Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:20 AM
Subject: Fwd: Record Omission Csae No. B267794 (Trial Case No. BC338322)
To: WCL CL <wlascher@fcoplaw.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com>
Wendy Lascher,
I see that you and Michelle Rice, attorneys on appeal in this case, were copied on the Second Appellate Court's confirmation that briefing in this case has been stayed until the record is fully transmitted. Please find attached a courtesy copy of the letter sent to the Court and Appeals Unit. An original is being mailed to you.
On a separate note, I received the following email from "sandra123@gmail.com." I am not clear if Sandra Jo Streeter sent this or someone is impersonating her. However, the issues raised relate to the suspended corporate matter I raised with you yesterday. If you have any questions or comments, please let me know. As for federal tax matters, they should be argued with the US District Court. The US District Court in Colorado was the first to hear the allegations that Cohen/Kory planned to use restraining orders to discredit me as a witness. That issue remains ongoing.
Kelley Lynch
From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.
Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:25 AM
Subject: Your clueless blog posts
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.
While a suspended corporation – as a litigation party – may not appeal an adverse ruling or judgment, no corporation (suspended or otherwise) is the appellant in any of your appeal proceedings; you are the sole appellant. (Nor has any corporate party appeared in any appeal in which you are involved.) Mere ownership of a suspended corporation (even if that was the case here) does not affect a party litigant’s ability to appear in court or to appeal an adverse judgment. Your suggestion to the contrary (e.g., a suspended entity might be "inside the trust" and if it is that somehow defeats the express permission given by the court of appeal for the trustee to appear as respondent of record) is utter nonsense. Nor does any of this change the fact that you violated a restraining order that you were previously convicted in 2012 of violating (and sentenced to 18-months in jail for) based on the same ineffectual "defense" (seeking tax information). Unlike Penal Code section 653M (criminalizing threatening or obscene electronic or telephonic communications), there is no good faith business purpose defense to a charge of violating a restraining order. Either you contacted the protected person in violation of the restraining order or you did not. If you did, that is 1-year in the county jail for each communication. A potential sentence that, given your lack of remorse and prior convictions for violating the same restraining order, you are likely to receive. From the court's perspective, if a sentence of 18-months in jail in 2012 followed by an addition 6-month sentence in 2014 for violating your probation were not enough for you to learn your lesson, what sentence will be justified this time?
Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:25 AM
Subject: Your clueless blog posts
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.
While a suspended corporation – as a litigation party – may not appeal an adverse ruling or judgment, no corporation (suspended or otherwise) is the appellant in any of your appeal proceedings; you are the sole appellant. (Nor has any corporate party appeared in any appeal in which you are involved.) Mere ownership of a suspended corporation (even if that was the case here) does not affect a party litigant’s ability to appear in court or to appeal an adverse judgment. Your suggestion to the contrary (e.g., a suspended entity might be "inside the trust" and if it is that somehow defeats the express permission given by the court of appeal for the trustee to appear as respondent of record) is utter nonsense. Nor does any of this change the fact that you violated a restraining order that you were previously convicted in 2012 of violating (and sentenced to 18-months in jail for) based on the same ineffectual "defense" (seeking tax information). Unlike Penal Code section 653M (criminalizing threatening or obscene electronic or telephonic communications), there is no good faith business purpose defense to a charge of violating a restraining order. Either you contacted the protected person in violation of the restraining order or you did not. If you did, that is 1-year in the county jail for each communication. A potential sentence that, given your lack of remorse and prior convictions for violating the same restraining order, you are likely to receive. From the court's perspective, if a sentence of 18-months in jail in 2012 followed by an addition 6-month sentence in 2014 for violating your probation were not enough for you to learn your lesson, what sentence will be justified this time?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:03 AM
Subject: Record Omission Csae No. B267794 (Trial Case No. BC338322)
To: Civil Appeals, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>
Cc: "Renteria, James"
Thank you.
Kelley Lynch
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:03 AM
Subject: Record Omission Csae No. B267794 (Trial Case No. BC338322)
To: Civil Appeals, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>
Cc: "Renteria, James"
Civil Appeals Unit,
Attached please find the Record Omission letter re. the above referenced case. I am uploading this to the Appeal Court so that the briefing may be stayed. The original letter and all service copies will be placed in the mail today by Paulette Brandt.