Date: Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:34 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>
FBI,
I believe this criminally harassing email from Gianelli is material. He appears to defend Steve Cooley, Pat Dixon, Alan Jackson and Jack Horvath.
If you review the Truth Sentinel interview site on Phil Spector, and in particular Gianelli's slanderous comments, you will see that Gianelli actually does argue Phil Spector's prosecution theories online. Those particular comments relate to Clarkson's DNA being on the gun and ammunition as well as the fact that the gun was not Phil Spector's. Dennis Riordan's brief and Bruce Cutler's arguments to the jury (and comments to Mick Brown) confirm that the fact that this gun was not Phillip was raised. In June 2009, after Gianelli communicated with Kory/Rice (per his own statements), he and Michelle Blaine targeted my blogs and email accounts. I captured that evidence. Michelle Blaine, who I view as the female Leonard Cohen, stole approximately $1 million
from Mr. Spector and went on a highly slanderous and disturbing campaign against him. That's how people frequently conduct themselves when trapped in their lies and forced to confront their own actions. Gianelli wrote that he worked, on two occasions, with the City Attorney of Los Angeles to have me falsely arrested. I do not know this man and his campaign of harassment, witness tampering, stalking, and so forth, has been thoroughly documented. He has gone to extreme lengths that include creating blogs dedicated to slandering me. He does indeed appear to be an unofficial member of Leonard Cohen's legal defense team and is the individual who (being in possession of her email address) began writing prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter on or around November
20, 2012 slandering and lying about me. I have every right to address slander, threats, false accusations, etc. Recently, Gianelli wrote and advised me that I should remove my riverdeepbook.blogspot.com blog. The attempts to silence me have been extraordinary. And that is one of the reasons for Leonard Cohen's
use of fraudulent restraining orders. He has advanced his inane narrative in the news media and does not want these matters heard on the merits. Cohen has also used the entirely fabricated narrative, that willfully disregards all corporate books and records, to defend himself with IRS Agent Luis Tejeda. That issue is going to be a very critical element of my RICO suit against Leonard Cohen. His refusal to provide me with IRS required tax and corporate information; the fraudulent tax refunds he has obtained; mistake that was secretly "rectified" with respect to my ownership interest in these entities; 1977 tax memorandum and his off-shore accounts; and his refusal to rescind the illegal K-1s LCI transmitted to State of Kentucky and Internal Revenue Service will also be issues.
Gianelli, when he wrote confirming that he brought information to my attention about Phil Spector's matter before the federal court, attached civil minutes dated March 12, 2015. Those minutes state: "The Court has reviewed petitioner’s Motion for Issuance of Report & Recommendation, filed on March 10, 2015. The Motion is granted to the extent that the Court anticipates issuing its Report & Recommendation in this action by September, 2015. The Motion is denied to the extent it seeks the issuance of the Report & Recommendation prior to that time." The fact that a federal court will decide on Phil Spector's appeal brief is extremely material and relevant to Gianelli's ongoing criminal harassment.
It is my personal opinion that Stephen Gianelli is using Karina Von Watteville to harass me. I have documented her conduct and will now provide the Court with supplemental declarations. Gianelli also attempts to elicit information. That explains why he writes about Cohen's failure to service, contacted and harassed nearly
every witness who provided me with a declaration (now submitted to Judge Hess), and works in tandem with numerous individuals.
I would strongly recommend that FBI review the forensic science Dennis Riordan and his colleagues addressed in their Brief. People do believe a third party non-biased agency should review the Phil Spector case and specifically the forensic evidence. Stephen Gianelli works in tandem with "Kelly Green." That individual
appears to be a male lawyer who was posting on the Darwin Exception as early as 2007. As I've said, and it's overwhelmingly obvious, the Darwin Exception was devoted to demonizing Phil Spector and glorifying Alan Jackson. This particular post was underneath a blog "article" about Bruce Cutler's Open Statements. I thought
perhaps a lawyer was actually providing these blog with this information throughout the trials. Due to the fact that I refused to cave into Gianelli's extortionate demands about my blog, he began a new and slanderous blog. Paulette Brandt, Linda Carol, and I are all being slandered there. Who was the first person to post there with
Gianelli? Kelly Green. This is a highly coordinated campaign of slander, harassment, and terrorism that has now gone on for years. It has been well documented. It has played out across the internet; via the mail and phone calls; and on blogs dedicated to Phil Spector's trials (Michelle Blaine's, Sprocket's Trial & Tribulations,
Darwin Exception, Gianelli's Law Blog, and now Gianelli's latest blog that I intend to sue Leonard Cohen over.
Stephen Gianelli believes he is immune from prosecution. He has sent me the U.S./Greece Treaty. He issues not-so-veiled threats about his alleged Mafia connection. He routinely lies to IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, ICE, and others. He has attempted to infiltrate IRS and federal tax matters. I have contacted Agent Wynar/FBI
again about the ongoing criminal conduct. I have also been in touch with Agent Wynar. I have addressed some of the lies and slander Gianelli sent to the District Attorney and City Attorney with both LAPD's TMU and Investigator Frayeh of the DA's office. I have documented all of this for IRS, FBI, and DOJ. Please see my
September 2009 letter to Alan Jackson. Stephen Gianelil's harassment, slander, etc. was documented in there. Gianelli has now publicly claims that Pat Dixon was somehow involved with the 2008 Boulder PD incident at Deneuve Construction. I absolutely followed FBI's advice and asked the Boulder DA to investigate and contacted the Attorney General of Colorado.
It is no wonder that Steve Cooley himself would then publicly align himself with Leonard Cohen in targeting me. Cooley should have been confronted on the witness stand. And then there are Leonard Cohen's three versions of his Spector good rock and roll gun stories before LA Superior Court. That issue does seem relevant as the version the prosecutors used in Spector's trial (and, according to Mick Brown, these statements or testimony were presented to the Grand Jury) was contradicted completely by Leonard Cohen's testimony. What evidence did my prosecutor use to elicit Cohen's testimony about Phil Spector and a gun? An April 18, 2011 email
to IRS, others, and Dennis Riordan. The prosecutor asked Cohen to review it and he confirmed that he was a recipient. He lied about that. This was obviously planned and I would assume the parties involved did not believe my lawyers and/or I would review the emails as Cohen was being questioned. What did that email say? Leonard Cohen advised me for 20 years that Phil Spector never held a gun on him. The FBI should decide for itself what version of Leonard Cohen's gun story about Phil Spector the Los Angeles District Attorney believes. Evidently, the weapon and Cohen's body parts are now interchangeable.
And, it is obvious, that a great deal of Gianelli's harassment relates to the fact that there is a hearing before Judge Hess on June 23, 2015. My federal RICO suit against Leonard Cohen will be filed shortly thereafter. Leonard Cohen is not going to extort $13.8 million from me ($5 million damages and fraud financial interest) in a matter I was not served; obtained fraudulent tax refunds using the fraud Complaint; or steal the intellectual property from me. He should be held accountable for his actions or, as one of his representatives noted, we should all stop paying taxes.
All the best,
Kelley
P.S. Here's the final scene from The Boost. Gianelli is lying that Paulette Brandt, Linda Carol, or I do illicit drugs or have alcohol issues. He also lied when he said Paulette Brandt is a lesbian. The man, as people have noted, is a psychopath and his emails are deranged. However, he has been clear. His goal with respect to me is prison or death. He wrote the "bloody stump" email. I am convinced of that fact. He created those types of
P.S. Here's the final scene from The Boost. Gianelli is lying that Paulette Brandt, Linda Carol, or I do illicit drugs or have alcohol issues. He also lied when he said Paulette Brandt is a lesbian. The man, as people have noted, is a psychopath and his emails are deranged. However, he has been clear. His goal with respect to me is prison or death. He wrote the "bloody stump" email. I am convinced of that fact. He created those types of
monikers and slandered my teachers, 14th Sharmapa and 17th Karmapa. I suppose that's because Sharmapa believed in 2005 that I was the victim of corrupt politicians and law enforcement. That's why I wrote Cutler that I felt Cooley might actually confess to his role in a legal conspiracy. These people are pathetic liars. They need to be brought to justice. Please cross off Bruce Cutler's name and insert "FBI." I heard from Phil Spector after my trial and I think it's safe to say that he felt he had a right to know that former DA Steve Cooley publicly aligned himself with Cohen while the City Attorney elicited testimony about Phil Spector and a gun. Cohen acknowledged in cross-examination that he was not a recipient of the April 18, 2011 email and the City Attorney "misspoke" when she concealed the section of that email to IRS Commissioner's Staff and regarding legitimate tax matters that still remain outstanding. This is nothing other than blatant obstruction of justice and Leonard Cohen's attempt to evade the consequences of his own wrong-doing. That's entirely clear. Stephen Gianelli is a two bit criminal hoodlum. He, and anyone else that files false complaints about me, should be prosecuted
to the full extent of the law. He believes he is immune. Perhaps his allies in LA Confidential have assured him of that fact.
Kellygreen said
The evidence will show, the evidence will show Cutler is a f*&king pig, a f%$king pig!
The man really loves to repeat himself.
The man really loves to repeat himself.
So much of Cutler’s OS makes me angry–but I find it truly disgusting that he never refers to Lana Clarkson by name, he always refers to her as the decedent–he is a fucking pig, a fucking pig.
Paulette Brandt, Ann Diamond, and Kelley Lynch Interviews - Truth Sentinel:
Phil Spector Brief:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:34 PM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:34 PM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Ms. Lynch,
As I brought to your attention, and not the other way around, the Federal District Court for the Central District of California, by and through the Hon. Paul L. Abrams, Magistrate, has granted Phil Spector’s motion for issuance of the magistrate’s Report and Recommendation re: the disposition of Philip Spector’s pending habeas petition “to the extent that the Court anticipates issuing its Report & Recommendation in this action by September, 2015. The Motion is denied to the extent it seeks the issuance of the Report & Recommendation prior to that time.” (Bold highlighting original; see attached minute order.)
Once the report and recommendation is necessary because Mr. Spector refused to stipulate that the petition can be decided by a magistrate judge. Therefore, the magistrate will generate what is in effect a proposed order setting forth an analysis and proposed disposition, and it will be up to the judge before whom the matter is pending to adopt or not to adopt the recommendation.
The Report and Recommendation will issue by September, and then the judge has an indeterminate time to decide what to do. However, give the poor reputation of S. James Otero in the defense bar, and his conservative leanings (Republican, Ronald Reagan appointee), my prediction is that he will deny the petition, and Mr. Spector will then move onto the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
In the unlikely event that Judge Otero did grant the petition, the People would no doubt appeal to the 9th Circuit as well, so win, lose or draw, Mr. Spector is unlikely to win his release, if at all, for another two years.
As to why all of this would make me, Leonard Cohen, or anyone else at all uneasy (let alone “desperate”) is unclear.
As for your intended federal lawsuit, you have been saying that ever since you first started emailing me in 2009, and with each passing month, as your communications get wackier and stranger (e.g., the below references to dominatrix’s and “spanking magazines”) that threat seems less and less likely to ever materialize. Nor is any such suit likely to last longer than it takes a federal district court judge to read it and sign a dismissal order on his own motion. Again, no source of great anxiety at all, let alone desperation.
But do have another bottle of wine ladies and/or another Twinkie and/or doobie or rock. Because at this point it’s just an addicts brain damaged ramblings – like the final scene in The Boost.