Date: Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Just another crazy engaged in "tax litigation" with the IRS (and I use that term loosely)
To: Paulmikell.A.Fabian@irscounsel.treas.gov, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, rkory <rkory@rkmgment.com>
Agent Sopko,
This is how the Criminal Stalker responds when he wants to downplay the seriousness of a situation. The man is pathetic. No FBI agent concluded that I am a 5150 case and Gianelli has provided no evidence to support that insanity. On the other hand, I did speak to the Oakland FBI extensively about Gianelli's criminal harassment of me and others. I can assure you that I didn't "wet" myself when I saw that the U.S. Treasury was on my blog. The same is true when the SEC, FBI's Criminal Division, IRS, and others were on my blog. Lt. Wolak, LASD, thought my blog was great and did mention that he had communicated with IRS. Gianelli, of course, attempted to infiltrate LASD to elicit information.
Gianelli thinks hunting you down and contacting your partner at DOJ is amusing. That's because, as certain witnesses of mine have concluded after he criminally harassed them, he's a PSYCHOPATH.
Kelley
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Ha!
You send out mass emails daily with links to your blog, and then when someone in officialdom clicks on one you practically wet yourself!
Treasury is reading my blog!!!! Gooody!!!!
Ha!
90 seconds on your blog is all anyone needs to see that you have no credibility at all. That is how long it took the FBI agent I spoke with about you to conclude you were “5150”.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Fabian,While I view this as the Criminal Stalker Proxy's attempt to elicit information, and interfere with federal tax matters, I would like you to advise me if Gianelli represents IRS Chief Trial Counsel's office, speaks for you, or knows what is on your mind. He most definitely appears to be an unofficial member of Leonard Cohen's legal team. As for my letter to DDA Alan Jackson (hand delivered to Jackson, former DA Steve Cooley, and DDA Truc Do), it addresses Cohen's theft of $1 million from Traditional Holdings, LLC and the fact that the assets are owned by BMT. I attach a copy of the letter herewith. I will note that Investigator Frayeh concluded that Gianelli found a sympathetic ear with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson about me. That might explain why Cooley publicly aligned himself with Cohen who then perjured himself when he testified that he was a recipient of the April 18, 2001 email to Dennis Riordan. That is how the City Attorney elicited testimony about Spector and a gun while concealing the aspect of the alleged email to the IRS Commissioner's Staff. Most of the trial was about federal tax matters and the record is replete with lies about those matters. Let me repeat what my PD told me: the City Attorney is attempting to sabotage IRS; discredit you; the DA doesn't want the Spector verdict overturned; and there may be a juror plant on your jury. My appellate attorney, who was criminally harassed by the Criminal Stalker for over a year, wrote that my trial is an IRS matter that demands an IRS investigation. The prosecutor then retaliated. All of these matters are intertwined and essentially the City Attorney attempted to cover up Cohen's own conduct by informing jurors that it "annoyed' him. Evidently the contents of the "IRS Binder" annoyed Leonard Cohen. Fortunately, I discovered the fraudulent tax refunds and challenged them as fraud. These matters, together with the transmission of the fraudulent Complaint to IRS together with Cohen's 2001-2005 returns and amended returns as well as fraudulent tax refunds will be addressed in my federal RICO suit. Cohen's testimony that he rectified a mistake in my ownership interest in TH, but included me in 2001-2003 federal tax returns as a partner (who paid taxes), will be addressed. Many federal tax matters have been implicated and the fraud default judgment, evidence of theft, embezzlement, self-dealing, and money laundering, does not change that fact. These issues arose well before the default. Cohen owes me IRS required tax and corporate information which I must now sue over. And much of what he owes me was due approximately six months before he retaliated with his fraud lawsuit that I wasn't served.Gianelli, Kory, and Rice have been advised to cease and desist.Kelley---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:53 PMSubject: Just another crazy engaged in "tax litigation" with the IRS (and I use that term loosely)
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.comMs. Lynch,I am not “upset” that you sent to Mr. Fabian your ridiculous manifesto to Alan Jackson dated September 21, 2009.I merely point out that it has nothing to do with his job description to read it.You are only making a fool out of yourself.The Office of the Chief Trial Counsel intersects with a lot of crazies in tax court.They no doubt have special training on how to deal with them. Believe me you meet the profile.You have filed a tax court petition addressing a discrete issue. The only thing before the tax court (and therefore the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel) at this time is whether the tax court even has jurisdiction to even consider that petition.This is not a general opportunity to share with the tax court and the IRS assigned trial lawyer even grievance you have had since 2009.No one is paying attention.Very truly yours,Stephen R. GianelliAttorney-at-Law (ret.)Crete, Greece