Date: Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:12 PM
Subject: Fwd: Kelley Lynch blogposted email dated Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:53 PM
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com
IRS,
Apart from the Criminal Stalker's pathetic excuses, it doesn't make sense that he would call the Chief Trial Counsel's Office re. an IRS Washington, DC IP address. My Tax Court Petition has nothing to do with the allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud that I reported to IRS Commissioner's Staff and many others. I have also provided IRS with an abundance of evidence.
In any event, Gianelli has some type of personal axe to grind here and we know he is a chronic and pathological liar. He uses this M.O. to infiltrate matters. See his communications with Bruce Cutler. Only an idiot would believe his lies about that situation. In any event, I have been clear - he should feel free to marry Cutler.
Right now - Gianeli's focus is on my Tax Court Petition and all Cohen-related LA Superior Court fraud/perjury matters. I will also contact the IRS Chief Trial Counsel's office about these harassing emails.
Kelley
| 1
Exit Time:
20 Jul 2015 09:27:22
Browser:
IE 11.0
OS:
Win7
Resolution:
1440×900
| Total Visits:
1
Location:
Washington, District of Columbia, United States
IP Address:
Internal Revenue Service (152.220.16.213) [
Search Referral:
www.google.com/#1 (Keywords Unavailable)
Visit Page:
| ||
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:29 PM
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:29 PM
Subject: Kelley Lynch blogposted email dated Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:53 PM
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: BlindDistribution@gmail.com
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: BlindDistribution@gmail.com
Ms. Lynch,
There you go (again) confusing speculation and malicious wishful thinking with fact.
I never said that I “discussed” your tax court petition with the IRS. Nor did I ever have any such discussion.
You wrote to me that the IRS was “reading about” me on your blog, and cut and pasted the activity log on your blog showing that someone using an IRS IP address was on your blog. You implied that I was in trouble or should be worried.
I replied “not to worry” and that “I get along with the office Chief Trial counsel just fine” and that the lawyer representing the IRS in opposition to your tax court petition was a “nice guy” – all of which is true, not of which states that any taxpayer information was discussed at any time.
This is not “rotten logic” it is fact – as is your 10-year pattern of making unfounded, serious accusations of misconduct against people you bear grudges against without any facts to support those accusations.
In addition, tax court proceedings are public record. When the tax court grants the pending motion to dismiss or otherwise issues a decision or other order disposing of the case, that decision will be available to any member of the public, including me, on the tax court website.
Very truly yours,
Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece
______________________________
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@
Date: Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:53 PM
Subject:
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org
Date: Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:53 PM
Subject:
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org
IRS,
I'm not convinced about the proxy ambulance chaser (Gianelli) and his argument re. ex parte communications. First of all, I can assure IRS that Gianelli does not have a power of attorney from me to speak to IRS about any tax matter that involves me whatsoever. This man is a criminal. If I wasn't afforded the opportunity to participate in any communication this criminal had with IRS about my Petition, that would be a serious problem. This man appears to be an agent provocateur/infiltrator. Isn't that why he hunted down Agent Sopko's partner or husband at DOJ? I didn't ask the Court to decide my Petition based on Gianelli's self-proclaimed communications with the gentleman handling the Tax Court Petition at the Chief Trial Counsel's office. I asked the Court to investigate that matter. I think that will protect the communications. I also view this as blatant retaliation.
Kelley