Date: Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: KARINA FIMBEL VON WATTEVILLE VS PAULETTE BRANDT Case Number: BC614XXX Filing Date: 03/17/2016
To: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>
Senate Judiciary,
The stalker is harassing us over KVW and her retaliatory, baseless lawsuit. This criminal has been harassing and stalking Paulette Brandt for three straight years now. We've spoken to Investigator personally about this matter. Investigator Brian Bennett also.
Kelley
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Alan Hootnick,
Since Gianelli is harassing me about this lawsuit that I haven't been served, I want you to know that I am convinced KVW moved into P's intentionally to spy, elicit and gather information, etc. That's my personal opinion. This is on a back burner until I am served. I know plenty about defamation laws, litigation privileges, retaliation over declarations (witness tampering), etc. The people that have taken this to far are Stephen Gianelli, his client, Cohen, the co-conspirator lawyers, etc. We've contacted Phil Spector's attorneys directly about this situation. That's just a FYI.The criminal stalker has been advised to cease and desist. He's been harassing Paulette Brandt for years. She has no idea who this stalking criminal is.KelleyCase Number: BC614279Filing Date: 03/17/2016
KARINA FIMBEL VON WATTEVILLE VS PAULETTE BRANDT ET AL
Case Type: Defamation (Slander/Libel) (General Jurisdiction)
Status: PendingPartiesBRANDT PAULETTE - Defendant/RespondentDOES 1 THROUGH 20 - Defendant/RespondentLYNCH KELLY - Defendant/RespondentMURPHY LINDA CAROL - Defendant/Respondent---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:02 PMSubject: Fwd: KARINA FIMBEL VON WATTEVILLE VS PAULETTE BRANDT Case Number: BC614XXX Filing Date: 03/17/2016
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:50 AM
Subject: KARINA FIMBEL VON WATTEVILLE VS PAULETTE BRANDT Case Number: BC614XXX Filing Date: 03/17/2016
To: PAULETTEBRANDT8@gmail.comI just found this from the LA Super Ct. on-line civil case index.I have no involvement in this matter; I simply thought you would like to know.Kelley Lynch just has to take things that one step way too far. This is the result.It is rarely a good idea to print up and distribute fliers stating that a person is a con and a cheat, or to send out mass emails falsely (and in anger) calling someone a “dominatrix” or a “prostitute” or accusing that person of “defrauding” or “shading” an elderly man’s estate and then putting all of that on line.Apparently all that and more was done in your name, to retaliate for not paying you rent. This is classic Kelley Lynch.As for her attempts to “borrow” the $400 filing fee to initiate a groundless, time barred, utterly frivolous lawsuit, how many of the people that Kelley Lynch has borrowed money from in the last ten years (including Rutger, Karen, Eric, Ray, and Paulette) do you think she has paid back? (My guess would be none.)How many of Kelley Lynch’s forays into the court system have been successful? (Same answer.)Some people never learn. But I don’t think you are one of them.--------------------------------------------------------