Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Kelley Lynch's Email To CIA Re: Leonard Cohen, Bay Of Pigs, Phil Spector & Her FOIA Request


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:21 AM
Subject: Leonard Cohen - Bay of Pigs
To: MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>

Hello CIA,

I am reviewing Leonard Cohen's version of events related to Bay of Pigs, Yom Kippur War, and Phil Spector.  In this interview with Pico Iyer, Cohen provides more details about his Bay of Pigs incident.  Evidently, Cohen was wearing Canadian Army shorts while envisioning himself as the first member of the invading force which I assume would be CIA or the military.  How does CIA think Cohen understood the impending invasion?  According to this interview, Cohen found himself surrounded by 16 soldiers which would imply that he was surrounded and arrested by Castro's forces who assumed he was part of the upcoming invasion.  This story sounds, and this is putting it mildly, absolutely absurd.  I think I need CIA information on when CIA believes Castro would have first known about the invasion.  Also, it would be helpful to know what CIA believes would have happened if Castro's soldiers discovered the first invader.

The other incident in this email relates to Leonard Cohen's testimony regarding Phil Spector and a gun.  I have not heard back from Alan Jackson.  I think Alan Jackson, and all other prosecutors in the Phil Spector matter, should be forced to explain why their version of the Cohen gun story is contradicted by Cohen's testimony (given under oath) during my alleged trial.  Streeter is the individual that elicited this testimony.  As my lawyers advised the jury at the end - we had no idea why there was all this testimony about Phil Spector, DA Steve Cooley, prosecutor Alan Jackson, and Leonard Cohen's version of the gun incident.  One thing is for certain, David Mamet was publicly stating (in advance of his film) that he felt Phil Spector was railroaded.  Extremely intelligent man.  It probably helped having Cohen on the stand testifying about Spector and a gun since Judge Fidler didn't permit it during the Spector trial.  And do keep in mind that at the time of my alleged trial, Alan Jackson and City Attorney Carmen Trutanich were running for District Attorney.  I have a copy of the ballot where Alan Jackson uses Phil Spector to run for District Attorney.  This was evidently very important to the DA because they hadn't nailed a celebrity since Fatty Arbuckle.

Do you think Leonard Cohen is a pathological liar?

All the best,
Kelley


Cohen gets to talking of Cuba, and the time, just after the revolution, when he was walking along the beach in his Canadian Army khaki shorts with his camping knife, imagining himself the only North American on the island, and got arrested as the first member of an invading force.

"So anyway, there I was, on the beach in Varadero, speculating on my destiny, when suddenly I found myself surrounded by 16 soldiers with guns. They arrested me, and the only words I knew at the time were 'Amistad de pueblo.' So I kept saying, 'Amigo! Amistad de pueblo!' and finally they started greeting me. And they gave me a necklace of shells and a necklace of bullets and everything was great."
Then, suddenly, he stops. "What time is it?"

I tell him and he says, "I shouldn't be talking about my adventures when we're about to listen to a wonderful teisho." And Leonard Cohen disappears into the black-robed disciple again, and into a reverent silence.

http://www.leonardcohenfiles.com/buzz.html

PD:  Now, I want to talk to you about what you mean by threatened.  You actually -- you were telling us about Phil Spector.  You were testifying about talking to the LAPD.  Cohen:  Yes, Sir.
PD:  And you talked to the LAPD with your attorney, correct?  Cohen:  With an attorney present, yes, Sir.  PD:  And that’s when you asked that – or your attorney – someone asked that Ms. Lynch leave?  Cohen:  The attorney asked that Ms. Lynch leave.  PD:  So when Ms. Lynch left, you started talking about an interview or story about Phil Spector, correct?  Cohen:  Correct.  PD:  And how he would oftentimes have guns when you were producing an album, correct?  He would have guns in the studio when he was producing an album with you?  Cohen:  That’s correct.  PD:  And, in fact, one time you told the detective that, quote – Well, before I go there, was Mr. Spector -- was he drunk at the time when he had these guns?  Cohen:  I don’t remember, Sir.  PD:  Was he hostile at the time?  Cohen:  Not to me.  PD:  Okay.  But he actually put a gun to your head?  Is that correct?  Cohen:  That’s correct.  PD:  It was a revolver?  Cohen:   No, it wasn’t a revolver.  It was an automatic.  PD:  But you weren’t actually -- you didn’t feel threatened when he put a gun to your head?  Cohen:  No, Sir.  RT 308-309


Leonard Cohen/Phil Spector Gun Incident (used by Phil Spector prosecutors)
This version is directly contradicted by Cohen's above testimony (given under oath)


10 11 12 13 - Los Angeles Superior Court 

·          
Defendant Phillip Spector has a long history of gun-related violence, directed ..... In 1977, Spector produced musician Leonard Cohen' s record album, “Death of ...



Monday, February 9, 2015

Stalker Stephen Gianelli Has A Pattern Of Slandering People - And Lying

In defense of attorney Chuck Morse

October 26, 2011 12:00 am

I am writing in support of a pillar in our community, attorney Chuck Morse. Stephen Gianelli, who lives in San Francisco, continues to vehemently disparage Mr. Morse’s reputation in letters to the editor as well as comments on his own letters to the editor (“Judge Wick made proper decision,” Oct. 18). 
I have known Mr. Morse and worked with his staff for the past 15 years. He has a flawless reputation and the utmost integrity — fair, honest and above reproach in all matters. He has served honorably and ethically on the boards of directors of the following organizations: Big Brothers of Napa, Aldea Children and Family Services (19 years; president twice for a total of five years), Garden Haven Adult Day Center, Napa Valley Hospice (president), Napa Adult Day Health Care, New Technology High School Foundation, Napa County D.A.R.E. Foundation, Solano-Napa Area Agency on Aging, Matrix Parent Network, Napa ParentsCAN (founding president) and Community Resources for Children.
In addition, Mr. Morse has served on the Land Trust of Napa County Investment and Finance Committee and the Napa County Commission on Aging. He has awards and commendations for pro bono legal services from the State Bar of California, Napa County Superior Court Judges, Napa County Bar Association and Legal Aid of the North Bay. 
I would wager that Mr. Morse did exactly what his client, Mr. Fogerty, wanted him to do. We need more attorneys like him.
Methinks this Mr. Gianelli doth protest too much. 
Paula Belden / Napa
http://napavalleyregister.com/news/opinion/mailbag/in-defense-of-attorney-chuck-morse/article_e478ae44-ff8c-11e0-b720-001cc4c03286.html

Kelley Lynch's Email To Phil Spector Prosecutor Alan Jackson Re. Her Book & A Potential Interview - Including With Respect To Leonard Cohen's 3 Versions Of The Alleged Incident Before LA Superior Court


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:39 PM
Subject: Fwd: Findlaw FirmSite Message From Phil Spector & Leonard Cohen
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>

cc:  Dennis Riordan, Esquire

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <TLR.FindLaw.FirmSite@thomsonreuters.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:38 PM
Subject: Findlaw FirmSite Message From Phil Spector & Leonard Cohen
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com



Name:
Kelley Lynch

Email Address:
kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

Subject:
Phil Spector & Leonard Cohen

Brief description of your legal issue:

Alan, 


I'm writing a book about the Phil Spector/Leonard Cohen matters. I was wondering if I could interview you. I have spoken with Detective Mark Lillenfeld (LASD) and others. I would like the book to be unbiased. I thought perhaps I could ask you about Leonard Cohen's three Phil Spector gun stories before LA Superior Court. The Grand Jury legal adviser instructed me to contact Phillip's attorney. And, Judge Fidler's Clerk told me to bring them to the attention of the DA and copy Judge Fidler if  the DA was still threatening me. She thought that might make me more comfortable. I sent them to the DOJ and FBI. 

I would also like to ask you, as the former head of Major Fraud, why you elected not to prosecute Leonard Cohen. He stole millions from me and I have the evidence, as I advised you. Also, the criminal negligence in my son's Whole Foods. Do you think that's a threat to the public - having a broken machine on the floor for 2 years, removing the safety guard, not telling anyone, and leaving the machine on the floor. I think it's criminal negligence. OSHA's attorney immediately thought that. 

Many people do believe Phil Spector is innocent. Weren't Leonard Cohen's statements (testimony?) used before Phil Spector's grand jury? Mick Brown/UK Telegraph swears he saw them when he reviewed the transcripts. So, I would also like to ask you about an indictment obtained using the Cohen version that involves a gun to the chest and a semi-automatic. He testified that Spector held a gun to his head and it was an automatic. 

For the record, I've filed claims against the City and County and continue to keep IRS, FBI, DOJ, FTB, and Dennis Riordan closely apprised. Gianelli, who people feel is on someone's payroll, continues to criminally harass me. He's also criminally harassing Paulette Brandt. We've spoken to LAPD, LAPD's TMU, and Investigator Frayeh (DA's office) about that criminal conduct. I did write you about Gianelli (and Cohen's tax fraud, etc.) in 2009. Investigator Frayeh said he hand delivered that letter to former DA Steve Cooley, Truc Do, and you. Was your failure to prosecute him [Cohen] a quid pro quo of any type? I thought it was fascinating that the DA aligned themselves with the City Attorney and Cohen. The prosecutor then elicited testimony about Cohen and a Spector gun story during my alleged trial. I continue to address Cohen's legal issues (including perjury now) and am filing a federal lawsuit against him. I am curious to know what version of the Leonard Cohen gun story about Phil Spector you believe. The one he testified about under oath or the one you used in the motions available online and possibly in the Grand Jury. The Grand Jury Legal Adviser wasn't clear what witness presented those statements to the Grand Jury. 

Feel free to email me if you are interested in weighing in. 

Kelley Lynch

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2015/02/leonard-cohens-testimony-under-oath.html

This email was initiated at the Findlaw FirmSite http://www.werksmanjackson.com/E-mail.shtml.

The content of this email is provided by and is the responsibility of the person posting the email communication. You acknowledge that any reliance on material in email communications is at your own risk.

Thank You



Thank you for contacting Werksman Jackson Hathaway & Quinn. Your message has been sent.
Thomson Reuters
Replies to this form will be sent directly to the original sender.
© 2011 FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business

Sunday, February 8, 2015

Kelley Lynch Asks FBI, Based On The Criminal Stalker's Latest Email, If They Have Their Drug Testing Kit Ready


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:19 PM
Subject: Fwd: Kelley Lynch email re "death threat" dated Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:43 PM
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>


FBI,

Did you find Gianelli's criminally harassing email amusing?  Does the FBI have a drug testing kit available?  It does seem as though people are on drugs here.  The Proxy Stalker took that email off my blog.  

This criminal belongs in prison.  

All the best,
Kelley

Li'l Red by PhillyBoyWonder (print image)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 12:08 PM
Subject: Kelley Lynch email re "death threat" dated Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:43 PM
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>
REDACTED STALKER'S RANT.  EMAIL WAS NOT FORWARDED.  STALKER GRABBED IT FROM BLOG.

---Forwarded message---

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: Death Threat
To: FBI
FBI,

I am sending someone evidence.  Please keep in mind that Nat McBride, a friend of Nicole Spector's, received a death threat related to her Free Phil Spector petition.  The petition was sabotaged.  Some of the individuals contacting her were on Gianelli's Blogonaut Blog.  I am also enclosing the email she forwarded me from someone impersonating Bruce Cutler.  I originally reported the death threat she confirmed to DOJ and Interpol.  Nat lives in UK and was terrified.

Kelley

Kelley Lynch's Email To IRS Re: Leonard Cohen's Perjured Testimony & Prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter's Bald Faced Lies Throughout Lynch's Alleged 2012 Trial


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Leonard Cohen's Perjury
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>


Hello IRS,

The tax issues are clearly relevant in the matter before Judge Hess and that would explain why Kory continues to argue federal tax matters.  I plan to attach the IRS transcript I recently received proving that Leonard Cohen has not provided me with IRS required form 1099 for the year 2004.  Streeter lied to the jurors when she advised them that the tax matter is a "ruse" and she is clearly referring to IRS required tax documents that employers provide their employees so I wouldn't have been the individual in possession of that information.  This woman is totally out of her mind.  I wasn't Cohen's business manager so the evidence doesn't show that.  Cohen testified that he did know what a 1099 and K1 are.  He has a team of professionals working for him so this man has no excuse for failing to provide IRS required tax and corporate information to me.  Cohen has this information.  

Streeter:  But the People will submit to you or show to you that this so-called business relationship, or not honoring their business relationship, indeed the most important thing that she mentions every so often the tax statement is merely a ruse.  For example ... the evidence you will see ... that Ms. Lynch specifically asked for her K-1 form ... Let’s talk a little bit about Ms. Lynch’s need for the tax form or tax returns -- the evidence will show that Ms. Lynch was Mr. Cohen’s business manager.  The evidence will show that Mr. [sic] Lynch -- Mr. Cohen has no clue as to what a W-2 form is, a 1099 is, a K-1 form.  The evidence will show that Ms. Lynch is the one that had all of that information, knew all that information.  Mr. Cohen did not have it, does not have it and does not understand what it means.  Okay.  (RT 42-43)

Streeter begins to elicit testimony about federal tax matters.  Does this "annoy" Leonard Cohen?  Yes, the K-1s are a constant theme.  The TH K-1s prove I am a partner who was included on federal tax returns.  The LCI K-1s prove criminal conduct.  I was not Cohen's business manager.  I never filed an IRS document or prepared one.  I suppose Cohen can now lie and say he meant I mailed them.  See all tax returns and preparer information.  They will be attached to my motion as well.


Streeter:  And do you also recall discussion about K-1, criminal K-1?  Cohen:  Yes, that was a constant theme.  Streeter:  Do you know what a K-1 is, Mr. Cohen?  Cohen:  Well, I didn’t until I asked.  Streeter  Who did you ask.  Cohen:  I asked my attorney.  RT 82  Streeter:  And you mentioned that Ms. Cohen – sorry – Ms. Lynch was your business manager; is that correct?  Cohen:  That’s correct.  Streeter:  During the time that she was in your employ as your business manager, who took care of filing documents with the IRS?  Cohen:  That was Ms. Lynch.  RT 82

I am reviewing the transcript from my so-called trial carefully now.  I think IRS should obtain all transcripts from the court.  You can then see prosecutors advising judges that my case is unusual because it involves a "celebrity."  That is how the City Attorney's office thinks.  These are issues that are being addressed in my motion.  The 9th Circuit Court is upset about prosecutorial misconduct.  Well, just about every word during my trial was a lie - including with respect to IRS and IRS matters.  Kory's testimony about providing my lawyers with tax information, etc. is deranged.  I'll get into his testimony as well.  These issues are also going to be addressed in the federal lawsuit I am filing against Cohen.

All the best,
Kelley

Kelley Lynch's Email To Dennis Riordan Re. Leonard Cohen's Testimony, Under Oath, About Phil Spector & A Gun Incident Is Contradicted By Other Versions - Including The District Attorney's


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:52 PM
Subject: Leonard Cohen's Perjury
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>


Mr. Riordan,

I am attaching the [Spector] prosecutor's Motion in Limine that is readily available online at LA Superior Court.  Marty never described the alleged incident at the Beverly Hills Hotel in this manner and said it was highly exaggerated.  However, Ed Lozzi was clear:  the valet loves to talk to journalists and authors about this incident.


In this Motion, Phillip allegedly held a semi-automatic to Cohen's chest.  Under oath, in my so-called 2012 trial, Cohen testified that Phillip held an automatic to his head.  This Motion also addresses Ogden becoming Phillip's assistant when I was.

The prosecutor is the individual who introduced Leonard Cohen, Steve Cooley, and Alan Jackson into this situation.  She intentionally elicited testimony about these individuals.  Here's where Streeter questions Cohen about Phil Spector and the gun incident.

Streeter:  Do you recall if also in that voice mail message there was any mention of Phil Spector?  Cohen:  Yes, Phil Spector’s name was mentioned.  Cohen:  And his attorneys; is that right?  Cohen:  I believe so.  Streeter:  Now, is the discussion of Phil Spector something that is common in the voice mail messages that Ms. Lynch has left you?  Cohen:  It’s almost routine.  RT 157-158  Streeter:  What about the email messages that Ms. Lynch has sent you, particularly in the time period of February 2011 to February 2012?  Is the topic of Mr. Spector a common topic? Is the topic of Mr. Spector a common topic?  Cohen:  Yes, it is.  Streeter:  Would you say that that is almost routine as well?  Cohen:  Yes, it is.  Streeter:  Did you have any involvement in the Phil Spector trial?  Cohen:  None, whatsoever.  RT 158 Cohen:  May I qualify that?  Streeter:  Yes.  Cohen:  At the very beginning of the trial, after the – the death of Lana Clarkson was made public, I was visited by two Sheriffs from the LA County.  And they interviewed me as to my relationship with Phil Spector.  My attorney, Mr. Cron, was present at the time.  I told the detectives that Phil Spector had produced an album of mine in 1977, and they asked me about some stories that were circulating in the newspaper about his use of guns in the studio. I told them of my experience.  Then they asked me when I’d last seen Phil Spector.  I said the last I’d seen him was shortly after the record was released, which I think was 1977 or 1978, and I hadn’t seen him since.  When they discovered that I hadn’t seen him since, they were no longer interested in interviewing me and left.  So that has some connection I did have with the trial.  Subsequent to that, I’ve had nothing to do with the trial whatsoever.  Streeter:  Now, when you spoke to the detectives do you know where Ms. Lynch was?  Cohen:  My attorney, Mr. Cron, asked Ms. Lynch to leave the room, so that I think the attorney/client privilege would not be challenged.  Streeter:  But she was somewhere around?  Cohen:  She was in my house.  RT 159

I wasn't at Cohen's house and the detectives should recall meeting me as I was leaving.  Steve Cron was not Leonard Cohen's lawyer.  Cohen gave a BBC interview saying he had recently spoken to Phillip and he wasn't mad any longer.  This is a link to the actual interview.  During my alleged trial, Cohen testified that he never spoke to Phillip again after they recorded together in 1977 so how did he speak with him in 1994?  I can assure you that this never happened.


Here is the excerpt from the BBC radio interview transcript where Cohen says he recently spoke to Spector proving that his testimony about this issue is perjured.

Leonard Cohen

That happened at a very curious time in my life because I was at a very low point, my family was breaking up, I was living in Los Angeles which was a foreign city to me, and I'd lost control, as I say, of my family, of my work, and my life, and it was a very very dark period. And when he got into the studio it was clear that he was an eccentric, but I didn't know that he was mad. He's not mad any longer, I've spoken to him on the phone recently, he's really quite reasonable and calm, but we were, you know, I was flipped out at the time and he certainly was flipped out, my flipped out was, you know, the expression was withdrawal and melancholy, and his was megalomania and insanity, and the kind of devotion to armaments, to weapons, that was really intolerable. With Phil, especially in the state that he found himself, which was post-Wagnerian, I would say Hitlerian, the atmosphere was one of guns, I mean that's really what was going on, was guns. The music was subsidiary an enterprise, you know people were armed to the teeth, all his friends, his bodyguards, and everybody was drunk, or intoxicated on other items, so you were slipping over bullets, and you were biting into revolvers in your hamburger. There were guns everywhere... And at a certain point Phil approached me with a bottle of Manishewitz kosher red wine in one hand and a 45 in the other, put his arm around my shoulder and shoved a revolver into my neck and said, "Leonard, I love you". I said, "I hope you do, Phil".


Streeter continues eliciting testimony.  At this point she is referring to the April 18th email that includes an email thread with an email to Michelle Rice (addressing tax matters) and the IRS Commissioner's Staff.  I suppose when she noticed that she decided to lie and say she "misspoke."  I have provided IRS with these emails so they may review her questions against the emails themselves.  This is how Streeter elicits testimony from Cohen about Phillip and an alleged gun incident.  Cohen looks over the email and confirms that he was a recipient.  In cross-examination it is prove that this original testimony was perjured because he was not copied on this email.  Streeter wanted Cohen to read the email in the thread addressed to you, Mr. Riordan.  And, let me assure you that for 20 years Cohen advised me that Phillip never held a gun on him.

Streeter:  I have People’s 13.  Now, thinking back to the emails that you received from Ms. Lynch about Mr. Spector, would she use his whole name or would she use part of his name, or did it vary?  Cohen:  It varied, but I think it was usually Phil Spector … Occasionally when she spoke of him as someone she knew well, I think she would call him Phillip.  Streeter:  I’m going to show you an email.  It’s – April 18, 2011.  I misspoke.  It’s at 8.11 AM.  Just look at the first page on the date.  See if that refreshes your recollection.  Let me know when you’ve done.  Cohen:  Yes Ma’am.  Streeter:  Did – does that refresh your recollection as to whether or not you received an email on April 18, 2011 at approximately 8.11 AM in the morning.  Cohen:  Yes, this is the email I received.  Streeter:  See if that email helps you recall whether or not there was any mention of either a Phil, a Phillip, or Phil Spector in the email.  Cohen:  In this particular email, Mr. Spector is called Phillip.  Streeter:  Okay.  And on what page is the email?  What page is the mention of Mr. Spector?  Cohen:  I haven’t studied the whole email, but it begins on the first page.  Streeter:  How many pages is that particular email, Mr. Cohen?  Cohen:  Seven pages … Streeter:  Is your name mentioned in any way with Phillip, Mr. Cohen?  Cohen:  Yes.  It says, Cohen told me Phillip never held a gun on him, and that would support what he told LAPD.  RT 160-161 

Here is Leonard Cohen's testimony, on cross examination, that contradicts the version of this alleged incident used by the DA and the other version Cohen wrote my prosecutor about during the trial.

PD:  Now, I want to talk to you about what you mean by threatened.  You actually -- you were telling us about Phil Spector.  You were testifying about talking to the LAPD.  Cohen:  Yes, Sir.


PD:  And you talked to the LAPD with your attorney, correct?  Cohen:  With an attorney present, yes, Sir.  PD:  And that’s when you asked that – or your attorney – someone asked that Ms. Lynch leave?  Cohen:  The attorney asked that Ms. Lynch leave.  PD:  So when Ms. Lynch left, you started talking about an interview or story about Phil Spector, correct?  Cohen:  Correct.  PD:  And how he would oftentimes have guns when you were producing an album, correct?  He would have guns in the studio when he was producing an album with you?  Cohen:  That’s correct.  PD:  And, in fact, one time you told the detective that, quote – Well, before I go there, was Mr. Spector -- was he drunk at the time when he had these guns?  Cohen:  I don’t remember, Sir.  PD:  Was he hostile at the time?  Cohen:  Not to me.  PD:  Okay.  But he actually put a gun to your head?  Is that correct?  Cohen:  That’s correct.  PD:  It was a revolver?  Cohen:   No, it wasn’t a revolver.  It was an automatic.  PD:  But you weren’t actually -- you didn’t feel threatened when he put a gun to your head?  Cohen:  No, Sir.  RT 308-309

Below is the email Cohen sent to Streeter and Mick Brown's emails confirming that he has reviewed the Grand Jury testimony/statements and Cohen's were presented to the Grand Jury.  I assume the prosecutors presented the same version to the Grand Jury that appear in this Motion.  Please keep in mind that Ann Diamond's article from 2008 confirms that a journalist advised me about Cohen's statements/testimony in the Grand Jury.  Since Cohen threatened Ann Diamond over that article, one can safely assume that he read it.  

In any event, I intend to attach this evidence to the motion I am filing with Judge Hess  It proves that Cohen has a pattern of lying under oath.  I am also attaching IRS evidence that Cohen has not provided me with a 1099 for 2004 and the K-1s from LC Investments, LLC (that they refuse to rescind) are illegal (as I am not a partner on that entity) but the $0 income shown on them for 2003, 2004, and 2005 proves perjury with respect to the fraud ledger.  I would assume that Agent Tejeda, being the head of fraud for IRS in Los Angeles, understands this.

The perjured statements and fraudulent misrepresentations in these legal documents are inconceivable and people belong in prison.  A copy of my motion will be sent to the State Bar, DA's Justice Integrity Unit, Criminal Grand Jury of Los Angeles, IRS, FBI, DOJ, FTB, and you.

All the best,
Kelley

Excerpt of Prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter Email to Leonard Cohen
April 5, 2012 at 2:20 PM

7.  Did you know Phil Spector?  If so, how?  Did you testify in front of the grand jury?

Phil Spector produced a record of songs we wrote together in 1977.  I have not seen or spoken to him since.  I did not testify before a grand jury.

Leonard Cohen Email to Sandra Jo Streeter
April 5, 2012 at 9:31 PM

Dear Ms. Streeter,

This is a short note I prepared for a biographer last year.  I know you’ve been burdened with an enormous heap of material, but this rounds off the question you asked about Phil Spector.

Sincerely
L

PHIL SPECTOR

Shortly after t death of Lana Clarkson, I was visited in my home by two detectives from the Homicide Bureau of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, Detective Paul Fornier, and Detective Richard Tomlin.

Kelley Lynch thought it would be a good idea to have a lawyer present, so she arranged for attorney Steven M. Cron to be there for the interview.  Mr. Cron asked Kelley Lynch to excuse herself, and she left the room.

Apparently the detectives had come across some old interviews I did in 1978 or 1979 in which I spoke of the difficulties of recording Death Of A Lady’s Man with Phil Spector:  the brandishing of guns, armed bodyguards, drunkenness, and Phil’s famous megalomania.  Even though Phil put his arm around my shoulder and pressed an automatic into my neck, except for the real possibility of an accident, I never at any moment thought that Phil meant to do me harm.  In ever felt seriously threatened.  I conveyed this to the detectives.  I said the incident was repeated in the press over the years, with exaggerations, but it was basically just a good rock ‘n roll story.

Then they asked me when I had last seen Phil Spector.
I said it’s been over 20 years.  They were very surprised.  They said they were under the impression we were close friends.  I said no.  Hearing this they thanked me for my time, finished their coffees, and left.  It was clear that I was not to be considered a valuable witness.

I was never approached again by anyone concerned with the case.  Needless to say, I did not testify before a Grand Jury.  

Mick Brown Email to Nikhil Ramnaney
April 10, 2012

Dear Nikhil Ramnaney,

Thank you for your letter.  I’m afraid there has been a misunderstanding here.  At the time, I was writing my book about Phil Spector I was sent copies of material that, as I understood it, had been submitted to the Grand Jury in the Phil Spector case.  Included in this material were (short) statements from Leonard Cohen.

I might well have mentioned to Ms. Lynch that these statements were included in materials presented to the Grand Jury.  However, I do not recall having stated that Mr. Cohen himself had testified to the Grand Jury.  Indeed, I would had no way of knowing whether he had or not.  My feeling is that these statements had not been given by Mr. Cohen personally at the time but were actually taken from one or more statements that he had given in the past concerning his recording sessions with Mr. Spector.

I hope this answers your question.  If it’s helpful, I shall try to find the original material that was sent to me.  If I can be of any more help to you please don’t hesitate to contact me.

Best wishes,


Mick Brown
From: Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>
Date: Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:18 AM
Subject: Re: Kelley Lynch Trial - Leonard Cohen, Phil Spector
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>


Kelley,


I have looked for the documents I was sent in connection with the Grand Jury and been unable to find them. They were sent to me by my friend the journalist and author Carlton Smith, who unfortunately has since passed away. However, I'm sure you would be able to access them from the same source as Carlton did. My understanding is they were/are on the public record.

I do not recall ever saying to you that Cohen himself had testified. If I did, it was my mistake. My recollection is that the statement from Leonard Cohen was the same  statement that had already appeared in media interviews, pertaining to the incident in the studio during the recording of 'Death Of A Ladies Man'. My recollection is that it was on a single sheet of paper. I have no idea whether Leonard Cohen personally made this statement to the DA, or whether - and I suspect this is the case - that quote had simply been taken from previously published interviews 


There was no mention of any statement attributed to Cohen in either of the two subsequent trials.


Mick




Kelley Lynch's Email To IRS Re. Leonard Cohen's Entirely Fraudulent "Victim Impact Statement"


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 4:25 PM
Subject: 
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>

Hello IRS,

I'm reviewing Leonard Cohen's "Victim Impact Statement."  I thought it was interesting that the individual who interviewed me focused on Cohen's preposterous "thank you" to Judge Vanderet.  I, of course, found his gratitude to the taxpayers nauseating.

I would like IRS to address Cohen's utterly false and fraudulent statements about IRS matters and the alleged retirement account.  Leonard Cohen's outstanding loans/expenditures from Traditional Holdings, LLC total approximately $6.7 million.  Is that what he is referring when he refers to a "massive depletion" of his alleged retirement account?  

What information does Cohen have about my tax returns or a day of reckoning with IRS?  This man will lie and say anything.  

There was and remains no forensic analysis.  There is a ledger that is evidence of financial fraud.  It is a meaningless list of numbers.  And, it fails to address corporate ownership interests, information contained on federal tax returns, assets, liabilities and equity.  So, yes, a forensic accounting needs to be prepared by IRS.  This ledger is evidence of nothing other than accounting fraud.

Since taxes were not paid, due to the way Cohen's tax lawyer handled the tax returns, on the income in 2001.  How precisely did Cohen pay taxes on anything?


In any event, I would like the IRS to provide me with a formal opinion.  How does the IRS explain the K-1s for Traditional Holdings, LLC, taxes I paid, illegal K-1s from LCI that completely undermine the ledger and prove perjury, etc?

It is my personal opinion that Leonard Cohen is not merely the alter ego of these entities but an ego maniac and narcissist.  

I am addressing the lies in Cohen's VIP for my federal lawsuit.  My motions will be filed in approximately a week and a half.  I am carefully reviewing all evidence, perjured statements, fraudulent misrepresentations, declarations received, etc.

All the best,
Kelley