be filed at some point in the future with the assistance of counsel.
9.       This website (clearly created by Cohen’s representatives refers people to Michelle Rice and
contains her email address) is Leonard Cohen’s defense to the allegations of civil and criminal tax fraud and documents the tactics employed.  Every document is fraudulent and/or perjured.  The note about the legal system is preposterous and I assume Bay Area attorney Stephen Gianelli, who has functioned for years as Cohen’s operative, was involved with the creation of this site.  LA Superior Court works beautifully for pathological liars, sycophants, and misogynists. 
10.   All documents transmitted to Agent Luis Tejeda by Robert Kory & Michelle Rice are entirely
fraudulent and perjured.  I discussed this fact with Agent Tejeda personally.  Most of the documents can be found in the so-called “IRS Binder” that was used against me by the City Attorney of Los Angeles.  It is evidently evidence that I have been provided with form 1099 (for the year 2004) and forms K-1 for the years 2004, 2005, 2006, and possibly other periods.  Corporate tax returns related to numerous corporations remain unfiled.  I do not have the relevant tax forms and will not rely upon the entirely fraudulent expense ledger attached to Leonard Cohen’s equally fraudulent complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC338322.

April 12, 2012

LASC Case No. 2CA04539, People v. Lynch

Lynch was convicted after a five-day jury trial of five counts of violating a court order (Pen. Code §273.6, subd. (a)) and two counts of making annoying telephone calls and sending annoying e-mails (§653m, subd. (b)) in Los Angeles Superior Court on April 12, 2012. Lynch's primary justification for her email and voicemail harassment was her assertion that she was simply seeking tax information that she needed to file her 2004 and 2005 tax returns. Specifically, she asserted that she needed form1099s from Cohen for 2004 and 2005. This issue was extensively considered at the criminal trial. The People presented a binder of communications (the "IRS Binder") that detailed the communications between Robert Kory and Lynch's accountant in 2004 and 2005, as well as Kory's communications with Luis Tajeda, head of the IRS fraud division for the western United States, responding to Lynch's assertions that Cohen had committed tax fraud. This binder established that Lynch already had in 2005 the tax information that she requested, and that the IRS was not pursuing Cohen for tax fraud. Judge Robert Vanderet ruled that Lynch's alleged justification based on a need for tax information was irrelevant and that testimony by Tejeda would not add anything new to what had been presented by Lynch's public defenders. 


IRS Binder


11.   At this point, we are basically in the cover up portion of the civil and criminal tax fraud.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.


                                                                        ______________________________________
                                                                        Kelley Lynch





[i] I have submitted numerous versions of form 211 (addendum), including more complex narratives, to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff.  This is the final version signed under the penalty of perjury.

Friday, April 19, 2019

Kelley Lynch's Complaint to California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Office of the Ombudsman re. Phil Spector's US Mail

CDCR logo'

Kelley,

Thank you for contacting the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Office of the Ombudsman.We will contact you soon.

Your Information:

      Name: Kelley Lynch
      Phone: REDACTED
      Email: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com

Offender Information:

      Name: Phillip Spector
      CDCR #: G63408
      Location: CHCF - California Health Care Facility, Stockton

Description of Issue:

      I have recently sent a letter to Phil Spector c/o the above facility. It was returned undeliverable. I am not clear on what is going on here and would like to ensure that Mr. Spector is actually receiving his mail. Would it be possible to confirm how to contact Mr. Spector? Do I need to copy the Warden? I've obtained Mr. Spector's inmate number and the facility from this inmate locator. Could you please let me know what I should do at this point?

https://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov/

This is the letter I sent Phil Spector which I will now revise.

https://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2019/04/kelley-lynch-letter-to-phil-spector-re.html

As I am, together with co-producers (including an entertainment industry attorney), working on a documentary of Phil Spector, I would like to know to whom I should speak re. an interview request. I would like Mr. Spector to participate in an interview from prison and am well aware of the fact that "Charles Mansion" has in the past.

I look forward to your prompt response.

Kelley Lynch


Overview of efforts to resolve the issue:

      I phoned the Warden's office, was transferred to countless people (in numerous facilities), and also contacted US Department of Justice.
https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/Ombuds/Ombudsman_Contact_Form.asp

NOTE:  The letter was NOT delivered to Phil Spector and the facility itself appears confused about their own inmates.