Date: Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:57 AM
Subject: Fwd: Kelley Lynch's email dated Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:11 AM
To: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, tania.cardoso@hollenbecklaw.com, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>
Stephen Gianelli,
Game, set, match, right, Gianelli? You are targeting Paulette Brandt over Phil Spector and me. You want to discredit her and I want Judge Hess to understand this. Also, the Small Claims judge and the Commissioner in the fraud domestic violence order. You've criminally harassed me over all these issues and I have the evidence. They can decide for themselves if you are an unofficial member of Cohen's legal team and/or moonlighting for the Spector prosecutors and arguing Spector prosecution theories online - ie., the gun was Phillip's and Clarkson's DNA wasn't on the bullets and ammunition when it was.
I am reviewing the criminally harassing emails you and Susanne Walsh have sent me, Paulette Brandt, and others, since I filed my Motion for Terminating Sanctions in mid-March 2015. I am submitting that evidence to LA Superior Court and addressing your slander, defamation, libel, harassment, stalking, threats, intimidation tactics, etc.
Karina Von Watteville phoned Robert Kory, after receiving Paulette Brandt's rent demand letter in June 2014, because she - not we - smelled cash. She is a vexatious litigant who tells everyone (including me) that men do things for her, give her money, and adore her. She photographed a gold record I had (belonging to me with my name on it) and mentioned that she never heard of Leonard Cohen. Witnesses were present. She did know Elton John whose Gold Record I have for the Duets album. Kory told her (and she repeated this to the mediator and Paulette Brandt at the first hearing) to sue me and said I was crazy. Kory's insane so he might have a hard time distinguishing reality from fiction. He also has bias and motive - he replaced me as Cohen's manager and became his lawyer. He's now, with his partner Michelle Rice, a paid lawyer, paid witness, and paid victim, who - with Rice - received domestic violence related orders. The reason for that is due to the fact that the foreign Colorado order was fraudulently registered as a domestic violence order. I've received your inane legal opinions about these orders and cannot figure out who would hire you. I view you as an ambulance chaser and Von Watteville's the perfect client for you from my perspective.
You emailed me about the Small Claims hearing and Von Watteville - not the other way around. You wrote me about the 15th which was the hearing date for the Small Claims matter. I wasn't aware of the date because Paulette Brandt hadn't told me. I have your emails so your lies now won't help you. You lie relentlessly and that includes to IRS, FBI, DOJ, ICE, FTB, District Attorney, City Attorney, and probably others. You relentlessly targeted my sons, sister (whose lawyer advised you to cease and desist), and others. People have gone to law enforcement and provided courts with declarations. You wrote that you have a glimpse of behind closed doors at Paulette Brandt's. No you don't. You do not know where I live. You're not retired. You have a job - me. You have relentlessly targeted me for six straight years now. You've devoted blogs to slandering and lying about me. You worked with Michelle Blaine to have my email accounts and blogs fraudulently taken down. You work in tandem with Cohen's fan, Susanne Walsh, and just cc'd Robert Kory when you transmitted the blog you threw up after your blackmail with respect to riverdeepbook.blogspot.com.
I have sent you countless emails advising you to cease and desist. You sent me the Greece/U.S. treaty and indicated that you are immune to extradition and prosecution. You could be deported however. You have issued not to veiled threats to me re. your alleged Mafia connections. You have said that I should die. You recently wrote me and Paulette that we should commit suicide. You do not know us and your obsession is vile and vulgar..
You're arrogance about yourself is appalling. You are a nouveau riche fraud and embarrassing. People view you as a psychopath who writes deranged emails. You have targeted nearly every witness who submitted a declaration to Judge Hess. You hunted won my ex-husband, Richard Dallett, and then lied about him. I have his emails and I know him. He said you called him numerous times and wanted information - including about my brother who you do not know.
The two year statute re. Von Watteville's agreement to pay Paulette Brandt (when she received her social security lump sum payment - or was notified that she received it) has not expired. You wrote the declaration that Von Watteville submitted and argued the statute. That is fraud upon the court.
I advised Von Watteville, over the course of months, to cease and desist with respect to her slander, false accusations, call to Robert Kory, and other relevant issues. IRS, FBI, and DOJ were copied in and have those emails.
Paulette Brandt didn't come after Von Watteville because she heard about her accident money. Von Watteville told me, and others, she had a $200,000 settlement for her hand injury and also noted that she was suing the insurance company for $80,000. Paulette Brandt didn't know her when her former roommate (from years and years ago in NYC) called out of the blue. She hadn't spoken to her in years and years. She begged Paulette Brandt to let Von Watteville stay. She said Von Watteville lost her green card and was waiting to sort that out until she received her lump sum social security check. That's an agreement. The woman was a stranger, who was being kicked out of the place she rented, and about to end up homeless. She is now lying, slandering us, and pathetic from my perspective. I do not know her so her obsession concerned me. I figured she would find Leonard Cohen. I saw right through her as Paulette Brandt continually reminds me.
Paulette Brandt, Linda Carol, and I do not do illicit drugs. I don't even touch marijuana and rarely have a glass of wine. Everyone that knows me understands this. Ray Lawrence blamed Michael and Tyler for stealing his alcohol - also parties with young people there. I didn't even really live with him. He was in Minnesota. And, guess what - no one cares about Ray Lawrence at all so enjoy your friendship. I know you referred him to a lawyer in Contra Costa. I also have the emails he privately wrote me about you and Kelly Green. I have provided them to IRS, FBI, and DOJ.
The judge asked anyone who was a witness to leave the courtroom. He didn't seize on the moment and zoom in on Debbie who is also being slandered. Why? Because she's a witness. Von Watteville's not intelligent. I've spoken to her. She was boasting about being stripper at a club where, according to her, women smoked through their "coozes." That sounds vulgar to me. Her demeanor? Someone noted that they saw her screaming in the hallway (about Cohen, Kory and ICE - that she brought up) and thought she looked like a con artist in the courtroom talking meekly to the judge. I am onto you, Gianelli. Many people are. You're not intelligent so how would you know if someone's intelligent.
Game, set, match, right, Gianelli? You are targeting Paulette Brandt over Phil Spector and me. You want to discredit her and I want Judge Hess to understand this. Also, the Small Claims judge and the Commissioner in the fraud domestic violence order. You've criminally harassed me over all these issues and I have the evidence. They can decide for themselves if you are an unofficial member of Cohen's legal team and/or moonlighting for the Spector prosecutors and arguing Spector prosecution theories online - ie., the gun was Phillip's and Clarkson's DNA wasn't on the bullets and ammunition when it was.
Your email to Ed Lozzi, with me copied in, was transparent as hell. You are attempting to infiltrate Phil Spector's defense. That's why you called Bruce Cutler using me as a pretext. I stand behind my letters to Cutler. They're not harassing. I heard from Phillip after the trial and it's safe to say that he felt it was important to know that Cooley and Cohen publicly aligned themselves to target me, Cohen was testifying about Phil Spector and a gun (that's why there are now three versions of Cohen's garbage gun story about Spector before LA Superior Court, etc. The three letters ARE the evidence Cutler provided the Court. His letter is hearsay. And, he said he destroyed the alleged voice mail messages. I never called him 30 times a day. He couldn't prove that if hell froze over. I do want to know more about his conversations with Dixon about me in 2008. You did, after all, advise me that Dixon was behind the Boulder PD incident at Deneuve Construction.
Now cease and desist, Gianelli. I see right through you - and so do many othres.
Kelley Lynch
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:29 PM
Subject: RE: Kelley Lynch's email dated Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:11 AM
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, khuvane@caa.com, blourd@caa.com, "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:29 PM
Subject: RE: Kelley Lynch's email dated Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:11 AM
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, khuvane@caa.com, blourd@caa.com, "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>
Ms. Lynch,
You have “no idea what you are talking about”?
Then please allow me to remind you!
You started emailing me about a Ms. Karina Von Watteville last Tuesday, accusing her of slandering you – which the situation appeared to be quite the opposite – alluding to a pending legal matter between Paulette Brandt and Ms. Von Watteville, even copying me with your emails to Ms. Von Watteville.
You sent me over twenty emails about the small claims matter, so I decided to offer Ms. Von Watteville my not inconsiderable legal expertise. I provided to her several bullet-proof defenses, and schooled her no how to conduct herself at yesterday’s hearing. I the emailed you, even calling my shots (as they say in pool) predicting that Ms. Brandt’s claim would be defeated by the two-year statute of limitations provided by CCP 339, an idea you LAUGHED AT. You emailed me on the 13th and the 14th even denying there was a hearing in the matter on the 15th!
You continued to email me, alluding to every aspect of the case, claiming that Ms. Von Watteville “called Kory”, and sent me emails yesterday the 15h before the hearing (based on Crete, Greece time) at 4:51, 4:56, 4:17, 4:17, 5:36 PM (between 7:00 and 8:00 AM Los Angeles time), even informing me that Paulette Brandt would bring a “witness who lived there at the time”. You copied me with an email calling Ms. Von Watteville disparaging names, and then copied me with an email to Ms. Brandt saying: “Let me know what time we're being picked up” for the hearing (rather hilarious since you and Ms. Brandt live together in a small 2-bedroom apartment – but you email each other, cc to me? Ha!).
So please, your claim I am stalking you about Ms. Brandt’s sordid little small claims matter is ridiculous. I do know what happened at the hearing, however, so please allow me to recap – because I am enjoying this so much!
REDACTED SLANDEROUS RANT.
Seizing the situation up, the judge instructed you and Debbie to wait outside the courtroom.
Fortunately, Ms. Von Watteville is intelligent enough to implement my defense strategy bullet points and legal citations to the letter, as well as my demeanor tips.
àAfter hearing both sides, and AS I PREDICTED (earning several derisive emails from you over the last few days) PAULETTE BRANDT LOST THE CASE because the lawsuit was initiated AFTER THE TWO-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS PROVIDED BY CCP 339 EXPIRED.
Perhaps I was being too subtle when I merely alluded to “Today’s hearing”.
I should have said Paulette Brandt lost her court case of yesterday, for the very reasons I predicted via email before the hearing.
I am not surprised that you and Ms. Brandt were shocked.
Neither of you understand what a “statute of limitations” is.
I hope you were paying attention yesterday, because CCP 339 is the SAME STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS that applies to bar your alleged financial claims against Leonard Cohen (since you saw fit to inject that matter into these discussions).
Isn’t is just GRAND how life turns out?
Needless to say, I am quite happy for Ms. Von Watteville, to whom I say “CONGRATULATIONS!”
Very truly yours,
Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece