Kelley Lynch's Email to Leonard Cohen's Lawyers Re. the Criminal Stalker's Attempt to Infiltrate Legal Matters & Argue Cohen's Legal Theories Re. RICO

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:52 PM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, Robert Kory <rkory@koryrice.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com

Michelle Rice and Robert Kory,

The Criminal Stalker, Stephen Gianelli, appears to be tripping out right now.  He is harassing me over Leonard Cohen, Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen legal issues, and someone who evidently wrote or advised him of a "blotter acid" print Steve Lindsey kept in his home when my son was visiting  His obsession with me is frightening.  I was placing his emails in a file as LAPD's TMU advised me to maintain them.  I came across this email about my RICO suit.  Gianelli has set forth his perceptions of my RICO arguments and then provided some case he researched in support of his arguments.  The case relates to litigation misconduct in an Idaho case.  I am aware of the litigation privilege.  I am also aware that LA Superior Court condones fraud, perjury, theft, and falsely characterizes motions for fraud upon the court as motions to reconsider when they are not.  I understand you have inserted "intrinsic fraud" arguments, based on the statements and false accusations you submitted to the court, into various matters and feel you are protected when you submit perjured statements and fraudulent misrepresentations to the court.  I've addressed this rather extensively with LA Superior Court.

If you would like to discuss these matters, as Cohen's attorney of record, or with respect to my RICO suit, please hit reply all. I view this email as an attempt to infiltrate my legal matters by an operative who appears to work as an unofficial member of Cohen's legal team.  I will let the federal court know why I feel that way.  

Kelley Lynch

P.S.  The Civil Appeal Unit didn't receive Bergman's withdrawal of counsel information.  Evidently you are supposed to notify them.  I haven't heard from you re. the two "Proposed Orders" you've delivered to me. I'll let Judge Hess know that I have no idea which Proposed Order you want me to submit.  He can then decide what Order to use.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:08 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>

Ms. Lynch,

Statute of limitations issues aside, your stated intention to file a “RICO suit” arising from your contentions that Kory, Rice and Cohen engaged in acts of “perjury,” “fraud,” and “extortion” in respect to the entry of the default judgment in Los Angeles case No. BC338322  in May of 2005, their statements and pleadings made and filed in opposition to your serial motions to set aside the judgment in 2013 and 2015, and in connection with the renewal of the judgment and to add post judgment interest to through the filing of a memorandum of costs in 2015, is precluded by California’s so called “litigation privilege” codified in Civil Code section 47.

As stated by US Magistrate Judge Williams in his memorandum decision dismissing  pro se plaintiffs’ civil RICO claims against parties and their attorneys based on alleged litigation misconduct in Christonson, et al,  v. United States, et al, 415 F. Supp.2d 1186, 1312 -1313 (D. Idaho 2006):

“Plaintiffs' second series of claims are based on events that would not be barred by res judicata, i.e., that a massive RICO conspiracy existed in the federal Utah judicial system and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. However, these claims are barred by the judicial proceedings privilege. In California and Utah, an "absolute privilege attaches to any publication that has any reasonable relation to the action and is permitted by law if made to achieve the objects of litigation, even thought the publication is made outside the courtroom and no function of the court or its officers is invoked. Rader v. Thrasher, 22 Cal.App.3d 883, 887 (Cal.Ct.App. 1972); accord Price v. Armour, 949 P.2d 1251, 1256 (Utah 1997); Beezley v. Hansen, 286 P.2d 1057, 1058 (1955); see also Krouse v. Bower, 20 P.3d 895, 898-99 (Utah 2001). The absolute privilege applies to judges, jurors, attorneys, parties, witnesses and any others involved in the litigation. Kachig v. Boothe, 22 Cal.App.3d 626, 641 (Cal.Ct.App. 1971); see also Price, 949 P.2d at 1256. This privilege is not limited to defamation claims; rather, it extends "to all claims arising from the same statements." Bennett v. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook McDonough, 2003 UT 9, ¶ 67, 70 P.3d 17 (Utah 2003) (citations omitted.). Furthermore, the Ninth Circuit has noted that RICO was not intended to circumvent judicial immunity even when the allegations involve general allegations of conspiracy. Franklin v. Terr, 201 F.2d 1098, 1102 (9th Cir. 2000).

“Plaintiffs have alleged the various Defendants have committed abuse of process and made fraudulent statements to courts in California and Utah in arguing that Plaintiffs' claims were barred by the statute of limitations. However, any legal arguments made by Defendants or their representatives are absolutely protected by the judicial proceedings privilege. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss all of Plaintiffs' claims based upon allegations against the above-named Defendants that they filed fraudulent pleadings and made fraudulent representations as part of a larger RICO conspiracy during the course of any judicial proceedings.” (Id, italics added.)

Simply stated, your alleged civil RICO claims arising out of the 2006 default judgment in BC338322 and related post judgment litigation activity are barred by privilege.

California’s litigation privilege is absolute, and applies even in the face of alleged “fraud” and “perjury” to completely immunize Kory, Rice and Cohen from any and all civil liability arising from their testimony and pleadings filed in BC338322.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli

Attorney-at-law (ret.)

Crete, Greece

Stephen Gianelli's Inconceivably Deranged Obsession with Kelley Lynch & Ongoing Legal Defense of Leonard Cohen

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:30 AM
Subject: Re:
To: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com

Stephen Gianelli,

Lying about me as usual?  Cease and desist.  I've just received another harassing email from you.  I'll assume you're Nestor as well.  You seem to be a psychopath.  Try to read these words:  Cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch

Ann Diamond on Stephen Gianelli

When Stephen Gianelli’s emails land in my inbox, mostly out of the blue and unsolicited, they are so overflowing with repetitive accusations, misinformation, threats, self-aggrandizing boasts, undiluted rage, and general nastiness that it's next to impossible to read to the end of one of them. My impulse is always to ignore them and tell him to stop sending them. That he seems to have unlimited energy  and endless time to go over all these details with someone he does not know in an attempt to win me over, while at the same time he constantly accuses me of having an ancient axe to grind with Cohen (i.e. I'm a hopeless case, as far as he's concerned, so he's barking furiously up the wrong tree), would under normal circumstances be a sign of mental imbalance.

He always throws in plenty of insults, false statements and fanciful deductions. His tone is that of a pitbull straining at the leash and gives me flashbacks of a courtroom where I’m being cross-examined by a vicious criminal lawyer whose whole strategy is to exhaust and terrorize the witness. Gianelli’s game is to complicate and obfuscate, mixing legal arguments with irrelevant nonsense. He seems to assume his opponent is stupid and weak and can be overwhelmed by a word-salad. I think some of this could be caused by his overuse of "copy and paste" --  he's in a hurry and not really writing "to me" or trying to make a persuasive argument. He doesnt reread his emails to see what kind of message they actually convey: that the writer is standing on some soapbox in his mind, shouting at the world, like certain mental patients you see walking the streets who seem to be mad at the air, the cars, the sidewalk.

He's obviously not interested in holding a discussion, getting to the truth, or looking beyond the various documents he "downloaded at his own expense"  -- and as anyone with common sense knows, legal documents don't prove what really happened in 2004-5.  They convey some of the evidence, all of it coming from one side.

Gianelli's explanation as to why he's been out to get Kelley Lynch since 2008, does not make sense either. He claims she slandered him and called him names on the internet, and in revenge he has totally immersed himself in her legal case. To the point of contacting her relatives and friends, spreading false stories about her, making up quotes, “writing her in jail”, posting photos of her residence and roommates on his blog – for the past seven years. Nobody in their right mind, let alone a 'successful trial lawyer' -- who has no material interest in this case, and is not a paid shill -- behaves like this. It's not just extremely unprofessional, it would land him on 'stress leave' or in serious trouble with his colleagues and peers if he were still practicing. Hiding behind the handle Blogonaut would not conceal his identity for long, especially not on the porous internet. His badly written and often illogical, emotional rants would embarrass and bring him close to  professional suicide.

But apparently since he's retired, and apparently well-off, and lives in a comfortable tax haven on Crete, he doesn't seem to care and just indulges his childish fantasies and catty remarks with his tiny circle of  cronies. It’s fairly obvious he uses alternate accounts and different IDs, e.g. “Mongochili,” to make it appear others read his blog and share his ‘obcession’ with Lynch. His sheer extremism indicates he is either a “rogue criminal lawyer” gone slightly postal, or a paid agent of Leonard Cohen and/or his legal team.  I think the latter.

I think his over-the-top campaign will have the opposite effect than the one intended: it can only make people suspicious of the case against Kelley Lynch. Otherwise, why not let justice take its course? Why subject her to endless attacks over the internet if she has already been declared guilty? This kind of harassment resembles 'gang stalking' -- except that Gianelli seems to be both the leader and most of the membership of his own gang.

Gianelli is like no other email correspondent I have ever had. A single-paragraph response from my end always leads to a flood from his. Each exchange is like a trip down a rabbithole of  irrational rage. Here and there he mixes in details and facts which might be worth discussing, if they weren’t drowned by high-volume invective. Of course this could be a tactic:  if he really was ever a successful trial lawyer, it may have been by being an insufferable bully. Or maybe most of his cases involved low-life criminals or people with little or no education.

He claims to have accurately predicted the outcome of every Lynch hearing -- but then so could I. As we all know, cases are won on technicalities. That's one of the reasons, including the 10-year series of precedents, that I am not surprised the judge dismissed Kelley's motion.

If Gianelli were truly a respectable lawyer, he would restrict his comments to these legal matters, and not engage in bizarre slander and speculation. He would have no need to bring up my "past" - or a wacked version of it that sounds like it came from someone on Cohen's disinfo team. He draws from a psychological profile that is easily recognizable because I have heard it from other Cohen groupies. As someone who saw a bit too much when I knew Cohen, I’m no stranger to slander, I've written out my story on a public blog etc. where anyone can read what I have to say. Much of what I have written on Cohen was initially to defend myself against gossip and rumours that were circulated (and believed) by some of his friends. My side is completely different, much more detailed and accurate. It's also quite revealing of the life of a clever pop idol in our celebrity-worshiping culture. There's no point in my arguing with people who base their opinions on ridiculous myths, like the 'restraining order' that never was. Cohen's deceptive tactics have not really evolved in the past twenty years, since he used them on me.

I really don't care if Gianelli thinks I am a star-struck 'scorned woman' who never got over her passing encounter with greatness. This Mafia-style lawyer's fixed opinions, based on trashy clichés say much more about him than they do about me or my writing, or why I became interested in what really happened to Kelley Lynch.

And of course, no one would ever suspect Leonard Cohen of encouraging Gianelli. But in my experience, Gianelli is exactly the kind of human megaphone Cohen places in charge of his 'secret business.' Like other clowns from Cohen's private entourage that I have met over the years, he may not even realize he's being used because he is ridiculous and therefore disposable. It's a fascinating system that owes much to the criminal underworld that Leonard Cohen skirts with all the skill of someone born into it. I'm sure Gianelli feels at home, and knows his place, in that world where he acts the part of a useful idiot whose job is to create a circus atmosphere and put the audience into a deeper state of trance.

I am by now firmly convinced Lynch is a patsy/victim of a weird consortium of Cohen associates, clueless supporters, and Cohen himself. If I hadn't lived next door to Leonard Cohen, and witnessed similar dynamics twenty years ago, I might believe differently. But the essence of what happened to Kelley also happened to me, two decades ago, on a lesser scale with lower stakes. It was relatively easy for me to walk away from it back then – my reputation was damaged but my life was not utterly destroyed by my association with Leonard Cohen, as Kelley's was.

I empathize with her situation, and see it as just one more story of the corruption that is sinking the whole world. I know Leonard Cohen would agree with that. He would only disagree with the idea that we all have an obligation to oppose injustice, rather than 'let it go by' and even profit from it. 

Ann D.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:

Alan Hootnick,

I've advised Stephen Gianelli relentlessly to cease and desist.  I don't know 'Nestor Hobson."  Gianelli has used this name previously.  I think he attempted to use this moniker to falsely accuse my friends Tyler and Ross of sending the "Bloody Stump" email.  I think Gianelli personally wrote it.  He creates monikers and inserts extraneous information into his psychotic emails.  Ann Diamond has nailed Gianelli.  He's clearly a rogue.  I have nothing to say about any of this bullshit.

Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:34 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>




--- On Tue, 11/10/15, Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
> Subject: Fwd:
> To: "alan hootnick" <ahootnick@yahoo.com>
> Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015, 2:45 AM
> FYI
> ----------
> Forwarded message ----------
> From: Nestor
> Hobson <nh15027@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:39 PM
> Subject: Re:
> To: "stephengianelli@gmail.com"
> <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
>
>
> "Recently" is a relative term. I heard those
> stories from Kelley over time - not all on the same day. My
> "association" with Kelley goes back decades, well
> before Berkeley or Ft. Lauderdale. Don't think too hard.
> I will cut you off if you don't cut the crap.
>
>
>
>
>

Ann Diamond's Piece on Ambulance Chaser, Stephen Gianelli - A Chronic Liar with Motive

Ann Diamond on Stephen Gianelli

When Stephen Gianelli’s emails land in my inbox, mostly out of the blue and unsolicited, they are so overflowing with repetitive accusations, misinformation, threats, self-aggrandizing boasts, undiluted rage, and general nastiness that it's next to impossible to read to the end of one of them. My impulse is always to ignore them and tell him to stop sending them. That he seems to have unlimited energy  and endless time to go over all these details with someone he does not know in an attempt to win me over, while at the same time he constantly accuses me of having an ancient axe to grind with Cohen (i.e. I'm a hopeless case, as far as he's concerned, so he's barking furiously up the wrong tree), would under normal circumstances be a sign of mental imbalance.

He always throws in plenty of insults, false statements and fanciful deductions. His tone is that of a pitbull straining at the leash and gives me flashbacks of a courtroom where I’m being cross-examined by a vicious criminal lawyer whose whole strategy is to exhaust and terrorize the witness. Gianelli’s game is to complicate and obfuscate, mixing legal arguments with irrelevant nonsense. He seems to assume his opponent is stupid and weak and can be overwhelmed by a word-salad. I think some of this could be caused by his overuse of "copy and paste" --  he's in a hurry and not really writing "to me" or trying to make a persuasive argument. He doesnt reread his emails to see what kind of message they actually convey: that the writer is standing on some soapbox in his mind, shouting at the world, like certain mental patients you see walking the streets who seem to be mad at the air, the cars, the sidewalk.

He's obviously not interested in holding a discussion, getting to the truth, or looking beyond the various documents he "downloaded at his own expense"  -- and as anyone with common sense knows, legal documents don't prove what really happened in 2004-5.  They convey some of the evidence, all of it coming from one side.

Gianelli's explanation as to why he's been out to get Kelley Lynch since 2008, does not make sense either. He claims she slandered him and called him names on the internet, and in revenge he has totally immersed himself in her legal case. To the point of contacting her relatives and friends, spreading false stories about her, making up quotes, “writing her in jail”, posting photos of her residence and roommates on his blog – for the past seven years. Nobody in their right mind, let alone a 'successful trial lawyer' -- who has no material interest in this case, and is not a paid shill -- behaves like this. It's not just extremely unprofessional, it would land him on 'stress leave' or in serious trouble with his colleagues and peers if he were still practicing. Hiding behind the handle Blogonaut would not conceal his identity for long, especially not on the porous internet. His badly written and often illogical, emotional rants would embarrass and bring him close to  professional suicide.

But apparently since he's retired, and apparently well-off, and lives in a comfortable tax haven on Crete, he doesn't seem to care and just indulges his childish fantasies and catty remarks with his tiny circle of  cronies. It’s fairly obvious he uses alternate accounts and different IDs, e.g. “Mongochili,” to make it appear others read his blog and share his ‘obcession’ with Lynch. His sheer extremism indicates he is either a “rogue criminal lawyer” gone slightly postal, or a paid agent of Leonard Cohen and/or his legal team.  I think the latter.

I think his over-the-top campaign will have the opposite effect than the one intended: it can only make people suspicious of the case against Kelley Lynch. Otherwise, why not let justice take its course? Why subject her to endless attacks over the internet if she has already been declared guilty? This kind of harassment resembles 'gang stalking' -- except that Gianelli seems to be both the leader and most of the membership of his own gang.

Gianelli is like no other email correspondent I have ever had. A single-paragraph response from my end always leads to a flood from his. Each exchange is like a trip down a rabbithole of  irrational rage. Here and there he mixes in details and facts which might be worth discussing, if they weren’t drowned by high-volume invective. Of course this could be a tactic:  if he really was ever a successful trial lawyer, it may have been by being an insufferable bully. Or maybe most of his cases involved low-life criminals or people with little or no education.

He claims to have accurately predicted the outcome of every Lynch hearing -- but then so could I. As we all know, cases are won on technicalities. That's one of the reasons, including the 10-year series of precedents, that I am not surprised the judge dismissed Kelley's motion.

If Gianelli were truly a respectable lawyer, he would restrict his comments to these legal matters, and not engage in bizarre slander and speculation. He would have no need to bring up my "past" - or a wacked version of it that sounds like it came from someone on Cohen's disinfo team. He draws from a psychological profile that is easily recognizable because I have heard it from other Cohen groupies. As someone who saw a bit too much when I knew Cohen, I’m no stranger to slander, I've written out my story on a public blog etc. where anyone can read what I have to say. Much of what I have written on Cohen was initially to defend myself against gossip and rumours that were circulated (and believed) by some of his friends. My side is completely different, much more detailed and accurate. It's also quite revealing of the life of a clever pop idol in our celebrity-worshiping culture. There's no point in my arguing with people who base their opinions on ridiculous myths, like the 'restraining order' that never was. Cohen's deceptive tactics have not really evolved in the past twenty years, since he used them on me.

I really don't care if Gianelli thinks I am a star-struck 'scorned woman' who never got over her passing encounter with greatness. This Mafia-style lawyer's fixed opinions, based on trashy clichés say much more about him than they do about me or my writing, or why I became interested in what really happened to Kelley Lynch.

And of course, no one would ever suspect Leonard Cohen of encouraging Gianelli. But in my experience, Gianelli is exactly the kind of human megaphone Cohen places in charge of his 'secret business.' Like other clowns from Cohen's private entourage that I have met over the years, he may not even realize he's being used because he is ridiculous and therefore disposable. It's a fascinating system that owes much to the criminal underworld that Leonard Cohen skirts with all the skill of someone born into it. I'm sure Gianelli feels at home, and knows his place, in that world where he acts the part of a useful idiot whose job is to create a circus atmosphere and put the audience into a deeper state of trance.

I am by now firmly convinced Lynch is a patsy/victim of a weird consortium of Cohen associates, clueless supporters, and Cohen himself. If I hadn't lived next door to Leonard Cohen, and witnessed similar dynamics twenty years ago, I might believe differently. But the essence of what happened to Kelley also happened to me, two decades ago, on a lesser scale with lower stakes. It was relatively easy for me to walk away from it back then – my reputation was damaged but my life was not utterly destroyed by my association with Leonard Cohen, as Kelley's was.

I empathize with her situation, and see it as just one more story of the corruption that is sinking the whole world. I know Leonard Cohen would agree with that. He would only disagree with the idea that we all have an obligation to oppose injustice, rather than 'let it go by' and even profit from it. 

Ann D.

Kelley Lynch's Email to Alan Hootnick Re. Phil Spector & Leonard Cohen's Embezzlement of Corporate Assets

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:45 AM
Subject: Fwd: Your email dated Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:07 AM
To: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com

Alan Hootnick,

Stephen Gianelli has criminally harassed me since May 2009.  At that time, Michelle Blaine, Sprocket, and others were posting on his Blogonaut Law Blog.  I posted and I've captured all of that evidence so Gianelli cannot lie about it.  I also forwarded it to others.  He has now, as I suspected removed that blog, and lies about these issues.  According to Gianelli, he heard from Michelle Rice at that time. I suppose that's why he contacted me (and separately, my son) using the assumed name "Joff Belark."  "Joff Belark" was evidently a journalist.  I bcc'd IRS and others on my responses.  Gianelli, or rather Joff Belark" then proceeded to post an entirely slanderous and highly inflammatory article about me on his law blog arguing Leonard Cohen's legal positions and defending him.  Gianelli has worked in tandem with Michelle Blaine, Susanne Walsh (Cohen's fan), and others.  He posts Spector prosecution theories online as was recently evident on Truth Sentinel.  Investigator William Frayeh, DA's office, felt Gianelli may have found a sympathetic ear with Alan Jackson about me.  Gianelli also writes and lies to government agencies about me.  That would include the City Attorney of Los Angeles.  I have therefore been forced to address his slander, defamation, libel, bald-faced lies, and vicious attacks.  

Gianelli has clearly read an email I posted on my blog where I asked Dennis Riordan which version of Cohen's gun story about Phil Spector he believes.  There are now three versions of Cohen's good rock 'n roll gun story before LA Superior Court.  It's not Gianelli's business but he attempts to insert himself into these matters.  Everyone who recorded with Phillip does not have a gun story.  That would include Hal Blaine who worked with Phil Spector for 37 years and never once saw him in the studio with a gun.  

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2015/11/which-version-of-leonard-cohens-good.html

I didn't mention Phil Spector's indictment or conviction.  I mentioned Cohen's testimony during my trial - about Phil Spector and a gun.

I don't know if Cohen testified before the Grand Jury or not.  I spoke with the Grand Jury's Legal Adviser and she didn't know what witness presented that testimony.  Mick Brown reviewed the Grand Jury transcripts and advised me that Cohen's testimony or statements were presented to the Grand Jury.  I know one version of Cohen's gun story was included in prosecution motions in the Spector case.  I don't think Cohen's gun story would have helped Phil Spector's defense and that statement is obviously blatantly false.  It's fascinating that Phil Spector never pulled a gun on Paulette Brandt.  She dated him throughout the years.  She worked inside his Pasadena house.  And she worked with him until 2002.  

Leonard Cohen did speak to detectives and I intend to obtain a copy of that report.  Cohen wrote the prosecutor about his statements to LA Sheriff's Department and set forth one of the gun stories in that email.  His testimony differed.  And his testimony completely contradicted the alleged gun story he testified about during my trial.  

I believe there may have been a quid pro quo and my trial appeared to be part of that.  I didn't embezzle from Cohen.  The evidence doesn't support Cohen's fabricated narrative.  Leonard Cohen is the individual who has embezzled from the corporate entities.  That would include approximately $6.7 million in loans/expenditures from Traditional Holdings, LLC alone.  Cohen has taken the fascinating legal position that he is the alter ego of these entities who engaged in self-dealing, co-mingling and money laundering.  The District Attorney and City Attorney aligned themselves in targeting me.  The City Attorney proceeded to lie to jurors about federal tax matters.  And, the City Attorney essentially argued that Leonard Cohen's own conduct annoys him.  I was never Cohen's lover and am absolutely in need of IRS required tax and corporate information.  Cohen testified that I have that information but IRS and FTB do not have it so that proves his testimony is perjured.  I don't have it and it wasn't transmitted, as required, to IRS and/or FTB.

Cohen's testimony occurred during the DA's re-election campaign.  Alan Jackson and City Attorney Carmen Trutanich were running.  David Mamet had recently come out publicly and stated that he felt Phil Spector was railroaded.  His film, which received tremendous press, included actors Al Pacino and Helen Mirren.  It helped to have Cohen on the stand testifying that Phil Spector held a gun on him.

In any event, I wrote Truc Do (and then Dennis Riordan) about a book I am writing and asked her for an interview.  Gianelli has attempted to insert himself into this dialogue.  He appears to be moonlighting for Phil Spector's prosecutors and an unofficial member of Leonard Cohen's legal team.

Let me know if you have any questions.  This man, the Criminal Stalker Gianelli, belongs in prison.

Kelley  

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:52 AM
Subject: Your email dated Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:07 AM
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: ahootnick@yahoo.com

Ms. Lynch,

Regarding Leonard Cohen’s Phil Spector gun story (everyone who recorded with him has one, apparently) and the different reported versions thereof – who cares?

Notwithstanding your strained (to say the least) attempt to lay Phil Spector’s indictment on murder charges  and subsequent conviction (two jury trials later) at Cohen’s feet, Leonard Cohen had absolutely NOTHING to do with either the indictment or the conviction for second degree murder.

Leonard Cohen did not testify before the grand jury. He did not testify at the trial or the retrial resulting in the conviction. The prosecution theory was that Spector has a habit and history of pulling guns on WOMEN who refuse his advances. Alleged instances wherein Spector pulled a gun on MALES would tend to REBUT the prosecution’s theory of the case, not enhance it. That is exactly why the defense called as a witness a MAN who testified that Spector pulled a gun on him! Cohen’s story would have HELPED the defense, not hurt it. But the bottom line is the jury never heard it.

You would like Cohen’s “gun story” to be the central, pivotal fact but the truth is that anything Leonard Cohen told investigators (and you don’t even know what that was, you were not present) was totally and completely irrelevant to the outcome of the grand jury proceedings or the conviction. (Indeed, there was zero mention of Cohen’s pretrial statement in any of Spector’s appellate briefs.)

I assure you Ms. Lynch had there been a quid pro quo as you put it, the bargain would have included your prosecution for embezzlement – which is what Cohen was seeking at the time.

But I ask you, “quid pro quo for what exactly? An irrelevant gun story that was so tangential it was never testified to at either trial?

Get real.

Stephen R. Gianelli

Crete, Greece

Leonard Cohen's Secret Life: Suffering Revolutionary Eggheads or What?

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:36 PM
Subject: MKULTRA
To: MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com

CIA,

You might want to consider tightening up those mind control skills.  CIA, what do you think this video is about?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NW7oNpzBSGc

Is it about a revolution?   What do you think it's about?  Suffering revolutionary eggheads?

Kelley

Which Version of Leonard Cohen's Good Rock 'n Roll Gun Story About Phil Spector Does Dennis Riordan Believe? Three Are Before LA Superior Court Now!

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: Your blog posted, mass emailed correspondence to Truc Do dated Sunday, November 8, 2015
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com

Hi Mr. Riordan,

Do you think it was an automatic or semi-automatic?  Held to the chest or head?  Does the real bullshit version of Cohen's story about Phillip involve wine or a cross bow?  These details are not clear.   One thing is clear - I am dealing with chronic liars with motive.  They all belong in bed together in prison.

Kelley

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Phil Spector could die in prison an innocent man.  Clearly, this is not ancient history and Cohen only publicly contradicted the DA's version in 2012.  I thought Do, who is clever with rhetoric, might want to explain which of Cohen's three bullshit gun stories about PS (before LA Superior Court) she and her pals believe.  I think reasonable people will and do conclude that Leonard Cohen is a liar.  However, LA Confidential doesn't want to prosecute him because they are all evidently in bed together.  And that's precisely where they all belong.

Kelley

NOTE:  Kelley Lynch did not harass anyone at LA District Attorney's Office.  She is wondering, however, if there was a quid pro quo with that office, their decision not to prosecute Leonard Cohen, and his testimony about Phil Spector during their re-election campaign.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:19 AM
Subject: Your blog posted, mass emailed correspondence to Truc Do dated Sunday, November 8, 2015
To: kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com

Ms. Lynch,

Do you really believe that after all of your email harassment of the Los Angeles County District Attorney Major Crimes Unit from 2007 through the present that a former prosecutor from that office – who is now a partner with one of the most prestigious law firms in the world – will either buy into your “I  am writing a book” nonsense or waste any energy on you beyond asking the IT department at her firm to block your email address then hitting “delete”?

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.gr/2015/11/kelley-lynch-interview-request-to-phil.html

Or are you using Ms. Do as a foil to speak rhetorically to a wider audience (e.g., the numerous email cc’s and the readers of your Google indexed blog)?

Either way, you are referencing (and attempting to re-write) ancient history.

Stephen R. Gianelli

Crete, Greece

Kelley Lynch's Email to Leonard Cohen's Lawyers Re. the Ongoing Insanity With Respect to Daniel J. Bergman Who Rice Evidently Fired July 24, 2015

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: Civil Appeal - Case No. B265754
To: Dan Bergman <dbergman@bergman-law.com>, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, Robert Kory <rkory@koryrice.com>
Cc: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>

Daniel Bergman, Michelle Rice, and Robert Kory,

Would you mind clarifying what is going on here with respect to this appeal (Case No. B265753) and Daniel Bergman.  It is my understanding that Bergman withdrew.  In fact, Gianelli sent me one of the more deranged emails I've ever seen in my entire life.  In that email, Rice allegedly fired Bergman with an unofficial member of Cohen's legal team copied in - Gianelli.  So, please clarify what is going on here as I feel as though I am dealing with escapees from a criminal insane asylum.

Kelley Lynch

From: Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>
To: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Kory <rkory@koryrice.com>; Dan Bergman <DBergman@bergman-law.com>
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: So where is your oft threatened, but never quite filed "motion to vacate the fraud domestic violence matter"? (See 4/14/2015 email)

Stephen:

No, Stephen, it is your ego that is in the way here.  

The reason Robert requested you only email him is because you were sending dozens of emails to me a day sending me unsolicited emails regarding Kelley Lynch, which I did not even read.  Your fixation on Kelley Lynch is truly pathological. 

The truth is Stephen, now that the gloves are off, so to speak, is that you did not have the balls or the "juice" to get her arrested when she was harassing you for years in San Francisco.  I have all of the emails where you were reporting her to the police, FBI, etc.  All to no avail.  Some big criminal lawyer you are.  You did not have any viable contacts in law enforcement that could help you out after your long self-proclaimed illustrious career as a criminal lawyer ?

It took little ole me - the lawyer who you claim produces "workmanlike" product for my client - to get Lynch arrested.  Through connections I made.  That's right, I got it done.  In fact you wrote me following her March 1, 2012 arrest in Berkeley expressing your surprise (still have that email, shall I send it to you, with a copy to Dan, to refresh your memory?) that I was able to get it done when you could not.  So your claiming now that you were instrumental in getting her arrested is nothing more than assuaging your own fragile ego.  Your pathological jealousy of me is as sick as Lynch's jealousy of our firm's success as Leonard's lawyers, managers, and representatives.  Throughout our ten year tenure Leonard was inducted into the Rock N Roll Hall of Fame, achieved the Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award, saw his album Old Ideas debut on Billboard at Number 2, behind Lana Del Rey, the highest charting album of Leonard's entire career.  And yes, I attended all of those events.  You did not Stephen.

Now that we are speaking truth and dispensing with civilities - I will say it - you have been trying for years to take credit for my work because unlike you, I do not self-promote my considerable successes, but rather let

has-runs and never-weres like yourself step in to try to get a little bit of my considerable light.  Shamelessly discussing with Leonard Cohen fans on your blog what actor is going to play you in any Cohen-Lynch bio-pic.

What a shameless starf*ker you are.  The cold, hard truth of the matter is your career was nowhere and you glommed onto the Cohen-Lynch matter and my successes seeking your proverbial 15 seconds of fame.

So do not think we have not seen your shameless self-promoting postings on leonardcohenfiles.com as if you had anything to do with any of the ten years' worth of litigation involving Cohen/Lynch.

I did not need anyone's help to properly register the out-of-state restraining order.  It is properly registered as you have repeatedly stated in your numerous bloviated emails regarding the restraining order that you did not file.

By the way, I also did not need any help flying with Leonard Cohen on a private jet from Burbank to Denver in August and September 2008 to get the permanent restraining order in Colorado either. 

Dan: your firm is fired and you are no longer needed in BC 338322 and BC 341120.  Please prepare your notice of withdrawal for filing Monday.  Robert and I have been discussing in private how little your firm contributed to the recent effort against Lynch.  I did all of the work and drafted the two dispositive filings, including the Opposition and Sanctions Motion.  The only motion that was barely passable was the Motion to Seal and even then it was barely literate.  Robert and I were shocked that you proposed to file a declaration for LC's signature with a sentence "Lynch refused to return documents to him."   You will not be assisting in either the restraining order matter, the appeals, nor in the federal court RICO suit she has threatened to file because I did a PACER search and none of your attorneys, including yourself, have done any litigation in federal courts. I have over ten years in federal district courts all over the country, including in Colorado, Nevada, New York and California.

P.S. I do not want to tell you what Leonard Cohen is paying me to defend him in all of the litigation against Lynch, a rate I can command because of my previous record of success.  Suffice it to say, it would make both of you sick with more envy than you already seem to have. 

Yours very truly,

Michelle L. Rice, Esq.
Kory & Rice LLP
9300 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Phone: (310) 285-1633
Fax: (310) 278-7641

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:

Civil Appeals,

I have received your notice dated November 5, 2015 showing an amount due, re. the designation of record, in the sum of $727.50.  The Notice confirms that I have a fee waiver.  It lists Daniel Bergman as the party responsible for this particular payment.  Daniel Bergman, from what I understand, withdrew as Leonard Cohen's counsel.  Therefore, I am not clear why he is being listed as the attorney of record in this matter.  Would you kindly clarify this for me. If Daniel Bergman is Leonard Cohen's attorney of record, I believe I should know this as it relates to service of process issues.

Thank you.

Kelley Lynch

Kelley Lynch Email to LA Superior Court Civil Appeals

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:43 PM
Subject: Civil Appeal - Case No. B265754
To: Civil Appeals, Dan Bergman <dbergman@bergman-law.com>, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, Robert Kory <rkory@koryrice.com>
Cc: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>

Civil Appeals,

I have received your notice dated November 5, 2015 showing an amount due, re. the designation of record, in the sum of $727.50.  The Notice confirms that I have a fee waiver.  It lists Daniel Bergman as the party responsible for this particular payment.  Daniel Bergman, from what I understand, withdrew as Leonard Cohen's counsel.  Therefore, I am not clear why he is being listed as the attorney of record in this matter.  Would you kindly clarify this for me. If Daniel Bergman is Leonard Cohen's attorney of record, I believe I should know this as it relates to service of process issues.

Thank you.

Kelley Lynch

Kelley Lynch's Email to Senate Judiciary Re. Her Complaints to the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office - Leonard Cohen's Criminal Tax Fraud, Theft, Killer King, SWAT, Criminal Negligence - Whole Foods Incident, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: Your blog posted, mass emailed correspondence to Truc Do dated Sunday, November 8, 2015
To: trucdo@jonesday.com, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com

Senate Judiciary,

I think the taxpayers would like to hear the answers.  In any event, I don't know if Gianelli represents Do but I can assure you that she is not my "foil."  Ms. Do must have some thoughts on Cohen's gun stories about Spector and one can assume she's reviewed the Grand Jury transcripts, no?  I did file a Complaint re. Cohen's theft, criminal tax fraud, etc. with Major Fraud.  I didn't, as the City Attorney suggested, believe IRS required tax information was on their website.  I believe Complaint forms for the Major Fraud Unit were.  I just want to be clear about that.

Kelley

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Ms. Do,

An individual who has criminally harassed me, and many others, wrote about my interview request.  Investigator Frayeh concluded that Stephen Gianelli may be a "shady character" who found a sympathetic ear with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson about me.  I don't know Alan Jackson but was wondering if you would comment on this situation as well.  It was memorialized in my letter to Alan Jackson from September 2009, hand delivered by Investigator Frayeh to Cooley, Jackson, and you.

I most certainly did not harass anyone at the District Attorney's Major Crimes Unit.  I reported criminal conduct and that includes Cohen's theft of millions in intellectual property from me - via default judgment.  I wasn't served his lawsuit and assume you understand that IP issues are federal.  Furthermore, one cannot transfer the property of suspended corporations to themselves even when arguing self-dealing, alter ego, money laundering, and blatant theft.  I did report criminal negligence re. my son's Whole Foods incident and attempted to request information regarding the Killer King/SWAT situation.  The King Drew file does not belong to me but was used to coordinate a custody matter.  

I am most certainly writing a book.  That book will raise many issues related to Phil Spector and his trials.  In fact, Paulette Brandt and I have provided interviews to a small internet radio program with some of the issues that will be addressed.  I didn't participate in the portion related to Cohen and CIA's MKULTRA program.  While Cohen informed me that he was a participant, I have no further details but was hoping CIA might weigh in.  

I don't view you as a foil and have worked with some of the most prestigious law firms in this country.  Phil Spector remains in prison and therefore this history is not ancient but entirely current.  In fact, he may soon have his case heard before the 9th Circuit.  I personally am filing federal RICO suits.  Therefore, I believe your interview would be of interest to many people, including the taxpayers, with respect to Phil Spector, Cohen's three versions of his Spector gun story, now before LA Superior Court, etc.  Mick Brown has reviewed the Spector Grand Jury transcript and advised me that Cohen's statements/testimony were presented.  I will subpoena that evidence in my federal cases.  It interested in the City Attorney as did many federal tax matters they lied about.

Have a good day.

Kelley Lynch

Truth Sentinel Episode 39 (Leonard Cohen, truth, lies, guilt, innocence, law, MK ULTRA)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVXTY0ATTR8

Truth Sentinel Episode 40 (Phil Spector, truth, lies, guilt and innocence, murder trial)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB1WMxTwnHg

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2015/05/kelley-lynch-press-release-hearing-in.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:19 AM
Subject: Your blog posted, mass emailed correspondence to Truc Do dated Sunday, November 8, 2015
To: kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com

Ms. Lynch,

Do you really believe that after all of your email harassment of the Los Angeles County District Attorney Major Crimes Unit from 2007 through the present that a former prosecutor from that office – who is now a partner with one of the most prestigious law firms in the world – will either buy into your “I  am writing a book” nonsense or waste any energy on you beyond asking the IT department at her firm to block your email address then hitting “delete”?

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.gr/2015/11/kelley-lynch-interview-request-to-phil.html

Or are you using Ms. Do as a foil to speak rhetorically to a wider audience (e.g., the numerous email cc’s and the readers of your Google indexed blog)?

Either way, you are referencing (and attempting to re-write) ancient history.

Stephen R. Gianelli

Crete, Greece