Date: Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:49 PM
Subject: Re:
To: Fabian Paulmikell A <Paulmikell.A.Fabian@irscounsel.treas.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, Robert Kory <rkory@koryrice.com>
Senate Judiciary,
Following is a summary of issues in anticipation of our conference call at 3PM today to discuss steps toward mediation of the above matter.
This is the memorandum I'm referring to. Kory has some seriously criminal and gratuitous false accusations in this memorandum but, being a lawyer, he probably understood this could be discovered. In any event, I didn't handle IRS or tax matters and was quite clear about that in my February 2002 email that Cohen is now attempting to conceal. It was submitted to IRS but for some reason LA Superior Court believes my letters are a/c privileged although Cohen's lawyers also confirmed that I did not hold a/c privilege. There was and remains no nexus of $5 million since the transaction fees are Cohen's personal expenses. He personally signed the fax to Greenberg authorizing those fees. And then there's the issue of phantom income shifted to me but not distributed. Why would that happen if I didn't have an ownership interest? I did evidently until Cohen retaliated against me for reporting his tax fraud to IRS ON APRIL 15, 2005 and at other times. Gianelli, who is representing Cohen, lied when he said 2006. Perhaps they think everyone at IRS, etc. is a dumbass.
If Mr. Fabian confirms that IRS exonerated Cohen, and provides me with evidence, I will submit it to the Senate Judiciary. Cohen perjured himself during my so-called trial when he testified that I handled IRS filings. The man will say anything.
Kelley
MEMORANDUM
To: Dianne DiMascio, Esq., David Berardo, Esq., and Dale Burgess, CPA
From: Robert Kory
CC: Ira Reiner, Esq., Kevin Prins, CPA
Re: Cohen v. Lynch, et al.
Open Accounting, Tax Issues, and Legal Issues
Date: January 14, 2005
· Impact of phantom income to Lynch from profit allocations without distributions from Traditional Holdings
· Impact on all parties of Traditional Holdings failure to report sale to Sony, or manner in which sale treated (delta of $5 million basis and $8 million sale price may be consumed in fees paid to third parties).
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Fabian,I am finalizing a new declaration for Tax Court. It will address the illegal tampering with my Tax Petition evidence blog and Gianellil's criminal harassment over the Tax Court case and federal tax matters. GIanelli is clearly arguing Leonard Cohen's case. I already issued a subpoena to Agent Tejeda. LA Superior Court decided to sabotage my Show Trial which was nothing other than, as my appellate attorney concluded, a federal tax case (related to Cohen) that demands an IRS investigation. The City Attorney, unlike IRS, had no concerns whatsoever about federal tax matters and privacy issues. In fact, the prosecutor lied extensively about federal tax matters; IRS holdings; etc. This is a "ruse" to Sandra Jo Streeter. I have no idea where this woman obtained her authority to argue federal tax matters, let alone lie about them, but intend to find out. The main issue for Cohen is the fact that he intentionally bankrupted me and believes courts have negative views towards self-represented parties and their constitutional rights are somehow tied to "fee waivers." Cohen literally attempted to have my fee waiver terminated with LA Superior Court. He prefers to be unopposed. In that manner, the can intentionally run statute of limitations and perjure himself freely. How does the Criminal Stalker know what a federal court will do with my RICO suit?My question for you right now is this: Would you please provide me with any evidence that Agent Tejeda concluded that there was no tax fraud by Cohen and closed whatever file was opened. According to this criminal, I will end up looking like a "dumbass." However, since I didn't handle corporate or tax matters, I do wonder about Kory's January 2005 memorandum confirming that Cohen and his personal tax and corporate lawyer failed to report $8 million in income on the 2001 TH returns. Cohen refuses to explain what mistake in my ownership re. TH was rectified but I would assume if this is the case, Cohen has now proven that the 2001 through 2003 TH tax returns that his representative prepared (for Cohen's benefit) were fraudulent. Does that make me look like a dumbass? In any event, Cohen and his operatives are quite clear - the statute of limitations re. criminal tax fraud has now run. Since this is all apparently public information, would you simply email me confirmation that Agent Tejeda exonerated Leonard Cohen and closed the file. I would appreciate that tremendously. I know the City Attorney informed my jurors that the DA elected not to prosecute Cohen but she failed to mention that Agent Tejeda exonerated Cohen. At that moment in time, Streeter merely lied to the Court about an IRS holding re. the default judgment; falsely informed jurors that I am in receipt of IRS required tax and corporate information; lied about corporate assets; and argued that when a man exposes his penis to his female colleague, it's her intent to annoy the man, etc.As I am actually finalizing my RICO suit, it would help if I had confirmation that Agent Tejeda exonerated Cohen so I'm not misleading a federal court.Kelley Lynch---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:33 AM
Subject: RE:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Cc: ahootnick@yahoo.comFirst, you need to have a pending trial to subpoena Agent Tejeda to. Not likely, because any federal suit you filed will be dismissed long before trial, before Cohen even needs to file an answer, as soon as the court rules on, and denies your fee waiver.Second, Agent Tejeda would only testify that in 2007 he concluded that there was no tax fraud by Cohen and closed the file. And you will wind up looking like the dumbass that you are – only more so.From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 7:49 PM
To: alan hootnick; Stephen Gianelli
Subject: Re:Gianelli,Cease and desist. I'll subpoena Agent Tejeda and he can explain precisely why and how he exonerated Cohen.Kelley LynchOn Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:Alan Hootnick,Have you seen me relentlessly advise this criminal to cease and desist? He's clearly Cohen's operative and now writing me about the "Man FROM LA Mancha." He must mean the Man From U.N.C.L.E., no? Did Cohen bring himself up by lying, cheating, stealing, and committing tax fraud? Cohen decided to work so he sold records. That's how it happens. He was also contractually obligated to tour. Actually, when one tours, you sell records.I haven't filed suit against Leonard Cohen yet but will be filing a federal RICO suit in the very near future. Cohen didn't win a judgment. He fraudulently obtained a default judgment, evidence of theft and money laundering, by failing to serve me the summons and complaint. I did report Cohen's tax fraud to IRS on April 15, 2005 and at other times. I haven't seen any evidence from IRS proving Cohen was exonerated. The prosecutor during my trial advised the jurors that Cooley elected not to prosecute Cohen. That might explain why Cohen was on the stand testifying about Phil Spector and a gun. The prosecutor elicited that testimony after Cohen confirmed that he was a recipient on an email to Dennis Riordan. He wasn't. That was perjured testimony. Well, LA Superior Court doesn't seem to mind that Cohen personally testified that I never stole from him - just his "peace of mind" - and we were in a "purely business relationship." Cohen's three versions of the Spector good rock 'n roll gun story before LA Superior Court doesn't faze the court. His lies, fraud, and perjury work so I anticipate more lies, etc.I don't agree that criminal tax fraud has a six year statute of limitations.It's me that's out of touch with reality. Not Cohen? He's the one with the stories about his role in MKULTRA; being recon during of Bay of Pigs; planning to join the Israeli army with no military experience (during Yom Kippur War); and all his stories about massive drug abuse, alcoholism, and psychiatric problems. Leonard Cohen is a chronic liar and misogynist. Gianelli is his operative. They can listen to "Man OF La Mancha" in a coffee klatch in hell.B the way, I did speak with the tax authorities in Canada and am aware that there are no statute of limitations in Canada. Cohen, Canada's National Treasure, cannot reside there due to tax and residence issues. As he personally informed me - Cohen obtained a new green card, immediately after abandoning one in 1988, because Canada asks where you filed your prior returns and IRS doesn't.Gianelli must be working on this 24/7. I wonder what his employers pay him. He is an "unofficial member" of Cohen's legal team and probably affiliated with Spector's prosecutors from what I can tell.Kelley Lynch---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:54 AM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com
Cc: ahootnick@yahoo.comMs. Lynch, you write:“Leonard Cohen brought himself down.”Really?How, exactly?Financially? A net worth going from near zero in 2004 to more than $50 MILLION today is up, not down.Record sales? He has sold more records since 2004 than he did before you left his employ.Critically? Let’s see now. 2006 inducted into the Canadian Songwriter’s Hall of Fame. 2007 received a Grammy for Album of the Year. 2008 inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. 2010 received a Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award. 2010 Cohen was inducted into the Songwriters Hall of Fame. No, I don’t think that is what one would call a downward career trend – by any measure.Okay, perhaps you meant legally? Let’s see. Kelley Lynch has been threatening to sue Leonard Cohen in federal and state court since 2004, but has never even filed suit, let alone won a judgment against him. Kelley Lynch reported Cohen to the IRS Criminal Division in 2006, but was cleared in 2007 (or so his attorneys claim, but it is a matter of record that a. no criminal charges were ever filed against him and b. the statute of limitation for tax fraud is six years and has run). No, Cohen was not brought down in a legal sense.One can only conclude, Ms. Lynch, that you are not residing what most people would call “reality”.Stephen GianelliCrete, Greece