Date: Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:53 PM
Subject:
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com
IRS,
I'm not convinced about the proxy ambulance chaser (Gianelli) and his argument re. ex parte communications. First of all, I can assure IRS that Gianelli does not have a power of attorney from me to speak to IRS about any tax matter that involves me whatsoever. This man is a criminal. If I wasn't afforded the opportunity to participate in any communication this criminal had with IRS about my Petition, that would be a serious problem. This man appears to be an agent provocateur/infiltrator. Isn't that why he hunted down Agent Sopko's partner or husband at DOJ? I didn't ask the Court to decide my Petition based on Gianelli's self-proclaimed communications with the gentleman handling the Tax Court Petition at the Chief Trial Counsel's office. I asked the Court to investigate that matter. I think that will protect the communications. I also view this as blatant retaliation.
Kelley
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@
Date: Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 3:14 AM
Subject: “Motion to supplement the record” in your tax court case
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 3:14 AM
Subject: “Motion to supplement the record” in your tax court case
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Ms. Lynch,
The tax court is not going to decide the pending motion to dismiss except on very narrow grounds including did the IRS serve you with a Notice of Determination and if so whether or not you initiated your tax court petition within 30-days of the date of mailing of that decision.
Your claims that various third parties, including me, are bad people or are “harassing” you are completely irrelevant to the pending motion – just as those same claims were completely irrelevant to your three state court motions that you lost notwithstanding your attempts to interpose those irrelevancies in those Los Angeles Superior Court proceedings as well.
The court is concerned with the issues before it, not your general “poor persecuted me” arguments.
The tax court decides cases based on law, not sympathy.
Very truly yours,
Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@
Date: Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 9:54 AM
Subject: Your pending “Motion to supplement the record” purportedly filed in tax court and published on your blog and in mass emails
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: BlindDistribution@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 9:54 AM
Subject: Your pending “Motion to supplement the record” purportedly filed in tax court and published on your blog and in mass emails
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: BlindDistribution@gmail.com
By the way, Ms. Lynch, a prohibited “ex-parte communication” would be between a party or an attorney and the court concerning a pending matter.
A communication directed only to an attorney for a party by a person other than the court WOULD NOT be an “ex-parte communication”, nor would it be unethical or improper for any reason – IF such a communication in fact occurred.
Attorneys contact each other about pending cases routinely.
Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece