Thursday, June 18, 2015

Clea Surkhang Letter To Judge Robert Hess Re. Leonard Cohen Case No. BC338322

                                                                        14 June 2015



Judge Robert Hess
Los Angeles Superior Court
Department 24
111 N. Hill Street
Los Angeles, California  90012

Re:  Kelley Lynch – Case No. BC338322

Dear Judge Hess,

I am writing to confirm that I prepared and provided Kelley Lynch with the declaration attached hereto.  I was unavailable to provide the actual physical signature on this document prior to the date Kelley submitted her Motion for Terminating Sanctions.  I therefore provided her with my limited power of attorney which authorized her to conform my signature on the declaration.  I also provided her with the signature page which I understand she now intends to submit to the Court.  I can attest hereto that the attached declaration, which is identical to the declaration submitted to this Court with Kelley Lynch’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions, was initially submitted with my full authorization and consent.  I am willing to provide the Court with a notarized copy of this declaration if necessary.

I would also like to confirm that, while I was unavailable to attend the January 17, 2014 hearing in this case, I was willing to testify telephonically.  I am still willing to testify telephonically.  I reside in Colorado and am unable to make any personal appearances before the Court.

I would also like to point out what might be viewed as a discrepancy with respect to my name as it appears in the declaration.  My legal name is Clea Westfal.  Yongzin Rinpoche, my husband, uses his family name which is Surkhang.  Therefore, I have signed two different copies of the signature page – one as Clea Westfal and the other as Clea Surkhang – ensure that no further difficulties arise.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at REDACTED.

Thank you.

                                                            Very truly yours,
                                                           

                                                            /s/ Clea Surkhang Westphal


DECLARATION OF CLEA SURKHANG


I, Clea Surkhang, do state and declare as follows:
1.       I am a citizen of the United States who currently resides in Longmont, Colorado.  I am a close
personal friend of defendant, Kelley Ann Lynch.  I am over the age of 18 years.  I have personal knowledge of the facts contained in this declaration and if called upon to testify I could and would testify competently as to the truth of the facts stated here.
2.      I have been a close friend of Kelley Lynch’s for over 29 years.  We met at a Buddhist seminary in
the summer of 1985.
2.      During the mid-to-late 1980s, Kelley and I both lived in New York City.  We saw each other
every week for dinners and spent time with one another over the weekends.  Kelley had a young son at the time and they lived together in a beautiful apartment that she kept spotless.
3.      In 1987, I moved from New York City to Colorado.  Kelley and I remained in close touch and

visited one another when we were able to.  My husband, Yongzin Rinpoche, is also a close personal friend of Kelley’s.
4.      I have spent time substantial time with Kelley over the years, watched her children grow up, and
know that she is a very caring mother.  Her first love is her children. 
5.      I am aware that Kelley worked as Leonard Cohen’s personal manager for approximately 17 years.
She never once indicated that they were having an intimate dating or engagement relationship, brief or otherwise.  Over the years, we have frequently had long girl talks and Leonard Cohen was simply not someone she was ever interested in dating or attracted to.  I specifically recall asking her directly:  “Were you dating?”  “Did you ever find Cohen attractive?”   Her answer was always “No.”
6.      I’ve watched Kelley’s sons, Rutger and Ray, throughout their childhoods.  They are both bright,
good hearted fellows.  Kelley is an amazingly strong, kind-hearted being, who has worked her entire life to help her children, parents, friends, and everyone who needed her assistance.  Her care for others is genuine and profound. 
7.      My husband and I visited Kelley in the late spring/early summer of 2005.  At that time, she was
approximately 5’6”, very thin, had large blue eyes, and wore her hair a very dark shade of brown and extremely short.  I recall this because her appearance had changed radically from the last time I saw her.
8.      Since Leonard Cohen filed his 2005 lawsuit against Kelley , she has continually maintained that
she was not served the summons and complaint.
9.      In the spring/early summer of 2007, my husband and I invited Kelley to stay with us at my
mother’s home in Erie, Colorado. 
10.  I am quite confident in Kelley’s integrity and the fact that she is as professional and
 straightforward in her business dealings as she has been in her friendship.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is
true and correct.  On the 4th day of December 2015, I verbally authorized Kelley Lynch to execute this declaration on my behalf in Los Angeles, California.

                                                                        ___________________________________
                                                                        Clea Surkhang

  

Kelley Lynch's Email To Her Witnesses & Scott of Truth Sentinel Re. Cohen & Gianelil's Lies, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: Kelley Lynch - Slander
To: Truth Sentinel <scottsentinel9@gmail.com>, Dan Bergman <dbergman@bergman-law.com>, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>
Cc: Rutger Penick, Ann Diamond, Paulette Brandt, Daniel Meade, clea westphal, Palden Ronge, The Scientist, Karen Lynch, David McCourt, Ray Lindsey, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov, AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov


Rutger, Clea, Palden,and Dan,

I continue to be targeted over your declarations.  Thank you for the powers of attorney and having the courage to provide me with these declarations.  I wasn't served Leonard Cohen's lawsuit and the attempts to discredit me over this situation are unconscionable.  

All the best,
Mother/Kelley

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Scott [Truth Sentinel],

I want to comment on the ongoing slander on Truth Sentinel's site.  Stephen Gianelli has spent over six years, since hearing from Michelle Rice (Cohen's law firm), targeting me, my sons, family members,  I have copied some of those who have been targeted, including witnesses who provided me with declarations, because the situation is ongoing.

Leonard Cohen failed to serve me his summons & complaint.  I have now been falsely accused of submitting fabricated declarations to the Court when, in fact, each witness provided a limited power of attorney and I have now submitted their original signature pages to the Court.  I attach their declarations hereto.  Ann Diamond has also provided me with a declaration.  The attempts to silence me and discredit me are Herculian.

Ann Diamond and Paulette Brandt are now being targeted.  Every one of my witnesses has been harassed by Stephen Gianelli.  He has written them in an attempt to harass, slander, insult, and intimidate them.  Obviously, this individual (who is now sending me harassing emails under the alter ego "Mongochilil") is unstable, on someone's payroll, and desperate.

I have never said that every judge was corrupt.  There is massive fraud upon the Court.  I have filed a Motion for Terminating Sanctions.  The hearing is scheduled for June 23, 2015, and the harassment is taking place all over the internet; in emails; and Gianelli (after attempting to blackmail me into removing my blog), created a blog dedicated to slandering me.  He is also arguing Spector prosecution theories online.  As I have advised the Court, the Phil Spector case is not my business; I was not part of that matter; and he has competent attorneys who should be served if Mr. Spector is to be afforded his right to confront his accuser.  

Stephen Gianelli had a blog that I stumbled upon.  I posted comments.  Spector's former assistant, Michelle Blaine, was on that blog.  She and Gianelli then targeted my blogs and email accounts and had them shut down.  I have the evidence.

This is a highly coordinated campaign of cyber-terrorism, slander, and harassment.  I have advised Leonard Cohen's lawyers that they should stop lying about me - publicly and in court documents.  Instead, they came up with some insane argument that I fabricated declarations.  I did no such thing.

I never said I wasn't served the Boulder TRO.  Leonard Cohen flew into Colorado, in the midst of a European tour, a day after threatening to take legal action against Ann Diamond.  His motive was and remains to silence me.  My declaration, submitted to the Court, now looks like a CIA release with all the Cohen redactions.  

This email is simply to set the record straight as Gianelli is desperate, works as a proxy, and appears to be an unofficial member of Cohe'ns legal team.  I was not Leonard Cohen's lover and intend to file a motion to vacate the fraudulent "domestic violence' Order.  Cohen is now arguing that I disagree with that order because I am evidently jealous or mad at Michelle Rice.  I've received assistance from the Chief Justice's Office of the California Supreme Court and Judicial Council regarding this issue and Cohen's lawyers were never discussed so the argument is obscene.

The Complaint in the Cohen case is a defense to tax fraud.  It was used to obtain tax refunds that have now been challenged.  I would like to point out that while I have no substance abuse issues, Leonard Cohen has a long and publicly documented history of drug and alcohol abuse as well as psychiatric problems.  I am definitely dealing with misogynists.  No one at my house attempted to evade service.  I wasn't served and that worked beautifully for "Plaintiffs."

All the best,
Kelley
I am a lawyer of considerable experience and when Kelley Lynch first came to my attention I was actively researching and blogging about litigation related events. When Lynch started making her various claims about a star-struck and “corrupt” Los Angeles judiciary entering a “fraudulent” default judgment against her in 2006 and a “corrupt” judge in Colorado entering a “fraudulent” civil harassment order against her in 2008 I was instantly intrigued and investigated with an open mind. With regard to the 2006 Los Angeles default,  I downloaded from the court website – at my own expense -  the Complaint, the proof of service on Lynch, all of the documents supporting the default judgment, and the court minutes, orders, and judgment. 
What I learned is that far from acting as a rubber stamp to a request for judgment by a celebrity, I leaned that the file was in order, and the judgement well supported. Additionally, judge Freeman REDUCED Leonard Cohen’s requested judgment by $1M. 
Lynch also claimed at the time that the other judgments against her, including two additional Los Angeles money judgments and a Colorado judgment in the Agile litigation were “fraudulent” and that she “was never served” with those suits either. But what I learned is – as in the case of Cohen’s suit – three additional and different professional process servers also served a woman at Kelley Lynch’s residence in August of 2005 who answered the door but refused to give her name. These suits were all filed by different plaintiffs who were represented by different law firms – other than the law firm representing Leonard Cohen, and these three additional cases that Lynch dismissed as “fraudulent” were presided over by different judges, two additional judges in LA and a third federal judge (Louis Babcock) in Colorado. I concluded that the odds of all of these independent, professional process servers and law firms committing “fraud” and all of these different judges being “corrupt” were too farfetched, and the coincidence of all of this fraud and corruption befalling Kelley Lynch every time she was sued just too great to credit her “fraud” claims. 
The icing on the cake for me was when I obtained and read the hearing transcript from the September 2, 2008 proceeding in Colorado, wherein  Kelley Lynch had claimed in emails sent to me in 2009 that Judge Carolyn Enichen had “fraudulently” entered  a civil harassment restraining order against her in a proceeding in which she had not been served. 
To my shock and surprise, the transcript revealed that Kelley Lynch appeared at the hearing, and asked judge Enichen to dispense with the evidentiary hearing (which was Lynch’s right) and to simply issue the PERMANENT civil harassment restraining order that Cohen was requesting. Lynch then THANKED the judge for doing so! This was no “fraud” order, this was an order that Lynch herself requested. 
Therefore, any objective person would conclude that I bent over backwards to give Lynch the benefit of the doubt, that I went the extra mile in looking into her claims, but that her claims simply are not credible.



Cohen Interview:

It's Interesting How All Women Who Are No Longer Interested In Leonard Cohen, Whether Or Not They Were "Lovers," Transform Into "Scorned Women." Well, When Misogynists Are Involved.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: "Limited powers of attorney" that you claim to be in possession of
To: C <mongochili@excite.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov, whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov
Cc: Dan Bergman <dbergman@bergman-law.com>, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>


IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Gianelli/Mongochili is on overtime pay evidently.  Gianelli has changed accounts again.  It has been using Guerilla Mail, GMX, and now Excite.com.  Very angry, desperate alter ego.  There are a number of alter ego/ego maniacs involved in this situation.  Have you noticed?  An interesting "fiction."  

Kelley Lynch

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Daniel Bergman and Michelle Rice,

Why not simply add Gianelli/Mongochili to the list of formal entries of legal appearances in Case No. BC338322.

Gianelli, who is accurately being referred to as a "troll," is trashing Ann Diamond on Truth Sentinel.  Are all women Leonard Cohen's "scorned" lovers even when they weren't his "lovers" and have seen him in years?  How very misogynistic.  It's a wonder more feminists haven't analyzed him.  Ann Diamond provided the Court with a declaration and, as has been true with just about all witnesses, she is being targeted, slandered, and Gianelli's in on it.  

Gianelli is also lying to Ann Diamond in his email about the price of my house, some insanity with pharmacy bills, etc.  I do not now this man.  It's fascinating that he and Rice spoke in May 2009 and he's still on the job.  Thoroughly predictable.  I've brought his blog to the attention of Judge Hess now.

Kelley Lynch


+Stephen Gianelli I smell troll .
 · 
Dedosdigital - why rely exclusively on your sense of smell? Try reading the linked documents and use the analytical abilities in your brain. There is an internet "trioll" at work alright and her name is Kelley Lynch.
 · 
+Stephen Gianelli You relentlessly attack , with malice ,  in support of the official media story . By contrast , I have never observed malice in Ann Diamond's writing .
 · 
Then you are not family with Diamond's writing about Leonard Cohen. Additionally, you quite obviously have not listed to the two podcasts.  In any event, I have read the court documents and transcripts and made up my own mind with analysis, not first or second impressions.
 · 
+Stephen Gianelli I am not Family . Familiar , with Ann's book , yes, having read it . You make the assumption I am not f a m i l i a r with the subject in question . Go ahead , but sophistry of that low order lacks interest or credibility .
 · 1 
+dedosdigital Thanks for your reading. No, I have no malicious intent toward the larger-than-life public figure called Leonard Cohen. I did not write my memoir to attack him -- merely to set the record straight and even 'reach out' to some of those involved. Leonard Cohen has more secrets running in the background than most of us could accumulate over several lifetimes. Occasionally, a woman enters his life and stumbles over some of these secrets. Relationships only function to the extent that they're based on truth. Unfortunately for Mr. Cohen, he must sometimes choose between the relationship and the carefully-maintained public image. Guess which he chooses. Nothing will convince devotees of the public Leonard Cohen that their man could ever lie or engage in other unethical conduct. Insiders know different. Let's not go berserk tearing down idols, but also let's not be naive.
 · 
+Ann Diamond Kochira koso..... On the contrary , thank you . Your books are eminently readable , enjoyable .
 · 
+Ann Diamond Very insightful comments, Ann. Thank you for your declaration. I think it is really quite brilliant. It is astounding that anyone would believe that someone who dated another individual years and years ago would be a scorned woman. I wasn't even Cohen's "lover" but he has now assigned me that title. The melodrama works beautifully in certain circles.
 · 
+dedosdigital You're very kind. Unfortunately I'm not Jane Austen which one would need to be to do justice. Although Stephen Gianelli apparently believes he knows the 'objective' truth through 'analysis' of records and documents, he relies on and spreads misinformation about people to discredit them without even attempting to grasp the basics. He loves clichés like "the scorned woman," "the embezzling personal assistant" etc. Except for the endless vitriol and litigation, Kelley Lynch's ongoing saga is very familiar to me. I believe much of it is based in denied emotions that get quite twisted and I think Jane Austen would agree. Although I did not wish to become part of his harem, I knew Leonard Cohen well at one time. He lives a complicated life where misunderstanding and confusion run rampant. He seems to enjoy that kind of life, while constantly complaining about it. He has a circle of sycophants and tells them whatever it takes to keep them loyal. This leads to chaos in his relationships for which he never takes responsibility since there is always another woman ready to throw herself at him. He basks in the adoration of people he sees as inferior. When he feels personally slighted, he withdraws into silence. There is no negotiating with him as he disdains "listening to women" -- in fact women terrify him -- under pressure he becomes rigid and inaccessible, or even 'switches alters' and seeks revenge. The original cause can be something quite trivial, although in Lynch's case there was a major falling out over money and 'community property." Once triggered, Cohen can go to extremes from which there is no backing down and has the ability to escalate and mount a destructive campaign the likes of which few could match, since most of us "don't have the discipline.' He draws as much inspiration from military strategy, as he does from troubadour poetry.
 · 



On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Mongochili/Gianelli,

Cease and desist.  I have never read such garbage lies in my entire life.  See if Cohen will add you to his team of lawyers formally.  You seem perfect for the "team."

Kelley Lynch
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mongo chilli <Mongochilli@gmx.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:40 PM
Subject: "Limited powers of attorney" that you claim to be in possession of
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com


Lynch,
 
We know that this is a lie, because your spontanious reaction on June 1 by email to Bergman, Rice, the FBI and others (then posted on your blog) to the accusation that the declarations contained "fabricated" signatures was to assert that the "declarations were prepared and sent to me" and that "the signatures are genuine".
 
Those statements are completely inconsistant with your testimony in the reply to the opposition that the witnesses provided you with "limited powers of attorney" and you then signed their names to the declarations. None of which makes sense either.
 
But the point you don't get is whether you had the witnesses' permission to sign their names or not, a declaration must be subcribed by the witness' own hand to be valid. By signing their names to their declaration, the declarations were worthless as evidenceBut you tried to pass those signatures off as genuine (a claim you made explicit on June 1), and it was only when Lenoard Cohen's attorneys called you on the deception that you admitted that the signatures were not genuine, that in fact you singned the witnesses' names to their declarations.
 
By preparing those declarations (including subscribing them) you violated Penal Code section 134. By actually filing them you violated Penal Code section 132. One count for each declaration falsely prepared, then fasely submitted, six counts total. (Two of the declarations stated on their face that they were signed by a person other than the declarant and were not misleading.)
 
Indeed, one signs for another pursuant to a power of attorney by signing THEIR OWN NAME "as attorney-in-fact for [insert name of prinicipal]", e.g., By Kelley Lynch, as attorney-in-fact for Rutger Penick". But you did not do that. You simply signed "Rutger penick" - thereby preparing and then submitting a fabricatred, misleading declaration that pretended to be valid but was in fact useless.
 
And you have now added PERJURY to your offenses.
 
If the "limited powers of attorney" - signed before you prepared and filed the declarations - exist, PRODUCE THEM.
 
Indeed, the fact that you FAILED to submit those (alleged) powers of attorney WITH your reply, and instead submitted INADMISSIBLE and imporper "letters" from the witnesses to the judge really says it all; if the POA's existed, you would have produced them with your reply.
 
You are digging a deeper hole for yourself with each passing day.
 
I guess that is what stupid criminals do. You ought to know....