Kelley Lynch's Email to Sandra Jo Streeter Re. Leonard Cohen & An Alleged Restraining Order Violation

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 7:34 AM
Subject: Case No. 6CJ03685
To: "SandraJo. Streeter" <SandraJo.Streeter@lacity.org>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com> 

Sandra Jo Streeter,

As of this date, I have concluded that Stephen Gianelli, who uses fake email monikers and fake names online to harass me and others, is sending these disturbing communications.  Nevertheless, it is quite clear that Gianelli is impersonating you while harassing me over an alleged restraining order violation.

I'm quite confused about his comments regarding an alleged July 27, 2016 restraining order violation involving Leonard Cohen and a federal tax/corporate matter.  When I asked Judge Lui to clarify the alleged violations, I was told on at least two occasions that they relate to Robert Kory and Michelle Rice.  Kory and Rice are not part of the Colorado order or the fraud California domestic violence order.  Nevertheless, Michelle Rice has submitted "evidence" to LA Superior Court - objecting to the termination of the fraud DV order although her client is now deceased - and also raised the alleged violation re. Cohen that "sandra123@gmail.com" has raised.  

As you know, I intend to file legal pleadings this week.  I would like to give the Court a complete overview of the situation.  I will, of course, submit these harassing emails and explain to the Court that Gianelli contacted you in November 2012, harassed me (my sons and others) for over a year, etc.  I think it's relevant and material in terms of the totality of circumstances.  I've enclosed the harassing emails I've received from "sandra123@gmail.com" to date.  

Please let me know if there is a violation of an order related to Leonard Cohen and what order that violated:  the Colorado order or the fraud California domestic violence order.  They are not the same order and your complaint has communications with Judge Archuleta, Boulder Combined Court, etc.  You're not involved in that situation so I am unclear as to why you have inserted yourself into it. Every lawyer I've spoken with understands that the Colorado order is not the California fraud DV order.  Kory & Rice are not part of either.  

In summary, I am filing legal pleadings on Tuesday or Wednesday and would like to address the Court re. the alleged restraining order violation against Leonard Cohen that I am being harassed over and which Rice has raised numerous times in legal pleadings.  

Kelley Lynch

REDACTED:  Harassing emails received from sandra123@gmail.com through February 18, 2017.

Kelley Lynch's Email to Wendy Lascher Re. Stay of Appeal & Sandra123's Email - Suspended Corporations, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:20 AM
Subject: Fwd: Record Omission Csae No. B267794 (Trial Case No. BC338322)
To: WCL CL <wlascher@fcoplaw.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com>

Wendy Lascher,

I see that you and Michelle Rice, attorneys on appeal in this case, were copied on the Second Appellate Court's confirmation that briefing in this case has been stayed until the record is fully transmitted.  Please find attached a courtesy copy of the letter sent to the Court and Appeals Unit.  An original is being mailed to you.

On a separate note, I received the following email from "sandra123@gmail.com."  I am not clear if Sandra Jo Streeter sent this or someone is impersonating her.  However, the issues raised relate to the suspended corporate matter I raised with you yesterday.  If you have any questions or comments, please let me know.  As for federal tax matters, they should be argued with the US District Court.  The US District Court in Colorado was the first to hear the allegations that Cohen/Kory planned to use restraining orders to discredit me as a witness.  That issue remains ongoing.

Kelley Lynch

From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:25 AM
Subject: Your clueless blog posts
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com
While a suspended corporation – as a litigation party – may not appeal an adverse ruling or judgment, no corporation (suspended or otherwise) is the appellant in any of your appeal proceedings; you are the sole appellant. (Nor has any corporate party appeared in any appeal in which you are involved.) Mere ownership of a suspended corporation (even if that was the case here) does not affect a party litigant’s ability to appear in court or to appeal an adverse judgment. Your suggestion to the contrary (e.g., a suspended entity might be "inside the trust" and if it is that somehow defeats the express permission given by the court of appeal for the trustee to appear as respondent of record) is utter nonsense. Nor does any of this change the fact that you violated a restraining order that you were previously convicted in 2012 of violating (and sentenced to 18-months in jail for) based on the same ineffectual "defense" (seeking tax information). Unlike Penal Code section 653M (criminalizing threatening or obscene electronic or telephonic communications), there is no good faith business purpose defense to a charge of violating a restraining order. Either you contacted the protected person in violation of the restraining order or you did not. If you did, that is 1-year in the county jail for each communication. A potential sentence that, given your lack of remorse and prior convictions for violating the same restraining order, you are likely to receive. From the court's perspective, if a sentence of 18-months in jail in 2012 followed by an addition 6-month sentence in 2014 for violating your probation were not enough for you to learn your lesson, what sentence will be justified this time?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:03 AM
Subject: Record Omission Csae No. B267794 (Trial Case No. BC338322)
To: Civil Appeals, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>
Cc: "Renteria, James"

Civil Appeals Unit,

Attached please find the Record Omission letter re. the above referenced case.  I am uploading this to the Appeal Court so that the briefing may be stayed.  The original letter and all service copies will be placed in the mail today by Paulette Brandt.

Thank you.

Kelley Lynch

Kelley Lynch's Email to Sandra Jo Streeter Re: Appeals, Corporate Matters, Federal Tax Matters, Ongoing Attempts to Infiltrate Her Defense, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:45 AM
Subject: Fwd: Your clueless blog posts
To: "SandraJo. Streeter" <SandraJo.Streeter@lacity.org>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>

Ms. Streeter,

Is there something related to any of the four appeals (two are consolidated) before the Second Appellate Court that you would like to discuss?  If so, please let me know.  I'm still unclear if you personally [are] sending me these or if a co-conspirator, such as Stephen Gianelli, is using a fake moniker to impersonate you.

As for the issue related to an alleged request for tax information:  the prosecutor at the last hearing mentioned that the violations related to Kory & Rice who are not part of the Colorado order.  Their former place of business was.  The Colorado court never obtained jurisdiction over Kory & Rice or Kory & Rice, LLP which was not formed at that time evidently.  The California order, which is a fraud DV order, is not the Colorado order.  I have made this perfectly clear to the Court so this email is clearly an attempt to elicit information about my defense.  I take that situation very, very seriously.  

If there are any issues you would like to address related to the corporations, they do not have injunctions.  And, federal tax matters should be argued in the proper venue which would be the U.S. District Court.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:25 AM
Subject: Your clueless blog posts
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com

While a suspended corporation – as a litigation party – may not appeal an adverse ruling or judgment, no corporation (suspended or otherwise) is the appellant in any of your appeal proceedings; you are the sole appellant. (Nor has any corporate party appeared in any appeal in which you are involved.) Mere ownership of a suspended corporation (even if that was the case here) does not affect a party litigant’s ability to appear in court or to appeal an adverse judgment. Your suggestion to the contrary (e.g., a suspended entity might be "inside the trust" and if it is that somehow defeats the express permission given by the court of appeal for the trustee to appear as respondent of record) is utter nonsense. Nor does any of this change the fact that you violated a restraining order that you were previously convicted in 2012 of violating (and sentenced to 18-months in jail for) based on the same ineffectual "defense" (seeking tax information). Unlike Penal Code section 653M (criminalizing threatening or obscene electronic or telephonic communications), there is no good faith business purpose defense to a charge of violating a restraining order. Either you contacted the protected person in violation of the restraining order or you did not. If you did, that is 1-year in the county jail for each communication. A potential sentence that, given your lack of remorse and prior convictions for violating the same restraining order, you are likely to receive. From the court's perspective, if a sentence of 18-months in jail in 2012 followed by an addition 6-month sentence in 2014 for violating your probation were not enough for you to learn your lesson, what sentence will be justified this time?

Kelley Lynch's Email Response to Wendy Lascher: You have an affirmative duty to bring the cancelled corporate plaintiff status to the attention of the court

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 2:26 PM
Subject: Fwd: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]
To: WCL CL <wlascher@fcoplaw.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com>

Ms. Lascher,

Michelle Rice has been the attorney on appeal well in advance of you.  You and your co-counsel have an affirmative duty to advise the court that plaintiff  LC Investments, LLC has a cancelled status in California.  This is most certainly evidence of bad faith.  Furthermore, it is relevant and material that there is no evidence before the appellate court that LC Investments, LLC is inside the trust.  There are no matters in this case before the trial court.  There is an appeal.  

I've asked about this issue.  You responded by telling me it's a trial counsel issue and copied in Michelle Rice.  Robert Kory is the corporate counsel.  At least, that's what LA Superior Court and the State of California have been advised.  

Kelley Lynch

Attorneys representing corporate clients in California courts have an affirmative duty to advise the court of the corporation’s incapacity, notwithstanding attorney-client confidentiality.   The failure to advise the court is evidence of bad faith that may support an award of sanctions.

200032610011    LC INVESTMENTS, LLC

Registration Date:

11/09/2000

Jurisdiction:

DELAWARE

Entity Type:

FOREIGN

Status:

CANCELED

Agent for Service of Process:

ROBERT B KORY
9300 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 200
BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212

Entity Address:

2140 S DUPONT HWY
CAMDEN DE 19934

Entity Mailing Address:

2140 S DUPONT HWY
CAMDEN DE 19934

LLC Management

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Wendy C. Lascher <wlascher@fcoplaw.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:12 PM
Subject: RE: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Cc: "mrice@koryrice.com" <mrice@koryrice.com>

This is an issue for trial counsel. I am handling the appeal only.

Wendy Lascher

From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 9:36 AM
To: Wendy C. Lascher; *irs. commissioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; : Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; stan.garnett; Mike Feuer; mayor.garcetti; Opla-pd-los-occ; Kelly.Sopko; Whistleblower; Attacheottawa; tips@radaronline.com; alan hootnick; bruce
Subject: Re: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]

Ms. Lascher,

Will the plaintiff corporation be revived at this time?  I think it's a relevant point.

Kelley Lynch

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

The plaintiff corporation status has been cancelled in California.

Kelley

200032610011    LC INVESTMENTS, LLC

Registration Date:

11/09/2000

Jurisdiction:

DELAWARE

Entity Type:

FOREIGN

Status:

CANCELED

Agent for Service of Process:

ROBERT B KORY
9300 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 200
BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212

Entity Address:

2140 S DUPONT HWY
CAMDEN DE 19934

Entity Mailing Address:

2140 S DUPONT HWY
CAMDEN DE 19934

LLC Management

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:

Wendy Lascher,

The record has not been fully transmitted to the Appellate Court.  We'll see what happens when the courts are open again tomorrow.  In the meantime, the email I sent regarding this situation is self-explanatory.

One thing I wanted to note is that while Robert Kory may be trustee, no evidence has been submitting proving that LCI is inside the trust.  I'll assume you will provide that information to the Court of Appeal.  There are two plaintiffs.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:25 AM
Subject: Fwd: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]
To: "Renteria, James", Civil Appeals

James,

I'm reviewing the record transmitted to the Court of Appeal. While my motion to vacate the renewal of judgment is part of the designation of record, it was not transmitted.  This is an ongoing issue with all appeals that involve me.  The AOB is due Wednesday, February 15, 2017 so I would like to know what to do now.

LA Superior Court transmitted two volumes.  The designation of record appears in Volume 2, page 404, and clearly attached a list of documents which included the Motion to Vacate the Renewal of Judgment dated July 28, 2015.  Obviously, I cannot prepare a proper brief without this document being part of the appeal.  Perhaps someone simply relied on the Respondent's designation of record and overlooked mine?

This Appeal needs to be stayed until this is sorted out.  I did not create this situation.

This information from CT 408, documents I designated, is included below.  The designation of record is attached.  The missing documents include the motion to vacate the renewal of judgment and all declarations and exhibits.

Could you please let me know how to handle this.

Thank you,

Kelley Lynch

Case Number:  BC338322 LEONARD NORMAN COHEN ET AL VS KELLEY A LYNCH ET AL Filing Date:  08/15/2005 Case Type:  Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) Status:  Default Judgment Pursuant to Decl. 05/09/2006 Parties COHEN LEONARD NORMAN - Plaintiff/Petitioner LYNCH KELLEY A. - Defendant/Respondent MICHELLE RICE - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

Documents Filed 

10/16/2015 Notice of Appeal
Filed by Appellant, Appellant in Pro Per

10/07/2015 Order (Denying Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Renewal of Judgment )
Filed by Plaintiff

09/21/2015 Opposition to Motion to Vacate; all declarations and exhibits.

Filed by Plaintiffs

07/28/2015 Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment; all declarations and exhibits.

Filed by Defendant

07/13/2015 Renewal of Judgment (in the amt of $14,059,183.80 FILED )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

07/13/2015 Notice (of renewal of judgment: issued )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Renteria, James
Date: Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:43 PM
Subject: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]
To: "kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com" <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>

Please See Attached

James Renteria, Deputy Clerk

COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

300 South Spring Street Ÿ Second Floor North Tower Ÿ Los Angeles, CA 90013

General: 213-830-7000 Ÿ Direct: 213-830-7130

james.renteria@jud.ca.gov  Ÿ courts.ca.gov/2dca Ÿ facebook.com/2dcoa

Committed to providing fair and equal access to justice for all Californians

Kelley Lynch's Email to IRS: Please look at the attorneys on appeal and cancelled corporation issue

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]
To: WCL CL <wlascher@fcoplaw.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com>

IRS,

Let's look at the lawyers listed with the appellate court.  Robert Kory is now the plaintiff and Lascher and Rice are the attorneys.  I have no idea why Lascher is advising me that this is a trial counsel issue.  This is now an issue for the appellate court and involves the trust.  I have no idea at this point if LC Investments, LLC is inside or outside the trust.  Kory failed to provide evidence related to that issue.

I was quite clear with Lascher about the issue.  

Kelley

A suspended corporation may not prosecute or defend an action in a California court. (Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Superior Court [54 Cal.App.4th 1366] (1922) 188 Cal. 393, 396-397 [205 P. 446]; Alhambra-Shumway Mines, Inc. v. Alhambra Gold Mine Corp. (1957) 155 Cal.App.2d 46, 50-51 [317 P.2d 649].)

Party	Attorney
Robert Kory : Plaintiff and Respondent	Michelle Lorraine Rice Kory & Rice LLP 5455 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1701 Los Angeles, CA 90036 Wendy C. Lascher Ferguson Case Orr Paterson LLP 1050 South Kimball Road Ventura, CA 93004
Kelley Lynch : Defendant and Appellant 1754 N. Van Ness Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90028	Pro Per

Is Representing A Cancelled Corporation During An Appeal A Trial Counsel (Also An Attorney on Appeal) Issue?

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:53 PM
Subject: Fwd: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]
To: WCL CL <wlascher@fcoplaw.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com>

Ms. Lascher,

Do NOT copy anyone from Kory & Rice on any communication to me.  The Appellate Court lists you and Michelle Rice as attorneys on appeal.  The matter is no longer before the trial court.  When a corporation is suspended, and LCI is cancelled, that is an issue that the appellate court will have to address.  I asked you about the family trust that has been substituted and whether or not LCI is inside the trust.  This is a relevant and material issue because there are two plaintiffs:  Leonard Cohen, deceased, and LC Investments, LLC, an LLC with a cancelled status in California.

Please call Sandra Jo Streeter.  Once she personally approves your inclusion of Rice on an email to me, we'll talk about "trial counsel."  She has decided to assert pre-filing standards upon me based upon a fraud domestic violence order.  

If you have anything else to argue about this matter, please do so with the Appellate Court.  I've asked the relevant question.  

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Wendy C. Lascher <wlascher@fcoplaw.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:12 PM
Subject: RE: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Cc: "mrice@koryrice.com" <mrice@koryrice.com>

This is an issue for trial counsel. I am handling the appeal only.

Wendy Lascher

From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 9:36 AM
To: Wendy C. Lascher; *irs. commissioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; : Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; stan.garnett; Mike Feuer; mayor.garcetti; Opla-pd-los-occ; Kelly.Sopko; Whistleblower; Attacheottawa; tips@radaronline.com; alan hootnick; bruce
Subject: Re: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]

Ms. Lascher,

Will the plaintiff corporation be revived at this time?  I think it's a relevant point.

Kelley Lynch

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

The plaintiff corporation status has been cancelled in California.

Kelley

200032610011    LC INVESTMENTS, LLC

Registration Date:

11/09/2000

Jurisdiction:

DELAWARE

Entity Type:

FOREIGN

Status:

CANCELED

Agent for Service of Process:

ROBERT B KORY
9300 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 200
BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212

Entity Address:

2140 S DUPONT HWY
CAMDEN DE 19934

Entity Mailing Address:

2140 S DUPONT HWY
CAMDEN DE 19934

LLC Management

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:

Wendy Lascher,

The record has not been fully transmitted to the Appellate Court.  We'll see what happens when the courts are open again tomorrow.  In the meantime, the email I sent regarding this situation is self-explanatory.

One thing I wanted to note is that while Robert Kory may be trustee, no evidence has been submitting proving that LCI is inside the trust.  I'll assume you will provide that information to the Court of Appeal.  There are two plaintiffs.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:25 AM
Subject: Fwd: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]
To: "Renteria, James", Civil Appeals

James,

I'm reviewing the record transmitted to the Court of Appeal. While my motion to vacate the renewal of judgment is part of the designation of record, it was not transmitted.  This is an ongoing issue with all appeals that involve me.  The AOB is due Wednesday, February 15, 2017 so I would like to know what to do now.

LA Superior Court transmitted two volumes.  The designation of record appears in Volume 2, page 404, and clearly attached a list of documents which included the Motion to Vacate the Renewal of Judgment dated July 28, 2015.  Obviously, I cannot prepare a proper brief without this document being part of the appeal.  Perhaps someone simply relied on the Respondent's designation of record and overlooked mine?

This Appeal needs to be stayed until this is sorted out.  I did not create this situation.

This information from CT 408, documents I designated, is included below.  The designation of record is attached.  The missing documents include the motion to vacate the renewal of judgment and all declarations and exhibits.

Could you please let me know how to handle this.

Thank you,

Kelley Lynch

Case Number:  BC338322 LEONARD NORMAN COHEN ET AL VS KELLEY A LYNCH ET AL Filing Date:  08/15/2005 Case Type:  Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) Status:  Default Judgment Pursuant to Decl. 05/09/2006 Parties COHEN LEONARD NORMAN - Plaintiff/Petitioner LYNCH KELLEY A. - Defendant/Respondent MICHELLE RICE - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

Documents Filed 

10/16/2015 Notice of Appeal
Filed by Appellant, Appellant in Pro Per

10/07/2015 Order (Denying Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Renewal of Judgment )
Filed by Plaintiff

09/21/2015 Opposition to Motion to Vacate; all declarations and exhibits.

Filed by Plaintiffs

07/28/2015 Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment; all declarations and exhibits.

Filed by Defendant

07/13/2015 Renewal of Judgment (in the amt of $14,059,183.80 FILED )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

07/13/2015 Notice (of renewal of judgment: issued )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Renteria, James
Date: Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:43 PM
Subject: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]
To: "kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com" <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>

Please See Attached

James Renteria, Deputy Clerk

COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

300 South Spring Street Ÿ Second Floor North Tower Ÿ Los Angeles, CA 90013

General: 213-830-7000 Ÿ Direct: 213-830-7130

james.renteria@jud.ca.gov  Ÿ courts.ca.gov/2dca Ÿ facebook.com/2dcoa

Committed to providing fair and equal access to justice for all Californians

Kelley Lynch's Email to Leonard Cohen's Appellate Lawyer, Wendy Lascher, Re. the Cancelled Plaintiff Corporation

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:35 AM

Subject: Re: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]

To: WCL CL <wlascher@fcoplaw.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com>

Ms. Lascher,

Will the plaintiff corporation be revived at this time?  I think it's a relevant point.

Kelley Lynch

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

The plaintiff corporation status has been cancelled in California.

Kelley

200032610011    LC INVESTMENTS, LLC

Registration Date:

11/09/2000

Jurisdiction:

DELAWARE

Entity Type:

FOREIGN

Status:

CANCELED

Agent for Service of Process:

ROBERT B KORY

9300 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 200 

BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212

Entity Address:

2140 S DUPONT HWY

CAMDEN DE 19934

Entity Mailing Address:

2140 S DUPONT HWY

CAMDEN DE 19934

LLC Management

*

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:

Wendy Lascher,

The record has not been fully transmitted to the Appellate Court.  We'll see what happens when the courts are open again tomorrow.  In the meantime, the email I sent regarding this situation is self-explanatory.

One thing I wanted to note is that while Robert Kory may be trustee, no evidence has been submitting proving that LCI is inside the trust.  I'll assume you will provide that information to the Court of Appeal.  There are two plaintiffs.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:25 AM

Subject: Fwd: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]

To: "Renteria, James", Civil Appeals

James,

I'm reviewing the record transmitted to the Court of Appeal. While my motion to vacate the renewal of judgment is part of the designation of record, it was not transmitted.  This is an ongoing issue with all appeals that involve me.  The AOB is due Wednesday, February 15, 2017 so I would like to know what to do now.

LA Superior Court transmitted two volumes.  The designation of record appears in Volume 2, page 404, and clearly attached a list of documents which included the Motion to Vacate the Renewal of Judgment dated July 28, 2015.  Obviously, I cannot prepare a proper brief without this document being part of the appeal.  Perhaps someone simply relied on the Respondent's designation of record and overlooked mine?

This Appeal needs to be stayed until this is sorted out.  I did not create this situation.

This information from CT 408, documents I designated, is included below.  The designation of record is attached.  The missing documents include the motion to vacate the renewal of judgment and all declarations and exhibits.

Could you please let me know how to handle this.

Thank you,

Kelley Lynch

Case Number:  BC338322 LEONARD NORMAN COHEN ET AL VS KELLEY A LYNCH ET AL Filing Date:  08/15/2005 Case Type:  Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) Status:  Default Judgment Pursuant to Decl. 05/09/2006 Parties COHEN LEONARD NORMAN - Plaintiff/Petitioner LYNCH KELLEY A. - Defendant/Respondent MICHELLE RICE - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

Documents Filed 

10/16/2015 Notice of Appeal

Filed by Appellant, Appellant in Pro Per

10/07/2015 Order (Denying Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Renewal of Judgment )

Filed by Plaintiff

09/21/2015 Opposition to Motion to Vacate; all declarations and exhibits.

Filed by Plaintiffs

07/28/2015 Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment; all declarations and exhibits.

Filed by Defendant

07/13/2015 Renewal of Judgment (in the amt of $14,059,183.80 FILED )

Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

07/13/2015 Notice (of renewal of judgment: issued )

Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Renteria, James

Date: Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:43 PM

Subject: B267794 - Cohen v. Lynch [ Trial Court Case No: BC338322 ]

To: "kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com" <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>

Please See Attached

James Renteria, Deputy Clerk

COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

300 South Spring Street Ÿ Second Floor North Tower Ÿ Los Angeles, CA 90013

General: 213-830-7000 Ÿ Direct: 213-830-7130

Committed to providing fair and equal access to justice for all Californians