Saturday, April 18, 2015

Kelley Lynch's Request For An IRS Opinion Re. Leonard Cohen's Ongoing Attempts To Subvert IRS Reporting & Filing Requirements


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:13 PM
Subject: Fwd: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org


Hello IRS,

I would like to note that the Boulder Combined Court did send me another letter informing me that they could not give me legal advice with respect to item #6.  I do not believe a State Court order (granted without jurisdiction in a matter I wasn't served) subverts IRS tax and corporate filing and reporting requirements.  I would like a formal IRS opinion on this matter.  I have also asked LA Superior Court to clarify the ambiguous judgment vis a vis IRS matters that have now arisen and due to the fact that Cohen believes he has no obligation to provide me with IRS required information.  This issue will be litigated.  It's fascinating that it is totally irrelevant that Boulder Combined Court advised me (and others) that this order expired on February 15, 2009.  I cannot address the insane argument the prosecutor and my lawyers were having because I have no idea what they were talking about or why.  I agreed to have this order become permanent.  I asked the judge to make it permanent.  However, the Court told me it expired so I knowingly and willfully violated nothing - regardless of Judge Vanderet's lies about me.  There is no domestic violence order.  Boulder Combined Court confirmed that.  So, why was I prosecuted for violating a domestic violence order in California?  LA Superior Court, including a Commissioner, have confirmed that this is indeed a domestic violence order.  Leonard Cohen perjured himself over the statutory required dating/engagement relationship but that's cool, not crazy, and just run of the mill lies under oath.  Not a problem for LA Confidential who attempted to rehabilitate him and his contradictory testimony with one of the most insane arguments I have ever heard in my life.  It's fine that Cohen exposed himself to his female colleague.  Not a problem if you're a celebrity with powerful and dangerous political allies in LA Confidential.  

I intend to file a federal RICO suit and Cohen's attempt to subvert IRS reporting and filing requirements is at issue.  So is LA Superior Court's attempt to aid and abet Cohen's theft and extort $10 million from me and exposing me to dangerous criminal stalkers like "Gianelli."  The man is out of control.  Does he have mafia connections as he likes to infer?  The man is an absolute maniac.

All the best,
Kelley

Boulder Combined Court:

6. If the PPO has restricted you from filing your taxes then you would need to motion the court to request specifically what you need or require to complete your taxes. The motion will then be determined by the Judge to either grant or dismiss the motion.



>

Boulder Combined Court Confirms Why Kelley Lynch Was Told (For Years) That The Boulder Order Expired On 2/15/2009 & Notes That The Order Is Not The Domestic Violence Order Lynch Was Prosecuted For Violating


From: Boulder Combined Court
Date: Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:32 PM
Subject: RE: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Thank you,

You may refer to the attachment (ICON) and Motion for Civil Protection Order I have sent you to verify my answers. I will not charge you for this document.

1. The Order regarding the motion to dismiss PPO was denied on 1/12/09.

2. The temporary restraining order expired on that date (2/15/09) and the PPO was granted on 9/2/08.

3. This case is not a domestic violence case which can be verified on the top right of the first page of the ICON;  noted as "Type: Protection Order". On the motion for civil protection order, the Petitioner only checked off Stalking and Physical Assault, Threat, or Other Situation but not Domestic Abuse.

4. I cannot verify when the PPO was received from any other agencies besides the Court. Again the court granted the PPO on 9/2/08.

5. The PPO hearing was held on 9/2/08 and will cost $35 for an audio recording. If you require a written transcript you will need to go through Tami with CTS West and her contact number is 720-922-3581.

6. If the PPO has restricted you from filing your taxes then you would need to motion the court to request specifically what you need or require to complete your taxes. The motion will then be determined by the Judge to either grant or dismiss the motion.

I will waive the request fee as this was completed in November of 2013. If you require anymore documents from this case I will need to charge you  a $5 research fee and $.25 per copy.

Thank you,
-----Original Message-----
From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:20 PM
To: Boulder Combined Court; irs.commissioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Kelly.Sopko; Doug.Davis; Dennis; wfrayeh; stan.garnett; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; moseszzz; a; wennermedia; Hoffman, Rand; Mick Brown; woodwardb; glenn.greenwald; lrohter; harriet.ryan; hailey.branson
Cc: Paulette Brandt
Subject: Re: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request


There are several pieces of information I need.  My friend, Paulette Brandt, and I have been told (on approximately six occasions) that Leonard Cohen's restraining order expired on February 15, 2009.  We were also advised that a Motion to Dismiss was entered on January 12, 2009.  I was not a resident of Boulder, Colorado when this restraining order was granted and left shortly after the hearing.  I may not have received certain documents.  I am requesting the following:

1.  Information regarding the Motion to Dismiss that was entered (and appears in the computer database) on January 12, 2009.

2.  Information regarding the expired restraining order (and appears in the computer database) on February 15, 2009.

3.  Any and all information that would establish that this order (originally granted based on a business relationship) was modified and re-issued as a domestic violence order.

4.  The date this order was entered into any federal, state, or local database.

5.  The amount it would cost to acquire a copy of the "secret" hearing Leonard Cohen attended that led to the judge issuing a temporary restraining order.

6.  Any information that would support Leonard Cohen's legal position and testimony that Judge Enichen had jurisdiction to prevent me from requesting information needed to file my federal and state tax returns.  That is how this order has been used and there is testimony to support this.  I am unclear how a local order can override IRS rules and requirements.

What I would like to know is how much it will cost to obtain this information and hearing CD.

Thank you,

Kelley Lynch

Kelley Lynch's Office - Lizzy Tysh Seems To Think This Was Leonard's Office

-From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: MK MULTRA, Etc.
To: MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org


Hi IRS,

My office.  See our tax returns.

Kelley


I truly don't have that kind of time, mickjaggerscat. I spoke with her on the phone, once, when I phoned Leonard's office, and she was very kind and helpful to me. However, I've read eoough of her missives [one of which I was included on the mailing list for] to see how extensively she meanders and trying to put things in any kind of order, so as to even establish a side which we might identify as hers would be so labour intensive and, from my perspective, fruitless, that I just won't be doing it. If you are interested in doing that and reducing it to a form that would be clear and understandable, I would be interested in reading your reduction and/or synopsis.
"Be yourself. Everyone else is already taken."
~ Oscar Wilde


lizzytysh
Posts: 24973
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 8:57 pm


Location: Florida, U.S.A.

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi CIA,

Leonard Cohen's constituents (he doesn't have "fans") are debating whether or not my version of events should be heard.  The lengths Cohen has gone to silence me is insane.  And, I might note, the so-called prosecutor attempted to silence me by raising my online posts and communications with journalists as issues.  

I am now allegedly, according to a Criminal Stalker and mafioso wanna be (Gianelli), "crazy" because I have written CIA.  Why is that crazy?  Leonard Cohen is the individual who has stated (in front of numerous people) that he was part of CIA's MK ULTRA program.  He is the individual who has told countless versions of his ridiculous Bay of Pigs story.  Do you believe that Leonard Cohen was captured by Castro's forces and interrogated as a potential member of an advance reconnaissance mission.  Was he interrogated and released?  Or, did the rebels assume he was part of the CIA or Castro's forces?  Hard to know.  What about the Yom Kippur War?  How was Cohen joining the Israeli military with no training?  Does the CIA actually believe Leonard Cohen could simply fly to Israel and become a paratrooper or pilot - with no experience whatsoever?  But these stories are not "crazy."  Writing the CIA is apparently crazy.  

Lying about people and a drone Valentine card sent to FBI and DOJ as an example of false threats being used against people in LA is not "crazy."  Writing the CIA to ask if CIA believes a prosecutor in LA fears that she is on a disposition matrix is crazy.  

Lying about someone, and victimizing an innocent person, is not crazy.  That's a day job for prosecutors in LA Confidential.  Targeting a woman, her sons, friends, etc. and slandering them, harassing them, stalking them, etc. is not crazy.  Advising the criminal stalker to cease and desist is evidently the problem.  Addressing lies and slander with the truth and facts is now crazy.  Pat Dixon believes Eminem wrote Puke - in particular the comments about "dry humping" - about him and fears for his life but that's not crazy, right?  Cooley thinks I'm President and appointed my FBI and CIA director and have advised my Attorney General to prosecute him for correction but that's not crazy, right?  The Penal Code (Perjury) in California is now a threat to former DA Steve Cooley and that's not insane?  

"Lizzy Tysh," who doesn't know me has written approximately 29,000 posts on a "fan" blog but cannot be bothered to listen to my interview.  It's too difficult for her.  She's a completely devoted fan evidently and Leonard Cohen's lies work.  The lies about my being a disgruntled ex-lover stalking him for tax information (that he refuses to provide me) makes a better bullshit story than my turning him into IRS for criminal tax fraud that may date back 40 years.  Strangers who know Leonard Cohen simply cannot grasp this about their beloved poet.  And, a lawyer who has terrorized my family and friends for six years is permitted to slander me on Cohen's approved fan site and his slanderous statements are embraced.  That's not crazy, right?  

Ann Diamond never stalked Leonard Cohen but has been falsely accused.  Cohen falsely accuses people of stalking him, ripping him off to breach contracts, and knows the type of bullshit the news media and his cult victims will regurgitate.  So, let's watch Cohen's fans debate whether or not my version of events should be heard.  According to LA Confidential the answer is no.  

I want to repeat this - who I write is not the business of criminal strangers, like Gianelli, with motive.  The man is on someone's payroll and his work relates to Cohen, IRS, and Phil Spector whose appeal will be decided in the near future.  LA Confidential must be desperate.  They finally nailed a celebrity.  The first they've nailed since Fatty Arbuckle.  What will they do if someone nails them over the set up of Phil Spector?  That's crazy right.  Setting someone up isn't.  People clearly prefer insane clowns and their inane rumors and vicious conduct.

Has CIA figured out which version of Cohen's good rock 'n roll gun story they believe?  The one Cohen testified about; the one he wrote my so-called prosecutor about; or the version the Spector prosecutor used - see LA Superior Court's website.  

All the best,
Kelley

IMAGE ENCLOSED FOR CIA VIEWING PURPOSES ONLY.

Drone5555




Saturday, April 18, 2015


Leonard Cohen's Fan Forum Debates Whether Or Not Kelley Lynch's Version Of Events Should Be Heard



Truth Sentinel Episode 39 (Leonard Cohen, truth, lies, guilt, innocence, law, MK Ultra)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVXTY0ATTR8


Truth Sentinel Episode 40 (Phil Spector, truth, lies, guilt and innocence, murder trial)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB1WMxTwnHg

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Postby mickjaggerscat on Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:07 am
Has anyone here ever thought of listening to Kelley Lynch's side? :shock: Just for the sheer hell of it, I mean. Not because she has anything to say or even deserves a chance to defend herself. That would be highly unfair and deeply offensive, especially after ten years of not knowing what she sounds like, or if she is even human. But just for the sake of something called "balance" which I'm sure you've all heard of :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVXTY0ATTR8
mickjaggerscat
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:17 am

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Postby lizzytysh on Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:40 am
I truly don't have that kind of time, mickjaggerscat. I spoke with her on the phone, once, when I phoned Leonard's office, and she was very kind and helpful to me. However, I've read eoough of her missives [one of which I was included on the mailing list for] to see how extensively she meanders and trying to put things in any kind of order, so as to even establish a side which we might identify as hers would be so labour intensive and, from my perspective, fruitless, that I just won't be doing it. If you are interested in doing that and reducing it to a form that would be clear and understandable, I would be interested in reading your reduction and/or synopsis.
"Be yourself. Everyone else is already taken."
~ Oscar Wilde
User avatar
lizzytysh
Posts: 24973
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Florida, U.S.A.

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Postby mickjaggerscat on Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:53 am
lizzytysh wrote:I truly don't have that kind of time, mickjaggerscat. I spoke with her on the phone, once, when I phoned Leonard's office, and she was very kind and helpful to me. However, I've read eoough of her missives [one of which I was included on the mailing list for] to see how extensively she meanders and trying to put things in any kind of order, so as to even establish a side which we might identify as hers would be so labour intensive and, from my perspective, fruitless, that I just won't be doing it. If you are interested in doing that and reducing it to a form that would be clear and understandable, I would be interested in reading your reduction and/or synopsis.

So, lizzytish, you're saying you have had time to post 24,973 times on this forum but you can't listen to an hour-long interview with Kelley Lynch discussing what she has been through these past ten years.

Someday, who knows, it might even become important to be well informed, especially since you've been commenting on her mental health, with an air of someone knowledgeable. Wouldn't it interest you to know how she came to violate her restraining order two years ago? She was told it had expired in 2009.

This link wasn't directed at you, personally. It's for members of this forum, quite a few of whom seem to have found the stamina to click on the link and listen to the interview.Of course It may not be what you want to hear.
Last edited by mickjaggerscat on Sat Apr 18, 2015 6:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
mickjaggerscat
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:17 am

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Postby Cheshire gal on Sat Apr 18, 2015 6:15 am
I, for one, do thank you for posting this information mickjaggerscat. It is always best to have two sides of any story. It's very interesting to hear Kelley Lynch's side, and leaves a lot for us to think about doesn't it?
'...and here's a man still working for your little smile' -Leonard Cohen
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
User avatar
Cheshire gal
Posts: 733
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:54 am
Location: Mass. USA

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Unread postby regensburg on Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:12 pm
Thank you mickjaggerscat for posting the link to the video which I have watched because you hear the other side of the story. I do agree with you and also with Cheshire Girl. It was very interesting to listen what she had to say. Maybe one day we will hear the whole truth.
User avatar
regensburg
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 10:26 pm

--
Ann Diamond's The Man Next Door (Bootleg edition)

"A wonderful memoir of life with Leonard Cohen in Montreal and Greece through the heady 60s, spiritual 70s and cynical 80s - the music - the lyrics - the drugs - the government's mind control experiments - brilliant table talk by a woman who knew him well. Cover art by Tigana."

http://www.lulu.com/shop/ann-diamond/the-man-next-door/ebook/product-21607282.html


Kelley Lynch's Questions To CIA Re. Leonard Cohen, His Constituents, The Criminal Stalker & LA Confidential



From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:08 PM
Subject: MK MULTRA, Etc.
To: MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org


Hi CIA,

Leonard Cohen's constituents (he doesn't have "fans") are debating whether or not my version of events should be heard.  The lengths Cohen has gone to silence me is insane.  And, I might note, the so-called prosecutor attempted to silence me by raising my online posts and communications with journalists as issues.  

I am now allegedly, according to a Criminal Stalker and mafioso wanna be (Gianelli), "crazy" because I have written CIA.  Why is that crazy?  Leonard Cohen is the individual who has stated (in front of numerous people) that he was part of CIA's MK ULTRA program.  He is the individual who has told countless versions of his ridiculous Bay of Pigs story.  Do you believe that Leonard Cohen was captured by Castro's forces and interrogated as a potential member of an advance reconnaissance mission.  Was he interrogated and released?  Or, did the rebels assume he was part of the CIA or Castro's forces?  Hard to know.  What about the Yom Kippur War?  How was Cohen joining the Israeli military with no training?  Does the CIA actually believe Leonard Cohen could simply fly to Israel and become a paratrooper or pilot - with no experience whatsoever?  But these stories are not "crazy."  Writing the CIA is apparently crazy.  

Lying about people and a drone Valentine card sent to FBI and DOJ as an example of false threats being used against people in LA is not "crazy."  Writing the CIA to ask if CIA believes a prosecutor in LA fears that she is on a disposition matrix is crazy.  

Lying about someone, and victimizing an innocent person, is not crazy.  That's a day job for prosecutors in LA Confidential.  Targeting a woman, her sons, friends, etc. and slandering them, harassing them, stalking them, etc. is not crazy.  Advising the criminal stalker to cease and desist is evidently the problem.  Addressing lies and slander with the truth and facts is now crazy.  Pat Dixon believes Eminem wrote Puke - in particular the comments about "dry humping" - about him and fears for his life but that's not crazy, right?  Cooley thinks I'm President and appointed my FBI and CIA director and have advised my Attorney General to prosecute him for corruption but that's not crazy, right?  The Penal Code (Perjury) in California is now a threat to former DA Steve Cooley and that's not insane?  

"Lizzy Tysh," who doesn't know me has written approximately 25,000 posts on a "fan" blog but cannot be bothered to listen to my interview.  It's too difficult for her.  She's a completely devoted fan evidently and Leonard Cohen's lies work.  The lies about my being a disgruntled ex-lover stalking him for tax information (that he refuses to provide me) makes a better bullshit story than my turning him into IRS for criminal tax fraud that may date back 40 years.  Strangers who know Leonard Cohen simply cannot grasp this about their beloved poet.  And, a lawyer who has terrorized my family and friends for six years is permitted to slander me on Cohen's approved fan site and his slanderous statements are embraced.  That's not crazy, right?  

Ann Diamond never stalked Leonard Cohen but has been falsely accused.  Cohen falsely accuses people of stalking him, ripping him off to breach contracts, and knows the type of bullshit the news media and his cult victims will regurgitate.  So, let's watch Cohen's fans debate whether or not my version of events should be heard.  According to LA Confidential the answer is no.  

I want to repeat this - who I write is not the business of criminal strangers, like Gianelli, with motive.  The man is on someone's payroll and his work relates to Cohen, IRS, and Phil Spector whose appeal will be decided in the near future.  LA Confidential must be desperate.  They finally nailed a celebrity.  The first they've nailed since Fatty Arbuckle.  What will they do if someone nails them over the set up of Phil Spector?  That's crazy right.  Setting someone up isn't.  People clearly prefer insane clowns and their inane rumors and vicious conduct.

Has CIA figured out which version of Cohen's good rock 'n roll gun story they believe?  The one Cohen testified about; the one he wrote my so-called prosecutor about; or the version the Spector prosecutor used - see LA Superior Court's website.  

All the best,
Kelley

IMAGE ENCLOSED FOR CIA VIEWING PURPOSES ONLY.

Drone5555




Saturday, April 18, 2015


Leonard Cohen's Fan Forum Debates Whether Or Not Kelley Lynch's Version Of Events Should Be Heard



Truth Sentinel Episode 39 (Leonard Cohen, truth, lies, guilt, innocence, law, MK Ultra)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVXTY0ATTR8


Truth Sentinel Episode 40 (Phil Spector, truth, lies, guilt and innocence, murder trial)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB1WMxTwnHg

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Postby mickjaggerscat on Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:07 am
Has anyone here ever thought of listening to Kelley Lynch's side? :shock: Just for the sheer hell of it, I mean. Not because she has anything to say or even deserves a chance to defend herself. That would be highly unfair and deeply offensive, especially after ten years of not knowing what she sounds like, or if she is even human. But just for the sake of something called "balance" which I'm sure you've all heard of :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVXTY0ATTR8
mickjaggerscat
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:17 am

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Postby lizzytysh on Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:40 am
I truly don't have that kind of time, mickjaggerscat. I spoke with her on the phone, once, when I phoned Leonard's office, and she was very kind and helpful to me. However, I've read eoough of her missives [one of which I was included on the mailing list for] to see how extensively she meanders and trying to put things in any kind of order, so as to even establish a side which we might identify as hers would be so labour intensive and, from my perspective, fruitless, that I just won't be doing it. If you are interested in doing that and reducing it to a form that would be clear and understandable, I would be interested in reading your reduction and/or synopsis.
"Be yourself. Everyone else is already taken."
~ Oscar Wilde
User avatar
lizzytysh
Posts: 24973
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Florida, U.S.A.

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Postby mickjaggerscat on Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:53 am
lizzytysh wrote:I truly don't have that kind of time, mickjaggerscat. I spoke with her on the phone, once, when I phoned Leonard's office, and she was very kind and helpful to me. However, I've read eoough of her missives [one of which I was included on the mailing list for] to see how extensively she meanders and trying to put things in any kind of order, so as to even establish a side which we might identify as hers would be so labour intensive and, from my perspective, fruitless, that I just won't be doing it. If you are interested in doing that and reducing it to a form that would be clear and understandable, I would be interested in reading your reduction and/or synopsis.

So, lizzytish, you're saying you have had time to post 24,973 times on this forum but you can't listen to an hour-long interview with Kelley Lynch discussing what she has been through these past ten years.

Someday, who knows, it might even become important to be well informed, especially since you've been commenting on her mental health, with an air of someone knowledgeable. Wouldn't it interest you to know how she came to violate her restraining order two years ago? She was told it had expired in 2009.

This link wasn't directed at you, personally. It's for members of this forum, quite a few of whom seem to have found the stamina to click on the link and listen to the interview.Of course It may not be what you want to hear.
Last edited by mickjaggerscat on Sat Apr 18, 2015 6:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
mickjaggerscat
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:17 am

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Postby Cheshire gal on Sat Apr 18, 2015 6:15 am
I, for one, do thank you for posting this information mickjaggerscat. It is always best to have two sides of any story. It's very interesting to hear Kelley Lynch's side, and leaves a lot for us to think about doesn't it?
'...and here's a man still working for your little smile' -Leonard Cohen
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
User avatar
Cheshire gal
Posts: 733
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:54 am
Location: Mass. USA

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Unread postby regensburg on Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:12 pm
Thank you mickjaggerscat for posting the link to the video which I have watched because you hear the other side of the story. I do agree with you and also with Cheshire Girl. It was very interesting to listen what she had to say. Maybe one day we will hear the whole truth.
User avatar
regensburg
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 10:26 pm

--
Ann Diamond's The Man Next Door (Bootleg edition)

"A wonderful memoir of life with Leonard Cohen in Montreal and Greece through the heady 60s, spiritual 70s and cynical 80s - the music - the lyrics - the drugs - the government's mind control experiments - brilliant table talk by a woman who knew him well. Cover art by Tigana."

http://www.lulu.com/shop/ann-diamond/the-man-next-door/ebook/product-21607282.html

Leonard Cohen's Fan Forum Debates Whether Or Not Kelley Lynch's Version Of Events Should Be Heard



Truth Sentinel Episode 39 (Leonard Cohen, truth, lies, guilt, innocence, law, MK Ultra)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVXTY0ATTR8

Truth Sentinel Episode 40 (Phil Spector, truth, lies, guilt and innocence, murder trial) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB1WMxTwnHg

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Postby mickjaggerscat on Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:07 am
Has anyone here ever thought of listening to Kelley Lynch's side? :shock: Just for the sheer hell of it, I mean. Not because she has anything to say or even deserves a chance to defend herself. That would be highly unfair and deeply offensive, especially after ten years of not knowing what she sounds like, or if she is even human. But just for the sake of something called "balance" which I'm sure you've all heard of :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVXTY0ATTR8
mickjaggerscat
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:17 am

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Postby lizzytysh on Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:40 am
I truly don't have that kind of time, mickjaggerscat. I spoke with her on the phone, once, when I phoned Leonard's office, and she was very kind and helpful to me. However, I've read eoough of her missives [one of which I was included on the mailing list for] to see how extensively she meanders and trying to put things in any kind of order, so as to even establish a side which we might identify as hers would be so labour intensive and, from my perspective, fruitless, that I just won't be doing it. If you are interested in doing that and reducing it to a form that would be clear and understandable, I would be interested in reading your reduction and/or synopsis.
"Be yourself. Everyone else is already taken."
~ Oscar Wilde
User avatar
lizzytysh
Posts: 24973
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Florida, U.S.A.

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Postby mickjaggerscat on Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:53 am
lizzytysh wrote:I truly don't have that kind of time, mickjaggerscat. I spoke with her on the phone, once, when I phoned Leonard's office, and she was very kind and helpful to me. However, I've read eoough of her missives [one of which I was included on the mailing list for] to see how extensively she meanders and trying to put things in any kind of order, so as to even establish a side which we might identify as hers would be so labour intensive and, from my perspective, fruitless, that I just won't be doing it. If you are interested in doing that and reducing it to a form that would be clear and understandable, I would be interested in reading your reduction and/or synopsis.

So, lizzytish, you're saying you have had time to post 24,973 times on this forum but you can't listen to an hour-long interview with Kelley Lynch discussing what she has been through these past ten years. 

Someday, who knows, it might even become important to be well informed, especially since you've been commenting on her mental health, with an air of someone knowledgeable. Wouldn't it interest you to know how she came to violate her restraining order two years ago? She was told it had expired in 2009. 

This link wasn't directed at you, personally. It's for members of this forum, quite a few of whom seem to have found the stamina to click on the link and listen to the interview.Of course It may not be what you want to hear.
Last edited by mickjaggerscat on Sat Apr 18, 2015 6:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
mickjaggerscat
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:17 am

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Postby Cheshire gal on Sat Apr 18, 2015 6:15 am
I, for one, do thank you for posting this information mickjaggerscat. It is always best to have two sides of any story. It's very interesting to hear Kelley Lynch's side, and leaves a lot for us to think about doesn't it?
'...and here's a man still working for your little smile' -Leonard Cohen
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
User avatar
Cheshire gal
Posts: 733
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:54 am
Location: Mass. USA

Re: Kelley Lynch convicted on violation of restraining order

Unread postby regensburg on Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:12 pm
Thank you mickjaggerscat for posting the link to the video which I have watched because you hear the other side of the story. I do agree with you and also with Cheshire Girl. It was very interesting to listen what she had to say. Maybe one day we will hear the whole truth.
User avatar
regensburg
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 10:26 pm

--
Ann Diamond's The Man Next Door (Bootleg edition)

"A wonderful memoir of life with Leonard Cohen in Montreal and Greece through the heady 60s, spiritual 70s and cynical 80s - the music - the lyrics - the drugs - the government's mind control experiments - brilliant table talk by a woman who knew him well. Cover art by Tigana."

http://www.lulu.com/shop/ann-diamond/the-man-next-door/ebook/product-21607282.html

What Does Mayor Garcetti Intend To Do About LA Confidential & This Criminal Activity?


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 4:39 PM
Subject: Re:
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>


Mayor Garcetti,

LA Confidential appears to be out of control and a Criminal Stalker is harassing many residents of Los Angeles.  His name is Stephen Gianelli and he appears to be moonlighting for someone.  Perhaps numerous someones.  He is obsessed with me and it is quite frightening.  He has, after harassing her for two years, decided to target, slander, and threaten Paulette Brandt.  Paulette Brandt was Phil Spector's girlfriend years ago and worked for him twice - the last time from 1991 through 2002.  We recently gave interviews about our views on Leonard Cohen and Phil Spector.  Evidently, ordinary residents of Los Angeles do not have access to justice in the same manner that celebrities do.  That would include Leonard Cohen who merely summoned LAPD's TMU and lied to them.  There is rampant perjury and fraud before Judge Hess now in Case No. BC338322 so he shouldn't be so focused on the perjury statement as perjury itself is criminal.  Leonard Cohen failed to serve me and this situation has exposed me to dangerously unstable animals.  We are attempting to see if Kevin Huvane and Bryan Lourd will sign us to CAA so that we can become celebrities in our own right and access the same celebrity justice system Leonard Cohen has availed himself of.  

One of the tactics being used (by the City Attorney as well) involves Gianelli stalking and harassing me, slandering me, and my responding to document this and ask that it cease and desist.  I have indeed reported this to many law enforcement agencies.  The man is unstoppable.  He defends Leonard Cohen, Steve Cooley, Alan Jackson, and Pat Dixon.  He must be on someone's payroll because he is a lawyer who has targeted me (and others - including both of my sons) for six straight years now.  

I would assume LA is concerned about the upcoming decision re. the Phil Spector matter.  Gianelli has become more aggressive and threatening.  He worked with the City Attorney to have me falsely arrested on two occasions.  I am filing a motion to vacate the fraud domestic violence order that DOJ should thoroughly investigate.  I have a hearing in the Cohen matter on June 23, 2015.  There is a rampant problem with service issues before LA Superior Court.  There are no remedies before LA Superior Court.  I will therefore be addressing these issues in federal RICO lawsuits.  That will include wire and mail fraud re. the fraud domestic violence related orders.  No one is assigning me a dating relationship with a man - Leonard Cohen - who sexually harassed and exposed himself to me for years.  It is nauseating.  I reported this man's criminal tax fraud to IRS on April 15, 2005 and he retaliated.  I have challenged the fraud refunds I discovered (re. IRS and FTB) as fraud.  Cohen used the fraudulent LA Superior Court Complaint to defend himself to the head of fraud at IRS in Los Angeles.  His lawyer, Robert Kory, just spoke with a woman attempting to defraud Paulette Brandt.  Gianelli is helping that woman legally.  The situation is a disgrace and many people belong in prison.

Any thoughts on Leonard Cohen's three versions of his Phil Spector gun story before LA Superior Court?  Is that cool even if those statements (according to Mick Brown) were presented to Spector's Grand Jury and appeared in prosecution motion in limine re. prior bad acts.  Prosecutorial misconduct, fraud, and perjury are out of control here and I understand why.  No one is held accountable and maniacs like Cooley, Jackson, Dixon, and Cohen are on the loose and have publicly aligned themselves with one another - during the DA campaign in the spring of 2012, I might note.  I suppose having Cohen on the stand testifying about Spector and a gun helped the DA, Jackson, and Trutanich.  There's a reason people view this town as LA Confidential and corrupt.

Let me assure you of this:  Oliver Stone is going to take the witness stand to explain why he was used to stir up a custody matter by Cohen and Kory in order to crush me and coerce me into a deal.  Ron Burkle is going to take the stand because Gianelli and others have harassed him but do not know him.  It's perfectly fine if people underestimate me.  Leonard Cohen does not have a defense re. our outstanding matters that involves calling me a drunken slut.  That won't address the federal tax and corporate matters I will litigate in federal court.  LA Superior Court is NOT extorting $10 million from me because Cohen failed to serve me, perjured himself, aligned himself with Cooley and Jackson, has celebrity access to the City Attorney and LAPD's TMU, and criminals are targeting me.  

You have a serious problem with fraudulent restraining orders being used as litigation tactics.  It's a no brainer.  But, what do you intend to do?  



Kelley Lynch

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:


Bruce Cutler,

I apologize for contacting you again but I am working on my RICO suit, reviewing evidence re. predicate acts (including the wire fraud re. the fraud domestic violence order, etc.) and trying to compile evidence related to the ongoing criminal harassment, retaliation, targeting of Paulette Brandt, and other tactics used by Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, Michelle Rice, Steve Cooley, and others.  

I have the letter you wrote Judge Robert Vanderet who sentenced me for violating a domestic violence order that does not exist.  Boulder Combined Court was very clear about that.  And, while I personally objected, he issued a "domestic violence related" order to you.  You did not request that.  The prosecutor, working with a domestic violence quack, tried to have me drugged and committed because she viewed my emails to you as too chatty.  I think Phil Spector had a right to know that Cohen publicly aligned himself with Steve Cooley and Alan Jackson; the City Attorney elicited testimony from Cohen about Spector and one version of Cohen's good rock and roll stories (there are now three versions before LA Superior Court); Cohen was testifying about Spector and an alleged gun incident; and the prosecutor elicited testimony about Cooley and Jackson.  I've just addressed my "parody" letter re. Cooley with someone from the ACLU who contacted me.  That was a game my colleagues and I played while working on an ACLU campaign and we pretended we were President and addressed our political platforms, appointed our CIA and FBI directors (etc.), and addressed issues we would address.  My issue was corruption in politics and the California Penal Code is quite specific about officials that use perjury to obtain convictions and death sentences.  Phil Spector received a death sentence and, if someone proved prosecutorial use of perjury, the Penal Code provides for the death penalty or a life sentence.

Your letter raised Pat Dixon.  I would like you to maintain all evidence related to Dixon.  Gianelli, a Criminal Stalker, has publicly stated that Dixon was behind the call to Boulder PD.  FBI advised me to contact the DA and Attorney General of Colorado about that matter and I did.  

Your letter mentioned that you deleted the voice mail messages so I will assume you could never prove that fact but Gianelli has criminally harassed me over this issue.  As I've said, he works in tandem with one Kelly Green who posted this about you in 2007:  Kelly Green is now slandering me on a blog Gianelli started after attempting to blackmail me into shutting down my riverdeepbook.blogspot.com blog.  He and Michelle Blaine previously targeted my email accounts and blogs.  

This moonlighting criminal is now threatening Paulette Brandt and Linda Carol (see his email at the bottom of this email and Carol's draft declaration).  This Criminal has repeatedly made statements about his Italian family members and alluded to the possibility that he has mafia connections.  The mafia should immediately issue a disclaimer.

I would like you to maintain any letter from the City Attorney of Los Angeles with respect to the "domestic violence related" order they may have mailed you.  I will address that issue as mail fraud in my RICO lawsuit.  I attach herewith my claims against the City and County.  I am well within the four year statute re. RICO.  That would include with respect to both false arrests and their tactics.  Gianelli is part of the tactics and is now providing legal advice to a woman attempting to defraud and slander Paulette Brandt.  The woman phoned Robert Kory after receiving Paulette Brandt's rent demand/Small Claims Court.  The criminal mind is a beautiful thing.  The tactics include the use of fraud restraining orders, slander, harassment, etc.  Gianelli continues to harass me, Paulette Brandt, and others.  He wants information about potential declarations people might give me.  He is not the attorney of record for Cohen and I address all legal issues related to Cohen, the motion I just filed, the upcoming hearing on June 23, 201`5, and the fraud domestic violence order (and the motion to vacate I will file next week in that matter) with the attorney of record.

You also may be in possession of a letter from my younger son's school.  I would like that letter and Cohen/Kory targeted him after attempting to stir up a custody matter - by falsely accusing me of having sex with Oliver Stone to Ray's so-called father.  That was another tactic.  I have recently contacted the DA's office regarding this ongoing criminal conduct.  I have brought it to the attention of Judge Hess, State Bar, City Attorney, LAPD's TMU, IRS, FBI, DOJ, and others.  

I would like you to maintain any and all evidence related to all communications with Gianelli, a criminal stalker who has relentlessly targeted me for six years, regarding me.  He has also relentlessly slandered me over this issue.  I heard from Phil Spector after my alleged trial and remain convinced that Gianelli is moonlighting and may work with Spector's prosecution.  He argues prosecution theories online.  You can review this for yourself on the Two Truth Sentinel sites related to Paulette Brandt, Ann Diamond, and my interviews re. Cohen and Phil Spector.  I personally believe CIA should address Cohen's allegations that he was part of the CIA MKULTRA program.  Ann Diamond is being targeted by Gianelli.  She never stalked Cohen.  He falsely accuses women of that.  Mick Jagger/Rolling Stones do not have a restraining order against Ann Diamond.  Phillip knows Mick Jagger and I have written to him about this situation.  I've also contacted other people in the industry because I think everyone should stand up for Phil Spector and against these corrupt actors.  If Dixon's your friend, that is your problem.  I didn't write Eminem's PUKE for this clown and Eminem mentioned "dry humping" re. Mariah Carey.  I doubt Eminem wants to "dry hump" Pat Dixon but you would have to ask him personally.


These are very serious matters.  I am representing myself and writing my own federal RICO suits.  You are in possession of evidence and I am addressing that evidence.  I am onto their "entrapment" tactics.  These people belong in prison.  I don't need to talk to you any longer, I am speaking directly to Dennis Riordan.  Paulette Brandt is aware of everything that is going on and I am aware that she is being targeted and slandered by criminals.  If I think of any additional evidence, I will follow up with one request.

You should be aware that Gianelli is a moonlighting stalker and he appears to be an amateur agent provocateur/infiltrator who is attempting to gather information about matters related to Leonard Cohen, IRS, and Phil Spector.  He works in tandem with Michelle Blaine, Susanne Walsh (who has harassed me and my family for years - and targeted Phil Spector's FB page - a fan of Cohen's), Kelly Green and others.  He legally argues Cohen's case and appears to be an off-the-record member of the defense.  People are writing me commenting about how sleazy he is and how disgraceful Cohen is.  Gianelli must be on overtime right now.  Someone wrote me earlier that a link to the Truth Sentinel interview (Cohen) was posted on Cohen's official fan website (that he monitors, approves content, and works with) and Gianelli was on there slandering me.  The page was pulled down.  Many people are onto this criminal.  He has advised me that he worked with the City Attorney to have me falsely imprisoned on two occasions.  

To recap:  I am asking you to maintain all evidence.  Gianelli is using hearsay regarding you to slander and harass me.  You would, of course, have to take the witness stand.  They're all counting on the fact that I am representing myself and LA Superior Court condones fraud, perjury, and a complete lack of service, witness tampering, etc.  That is my personal opinion based on what I have witnessed.  The judges actually lie from the bench and their demeanor is appalling.  

Kelley Lynch


Truth Sentinel Episode 39 (Leonard Cohen, truth, lies, guilt, innocence, law, MK Ultra)


Truth Sentinel Episode 40 (Phil Spector, truth, lies, guilt and innocence, murder trial)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB1WMxTwnHg


Kellygreen said

September 3, 2007 at 2:15 am
The evidence will show, the evidence will show Cutler is a fucking pig, a fucking pig!
The man really loves to repeat himself.
So much of Cutler’s OS makes me angry–but I find it truly disgusting that he never refers to Lana Clarkson by name, he always refers to her as the decedent–he is a fucking pig, a fucking pig.

SECOND UPDATE 4/15/2015 – By email of today, Kelley Lynch fills in more details. According to Ms. Lynch, the housemate that she replaced at Paulette Brandt’s a small 2-bedroom apartment – and who roomed with Ms. Brandt for 14-months  -  was a  “grifter”  and former “stripper” who “shared a room here with a dominatrix” and two incontinent cats that “peeed on the floor” and who unwittingly imported cockroaches into the apartment during frequent forays into the bottom of the corner dumpster. Lovely circles Ms. Brandt socializes in!
If Ms. Lynch’s email of today is true, it would certainly explain why Ms. Brandt would willingly welcome into her home an adjudicated embezzler and convicted criminal harasser who served half of the last three years in the Los Angeles County Jail, and who has a history of homelessness, involuntary psychiatric holds, a slew of civil harassment orders against her, and even now continues to copy her mass emails to the IRS, the DOJ, the Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB), and many others, and whose own family describes as “sick and she needs help” – a/k/a Kelley Lynch.  

2 comments:

  1. Welcome back, friend!

    I find it hard to believe while she was robbing Cohen blind, her family did the bookkeeping for Cohen's entities; yet, neither her mother, father, sister, nor Steve Lindsey had any idea everything they had, and the high life they were living, was paid for by Cohen? Unbelievable. Of course she couldn't go to rehab during that period. Had she gone to rehab, the gig would've been up.
    Reply
  2. How can you go to rehab if you ABSOLUTELY have no alcohol issues? Ha!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:53 AM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com


SENT VI ELECTRONIC MAIL ONLY
Kelley A. Lynch
1754 N. Van Ness Avenue
Hollywood, California 90028

Ms. Lynch,

To paraphrase your advice for Jeffery Kory, if you have motions and/or other court filings to make, file them and then attend the hearing(s).

Everything else is pure harassment.

If you persist on this path, neither you nor your other housemates are going to enjoy the legal consequences.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece

DECLARATION OF LINDA CAROL


I, LINDA CAROL, declare:
1.        I am a citizen of the United States who currently resides in Los Angeles, California.  I am Paulette Brandt’s roommate.  I am over the age of 18 years.  I have personal knowledge of the facts contained in this declaration and if called upon to testify I could and would testify competently as to the truth of the facts stated herein.
2.         At some point in or around October 2013, I began an apartment search in the Los Angeles area.  Marie Jones posted an ad and I rented a room from her for the months of November and December 2013.  At that time, I met Karina Von Watteville a/k/a Karina Fimbel.  Ms. Watteville was living with Marie Jones and that is how I became acquainted with her. 
3.         Problems arose between Marie Jones and Karina Von Watteville related to monies alleged owed Ms. Jones and Ms. Watteville’s cats who were using the apartment as their kitty litter box.  Karina Von Watteville, who picks through people’s trash and brings items home, infested the apartment with bed bugs and cock roaches.  An argument arose over money allegedly due Marie Jones and the police were called.  This incident occurred in or around November/December 2013.
4.         I continued to look for a permanent and more appropriate room to rent.  Karina Von Watteville advised me that she lived with a woman by the name of Paulette Brandt who had an available guest room for rent.  Ms. Von Watteville liked Ms. Brandt very much and said she enjoyed living with her and strongly encouraged me to contact Ms. Brandt about the room.  Ms. Von Watteville also explained to me that the apartment was clean, pretty, and assured me that Paulette Brandt was an excellent roommate and friend.
5.         I contacted Ms. Brandt, visited the apartment, rented the room, and have lived here for over a year now.  We get along extremely well.  The apartment is well kept and very pretty.  I have my own room and enjoy my privacy.
6.         At some point, after I moved in, Paulette Brandt and I discussed the fact that Karina Von Watteville owes her rent for the 14 months she lived here.  I spoke to Ms. Watteville who personally informed me that she felt bad about the situation.  Both individuals advised me that Karvina Von Watteville promised to pay Ms. Brandt in full when she received her social security check.  At some point in or around June 2014, Karina Von Watteville advised me that she had received her social security check.
7.         Paulette Brandt sent Ms. Watteville a rent demand letter.  At that point, Karina Von Watteville began slandering Paulette Brandt and seemed obsessed with a friend of ours, Kelley Lynch.  I have known Kelley Lynch for over a year and she is a very nice, courteous, and respectful individual.  Karina Von Watteville does not know Ms. Lynch but became increasingly upset with her over Paulette Brandt’s rent demands. 
8.         In or around June 2014, Paulette Brandt filed a Small Claims Complaint against Karina Von Watteville asking that she pay her the rental arrears due and owing.  I personally served Karina Von Watteville the Small Claims Complaint.  She was extremely angry but did confirm that she had an agreement to pay Paulette $500/month rent and $50/month utilities. 
9.         In or around June 2014, Karina Von Watteville was living in a commercial space she rented under the name of Cover Girl Models.  She lived in the space with her cats.  I visited on one occasion and was shocked to note that garbage and trash was piled around the room and the cats were using the entire space as their kitty litter box.
10.       Karina Von Watteville evidently permitted her cats to use her room at Paulette Brandt’s apartment as a kitty litter box as well.  She informed me that, after receiving the formal two months notice from Ms. Brandt (re. vacating the premises), she retaliated by leaving bags of garbage and trash behind and intentionally permitting her cats to urinate and defecate in the room.  She also apparently infested Paulette Brandt’s apartment with cock roaches.
11.       I do see Karina Von Watteville from time to time but she no longer speaks to me.  I am aware that, after receiving Paulette Brandt’s paperwork, she contacted Leonard Cohen’s lawyer.  Kelley Lynch was Cohen’s personal manager, is involved with legal matters related to him, and reported allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud to Internal Revenue Service.
12.       Since I have known Kelley Lynch she has informed me that a man by the name of Stephen Gianelli has criminally harassed and stalked her, members of her family, and others.  He is now sending Kelley Lynch highly slanderous emails about me and Paulette Brandt.  I do not know this individual.  It is my understanding that he has offered Karina Von Watteville assistance with the Small Claims matter involving Paulette Brandt.  Neither Kelley Lynch nor I are parties to that matter.  I am aware that Karina Von Watteville communicated with Robert Kory (Leonard Cohen’s lawyer), and was legally assisted by Stephen Gianelli, because I have seen some of the slanderous and false emails he has sent Ms. Lynch and have had numerous discussions with people who were present at both Small Claims hearings.  At those hearings, Karina Von Watteville evidently attempted to use Kelley Lynch’s cease and desist letters to defend herself.  This is an excerpt of Stephen Gianelli’s email confirming that he provided Karina Von Watteville with advice and addressing her phone call to Cohen’s lawyer. 
Ms. Von Watteville followed my advice and never even had to get to the other two defenses I specified; she won the hearing with the first issue out of the box:  The claim is time barred under CCP § 339 as arising from the breach of an alleged oral contract. Simple and elegant. No credibility issues to resolve. The shortest distance between point “A” and point “B”.  Game, set match.

In contacting Robert Kory with advice about what to do about your disparagement, Ms.Von Watteville  did not thereby “insert herself into Leonard Cohen's Criminal Tax Fraud matter”, first because all she did was contact a lawyer who (according to your blog) has extensive knowledge about Kelley Lynch for advice about what do about your email harassment;  and second, because there is no pending “Criminal Tax Fraud matter” for Ms.Von Watteville to have inserted herself into.

12.       I was copied in on Kelley Lynch’s cease and desist letters addressing Ms. Von Watteville’s slanderous comments I (and others) repeated to Ms. Lynch.  Karina Von Watteville does not know Kelley Lynch, as I’ve said, and simply began bad mouthing her, told me she planned to have her investigated and get her in trouble, posted a Gold Record Leonard Cohen gave Kelley Lynch (that Von Watteville photographed) on her Google Plus account, and advised me that Ms. Lynch is an alcoholic.  Kelley Lynch does not have a substance abuse problem and is most definitely not an alcoholic.  These are merely slanderous allegations meant to undermine her credibility.  The slander now appears to be retaliation over Paulette Brandt’s attempts to collect the outstanding rent she is owed.
13.       I want to reiterate that Karina Von Watteville a/k/a Karina Fimbel personally advised me that she owed Paulette Brandt 14 months rent and utilities and planned to pay her in full once she received her lump sum social security check.  I do not know if she received this but personally saw her waving around a wad of money at the food bank and informing people that it was $10,000 in cash.
14.       I didn’t share most of what I know about Karina Von Watteville, and what she has advised me, with Paulette Brandt because I didn’t want to get in the middle of the situation.  I considered both women my friends.  I am deeply upset that I am now being slandered, by Stephen Gianelli (a man I don’t know), who is attributing the comments he has made to Karina Von Watteville.  Paulette Brandt attempted to help Karina Von Watteville and is now being retaliated against and slandered.  It is a very disturbing situation.
15.       I have spent most of my adult life working as a model and actress and am now pursuing a college degree. 
I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
This declaration is executed on this 18th day of April 2015 in Los Angeles, California.

                                                                        ______________________________________
                                                                        Linda Carol