Date: Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:05 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Dan Bergman <dbergman@bergman-law.com>, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov, AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov
Hello IRS, FBI, and DOJ,
I will also advise Judge Hess that KVW's first move, after receiving Paulette Brandt's rent arrears letter, was to phone Robert Kory. She then ended up being represented by "Stephen Gianelli." I don't know Linda Carol or Karina Von Watteville. In any event, this situation won't help Cohen as he personally has a long and publicly documented history of psychiatric, drug, and alcohol problems. I'm not sure why he believes his own conduct is my intent to "annoy" him.
In any event, I am finishing up my Reply. Cohen has falsely accused me of fabricating declarations but has two law firms that can come up with an excuse for that insanity. The comments about perjury are laughable given the fact that every word before LA Superior Court with respect to Leonard Cohen is a lie. That includes the entire complaint submitted to IRS, used to obtain fraudulent tax refunds, and used to defend himself with Agent Luis Tejeda after realizing the U.S. Treasury flew agents into meet with me. I suppose the failure to serve me was a sure thing by December 2005 (six months before the May 2006 default) as Cohen rushed his 2005 returns, amended his 2003 and 2004 returns, and applied for fraudulent tax refunds using the Complaint and some version of the fraud financial ledger. I'm not clear why corporate accountings were not submitted to IRS and/or why Cohen's loans/expenditures from TH alone were concealed (approximately $6.7 million), etc. One lie replaces another lie and now they have an excuse for their perjury. Leonard Cohen does not have an excuse for an entirely perjured document submitted to IRS - the Complaint in this case together with the other documents he used to defend himself against criminal tax fraud.
In any event, I have once again advised Cohen's two law firms that they should immediately cease lying about me in legal documents. All of this will be addressed in my federal RICO suit.
Al the best,
Kelley
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
https://thedarwinexception.wordpress.com/2007/09/02/ca-vs-spector-revisiting-opening-statements-bruce-cutler/Daniel Bergman and Michelle Rice,I will now bring this blog, and the false and slanderous comments about my declarations, to the attention of Judge Hess. I do believe he should understand that you have sealed documents attached to Greenberg's lawsuit and readily available on PACER You have no evidence to prove that any declaration was fabricated or forged. I forged nothing of Cohen's. The man needs to stop lying. He does, however, owe approximately $6.7 million with interest to TH. The interest totals approximately $4 million or so. That comes to $10.7 million. I am unclear as to how this figure could have been left off the fraud financial ledger. The fact that LA Superior Court has no jurisdictions over numerous entities (not named in the lawsuit; not even minimal contact).Stephen Gianelli, who represents Karina Von Watteville, is now publicly trashing Linda Carol on his blog devoted to targeting me and Paulette Brandt - with Kelly Green who posted this on the Darwin Exception in 2007. See below. I don't know Linda Carol but Karina Von Watteville is. I will now bring this situation to the attention of Judge Hess. I tend to doubt your client would ultimately be interested in trashing someone when he himself has had a long and publicly documented history of psychiatric, drug, and alcohol problems. I believe he was discussing this publicly with Sylvie Simmons (meth, LSD, etc.) while testifying that I "assailed" his reputation. Judge Vanderet permitted Cohen to get away with that insanity on the stand.The reason I am bringing this to your attention is due to the fact that Stephen Gianelli has targeted me since hearing from Michelle Rice/Kory Rice in May 2009. He has been quite public about that matter. He appears to threaten, slander, insult, harass, and stalk witnesses and I will now provide Judge Hess with evidence of that fact. I do think that Judge Hess should speak to each witness since criminal witness tampering, as FBI explained to me, is indeed criminal. I know Gianelli views himself as immune. When he started this blog, he first gave me an ultimatum that I view as blackmail: he advised me to pull down my riverdeepbook.blogspot.com blog or he would start one of his own. That blog will now be submitted to Judge Hess as evidence. I embezzled nothing. Cohen is the individual who engaged in embezzlement from these corporations and his Complaint in Case No. BC338322 is nothing other than an attempt to obstruct justice and cover up his role in criminal tax fraud. I have been very clear with Judge Babcock and others about my views on this matter.The lies about serving me continue to mount. I have advised you that I think it would be wise to stop lying about me in court documents. I intend to file a federal RICO suit, if relief is unavailable before LA Superior Court, and your attempts to have my fee waiver terminated and prevent me from filing further documents in this case are now going to be litigated in federal court - as well as the evidence you have under seal. I did not have a/c privilege with Westin who only represented Cohen. I asked Westin to write the March 2002 letter due to the insanity with IRS and the inadvertent 1099s Cohen received from Sony for $1 million and $7 million, respectively. You have many documents attached to Greenberg's lawsuit (Rice was a lawyer on that matter) and available on Pacer under seal now. As an attorney recently noted, Pacer documents note that they are sealed when they are under seal and I have called the SDNY. The CAK documents are publicly available documents. I will, of course, ask Judge Hess to explain this situation.Kelley LynchSeptember 3, 2007 at 2:15 amThe evidence will show, the evidence will show Cutler is a fucking pig, a fucking pig!
The man really loves to repeat himself.So much of Cutler’s OS makes me angry–but I find it truly disgusting that he never refers to Lana Clarkson by name, he always refers to her as the decedent–he is a fucking pig, a fucking pig.
10 comments:
I find it hard to believe while she was robbing Cohen blind, her family did the bookkeeping for Cohen's entities; yet, neither her mother, father, sister, nor Steve Lindsey had any idea everything they had, and the high life they were living, was paid for by Cohen? Unbelievable. Of course she couldn't go to rehab during that period. Had she gone to rehab, the gig would've been up.
Apparently, Lynch got away with forging Leonard Cohen's signature for years, so what's a few declarations, right?
WRONG.
Hopefully, given Lynch's prior record of criminal convictions in California and Colorado (as well as all of the crimes she got away with - including death threats and embezzlement) Los Angeles prosecutors will take a hard look at Lynch's and Brandt's conduct in view of Penal Code sections 132 and 134.
We simply can't have litigants running around filing fraudulent declarations with the court. The legal system has enough problems as it is....
And assisting Lynch in signing other people's names to declarations?
Setting aside the fact that Lynch has zero chance of setting Cohen’s 10-year old judgment aside at this point - let alone successfully suing Cohen on 10+ year old stale claims after that, all the money in the world can only buy you so many candy bars in the prison commissary.
What a bunch of idiots.
According to the legal brief filed by Cohen's attorneys and published by Lynch on-line, the problems with Lynch's pending motion to vacate are insurmountable.
The motion is the second motion asking that the 2006 judgment be set aside. Successive motions asking for the same relief are prohibited under California procedure absent new evidence that could not have been presented in support of the earlier motion or a change in the law. All of the alleged grounds for the new motion relate to events taking place more than two years ago, in some cases over 8 or more years ago. For that reason alone the motion is dead on arrival. But there is more.
The signatures on four of the declarations filed in support of the motion appear to be signed by Kelley Lynch and not the witness giving the declaration, rendering those declarations useless as evidence.
Lynch has admitted in a letter to the IRS, posted on her blog on May 27, that the Kelley Lynch supporting declaration was signed by Paulette Brandt, not Kelley Lynch - rendering that declaration worthless as evidence.
That leaves the Paulette Brandt declaration. But Brandt changed her testimony from her declaration given to support the first motion to vacate filed in 2013 from "I was in touch with Kelley Lynch" during the summer and fall of 2005 (when the suit was served) to (in her 2015 declaration) I was present at Kelley Lynch's house at 9:00 am the morning that Cohen's process server claims to have served a female occupant, and no one came to the door at all. And Paulette now claims for the first time that Kelley Lynch did not have blond hair with dark roots (as the process server described the female served) because Brandt (she now claims) PERSONALLY died Kelley Lynch's hair a dark brown. None of this was in Brandt's 2013 declaration on the subject of service of the suit and Lynch's hair color!
Additionally, Lynch seeks to vacate the judgment based on alleged perjury in the declarations supporting the amount of damages in the request to enter default filed in 2006. But California law does not allow judgments to be set aside for alleged "perjury" after the time to appeal has expired! And this rule is set forth in the very appellate decisions that Lynch herself cites in her motion!
For all of these reasons (and more) NOTHING Lynch could possibly say in her reply could cure these fatal defects in her motion.
Ergo, no one cares what Lynch is planning in her reply, let alone enough to "fish for information" on that subject. Not to mention Lynch is required to serve Cohen with her reply on the 16th of May anyway.
Kelley Lynch has to be one of the dumbest criminals who ever walked the face of the earth!
Kellygreen said