From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:21 AM
Subject: Case No. BC338322 LC Investments, LLC K-1s
To: Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>
Jeffrey,
I have now obtained a copy of Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Points & Authorities Pursuant to CCP 579 to proceed against defendants Westin, and Does 1 through 50, while seeking a default judgment against Kelley Lynch. The first statement in the "Statement of Relevant Facts" section: Cohen ... the sole owner of LCILLC, a Delaware limited liability company established in 2001 ..." Would you like to explain the illegal K-1s transmitted to IRS and State of Kentucky noting that I am a partner on this entity for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005. The illegal K-1s really seemed to interest Sandra Jo Streeter. I have no idea what her jurisdiction over federal tax matters might be but I intend to find out.
I am sitting here with the K-1s and a recent IRS transcript showing LCI K-1s on my federal tax transcript.
For the record, I didn't "retain" anyone on Cohen's behalf. He retained them. I couldn't have retained Westin because I didn't know him. I also was not a friend of Neal Greenberg's and had no idea he was an investor. I knew his ex-wife.
Who are the John Does? I think that is highly relevant and material. Cohen didn't simply include fraudulent John Does in his Complaint, did he?
I am also sitting here with the Sheriff's Department inventory that shows my property being seized. Phil Spector's was also seized. Machat & Machat's property was seized. Cohen and his daughter seized all of my business files. What right does your client have to seize my property?
I continue to be criminally harassed by Gianelli over your client's insanity which involves extremely serious allegations related to criminal tax fraud. As Robert Kory doesn't represent IRS, I remain uninterested in his correspondence, declarations, and defense of his client - apart from the perjury.
I would like these illegal K-1s rescinded. I still do not have IRS required 1099 from Cohen for 2004. IRS believes Cohen owes it to me. The default judgment does not indicate that it was retroactive and covers 2004 and 2005 federal tax matters. It doesn't indicate that it covers federal tax matters at all.
I do look forward to the explanation for why I was included on so many federal tax returns and federal tax forms. I would imagine IRS is as well. After all, Cohen has essentially argued that the federal tax returns, prepared by his tax lawyer for his benefit, are fraudulent. Fascinating legal position. Good luck with that argument.
Kelley Lynch