River Deep Blog: Kelley Lynch's Email To IRS, FBI & DOJ Re. Stephen Gianelli's Ongoing Criminal Harassment, Stalking, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:30 PM
Subject:
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>

Hello IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

I have now sent you the very first rough draft of my RICO Complaint against Leonard Cohen; declarations from Linda Carol (and others); the ongoing criminally harassing emails; and other information. This Criminal Stalker (Gianelli) continues to copy in Investigator Frayeh and Vivienne Swanigan. I would like you to review his emails with Swanigan instructing him to harass me with further emails and pass along an official message from that office to me: they are not in a legal conspiracy with Stephen Gianelli. This office permitted Gianelli, beginning with his November 2012 email to Streeter, to harass, slander, and target me and others for well over a year. Finally, in 2014 Swanigan advised him that his emails were no longer necessary, helpful, or wanted. I supose they were up until that point. Who is this woman to copy in my sons and sister?

Please review the emails I've received from this Criminal Stalker for the past couple of days. The issues related to Phil Spector, Cohen, IRS tax matters (related to Cohen), Cohen's lawyers, Bruce Cutler, LAPD's TMU, the vile and vicious email this criminal probably sent me, threats, Coyote Shivers, Mike Conzachi, witnesses (Dan Meade, Paulette Brandt, Linda Carol), and an attack on Ann Diamond.

I have asked Gina Brandt to provide me with any emails she receives that appear to be from me, anyone impersonating me, or an email address that uses my name. I am fully aware of LA Superior Court's shabby evidence standards and Gianelli pretends that my emails (posted on my blog) are forwarded to him. I can prove they were not. Anyone with a subpoena can now.

I would like you to review my son's declaration, Linda Carol's, the other declarations I've sent privately, and my RICO Complaint that I continue to work on. This criminal is out of control. Witness tampering hardly begins to describe this situation. I phoned Agent Wynar/Oakland FBI today as Gianelli advised me in writing that he worked with Agent Wynar on a case. I will subpoena all information related to Gianelli's calls to Agent Wynar at a later point in time.

All the best,

Kelley

To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Cc: wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, mr.synt4xerror@gmail.com,karen@softwheresolutions.com, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>,karen@mccourt.org, mpduke1@msn.com

Dear Mr. GIANELLI:

Please stop copying me on any and all emails to or regarding Kelly Lynch. Your communications are unnecessary, unhelpful, and unwanted.

Thank you.

Vivienne A. Swanigan
Deputy City Attorney
Labor Relations Division

Subject: Fwd: Emails to Kelly Lynch
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
To: Deputy City Attorney Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>
CC: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>,

John Penick <mr.synt4xerror@gmail.com>,Ray Lindsey <raymond.c.lindsey@gmail.com>,karen <karen@mccourt.org>,wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>,Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>

Ms. Swanigan,

Here is an email wherein you recently expressly REQUESTED ME TO SEND several emails to Kelley Lynch clarifying that I have never met or communicated with Sandra Jo Streeter and am not in cahoots with her - which I subsequently did as requested, copy to you.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>
Date: Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:01 PM
Subject: Emails to Kelly Lynch
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>

Since you are still intent on "poking the lion", could you please send emails (several) to Kelly Lynch stating that you are not connected to Sandra Streeter, have never met her, and you are not involved with a conspiracy with her? Because, unfortunately, your poking at Lynch and defending our prosecutor is making her focus more and more on Ms. Streeter and a delusional belief that Streeter and you are cohorts in a conspiracy against her.

Also, could you please not give Lynch any further information about what we are doing/planning? My intent in emailing you about the hearing was just to let you know what happened as a courtesy, not to give you more ammunition to throw at Lynch. I do not like the fact that I have unwittinglin fueled the fires of Kelly Lynch's imaginary Gianelli-Streeter conspiracy by giving you information about what happened at the hearging. - Vivienne

DECLARATION OF RAY CHARLES LINDSEY

I, Ray Charles Lindsey, declare as follows:

1.    I am over the age of eighteen. The following facts are within my personal knowledge and, if called and sworn as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto.

2.    I am a resident of California.

3.    Since approximately 2009, I have been receiving emails from Stephen Gianelli, Susanne Walsh (Leonard Cohen’s fan), and others. Leonard Cohen’s lawyer, Michelle Rice, was copied in on some of these emails.. Apart from Leonard Cohen, I do not know these people and have never met them. These individuals were also posting on the internet about my mother. Most of the emails related to matters involving Leonard Cohen, IRS, and Phil Spector.

4.    My mother was Leonard Cohen’s personal manager for approximately 17 years. They had a falling out in the fall of 2004 to my knowledge. My mother is also a friend of Phil Spector.

5.    On or around May 6, 2013, Ray Lawrence began privately emailing me. I don’t not know him and have never met him. He made serious accusations about my mother and was angry with my Aunt Karen. Karen is my mother’s sister.

6.    While Ray Lawrence was in Minnesota, my mother lived with his roommate, Michael Ingrassia. My mother moved out of their house on June 4, 2013 and shortly thereafter I began receiving an onslaught of emails from him, Stephen Gianelli, and Susanne Walsh. My mother was the target of those emails. Ray Lawrence accused my mother of many things, including stealing Michael Ingrassia’s computer. My mother then sent out an email from Michael Ingrassia confirming that he had given her the computer.

The accusations were confusing and disturbing. Whenever one of these individuals accused my mother of something in their mass emails, she would refute them, asked Gianelli, Walsh, Lawrence, and others, to stop emailing her, asked them to stop contacting her sons, family members, and friends, and/or advised them to cease and desist.

7.    On or around June 18, 2013, I wrote Stephen Gianelli, Susanne Walsh, and Ray Lawrence advising them to stop contacting me and my immediate family because their emails were making me ill. See Exhibit A.

8.    On June 21, 2013, my brother, Rutger Penick, responded to these emails and addressed the fact that he felt Stephen Gianelli was picking on my mother because she is poor. He sent a copy of that email to Ray Lawrence and Susanne Walsh. My mother and I were copied in as well. See Exhibit B.

9.    At some point, Ray Lawrence’s emails made demands on my mother about property and evidence she left at his house with his permission.. He began threatening to destroy them, sell them, or provide her documents to Leonard Çohen’s lawyer, Michelle Rice.  Gianelli and Walsh also sent emails advising Lawrence to send my mother’s evidence and paperwork to Michelle Rice. This was upsetting to my mother and she emailed the recipients of the emails the agreement she and Lawrence had entered into permitting her to store her belongings at his house.

9.    The emails from Ray Lawrence were extremely slanderous and accusatory with respect to my mother and were upsetting and confusing. For the time being, they seem to have stopped.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on July 17, 2013 at Los Angeles, California.

SIGNED & FILED WITH COURT [CONTRA COSTA – 2013; LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT – 2015]
Ray Charles Lindsey

EXHIBIT A

From: Ray Lindsey
Date: Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:50 PM
Subject: I'm getting physically ill
To: Susanne Walsh <sanneka@esenet.dk>
Cc: Ray Lawrence <monchobear@gmail.com>, "STEPHEN R. GIANELLI" <stephengianelli@gmail.com>

Please discontinue contacting anyone in my immediate family. This is causing me to become ill as a result of the consistent bullshit. I just want everything to stop. I know I've added my share to the pool, but this is getting too much for me. I'm getting in over my head and it's hurting my heart to have to see my mother go through as a result of her own actions and the actions of others.

Can't we all just practice compassion for one moment, please.

EXHIBIT B

From: Rutger Penick
Date: Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: I'm getting physically ill
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>, Ray Lawrence <monchobear@gmail.com>, Susanne Walsh <sanneka@esenet.dk>

Stephen shut up already. Live the rest of your worthless life without picking on the poor. I am sure that makes you feel superior.

Sincerely,

Rutger Penick | MCTS:Windows 7

DECLARATION OF LINDA CAROL

I, LINDA CAROL, declare:

1. I am a citizen of the United States who currently resides in Los Angeles, California. I am Paulette Brandt’s roommate. I am over the age of 18 years. I have personal knowledge of the facts contained in this declaration and if called upon to testify I could and would testify competently as to the truth of the facts stated herein.

2. At some point in or around October 2013, I began an apartment search in the Los Angeles area. I searched Craig’s List. Marie Jones posted an ad and I rented a room from her for the months of November and December 2013. At that time, I met Karina Von Watteville a/k/a Karina Fimbel. Ms. Von Watteville was living with Marie Jones and that is how I became acquainted with her. I lived with Marie Jones, Karina Von Watteville, and Marie Jones for two months.

3. Problems arose between Marie Jones and Karina Von Watteville related to monies allegedly owed Ms. Jones with respect to Ms. Watteville’s cats. The money may have related to a security deposit. The cats were using the apartment as their kitty litter box and this upset Ms. Jones. I personally witnessed an incident that involved the police. Ms. Jones and Ms. Von Watteville were arguing about money owed to Ms. Jones and someone called the police. An incident report was taken. Marie Jones was also upset that, due to her habit of trash picking, Karina Von Watteville infested her apartment with bed bugs and cock roaches. I personally witnessed this.

4. I continued to look for a permanent and more appropriate room to rent. Karina Von Watteville advised me that she lived with a woman by the name of Paulette Brandt who had an available guest room for rent. Ms. Von Watteville liked Ms. Brandt very much and said she enjoyed living with her and strongly encouraged me to contact Ms. Brandt about the room. Ms. Von Watteville also explained to me that the apartment was clean, pretty, and assured me that Paulette Brandt was an excellent roommate and friend. At this time, Karina Von Watteville informed me that she paid Paulette Brandt rent of $500/month plus $50/month utilities. I specifically asked about this because Ms. Von Watteville recommended Paulette Brandt and I needed to know what type of rent I would be expected to pay. Ms. Von Watteville also informed me that, prior to moving in with Ms. Brandt, she did not know her. They had a mutual friend who Paulette Brandt knew years earlier in New York City who asked if Ms. Brandt would do her a favor and rent the room to Karina Von Watteville.

5. I contacted Ms. Brandt, visited the apartment, rented the room, and have lived here for over a year now. We get along extremely well. The apartment is well kept, clean, and very pretty. I have my own room, enjoy my privacy, and love living here. I am extremely fond of Paulette Brandt. She is a lovely woman, gracious, generous, extremely intelligent, and funny.

6. At some point, after I moved in, Paulette Brandt and I discussed the fact that Karina Von Watteville owes her rent for the 14 months she lived here. I spoke to Ms. Von Watteville who personally informed me that she felt bad about the situation. Both individuals (Paulette Brandt and Karina Von Watteville) advised me that Ms. Von Watteville intended to pay Ms. Brandt in full when she received her social security check. Ms. Von Watteville confirmed this for me after I moved in with Paulette Brandt.

7. At some point in or around June 2014, Karina Von Watteville advised me that she had received her social security check. After showing me a copy of the lump sum check, Ms. Von Watteville informed me that she had no intention of paying Paulette Brandt. She did not explain why. Ms. Brandt also ran into Karina Von Watteville who advised her that she received the lump sum check and evidently showed her a copy as well.

8. Paulette Brandt sent Ms. Von Watteville a rent demand letter. Karina Von Watteville then began slandering Paulette Brandt and seemed obsessed with a friend of ours, Kelley Lynch. I have known Kelley Lynch for over a year and she is a very nice, courteous, and respectful individual. Karina Von Watteville does not know Ms. Lynch but became increasingly upset with her over Paulette Brandt’s rent demands. Ms. Von Watteville began calling me obsessively about Kelley Lynch. She was bad mouthing her relentlessly. I did not understand why, felt extremely uncomfortable being placed in this position, and felt it simply related to Paulette Brandt’s rent demands. Karina Von Watteville informed me that she planned to have Kelley Lynch investigated and wanted to get her in trouble. Those are her exact words.

9. In or around November 2014, Paulette Brandt filed a Small Claims Complaint against Karina Von Watteville asking that she pay her the rental arrears due and owing. I personally served Karina Von Watteville the Small Claims Complaint. She was extremely angry and completely turned on Ms. Brandt. She continued to slander Paulette Brandt and Kelley Lynch.

10. In or around June 2014, Karina Von Watteville was living in a commercial space she rented under the name of Cover Girl Models. She lived in the space with her two cats. I visited her there on one occasion and was shocked to note that garbage and trash was piled around the room, the cats were using the entire space as their kitty litter box, and it smelled terribly.

11. I also dated a man who informed me that he permitted Karina Von Watteville to stay with him. She left his apartment a mess, infested the apartment with cock roaches, and permitted someone else to stay there with her.

12. Karina Von Watteville evidently permitted her cats to use her room at Paulette Brandt’s apartment as a kitty litter box as well. She personally informed me that, after receiving the formal two months notice to vacate Ms. Brandt’s property, she retaliated by leaving bags of garbage and trash behind and intentionally permitted her cats to urinate and defecate in the room. She also apparently infested Paulette Brandt’s apartment with cock roaches. Karina Von Watteville has infested numerous apartments with bed bugs and cock roaches.

13. I do see Karina Von Watteville from time to time but she no longer speaks to me. I am aware that, after receiving Paulette Brandt’s paperwork, she contacted Leonard Cohen’s lawyer. Kelley Lynch was Cohen’s personal manager, is involved with legal matters related to him, and reported allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud to Internal Revenue Service.

14. Since I have known Kelley Lynch she has informed me that a man by the name of Stephen Gianelli has criminally harassed and stalked her, members of her family, and others. He is now sending Kelley Lynch highly slanderous and harassing emails about me and Paulette Brandt. I do not know this individual. It is my understanding that he offered Karina Von Watteville legal assistance with the Small Claims matter involving Paulette Brandt. Neither Kelley Lynch nor I are parties to that matter. I have seen some of the slanderous and threatening emails Stephen Gianelli has sent Ms. Lynch and have had numerous discussions with people who were present at both Small Claims hearings.

This is an excerpt of Stephen Gianelli’s email confirming that he provided Karina Von Watteville with legal advice and referred to her phone call to Leonard Cohen’s lawyer, Robert Kory.

Ms. Von Watteville followed my advice and never even had to get to the other two defenses I specified; she won the hearing with the first issue out of the box: The claim is time barred under CCP § 339 as arising from the breach of an alleged oral contract. Simple and elegant. No credibility issues to resolve. The shortest distance between point “A” and point “B”. Game, set match.

In contacting Robert Kory with advice about what to do about your disparagement, Ms.Von Watteville did not thereby “insert herself into Leonard Cohen's Criminal Tax Fraud matter”, first because all she did was contact a lawyer who (according to your blog) has extensive knowledge about Kelley Lynch for advice about what do about your email harassment; and second, because there is no pending “Criminal Tax Fraud matter” for Ms.Von Watteville to have inserted herself into.

15. I was copied in on Kelley Lynch’s legal cease and desist letters addressing Ms. Von Watteville’s slanderous comments I (and others) repeated to Ms. Lynch. I felt Ms. Lynch should be aware of what was being said as Ms. Von Watteville does not know her, seemed obsessed with her, and was repeating false information about her. Karina Von Watteville also posted a Gold Record Leonard Cohen gave Kelley Lynch (that Von Watteville photographed) on her Google Plus account, and advised me that Ms. Lynch is an alcoholic. I have no idea why she said this. She has never seen Kelley Lynch drink and Kelley Lynch does not have a substance abuse problems and is most definitely not an alcoholic. These are merely slanderous allegations meant to undermine her credibility. The slander now appears to be retaliation over Paulette Brandt’s attempts to collect the outstanding rent she is owed. I confirmed receipt of Kelley Lynch’s cease and desist letters and assured her that they accurately reflected what I had been told specifically by Karina Von Watteville.

16. I want to reiterate that Karina Von Watteville a/k/a Karina Fimbel personally advised me that she owed Paulette Brandt 14 months rent and utilities and planned to pay her in full once she received her lump sum social security check. I personally saw her waving around a wad of money at the food bank, bragging that she received money (including with respect to an accident she had) and informing people that it was $10,000 in cash. I found it rather disturbing to witness her waving around so much cash in public and bragging about it.

17. I didn’t share most of what I know about Karina Von Watteville, and what she has advised me, with Paulette Brandt because I didn’t want to get in the middle of the situation between them. I considered both women my friends. I am, however, deeply upset that I am now being slandered, by Stephen Gianelli (a man I don’t know), who is attributing the comments he has made to Karina Von Watteville. It is a very disturbing situation. I have never seen any of the activity this individual has now accused Paulette Brandt, Kelley Lynch, or myself of engaging in. We have stable, simple, and down to earth lifestyles. I personally believe this man, a complete stranger, is attempting to intimidate and threaten me and Ms. Von Watteville simply doesn’t want to pay her debts and probably feels she can benefit from a potential relationship with Leonard Cohen. Ms. Von Watteville spends a tremendous amount of energy talking about how attractive she is, the royal families she knows, celebrities she has met, and gifts men shower upon her.

18. I have spent most of my adult life working as a model and actress and am now pursuing a college degree.

I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

This declaration is executed on this 18th day of April 2015 in Los Angeles, California.

______________________________________

Linda Carol

BRUCE CUTLER, LAPD’S TMU, VICIOUS EMAIL PROBABLY SENT BY GIANELLI (WHO CREATES THOSE TYPES OF MONIKERS)

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM
Subject: Kelley Lynch's renewed harassment of Bruce Cutler
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov

BTW, Ms. Lynch, the “bloody stump” email – which I did not author or transmit – is vile and obscene, and sending it to your harassment victim Bruce Cutler today – in light of your long history of documented harassment of Mr. Cutler – gives TMU probably cause to seek a warrant for your arrest for criminal harassment, should Mr. Cutler make that request to TMU.

PHIL SPECTOR MATTER

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:34 PM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

Ms. Lynch,

As I brought to your attention, and not the other way around, the Federal District Court for the Central District of California, by and through the Hon. Paul L. Abrams, Magistrate, has granted Phil Spector’s motion for issuance of the magistrate’s Report and Recommendation re: the disposition of Philip Spector’s pending habeas petition “to the extent that the Court anticipates issuing its Report & Recommendation in this action by September, 2015. The Motion is denied to the extent it seeks the issuance of the Report & Recommendation prior to that time.” (Bold highlighting original; see attached minute order.)

Once the report and recommendation is necessary because Mr. Spector refused to stipulate that the petition can be decided by a magistrate judge. Therefore, the magistrate will generate what is in effect a proposed order setting forth an analysis and proposed disposition, and it will be up to the judge before whom the matter is pending to adopt or not to adopt the recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation will issue by September, and then the judge has an indeterminate time to decide what to do. However, give the poor reputation of S. James Otero in the defense bar, and his conservative leanings (Republican, Ronald Reagan appointee), my prediction is that he will deny the petition, and Mr. Spector will then move onto the 9^th Circuit Court of Appeals.

In the unlikely event that Judge Otero did grant the petition, the People would no doubt appeal to the 9^th Circuit as well, so win, lose or draw, Mr. Spector is unlikely to win his release, if at all, for another two years.

As to why all of this would make me, Leonard Cohen, or anyone else at all uneasy (let alone “desperate”) is unclear.

As for your intended federal lawsuit, you have been saying that ever since you first started emailing me in 2009, and with each passing month, as your communications get wackier and stranger (e.g., the below references to dominatrix’s and “spanking magazines”) that threat seems less and less likely to ever materialize. Nor is any such suit likely to last longer than it takes a federal district court judge to read it and sign a dismissal order on his own motion. Again, no source of great anxiety at all, let alone desperation.

But do have another bottle of wine ladies and/or another Twinkie and/or doobie or rock. Because at this point it’s just an addicts brain damaged ramblings – like the final scene in The Boost.

---Forwarded message---

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:59 AM
Subject: Stephen Gianelli, Criminal Stalker
To: Paulette Brandt, linda carol
Cc: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>

Paulette and Linda,

The Criminal Stalker, who wrote me again yesterday with Karina Von Watteville copied in, seems focused on a woman he contacted. Her name is Gina Brandt, she appears to be an attorney, and she copied me on her response. I have no idea who she is or why Gianelli wrote her. I know this - prior to receiving Gina Brandt's email, Gianelli wrote me about a "Gina Brandt" and indicated that he believed she is Paulette's sister.

I believe the information both of you have regarding the individual KVW lived with (prior to the urgent request permitting her to stay here with the assurances she would pay rent) are important. The individual rented property to her; she was evicted for not paying rent and owed him $4,000; and, she infested his property with cock roaches.

I have located one spanking/S&M magazine and believe copies of the actual magazines KVW appeared in would be good to have.

In any event, due to the fact that Paulette helped this woman, she has now defrauded you, slandered both of you, contacted Leonard Cohen's lawyer, and continues to be involved with "Stephen Gianelli." However, according to the criminal stalker we're the low lifes.

Karina Von Watteville is a complete stranger to me. As both of you know, I have rarely met this woman. You were present at the first hearing Paulette when KVW began explaining to the mediator that "Robert Kory" (Cohen's lawyer) was involved with her defense. At the second hearing, KVW was screaming about Leonard Cohen. They are quite similar - both lie, cheat, steal, slander, and retaliate. Why? They do not like to pay their bills.

I now understand precisely who this woman is. Please keep in mind that these people are desperate; Phil Spector's federal appeal will be decided in the near future; and Cohen and I have a hearing on June 23, 2015. I also intend to file a federal lawsuit.

Stephen GIanelli is moonlighting. He is a lowlife hoodlum who evidently has connections to the mafia. People view him as a psychopath, sleazebag, and inveterate liar. Do keep that joke in mind: How do you know when a lawyer is lying? His lips are moving.

All the best,

Kelley

P.S. Linda, I think your declaration looks great.

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RELATED RESTRAINING ORDERS; NOTICE TO BRUCE CUTLER TO MAINTAIN THAT EVIDENCE

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 4:55 AM
Subject: Your recent emails to Robert Kory and Bruce Cutler
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov

Ms. Lynch,

The reason you were ordered as a condition of your 2012 criminal probation to refrain from contacting Robert Kory, Michelle Rice and Bruce Cutler is that your prior communications we deemed to be harassing and unwanted.

You have now resumed those harassing contacts upon the early termination of your probation.

As I accurately predicted with respect to your 2012 arrest and 2014 remand, I am now predicting that you are again headed back to jail.

Stephen R. Gianelli

Attorney-at-Law (ret.)

Crete, Greece

PHIL SPECTOR

From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:36 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

I don't understand how setting the record straight on the procedural posture of the Spector habeas petition is "harassment".

On Thursday, April 23, 2015, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

> Stephen Gianelli,
> You continue to write me harassing emails about Phil Spector. Yes, you wrote me about the federal appeal. I didn't write you because I don't have
> any details about it.
> Cease and desist. Are you interested in Twinkies? No one here has a substance abuse issue and you do not know us, liar. You are a criminal and you
> belong in prison.
> I have advised you relentlessly to cease and desist. You are now writing me about Coyote Shivers. Speak to Mike Feuer. I agree with Mike Conzachi -
> the City Attorney will never do the right thing and understands they have civil liability. You attempt to infiltrate matters. That's why the CIA, NSA, and
> FSB would never hire you. You're an amateur agent provocateur/infiltrator, and missed your calling - a guard at Auswitz.
> Stop harassing me, Paulette Brandt, Linda Carol, my witnesses, and my family. You do not know us and never will.
> Kelley Lynch

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:34 PM
> Subject:
> To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
>
>
> Ms. Lynch,
>
>
>
> As I brought to your attention, and not the other way around, the Federal District Court for the Central District of California, by and through the Hon. Paul L. Abrams, Magistrate, has granted Phil Spector’s motion for issuance of the magistrate’s Report and Recommendation re: the disposition of Philip Spector’s pending habeas petition “to the extent that the Court anticipates issuing its Report & Recommendation in this action by September, 2015. The Motion is denied to the extent it seeks the issuance of the Report & Recommendation prior to that time.” (Bold highlighting original; see attached minute order.)
>
>
>
> Once the report and recommendation is necessary because Mr. Spector refused to stipulate that the petition can be decided by a magistrate judge. Therefore, the magistrate will generate what is in effect a proposed order setting forth an analysis and proposed disposition, and it will be up to the judge before whom the matter is pending to adopt or not to adopt the recommendation.
>
>
>
> The Report and Recommendation will issue by September, and then the judge has an indeterminate time to decide what to do. However, give the poor reputation of S. James Otero in the defense bar, and his conservative leanings (Republican, Ronald Reagan appointee), my prediction is that he will deny the petition, and Mr. Spector will then move onto the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
>
>
>
> In the unlikely event that Judge Otero did grant the petition, the People would no doubt appeal to the 9th Circuit as well, so win, lose or draw, Mr. Spector is unlikely to win his release, if at all, for another two years.
>
>
>
> As to why all of this would make me, Leonard Cohen, or anyone else at all uneasy (let alone “desperate”) is unclear.
>
>
>
> As for your intended federal lawsuit, you have been saying that ever since you first started emailing me in 2009, and with each passing month, as your communications get wackier and stranger (e.g., the below references to dominatrix’s and “spanking magazines”) that threat seems less and less likely to ever materialize. Nor is any such suit likely to last longer than it takes a federal district court judge to read it and sign a dismissal order on his own motion. Again, no source of great anxiety at all, let alone desperation.
>
>
>
> But do have another bottle of wine ladies and/or another Twinkie and/or doobie or rock. Because at this point it’s just an addicts brain damaged ramblings – like the final scene in The Boost.
>
>
>
>

From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:54 AM
Subject:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Just as I thought, Mr. Shivers' representatives aren't interested in your daily drama either.

You thought what exactly? That he'd be so into his assignment that he'd go after every attorney who agrees with the appellate decision in People v. Shivers?

Sane people don't respond in that manner.

And my impressions were spot-on.

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

LIES THE CRIMINAL STALKER HARASSES ME OVER; COYOTE SHIVERS

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>

Date: Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:46 AM
Subject: Re: Kelley Lynch email dated Wednesday, April 22, 2015 12:16 AM
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov

Ms. Lynch,

You have your opinions and I have mine.

And no one is going to have me arrested for expressing them, after you have copied me with over then thousand abusive, accusatory and harassing emails since I was required to ban you from my law blog in 2009.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli

Attorney-at-law (ret.)

Crete, Greece

From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 12:16 AM
To: m conzachi; Stephen Gianelli; irs.commissioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; lrohter; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; stan.garnett; USLawEnforcement@google.com; Feedback; mike.feuer@lacity.org; mayor.garcetti
Subject: Re: People v. Shivers

Stephen Gianelli,

I am advising you once again to cease and desist. This is criminal conduct. I am not involved with the Coyote Shivers legal matters with Perrette but have my opinions. I have brought your email (arguing the City Attorney's case against Coyote Shivers) to the attention of the investigator. Harass him so he can personally have you arrested. Do not contact me, my friends, Paulette Brandt, or my witnesses again. The would include Dan Meade who views you as dangerously unstable.

Kelley Lynch

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Mike,

Stephen Gianelli, a lawyer who has been criminally harassing and stalking me, my sons, Paulette Brandt, and others for approximately six years now, appears to have an interest in the Coyote Shivers matter. He has mentioned an investigator who I assume is you. Therefore, I do believe that you personally should review this information. This criminal is moonlighting for someone. I have contacted LAPD's TMU, District Attorney, and City Attorney about this ongoing criminal conduct. After all, many people being harassed, stalked, threatened, and intimidated are residents of Los Angeles. This man, who I do NOT know, was privately communicating with my then minor son. I can assure you that I do not know if this man is a sexual predator, member of NAMBLA, or someone out front with a gun. My son addressed the fact that these criminally harassing emails made him physically ill. I have now provided LA Superior Court with this declaration which was also submitted to a court in Contra Costa.

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2014/09/ray-charles-lindsey-kelley-lynchs-son.html

https://www.scribd.com/doc/157116027/Kelley-Lynch-Leonard-Cohen-IRS-Ray-Lawrence-Stephen-Gianelli-Etc

The issues this man writes about are, as my son noted, Phil Spector, IRS, and Leonard Cohen. I have filed a motion addressing Cohen's fraud and perjury and a hearing is scheduled for June 23, 2015. I am filing a motion asking LA Superior Court to vacate the fraud domestic violence order. The Boulder order was NOT a domestic violence order and the Boulder Combined Court confirmed that in writing and provided evidence explaining why Paulette Brandt (who already testified about this situation) and I were told repeatedly that the order expired on February 15, 2009. I was not aware that the order was domestic violence during my trial, when my appellate attorney wrote my appeal, or when I was researching information for the writ of habeaus corpus I filed detailing much of the insanity that has arisen since I reported Leonard Cohen's tax fraud to IRS on April 15, 2005. LA Superior Court asked me "Is this your boyfriend?" The Colorado order was registered using Domestic Violence Form 600. I did not agree to any order (specifically) Colorado based on fraud, perjury, or lies. Leonard Cohen confessed, on the witness stand during my alleged trial in 2012, that he changed his testimony from one hearing to the next. He also testified that I never stole from him. I suppose he'll now lie and say he meant I never stole a potted plant from his front porch.

I have sent your articles (on restraining order terrorism) to the DOJ and suggested that they read them.

I want to be clear about something: I have no issues with LAPD's TMU. I have spoken to Detective Viramontes numerous times and he was honest, professional, and helpful. He did advise me that Leonard Cohen was not comfortable with my requests for tax information and wondered why he didn't simply provide me with the IRS required tax information. Good question and that is now before the Court as well. I have asked Judge Hess to clarify the ambiguous judgment and there is precedence for doing so. Leonard Cohen does not even bother attending hearings. He simply sends his lawyers, who are paid witnesses, to court.

Stephen Gianelli is a criminal. He is moonlighting for someone and refuses to cease and desist. He is an absolute bald-faced liar and psychopath. Paulette Brandt and I have personally spoken with LAPD detectives about this criminal conduct. He works in tandem with Leonard Cohen's fan, Susanne Walsh and worked with Phil Spector's former assistant, Michelle Blaine, to have my email accounts and blogs shut down. She stole nearly $1 million from Spector and is the female Leonard Cohen: a bald faced liar and thief. Leonard Cohen stole from me; embezzled approximately $6.7 million from his so-called retirement account, and failed to serve me the summons and complaint. Gianelli belongs in prison. I want you to be clear about that fact. I wouldn't view his interest in Coyote Shivers as benign. And, do note - he cc'd the District Attorney's office (investigator on the Phil Spector case) and Swanigan of the City Attorney's office. She is the individual who encouraged him to continue harassing me and to pass along an insane message from their office to me. I've seen her on the witness stand and have provided IRS, FBI, and DOJ with my personal opinions.

I've asked Mayo Garcetti what he feels can be done to bring this criminal harassment to an end. I am awaiting his response. Gianelli now has it out for Paulette Brandt and just contacted a lawyer, Gina Brandt, while attempting to gather information. Gina Brandt does not know Paulette Brandt. I would like to advise you that the Phil Spector federal appeal matter should be decided in the not too distant future. Gianelli argues, from my position, prosecution theories. You can look here. According to Spector's experts, Clarkson's DNA was on the ammunition. Gianelli is also targeting and harassing (slandering) a former friend of Leonard Cohen's, Ann Diamond. He is harassing every witness who has provided me with a declaration. This man is dangerously unstable and has alluded to the fact that he may have connections with the mafia.

Stephen Gianelli has been advised countless times to cease and desist. He refuses to do so and appears aggressive and amused by his vicious tactics.

All the best,

Kelley

P.S. If you're interested in Paulette Brandt, Ann Diamond, and my interviews with this small internet site, have a listen. You can also review Gianelli's slanderous comments and what his focus is. That would include, but is not limited to,Leonard Cohen's criminal tax fraud, the woman who shot herself at Spector's, and the Spector forensic science and DNA. Another individual, who I do not actually know, responded to Gianelli re. the issue with Clarkson's DNA being on the ammunition. It's addressed in the appeal brief.

Truth Sentinel Episode 40 (Phil Spector, truth, lies, guilt and innocence, murder trial)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB1WMxTwnHg

Truth Sentinel Episode 39 (Leonard Cohen, truth, lies, guilt, innocence, law, MK Ultra)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVXTY0ATTR8

Restraining Order Terrorism:

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/restraining-order-terrorism-we-have-arrived/

http://www.avoiceformen.com/restraining-order-terrorism/shivers-vs-the-restraining-order-mafia/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:48 AM
Subject: People v. Shivers
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>

Ms. Lynch,

Although I am retired, I am still licensed and try to keep up with the appellate decisions coming out of the California Courts of Appeal and the Supreme Court. In reviewing the decisions of the last week I came across the opinion of the Appellate Department of the LA Superior Court AFFIRMING the criminal conviction of your “buddy” Francis “Coyote” Shivers for violating a restraining order and for criminal harassment using an electronic communications device a/k/a Twitter.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/262578355/People-v-Francis-Coyote-Shivers-Opinion-of-the-Los-Angeles-County-Superior-Court-Appellate-Division-AFFIRMING-His-Criminal-Harassment-Conviction

I put “buddy” in quotes because (although you have reached out to Shivers and contacted an investigator hired on his behalf and championed his “conspiracy” theory on your blog) even Mr. Shivers knows you are a crazy lunatic and he has had nothing to do with you.

In any event, the opinion now puts to rest the nonsense claims that he was “targeted” by a conspiracy between a celebrity and the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office has you have claimed. Instead, he ran into the protected person at a restaurant and instead of simply leaving as the injunction required him to do he approached her table, shouted “she is harassing me” and filmed the protected person’s table with his camera phone. He then took to Twitter, and using a hash tag for NCIS, announced that he was returning to the same restaurant for dinner that night, falsely claimed that he was the protected person under the restraining order, and urged the public – if they saw her enter the restaurant – to call the police. In other words, Shivers was simply GUILTY as the jury found him to be, and no error was committed at his trial. The two of you do have that in common, although the similarity ends there. (Shivers is in a relationship and gainfully employed.)

EMAIL TO GINA BRANDT RE. ANY EMAILS ALLEGED TO BE FROM MY ACCOUNT

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:53 PM
Subject: Fwd: Gina Brandt
To: Gina Brandt <gbrandt@pszjlaw.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>

Gina,

If you have an email from me (other than responding to your email to me) would you forward it to me? This Criminal Stalker is falsely accusing me of many things. That now includes harassing you. I do not know you; he wrote me about you; thought you were Paulette Brandt's sister; and I never sent you an email except to confirm the ones you sent me. If someone has sent you emails using my name or email address I would like to be informed.

I have no idea who this man is but he is witness tampering with every individual who has provided me with declarations I submitted to the Court and is one of the most vile, vulgar individuals I've ever met in my life. He is obviously on someone's payroll. The issues involved Leonard Cohen, IRS and tax fraud, and Phil Spector. Also, witness tampering, intimidation, stalking, harassment, etc.

Paulette Brandt's sister is a lawyer but that's neither here nor there. Gianelli's interest in Phil Spector's former assistant/girlfriend and my witness is of interest.

Thank you very much. If you are copied on emails by anyone using my name, I can assure you that it is not me. This man also pretends to forward emails, etc. It makes one really concerned about LA Superior Court's evidence standards where someone with motive can merely take the stand and testify that they know who owns an email account with no evidence to support that fact. For instance, the account owner's information obtained via subpoena. I find that frightening. You could set anyone in the world up in that manner.

All the best,

Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:56 PM
Subject: Gina Brandt
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

Ms. Lynch,

Gina Brandt emailed you for the sole reason that YOU have been emailing her (I sent her one email and the cc’s on it were blind.)

Obviously, you looked up her contact information on the internet.

Your life really is becoming more of a low-rent drama that ever.

I never even knew that there were people like Ms. Brandt, Ms. Carol, and you – living in the fringes of society in Los Angeles, formerly tangentially related to modeling and/or the entertainment industry, and permanently assigned to underclass status, all living in the same marginal neighborhood, flailing away at the world.

Really sad.

I guess long term substance abuse and hopelessness will do that to a person.

GINA BRANDT

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:56 PM
Subject: Gina Brandt
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

Ms. Lynch,

Gina Brandt emailed you for the sole reason that YOU have been emailing her (I sent her one email and the cc’s on it were blind.)

Obviously, you looked up her contact information on the internet.

Your life really is becoming more of a low-rent drama that ever.

Really sad.

I guess long term substance abuse and hopelessness will do that to a person.

MIKE CONZACHI’S RESPONSE RE. GIANELLI’S INTEREST IN COYOTE SHIVERS MATTER WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY OF LOS ANGELES

From: Michael Conzachi <mconzachi@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: People v. Shivers
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Kelly,

I wish you success in your endeavors as I know this has been difficult for you, however there is nothing more I can do for Francis.

I know it's unfair, but the reality is that the City of LA will not, under any circumstances do the right thing as they would open themselves up for significant civil liability. Your recourse would be to obtain an attorney who would be willing to see this through for you and of course the cost would be prohibitive.

In the future, do not include me in the list of "cc" recipients as I am concentrating my efforts on military issues.

Thanks,,,,, MC

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
To: m conzachi <mconzachi@yahoo.com>; Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>; irs.commissioner <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>; Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>; "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>; Doug.Davis <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>; Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>; MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>; nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>; fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>; rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>; khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>; blourd <blourd@caa.com>; Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>; a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>; wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>; Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>; glenn.greenwald <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>; lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>; Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>; hailey.branson <hailey.branson@latimes.com>; stan.garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>; "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>; Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>; mike.feuer@lacity.org; mayor.garcetti <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: People v. Shivers

Stephen Gianelli,

Kelley Lynch

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Mike,

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2014/09/ray-charles-lindsey-kelley-lynchs-son.html

https://www.scribd.com/doc/157116027/Kelley-Lynch-Leonard-Cohen-IRS-Ray-Lawrence-Stephen-Gianelli-Etc

I have sent your articles (on restraining order terrorism) to the DOJ and suggested that they read them.

Stephen Gianelli has been advised countless times to cease and desist. He refuses to do so and appears aggressive and amused by his vicious tactics.

All the best,

Kelley

Truth Sentinel Episode 40 (Phil Spector, truth, lies, guilt and innocence, murder trial)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB1WMxTwnHg

Truth Sentinel Episode 39 (Leonard Cohen, truth, lies, guilt, innocence, law, MK Ultra)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVXTY0ATTR8

Restraining Order Terrorism:

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/restraining-order-terrorism-we-have-arrived/

http://www.avoiceformen.com/restraining-order-terrorism/shivers-vs-the-restraining-order-mafia/

Ms. Lynch,

https://www.scribd.com/doc/262578355/People-v-Francis-Coyote-Shivers-Opinion-of-the-Los-Angeles-County-Superior-Court-Appellate-Division-AFFIRMING-His-Criminal-Harassment-Conviction

KELLEY LYNCH EMAIL TO MIKE CONZACHI RE. GIANELLI’S INTEREST IN THE COYOTE SHIVERS/CITY ATTORNEY MATTER

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:14 PM
Subject: Fwd: People v. Shivers
To: m conzachi <mconzachi@yahoo.com>, Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>

Mike,

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2014/09/ray-charles-lindsey-kelley-lynchs-son.html

https://www.scribd.com/doc/157116027/Kelley-Lynch-Leonard-Cohen-IRS-Ray-Lawrence-Stephen-Gianelli-Etc

I have sent your articles (on restraining order terrorism) to the DOJ and suggested that they read them.

Stephen Gianelli has been advised countless times to cease and desist. He refuses to do so and appears aggressive and amused by his vicious tactics.

All the best,

Kelley

Truth Sentinel Episode 40 (Phil Spector, truth, lies, guilt and innocence, murder trial)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB1WMxTwnHg

Truth Sentinel Episode 39 (Leonard Cohen, truth, lies, guilt, innocence, law, MK Ultra)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVXTY0ATTR8

Restraining Order Terrorism:

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/restraining-order-terrorism-we-have-arrived/

http://www.avoiceformen.com/restraining-order-terrorism/shivers-vs-the-restraining-order-mafia/

Ms. Lynch,

https://www.scribd.com/doc/262578355/People-v-Francis-Coyote-Shivers-Opinion-of-the-Los-Angeles-County-Superior-Court-Appellate-Division-AFFIRMING-His-Criminal-Harassment-Conviction

OUT OF THE BLUE, GIANELLI BEINGS HARASSING ME OVER COYOTE SHIVERS AND SENDS ME THE INANE APPELLATE OPINION

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:48 AM
Subject: People v. Shivers
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>

Ms. Lynch,

https://www.scribd.com/doc/262578355/People-v-Francis-Coyote-Shivers-Opinion-of-the-Los-Angeles-County-Superior-Court-Appellate-Division-AFFIRMING-His-Criminal-Harassment-Conviction

MOTION BEFORE JUDGE HESS (CASE NO. BC338322), ETC.

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:45 AM
Subject: Linda Carol declaration posted on your blog
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

Ms. Lynch,

The general pathos you seek to evoke by attempting to inject the soap opera increasingly is your life into a pending motion to reconsider vacating a decade old default judgment entered in BC338322, dismissing it and/or allowing you to defend it on the merits (originally filed during the fall of 2013 and denied January 17, 2014) is not aiding your cause.

It just makes the body of your prolific post judgment email communications to the plaintiff and his counsel, and your never-ending attempts to relitigate that which was finally determined in 2006 look exactly like what it is: Pure harassment.

Second, the more you denigrate the associates of your associates by painting them as lowlife degenerates, the more you clarify to the world how low you – and they – have all fallen, Paulette Brandt included. If you associate with trash, and live with trash, what does that say about you? Therefore, if your characterizations of Ms. Von Watteville that you have cobbled together in the form of Ms. Carol’s unsigned declaration are accurate, you are not only sliming her, you are sliming her long term friend Linda Carol and you are sliming Ms. Von Watteville’s long term housemate Paulette Brandt, and (because you are a long term housemate of Carol and Brandt as well) you are sliming yourself.

Slander is not a zero sum game, where the slandered is diminished and the slanderer is acquitted or elevated. Often, as in this instance, the slandered only diminishes herself.

Of course, logic is not your strong suit, and neither is it Ms. Brandt’s or Ms. Carole’s.

GIANELLI’S HARASSMENT OF DAN MEADE

From: Daniel Meade <trimesamten1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:56 AM
Subject: Fwd: The Colorado order says on its face that "This Protection Order DOES NOT EXPIRE"
To: kelley lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Daniel Meade <trimesamten1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: The Colorado order says on its face that "This Protection Order DOES NOT EXPIRE"
To: "STEPHEN R. GIANELLI" <stephengianelli@gmail.com>

Mr. Gianelli,

What is your problem?

I asked you not to communicate with me. I couldn't care less what you have to say or think.

Why not be a nice fellow and have some manners.

You are just being a silly pest.

So please piss off.

Dan Meade

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 1:18 PM, STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:

At page one of the 2008 Colorado order (attached to the linked FORM DV-600) is a box stating and appearing as below, in 16-point bold type:

This Protection Order DOES NOT EXPIRE and only the Court can change this Order.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/111041974/California-Registration-of-Leonard-Cohen-s-Restraining-Order-Against-Kelley-Lynch-Filed-May-2-2011#scribd

This is the same order bearing Kelley Lynch’s 2008 signature acknowledging her receipt of a copy in open court and that Michelle Rice transmitted to Kelley Lynch in 2011 attached to Rice’s Cease and Desist letter that Kelley Lynch replied to.

SUSANNE WALSH COORDINATED HARSSMENT WITH GIANELLI RE. THE FRAUD DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ORDER & THE MOTION I INTEND TO FILE IN THAT MATTER

From: susanne walsh <sanneka@esenet.dk>
Date: Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: The Colorado order says on its face that "This Protection Order DOES NOT EXPIRE"
To: "STEPHEN R. GIANELLI" <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: PAULETTEBRANDT8@gmail.com

Once again Kelley Lynch made it on the Public Danish Radio, I am not really sure what the anniversary was about, but something about two years ago she was sentenced for harassing, threatening and slandering Leonard Cohen and others, and was ordered to attend anger management classes and alcohol abuse treatment..

It is NOT crazy that people, who are harassed by Kelley Lynch to seek advise from others, who have been through the same thing. It is NOT crazy to have a permanent order of protection against someone who is obviously sick and abusive, it is NOT crazy to use legal terms for a case of prosecusion, that may not fit exactly to the defendants wishes. It is NOT crazy for the IRS to pay a refund of taxes to a person who have paid taxes on money stolen from him. It is Not crazy for people who have been slandered and and lied about for years to speak up and defend themselves. However, it IS crazy that a person for an entire decade, write to the IRS, DOJ, FBI and numereous others public offices about Leonard cohen stealing millions of dollars from her, for keep on accusing same man for criminal tax fraud, when he has never been accused, arrested or prosecuted for that crime, by the IRS. It IS crazy to keep on telling the same public offices about Phil Spector and the "thre different gun stories", the Cuba incident or the Yom Kippur war, about Leonard Cohen's daughther dancing on a bed or how Cohen sexually harassed her. The attached picture does not really show a woman who is being sexually harassed, it shows a woman who is very much in love with a man who obviously just want to get away from her. It is crazy to accuse Mr. Gianelli for falsly accusing Ann Diamond of stalking Leonard Cohen, I did read her book "The man next door" where she tells about her obsession with Cohen and how she followed him all over Europe and Canada for years and hoped he would marry her. It IS crazy to write to Bruce Cutler, a man who testified that he had been harassed by Lynch everyday for several years, whom she (and her mother) dreamed of her marrying. It IS crazy to claim that she will call Oliver Stone to the witness stand, because somebody "accused" her of having sex with him, more than ten years ago. In fact everything about Kelley Lynch is crazy. Instead of getting treatment for her alcohol abuse and her mental problems, getting a job where she can support herself, reparing her relationship with her family and especially her children, she sits and fantasize about the revenge she can get on the people SHE has hurt, and with another old disgruntled "has been", dream up some conspiricies and ways to harm, sue and threaten people. Mr, Gianelli has given so much free legal advise to Ms. Lynch, but instead of being grateful, she turns on him, slander, lie and harass him. Yes, a lot of crazy things going on, but put the hat on the head it fits.

GIANELLI CONTINUES TO CRIMINALLY HARASS PAULETTE BRANDT

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI

Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 6:18 PM

To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

Cc: PAULETTEBRANDT8@GMAIL.COM

Subject: The Colorado order says on its face that "This Protection Order DOES NOT EXPIRE"

At page one of the 2008 Colorado order (attached to the linked FORM DV-600) is a box stating and appearing as below, in 16-point bold type:

This Protection Order DOES NOT EXPIRE and only the Court can change this Order.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/111041974/California-Registration-of-Leonard-Cohen-s-Restraining-Order-Against-Kelley-Lynch-Filed-May-2-2011#scribd

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 9:18 AM
Subject: The Colorado order says on its face that "This Protection Order DOES NOT EXPIRE"
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: PAULETTEBRANDT8@gmail.com

At page one of the 2008 Colorado order (attached to the linked FORM DV-600) is a box stating and appearing as below, in 16-point bold type:

This Protection Order DOES NOT EXPIRE and only the Court can change this Order.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/111041974/California-Registration-of-Leonard-Cohen-s-Restraining-Order-Against-Kelley-Lynch-Filed-May-2-2011#scribd

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:53 AM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
MATTERS BEFORE LA SUPERIOR COURT; GIANELLI IS NOT ATTORNEY OF RECORD; KORN & KORY; AND A THREAT TO ME, PAULETTE, AND LINDA.

SENT VI ELECTRONIC MAIL ONLY

Kelley A. Lynch

1754 N. Van Ness Avenue

Hollywood, California 90028

Ms. Lynch,

To paraphrase your advice for Jeffery Kory, if you have motions and/or other court filings to make, file them and then attend the hearing(s).

Everything else is pure harassment.

If you persist on this path, neither you nor your other housemates are going to enjoy the legal consequences.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli

Attorney-at-Law (ret.)

Crete, Greece

HARASSMENT RE. ANN DIAMOND AND SLANDEROUS EMAIL ABOUT ANN DIAMOND

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:00 PM
Subject: How transparent can you get "mickjaggerscat" (who also posted on the LC forum in 2012 that she lived next door to Cohen)
To: anndiamond2011@gmail.com

Dear mickjaggerscat a/k/a Ann Diamond: Nice try, but clearly YOU are the one with the (anti-Cohen) agenda if you can read the linked 2008 permanent Colorado restraining order, page 1 (that Kelley Lynch also signed for) and come away with even a mistaken impression that the order would have expired a year later in 2009.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/111041974/California-Registration-of-Leonard-Cohen-s-Restraining-Order-Against-Kelley-Lynch-Filed-May-2-2011#scribd (Scroll down the 2008 Colorado order.)

At page one of the 2008 permanent Colorado order (attached to the linked FORM DV-600) is a box stating and appearing as below, in 16-point bold type:

This Protection Order DOES NOT EXPIRE and only the Court can change this Order.

On page two of three of the 2008 permanent Colorado order (attached to the linked FORM DV-600) is Kelley Lynch signature under the preprinted language: “By signing I acknowledge receipt of this Order.”

On page three of three of the 2008 permanent Colorado order (attached to the linked FORM DV-600) is the following language under the 22 point bold type face statement:

NOTICE TO THE RESTRAINED PERSON

“You may apply to the court for a modification or a dismissal of a protection order four years after the date of issuance of the Permanent Protection Order”.

GENERAL HARASSMENT RE. LEONARD COHEN, KARINA VON WATTEVILLE, ETC.

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:40 AM
Subject: Your email dated Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:19 AM
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: Karina Von Watteville <karina.inger.v@gmail.com>

Ms. Lynch,

You write “I would like to know where it states in any law book or statute that I should address the legal issues he writes me about re. Cohen matters…”.

As the below email (and the thousands you have sent to me this year alone attest) you have been addressing your (alleged) “legal issues” with Leonard Cohen for some time – years in fact, since about April of 2009. I have been debunking your claims with the record and what the law really say ever since you started sending me emails every day and making me a focus of your various blogs.

So who are you trying to kid by writing hundreds of emails to the IRS and others claiming you are not doing just that?

I do not represent Ms. Von Watteville but you and Linda Carol should be glad that I do not. Your preparing slanderous declarations and now (in the referenced email) going so far to claim that a woman is a prostitute, then posting those allegations on your publicly available blog under circumstances wherein you claim you don’t know the object of your slander means that you have published these slanderous per se statements without knowing they are true or not.

If I did represent Ms. Watteville I would sue both you and Ms. Carol and take your videotaped depositions as soon as you were both served and then prosecute the case to judgment out of general principle. Then I would summon you both to court every 120 days to conduct a debtor’s examination under oath as the law allows.

Publicly calling someone a liar is one thing, but publicly alleging they are a prostitute is quite another. You both had better hope that Ms. Von Watteville does not find the means to pursue this outrageous slander of yours in a court of law.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli

Attorney-at-Law (ret.)

Crete, Greece

---Forwarded message---

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:19 AM
Subject:
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org

Hello IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

I don't know why the Criminal Stalker has written me and stated that Linda Carol's declaration is unsigned. There was a minor correction that I've addressed with you privately. I do not know Karina Von Watteville so her "degenerate" nature is not anything that concerns me. I have hardly ever spoken to this woman and wouldn't associate with her if my life depended on it.

Stephen Gianelli is very clear that his criminal harassment and stalking is meant to make it appear that I am the individual engaged in "pure harassment." I would like to know where it states in any law book or statute that I should address the legal issues he writes me about re. Cohen matters with an attorney that has not formally entered an appearance with the court.

Stephen Gianelli does not know where I reside or with whom. I do not know this stalker at all. He has simply targeted me, my sons, sister, and every witness who has provided me with a declaration. This criminal conduct has gone on for nearly six straight years - since this criminal first allegedly communicated with Kory/Rice.

For the record, Von Watteville's drama (and attempt to defraud Paulette Brandt) is not my soap opera. This woman does not know me. At the first hearing, she began raising Robert Kory as her defense and even confused the mediator. At the second hearing, she began ranting in the hallway about Leonard Cohen. She is the individual who contacted Robert Kory after receiving Paulette Brandt's rent demand letter and then obtained legal representation from the criminal stalker, Stephen Gianelli, in Paulette Brandt's Small Claims matter. She is also the individual who began slandering and lying about people. I have discovered a number of other very disturbing issues but will discuss them with you privately at this time until these matters are confirmed.

I would like to point out that this declaration does not contain the information that Linda Carol provided about Von Watteville's past (as told to Ms. Carol and Ms. Jones) life as a hooker and stripper. I don't think all of these issues need to be addressed at this point in time.

All the best,

Kelley

From: Paulette Brandt
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:20 AM
Subject: Fwd: Your email of today to the City Attorney
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM
Subject: Your email of today to the City Attorney
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>

Ms. Lynch,

The City Attorney is well aware of who the criminal harasser ‎is: They obtained a criminal conviction and 18-month jail sentence against her in 2012 and an order revoking her probation and 6-month jail sentence in 2014. (That would be you.)

You also threatened to kill their trial prosecutor as well as then DA Steve Cooley. (I realize you deny this. But what matters is that they BELIEVE you did those things - as they have argued in court.)

Bombarding ‎the City Attorney with thousands of emails since your most recent time in jail, including about Linda Carol and Paulette Brandt, is not going to change that perception. It only reinforces it.

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

ONGOING HARASSMENT WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY & DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICES COPIED IN

From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM
Subject: Your email of today to the City Attorney
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>

Ms. Lynch,

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

GIANELLI’S REPRESENTATION OF KARINA VON WATTEVILLE, SLANDER, HARASSMENT, LEONARD COHEN MATTERS, ETC.

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:45 AM
Subject: Linda Carol declaration posted on your blog
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

Ms. Lynch,

Slander is not a zero sum game, where the slandered is diminished and the slanderer is acquitted or elevated. Often, as in this instance, the slandered only diminishes herself.

Of course, logic is not your strong suit, and neither is it Ms. Brandt’s or Ms. Carole’s.

SLANDEROUS ATTACK ON DAN MEADE OVER THE DECLARATION SUBMITTED TO JUDGE HESS

From: Daniel Meade <trimesamten1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:17 AM
Subject: Fwd: Stalking Leonard
To: kelley lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:46 AM
Subject: RE: Stalking Leonard

To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Daniel Meade is a fawning sycophant who was obviously impressed with your brief display of generosity with money you stole from Leonard Cohen and lays in on a little too thick in his declaration to be taken with a straight face. Yea, I get it. Your home was lovely, your personal assistant was lovely, the breakfast the maid brought him was lovely, and you are goodness and generosity personified – and what lovey taste you have, in a dignified and lovey Zen kind of a way! Just lovely!

Of course this is a far different picture than captured just a few months later by the Los Angeles Sheriff Department video camera during the execution of a civil writ to seize Leonard Cohen’s property a and records. Pool overgrown with algae, the interior of your home littered with pizza boxes, fast food containers, full ashtrays and dirty clothes and dishes. What a difference a few months can make, amiright?

Naturally, Daniel Meade (based on a 5 second phone call) concluded that Leonard Cohen is “an aggressive asshole”, based on a single, brief encounter concluded that Steve Lindsey is “arrogant and entitled” like “rich people tend to be” – because they are!

The really amusing thing about this ridiculous, fawning portrait Meade paints of Kelley Lynch and her “lovely” personal assistant with the poolside service as that is was completely irrelevant to your then pending attempts to vacate Cohen’s default judgment and not be returned to jail on probation violations. So Meade prostrated himself before your loveliness for nothing.

Of course, once Lenard Cohen withdrew his patronage, your Mercedes turned back into a pumpkin, your lovey pool a cesspool, and you are currently hanging out at a far less fabulous venue, that cat infested, dark, cramped 2-bedroom apartment occupied by three substance abusing has-beens.

DECLARATION OF DANIEL J. MEADE

I, Daniel J. Meade, do state and declare as follows:

[…]

I found the home environment to be very loving, uplifted and dignified in a particular sort of Buddhist style. Kelley was a great host and obviously a good and decent mother. It was a very pleasant 5-6 weeks for me. But, during my stay I witnessed a few rather unpleasant incidents: I was well aware that Kelley worked as Leonard Cohen's personal manager. I had been a fan of his music and poetry since the age of One day the phone rang while Kelley was in the shower, I picked up and Leonard Cohen asked “Is Kelley there?” I responded by asking “Who are you?” He replied “I am Leonard.” I then simply said “Leonard who?” and his response was to become angry. He then hung up on me. I actually meant this as a joke. Of course, I knew it was Leonard Cohen. His voice is very recognizable. Later that morning, Mr. Cohen emailed Kelley a very personal and vicious letter. She read it to me and I could not believe what an abusive, humorless, and aggressive asshole he was to her. My little dream of the man who wrote these profound song lyrics immediately went down the local toilet in Los Angeles at that time. I asked Kelley to give me a copy of this letter so I could share it with the world at large and inform them about this man's true nature. I was in disbelief at his level of hostility particularly given the fact that he holds himself out to the world as some sort of religious sage. He was clearly jealous of my presence. Kelley discreetly declined to provide me with a copy of this exceedingly disturbing email. I do not believe she refused to give me the letter simply to protect her position as Mr. Cohen’s personal manager. I believe she declined out of a sense of respect for Leonard Cohen and may have been trying to keep his weaknesses and unconscionable conduct towards her private.

From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 7:58 AM
To: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI
Cc: Ann Diamond; Susanne Walsh; irs.commissioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; lrohter; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; stan.garnett; USLawEnforcement@google.com; Feedback; mike.feuer@lacity.org
Subject: Re: Stalking Leonard

Gianelli and Walsh,

I have been clear that I don't want to receive criminally harassing emails from either of you. My sons have been clear also. Please review this information and the declarations/evidence attached. The people, such as Dan Meade, who have noted that you need psychiatric help are intelligent. I do not want to hear from either of you. If Leonard Cohen wants to slander Ann Diamond, lie about their past relationship, falsely accuse her of stalking him, and lie about Mick Jagger obtaining a restraining order, he should be a man and write his own emails. He can also remind his daughter that she shouldn't make public statements like she did at Concordia and then Freda Guttman's daughter won't repeat it to her mother.

Cease and desist, psychopaths.

Kelley Lynch

https://www.scribd.com/doc/157116027/Kelley-Lynch-Leonard-Cohen-IRS-Ray-Lawrence-Stephen-Gianelli-Etc

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:46 AM
Subject: RE: Stalking Leonard
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

DECLARATION OF DANIEL J. MEADE

I, Daniel J. Meade, do state and declare as follows:

[…]

Gianelli and Walsh,

Cease and desist, psychopaths.

Kelley Lynch

https://www.scribd.com/doc/157116027/Kelley-Lynch-Leonard-Cohen-IRS-Ray-Lawrence-Stephen-Gianelli-Etc

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 9:44 PM, STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:

Ms. Diamond,

I read an essay where you describe some kind of mystical connection between yourself and Leonard Cohen beginning with an incident when you were a young girl standing on a street corner and, by chance, Cohen stopped at a traffic light behind the wheel and happened to make eye-contact with you thereby enabling some deep, mutual soul-connection and foretelling a future relationship.

I also read a story wherein you describe applying for a small grant do travel to Hydra. You spend the entire piece describing NOT running into Leonard Cohen, even though you walked to his house on several occasions and stared up at the home hoping he would emerge. You basically spent a season cooped up in a cramped and windowless room, without air-conditioning, and only a hot-plate on which to prepare your meals while you whiled away your days speculating about Cohen’s network of informants on the island and whether he was aware of your presence there. Finally, on the day you departed, you describe coming face-to-face with Cohen in the harbor area and some semi- nonverbal message he gave you. That was a lot of discomfort to endure for an entire summer simply to hope to run into Leonard Cohen and came off as somewhat Cohen obsessed and stalker-like.

In another essay, which you took down from your blog after some commented that it made it appear that you were stalking Cohen, you describe sitting for hours on a park bench that looked directly at Cohen’s apartment building looking up at his windows looking for some sign of movement.

An objective reader might draw the conclusion that you were and are obsessed with Leonard Cohen and that perhaps you moving next door to Cohen was not a “coincidence” after all.

You also have written pieces that caused me to question how much of your perception is reality based, for example the essay you published about your theory that the British Royal family engaged in devil worship/animal sacrifice/sexual orgies on an island, and how you bicycled out to the evil locus of these past events, and that on the way back to your accommodation birds became spirits and seemed to be pursuing and speaking to you.

As for the Rolling Stones, I am told they did obtain a restraining order against you, and instead of denying it you have always put it off to a “misunderstanding”. That small (but interesting) data point does lend credence to the theory you were a bit of a groupie who tended to pursue famous men to the point of wearing out your welcome.

Susanne is not the only one who shares the opinions she expressed. Many in the Canadian literary community of your generation agree wholeheartedly. Whether that is out of jealousy over your “relationship” with Leonard Cohen, your literary talent, or because their opinions are more or less accurate observations based on your own writings is not for me to judge.

But your condescending portrayal of Susanne’s opinions as startling or the product of ignorance is disingenuous.

From: susanne walsh [mailto:sanneka@esenet.dk]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 12:56 AM
To: Ann Diamond
Cc: Kelley Lynch; stephengianelli@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Stalking Leonard

Dear Ann Diamond

Yes I did read "The man next door", I found it well written and entertaining, however I do have some doubt to whether it was really memoirs or fiction, if Cohen really INVITED you to follow him around the world and indicate that he may wish to marry you, or if it was wishfull thinking on your part, and thoughts created and developed in your own mind.

After all, you are the same woman, who for years insisted that The Newtown School shooting was all a hoax, that the 20 dead children are alive and well somewhere and that the grieving parents and teachers were all paid actors. You claimed some of the same things around the Boston Marathon shootings. As far as I remember, it should all have been planed by the US Government. So please forgive me if I am a bit suspicious to whether you completely understand the difference between reality and imagination.

Sincerely

Susanne Walsh

ANN DIAMOND ADDRESSES SOME OF THE SLANDER, HARASSMENT, ETC.

From: Ann Diamond

Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 10:44 PM

To: susanne walsh

Subject: Stalking Leonard

Dear Susanne

Thanks for reading The Man Next Door, and for your comments to Mr Gianelli and Ms Lynch. Obviously you didn't read it too carefully or you would have noticed Mr Cohen, who was my neighbour for over 20 years in Montreal, invited me to meet him on Hydra and also suggested I go to Mount Baldy. In 1979 he also invited me along on his UK tour and generously paid for my hotel, meals and transportation for over a week of concerts in 6 cities.

If you think that shows I "stalked" him, I would welcome you to say so in a public forum where we can discuss the details in the open. Since you have read The Man Next Door, maybe you would like to post a review of it online. There is space for this at Amazon and Lulu.

As for my "hoping he would marry me" - that's also inaccurate. As I state in the memoir, I was mystified by his repetition of phrases like "We're getting married" or "My house is waiting for you" - why would he lie about something so personal? Later I learned he did this with many young women. The point of writing about this was to expose the world of abuse and deception that surrounds some well-loved celebrities.

Thanks again for your interest in the truth.

Ann Diamond

LEONARD COHEN AND ANN DIAMOND

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:19 PM
Subject: RE: Stalking Leonard
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: anndiamond2011@gmail.com

Because, Ms. Lynch, Leonard Cohen barely knows that Ann Diamond exists, and would not stoop to slander a person of such lesser literary status.

GRATUITOUS HARASSMENT FROM A MAN WHO ISSUES VEILED (AND NOT SO VEILED) THREATS ALLUDING TO HIS FAMILY’S POSSIBLE MAFIA CONNECTIONS, ITALIAN DESCENT, AND GENERAL HOODLUM BEHAVIOR
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:17 PM
Subject: RE: Stalking Leonard
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: sanneka@esenet.dk

Ms. Lynch,

Given a side-by-side comparison based on any criteria you care to name, family background, social status, level of education, career success, criminal record, relationship success, life-management success, credit score, net worth, good works, looks, or quality of friends and associates, if I am a “low life” then you are the bacteria, on the chewing gum, on the bottom of my “low life” Gucci loafers.

From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 8:22 AM
To: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI
Cc: Ann Diamond; Susanne Walsh; irs.commissioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; lrohter; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; stan.garnett; USLawEnforcement@google.com; Feedback; mike.feuer@lacity.org
Subject: Re: Stalking Leonard

Mike Feuer,

Are you clear? I don't want some low life hood, who belongs in a gas station in Jersey, contacting me. I don't want Walsh, a gossiping lunatic, slandering me, targeting my sons, etc. Everyone who criticizes Leonard Cohen is being targeted. He cannot do it himself? He has to use operatives. Why would someone not representing Cohen go at this many people, do this type of research, argue this many legal positions? Are you a lawyer? Who would you do this for? Paid lawyers wouldn't do it. Everyone that knew Cohen is now a drunken slut, right? Who was in MK ULTRA? Who took the drugs? Who drank too much? Who exposed himself? Who funneled income into off-shore accounts? Who ripped off me, Machat & Machat, and Phil Spector? Who committed tax fraud? Who perjured themselves? Who exposed their penis? Who has three versions of his Phil Spector gun story before LA Superior Court? Your victim. I think he should change his name. This man should fight his own battles. Why have the taxpayers he thanked? Should U.S taxpayers thank him or you actually? Why? The man's a thief. Speak to Steven Machat but wait until he recovers from his horrendous situation. It's not all about Leonard Cohen. It is for Leonard Cohen and his paid witness lawyers and thug operatives. Dan Meade was correct - this man is a psychopath and his emails are deranged? He just wrote and harassed and insulted a witness of mine today. I guess Leonard Cohen doesn't like Dan Meade's views on him.

I want to remind you of something, Mike. This man is a Canadian who cannot live there because of tax and residence problems. I spoke to Canada Revenue. They didn't think the tax matter was a ruse. They wanted to know his yearly income for the last forty years was. There's no statutes of limitations there. The man is desperate and these two criminals are harassing and targeting many LA County and City residents. But we're not celebrities, right Mike? We're also not criminals with motive.

Do you think Gianelli's in the mafia? He likes to allude to that. Is he going to "wack" people? Is that what he is insinuating?

Kelley Lynch

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Ann,

Why doesn't Cohen just come out and slander you? Why do his operatives have to do his dirty work? How sickening - two morons with motive.

Kelley

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Have I been clear enough with these criminals? Leonard Cohen should write his own emails trashing people. He's a coward and uses operatives. I've advised these two psychopaths to cease and desist. I have never seen anything so discursive, insane, and deranged in my life. Gianelli just targets Dan Meade (who gave me a declaration), lies to him today, and calls him an idiot or moron? This man is a criminal. He's on Cohen's defense team. He just hasn't entered a formal entry of appearance. He loves his little criminal game. He didn't address whether he's in the mafia or just threatening me with his Italian aggression? The Mafia should issue a disclaimer against this low level hood who belongs in some gas station in Cherry Hill, gossiping about Leonard Cohen's former girlfriends, etc. My God. Leonard Cohen is also insane. Leonard Cohen wants Ann slandered now? It's funny women who know misogynist men always turn into drunken sluts. Maybe it was the drugs Cohen was doing at the time. Please see all news accounts. Or was he in MK ULTRA? Was in the Bay of Pigs during his relationship Ann Diamond or not? I cannot keep up with his conspiracy theories. But he was our most important spy, right? Our most important spy should slander people directly but he's hiding behind people. He doesn't even show up for hearings. He has too much money and just sends lawyers. He also embezzled nearly $6.7 million from TH and his tax refunds are fraudulent. They have been challenged. Cohen loves a game of cat and mouse. He feels like he's the center of attention. Dahmer probably felt the same way.

I've asked these criminals to cease and desist. I view them as criminals.

Kelley

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Gianelli and Walsh,

Cease and desist, psychopaths.

Kelley Lynch

https://www.scribd.com/doc/157116027/Kelley-Lynch-Leonard-Cohen-IRS-Ray-Lawrence-Stephen-Gianelli-Etc

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 9:44 PM, STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:

Ms. Diamond,

An objective reader might draw the conclusion that you were and are obsessed with Leonard Cohen and that perhaps you moving next door to Cohen was not a “coincidence” after all.

But your condescending portrayal of Susanne’s opinions as startling or the product of ignorance is disingenuous.

From: susanne walsh [mailto:sanneka@esenet.dk]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 12:56 AM
To: Ann Diamond
Cc: Kelley Lynch; stephengianelli@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Stalking Leonard

Dear Ann Diamond

Sincerely

Susanne Walsh

From: Ann Diamond

Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 10:44 PM

To: susanne walsh

Subject: Stalking Leonard

Dear Susanne

Thanks again for your interest in the truth.

Ann Diamond

GIANELLI CONTINUES TO TARGET ANN DIAMOND; FALSELY ACCUSES HER OF STALKING LEONARD COHEN AND FALSELY STATES IN PUBLIC THAT MICK JAGGER/ROLLING STONES OBTAINED A RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST ANN DIAMOND

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 9:44 PM
Subject: RE: Stalking Leonard
To: anndiamond2011@gmail.com
Cc: sanneka@esenet.dk

Ms. Diamond,

An objective reader might draw the conclusion that you were and are obsessed with Leonard Cohen and that perhaps you moving next door to Cohen was not a “coincidence” after all.

But your condescending portrayal of Susanne’s opinions as startling or the product of ignorance is disingenuous.

From: susanne walsh [mailto:sanneka@esenet.dk]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 12:56 AM
To: Ann Diamond
Cc: Kelley Lynch; stephengianelli@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Stalking Leonard

Dear Ann Diamond

Sincerely

Susanne Walsh

From: Ann Diamond

Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 10:44 PM

To: susanne walsh

Subject: Stalking Leonard

Dear Susanne

Thanks again for your interest in the truth.

Ann Diamond

FORWARDED SOME OF GIANELLI’S SLANDEROUS EMAILS RE. LINDA CAROL TO HER FOR REVIEW

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 3:12 PM
Subject: Gianelli
To: linda carol

Linda,

Just FYI. Here are two harassing and slanderous emails referring to you. You do NOT supply anyone with marijuana; no one here smokes crack; no one is an alcoholic; the apartment is clean; and the cats are no one's business. This man is attempting to intimidate people he views as witnesses. Karina Von Watteville is retaliating against Paulette and attempting to defraud her and this situation is unconscionable.

I don't think it's a crime to have drapes and window coverings on the front window so the sun doesn't stream in and people on the street cannot look in. I also don't think one clothes rack is unlawful. Paulette is permitted to sublet. This man is moonlighting for Leonard Cohen and Cohen's lawyer's involvement with Karina is highly problematic for Cohen.

I have sent this man cease and desist letters. He has harassed my sons, slandered me everywhere, and he is also somehow obsessed with the Phil Spector case. He's an attorney and probably aligned with Spector's prosecution. They do not want the verdict overturned and everyone understands that Paulette and I know he is innocent, know witnesses lied, and recently gave interviews to a small internet radio program.

Leonard Cohen retaliated against me because I reported his tax fraud to IRS. He then filed a lawsuit in an attempt to defend himself and ended up stealing from me. I wasn't served so that's a problem for him and the Court who has now exposed me to dangerous psychopaths like this moron.

Anyway, these are examples of what this Criminal is writing.

Kelley

GIANELLI’SATTACK ON PAULETTE BRANDT

From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: The 15th
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Ms. Lynch,

If you are going to deny that Paulette is keeping more than three cats in the apartment you share without a "cat kennel permit" (see below), that the windows are covered in paper, or that the apartment is furnished with heavy velvet drapes, or that Linda Carol lives there, has a medical marijuana card, and is a heavy marijuana smoker and also supplies others (including Paulette) with weed, then you are denying the obvious (as usual). Therefore, I don't believe you when you deny that Paulette uses crack cocaine and used to have a heavy cocaine habit either.

See how that works?

If you lie about the stuff that doesn't really matter, no one believes you about the big stuff either.

GIANELLI’S HARASSMENT OVER PAULETTE BRANDT’S SMALL CLAIMS SUIT AGAINST KARINA VON WATTEVILLE WHO GIANELLI ENDED UP (ALTHOUGH HE DOES NOT KNOW HER) PROVIDING LEGAL ADVICE TO.

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:31 PM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

Ms. Lynch,

You are not being “blackmailed” and I could care less about Paulette’s small claims appeal hearing tomorrow. [And that is precisely what it is.] We’ll see if her sister the lawyer shows up to represent her. I very much doubt it.

This is not about that.

It is about you sending over 10,000 emails attempting to get me arrested, prosecuted, jailed, and disbarred cc to all manner of law enforcement, all of which is not being aided by Paulette Brandt who has also tried to get law enforcement to take action against me.

It’s also about me now knowing that Paulette is a hoarder of cats and clothes, that she once had a heavy cocaine habit and during 2011 to 2012 binged with smoking crack or something similar, that her apartment (now your apartment) has the windows covered over with paper and then heavy drapes to keep the neighbors from seeing inside the apartment – due to the illegal number of cats residing there (six inside and a seventh feral cat outside that Paulette feeds), that her apartment is crammed with clothing racks of stuff she hoards, that Linda Carol Murphy, age 51, moved in in approximately February 14, 2015, that Ms. Murphy is on disability and has a marijuana card and supplies Paulette and others with marijuana, and that the apartment reeks of pot smoke, and that you are heavily into alcohol.

All of which makes sense, because unless Paulette was a substance abuser, why would she allow you, an alcoholic with a record of criminal harassment, move into her apartment.

And if Paulette was not worried about the number of cats, she would not have the windows covered over. (Cat hoarding, BTW, is a serious mental condition. http://www.animalhoarding.com/ )

Which we now know is a hell hole, dark, crowded, cluttered, smelly, with three women living in a 2-BR apartment, two of whom are home all day every day. So Paulette moving you in suddenly makes a lot more sense, especially since you have promised to share the “millions” in fictional money you claim you will ultimately win from Cohen in the lawsuit you lost in 2006. Which is the same story you fed to Raymond Lawrence and everyone else you have stayed with.

Just like you promised to pay people back with that unemployment insurance claim appeal that when nowhere (just like all of your legal claims go nowhere).

GIANELLI, OUT OF THE BLUE, DECIDES TO HARASS DAN MEADE USING FALSE ACCUSATIONS AND INSULTS.

From: Daniel Meade <trimesamten1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 8:34 AM
Subject: Fwd: Trolling my Facebook page
To: kelley lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Daniel Meade <trimesamten1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: Trolling my Facebook page
To: "STEPHEN R. GIANELLI" <stephengianelli@gmail.com>

Mr. Gianelli,

I have never trolled you on my own or at Kelley's request.

Was the word idiot your way of signing your letter to me or just calling me a name like a high school girl?

I have no wish to communicate with you ever!

In my opinion you need some kind of psychological help or a kind friend or at least some one to coach you in basic human manners.

I hope you feel better some day.

Dan Meade

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:38 AM, STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:

Daniel Meade,

You asked me not to email you, now you are trolling my Facebook page at Kelley Lynch’s request (because I blocked her as well)?

You really are a piece of work.

Idiot.

RICO

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:08 PM
Subject: RE: Kelley Lynch email to the IRS dated Monday, April 20, 2015 12:53 AM
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Ms. Lynch,

1. There is no RICO action and thus no counsel of record in such an action for you to confine your discussions to.

2. Indeed, have been doing nothing but discuss your various, threatened, future lawsuits in your daily and weekly emails and in blog posts since the first time I heard your name in 2009.

3. You don’t have exclusive rights to the words “IRS and other tax matters” and the only reason that came up at all during your criminal trial was by way of rebutting your implausible defense to sending thousands of abusive and threatening emails and leaving scores of abusive and threatening voice messages for Leonard Cohen – that it was a good faith attempt to address “tax matters”. The only reason that “Phil Spector”, “gun stories”, “Rutger’s fingers”, “Lorca Cohen”, “NAMBLA”, “Steve Cooley”, and “Pat Dixon” came up at all during your trial was to demonstrate the wide ranging number of issues your communications to Leonard Cohen raised that had zero to do with taxes, which of course none of your communications on those subjects in violation of the Colorado order did.

4. No one ever claimed that the Colorado protective order was a domestic violence order. Rather, it is an injunction or other order, issued under the antistalking laws of the issuing state – namely, a permanent civil protection order issued under Colorado Statutes section 13-14-102 – and as such was properly registered in California with the Domestic Violence Restraining Order System pursuant to using Judicial Council form DV-600 as mandated by Family Code sections 6400 and following. You were prosecuted under Penal Code section 273.6 (a) which makes it a crime to violate CIVIL protection orders as well. In any event, your judgment of conviction is now final and it is too late to attempt to relitigate your guilt or innocence of violating Penal Code section 273.6 (a).

5. From a legal standpoint, you were served with Cohen’s 2005 lawsuit in BC338322, as conclusively established by the emails you started to transmit to plaintiff’s counsel Scott Edelman within hours of an unidentified female answering your front door being handed a copy of the suit as established by the proof of service and Judge Hess’s ruling dated January 17, 2014.

6. I copied Mr. Frayeh and Ms. Swanigan because they have an interest in the subject matter; nor does it particularly matter whether you understand why I cc whom I cc.

7. I have caught you in so many lies, big and small, that I don’t believe anything that comes out of your computer (or mouth) that is not independently corroborated. You repeating what one of your dope-head roommates allegedly said to you is not “independent cooperation”. And Daniel Meade is a ridiculous, obsequious, and resentful human being, as made patent by his declaration (See bold, highlighted sections.)

DECLARATION OF DANIEL J. MEADE

I, Daniel J. Meade, do state and declare as follows:

1. I am a citizen of the Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. I was born and raised in the United States.

Except as to those matters stated on information and belief, I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein and could and would testify competently if asked to do so.

[…]

4. Kelley Lynch and I have remained extremely close friends to this day. I view her as one of my

closest friends. We have stayed in close contact consistently for over 35 years.

5. I also know Kelley's parents, grandparents, brother, sister, sons and second husband, Douglas

Penick, who is a friend of mine. Kelley has a very close relationship with her family.

6. […]

7. Kelley is a quick wit and possesses a great sense of humor. […]

After my friend's death, Kelley generously flew me out to Los Angeles to visit and recuperate. My son also joined us. She took a bit of time off work to tend to my needs. I was able to spend time with and became intimately acquainted with her sons, Rutger and Ray. I found the home environment to be very loving, uplifted and dignified in a particular sort of Buddhist style. Kelley was a great host and obviously a good and decent mother. It was a very pleasant 5-6 weeks for me. But, during my stay I witnessed a few rather unpleasant incidents: I was well aware that Kelley worked as Leonard Cohen's personal manager. I had been a fan of his music and poetry since the age of One day the phone rang while Kelley was in the shower, I picked up and Leonard Cohen asked “Is Kelley there?” I responded by asking “Who are you?” He replied “I am Leonard.” I then simply said “Leonard who?” and his response was to become angry. He then hung up on me. I actually meant this as a joke. Of course, I knew it was Leonard Cohen. His voice is very recognizable. Later that morning, Mr. Cohen emailed Kelley a very personal and vicious letter. She read it to me and I could not believe what an abusive, humorless, and aggressive asshole he was to her. My little dream of the man who wrote these profound song lyrics immediately went down the local toilet in Los Angeles at that time. I asked Kelley to give me a copy of this letter so I could share it with the world at large and inform them about this man's true nature. I was in disbelief at his level of hostility particularly given the fact that he holds himself out to the world as some sort of religious sage. He was clearly jealous of my presence. Kelley discreetly declined to provide me with a copy of this exceedingly disturbing email. I do not believe she refused to give me the letter simply to protect her position as Mr. Cohen’s personal manager. I believe she declined out of a sense of respect for Leonard Cohen and may have been trying to keep his weaknesses and unconscionable conduct towards her private.

8. The second unpleasant incident I would like to share is as follows: One day, while visiting Kelley and her family, I was relaxing by the pool. Kelley's great home care assistant, Elena, had brought me food. Elena was a delightful individual who took great care of Kelley's sons and home while she was at work. Kelley was extremely busy working as Cohen’s personal manager and also owned a greeting card company. She devoted a tremendous amount of time to her sons, work, and charitable work. Kelley is a tireless individual. Elena would help with the boys when they returned from school or other activities, assist with meal preparations, and appeared to love Kelley and the boys. Elena’s presence in the home was important. Kelley home-schooled her older son and carpooled her younger soon. There were numerous children and teenagers in her home during the evenings and weekends. Kelley provided a stable environment for these young people but was very careful with boundaries and discipline. Kelley was essentially a single mother, raising her children with the assistance of her parents, and wanted an adult present in the household at all times. Suddenly, out of the blue, Steven Lindsey showed up unannounced - meaning he did not call or email asking if it was an appropriate time to drop by. Steve Lindsey is the father of Kelley’s younger son, Ray. I suppose he felt entitled to behave in this manner because he was Ray's genetic father and felt he could do as he liked, in an arrogant fashion, as rich people tend to do. Douglas Penick is Rutger's father and a close friend of mine. Kelley was not pleased with the invasion and from what I witnessed neither were her sons or Elena. I was sitting by the pool, clueless as to Lindsey's arrival, when he sat down next to me. He tried to be nice about the death of my girlfriend. The aggression Steve Lindsey brought into that home was, from my perspective, overwhelming and loud. After helping to calm things down inside, Kelley came out and made a few dark jokes about death, in a Monty Python sort of way. She was trying to help me through my grief in her playful fashion. Steve Lindsey became offended by Kelley and my interactions. He stormed off angry and, from what I could hear from outside, Ray was in the house quite upset. I asked Kelley – “Does he always invade your home unannounced?” She replied, “Yes, whenever he wants to.” I thought “How sad for Ray and Rutger and you.” Kelley and her sons were very, very close.

9. It is my personal belief that both Leonard Cohen and Steve Lindsey were obsessed with Kelley,

were extremely possessive of her, privately conducted themselves in a jealous and hostile manner towards her, and became angry and vicious when she was unable to tend to them specifically.

10. In the 35 years I have known Kelley, I have never once heard that she and Cohen were in a brief,

intimate dating relationship. I have, on the other hand, heard first hand that she felt Cohen’s conduct towards her was technically sexual harassment and thoroughly unprofessional. At times, throughout the years, Kelley and I have been involved in an intimate dating relationship and I feel absolutely confident that had she been involved in a similar relationship with Cohen she would have shared that information with me. Kelley and I have a very direct and honest friendship.

11. Since 2005, when Leonard Cohen filed his lawsuit against Kelley, she has consistently maintained that she was not served the lawsuit. This has been extremely frustrating for her.

12. These are my thoughts about what a good person Kelley Lynch is. I have no fiduciary concerns

here. She is simply an old friend of mine and I am concerned about her welfare and the welfare of her sons.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that I executed this Declaration on the 6^th day of October 2014 at Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

SIGNED___________________________________

Daniel J. Meade

From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 12:53 AM
To: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI; irs.commissioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; lrohter; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; stan.garnett; USLawEnforcement@google.com; mike.feuer@lacity.org
Cc: wfrayeh; Vivienne A. Swanigan
Subject: Re: Kelley Lynch email to the IRS Dated Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:13 PM

Stephen Gianelli,

I have received numerous harassing emails from you and Susanne Walsh today. Walsh copied in Paulette Brandt although she previously lied about that issue. You have not filed a formal entry of appearance so I will not be discussing my federal RICO lawsuits, IRS and other federal tax matters, or the fraud domestic violence order with you. If a Court orders me to discuss these matters with you, as opposed to the attorneys of record, I will abide by their order. I do not understand why you have copied employees of the City and County of Los Angeles (Frayeh and Swanigan) on your emails arguing Leonard Cohen's legal position with respect to federal tax matters and a federal issue re. the fraud restraining orders and other litigation tactics. The City and County of Los Angeles, who have been notified that I intend to file lawsuits against them, are not in a position to address federal tax matters and LA Superior Court has no jurisdiction to hear federal tax matters. Furthermore, I was not served Cohen's lawsuit in Case No. BC3338322 and there was and remains no "domestic violence" order in Colorado.

Dan Meade forwarded me your insulting and deranged emails to him of today. No one is interested in your Facebook page and I didn't know you had one. Dan Meade thinks you need psychiatric help and I agree.

Cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 2:39 AM, STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:

Ms. Lynch,

There is nothing in the 2008 Colorado protective order that prohibits you from complying with “IRS requirements”. The order prohibits you from contacting (or coming near) the protected person (Leonard Cohen) or specified locations, including his home and his attorneys’ offices on Wilshire Blvd.

What you are really driving at is your frustration that you cannot claim an “exception” to the no-contact provisions of the 2008 order in aid of contacting Leonard Cohen (allegedly for) “tax reasons” as a pretext to continue your harassment campaign unfettered by the Colorado injunction.

But there is no “tax reason” to be served by contacting Leonard Cohen.

First, Leonard Cohen received your demands for forms 1099 and demands relating to (allegedly) illegal forms k-1 – all relating to tax years ending in 2005, and has responded, through counsel, that neither he nor his advisors have any “tax documents” to give you and have ignored your other demands about “rescinding” k-1’s and clearly have no intention of even replying to you – let alone complying. Therefore, no purpose would be served by even one more such request communicated to Leonard Cohen, let alone the hundreds of abusive and accusatory emails and voice mails that have characterized your alleged “attempts to obtain tax information from Cohen” in the past.

Second, you announced about six months ago in an email to Jeffery Korn that you had filed a formal request with the IRS to obtain the “missing” forms 1099, that the matter was now in the hands of the IRS, and that there was no longer any need to contact Leonard Cohen on that issue. As you acknowledged in the email, there are formal IRS procedures to obtain tax information from a former employer that do not involve any direct contact with the former employer.

Third, a form 1099 is not the proper means of reporting embezzled funds to the IRS. A binding, final judgement has established the fact and amount of your embezzlement. (I realize you claim you were not served, but Judge Hess has ruled that you WERE served – as your emailed correspondence to Scott Edelman within hours of your service all but conclusively established. From a legal standpoint, you were served.) A 1099 is only to report sums PAID TO an employee or independent contractor that were not subject to tax withholding, and NOT sums that the employee or independent contractor unlawfully pays themselves.

See here: http://www.plantemoran.com/perspectives/articles/Pages/navigating-the-aftermath-of-embezzlement.aspx

“Though employers may wish to report the income on Form W-2 or Form 1099-MISC, the best option is to use Form 3949A. This is an Information Referral form for reporting potential violations of the Internal Revenue laws. The victimized organization can provide information about the embezzler such as name and address, social security number, alleged violation (i.e., unreported income), suspected amount of unreported income by year, and any additional comments. The informant may also indicate whether the books and/or records are available to substantiate the claim, the name of the bank used by the taxpayer, and if the taxpayer is presumed dangerous. Further, under the Whistleblower Law, if the IRS uses this information and it results in collection of taxes, penalties, and interest in excess of $2 million, the whistleblower may be awarded 15 to 30 percent of the amount collected.

“Why not use W-2 or 1099-MISC forms to report the unauthorized and unearned embezzled funds? These forms do not meet the required criteria.”

Moreover, the IRS does not give “opinions,” let alone in response to emails – as you should know since you have copied me with hundreds of requests for “a written opinion form the IRS”, since 2009 had have never even received an acknowledgement let alone an “opinion”. Rather, it is clear that you simply use these emails as rhetorical devices to argue your cause and to give your arguments greater weight by implying (falsely) that you have the ear of the IRS.

Regarding your claims that the Bounder court told you that the 2008 protective order expired in 2009, and therefore, when you sent emails and left voice mails for Leonard Cohen in 2012 you believed the Colorado order had expired, here is why that claim is nonsense:

1. Michelle Rice emailed you in 2011 and expressly told you the 2008 Colorado order had been registered in California and prohibited your contacts with Cohen. You replied to that email notice with approximately 80 emails to Ms. Rice, but NOT ONCE did you tell Michelle Rice in response to her 2011 email that you had previously called the court and was informed that the order had expired. In any event, you were put on notice in 2011 that the order had NOT expired and that your communications to Cohen were in violation of the order.

2. The California form DV-600 that Ms. Rice emailed to you has a blank for the expiration date of the out-of-state order being registered, and in that blank is written “permanent”. The attached 2008 Colorado order also says that the order is “permanent” and bears your signature. According to the 2008 Colorado hearing transcript, the judge admonished you that the order would be “permanent” before acceding to your request to make the temporary order “permanent”. (http://www.scribd.com/doc/29876970/Cohen-vs-Kelley-Lynch-Tr-Hg-Restrain-Ing-Colorado-9-2-2008#scribd – scroll to pages 21 and following.)

3. At your trial you testified that because California “permanent” restraining orders expire in 18-months unless renewed, you assumed that Colorado law was the same, and that the order, while dominated “permanent” had expired. YOU DID NOT testify that you called the court and was told the order had expired. Obviously, if you HAD called the court prior to your 2012 trial and had been so informed, your trial testimony on the subject of your mistaken belief that the order had expired would have been the time that you would have mentioned that fact – IF it really happened that way. But you never mentioned (allegedly) calling the court and being misinformed about the order expiring in 2009. This testimonial omission (and the failure to mention that information in your many responses to Ms. Rice’s 2011 Cease and Desist email) proves that your claim the Colorado court told you the order had expired is of recent vintage.

4. Your jury DID NOT BELIEVE YOUR TESTIMONY that you mistakenly assumed that the Colorado order had expired in 2009 – which is unsurprising, given Ms. Rice’s 2011 email to you expressly informing you that the order was registered in California in 2011 and that you were in violation of it. You were convicted. You filed a direct appeal and a petition for writ of habeas corpus. NOWHERE IN YOUR BRIEF ON DIRECT APPEAL OR IN YOUR HABEAS PETITION DID YOU CLAIM THAT YOU CALLED THE COLORADO COURT AND WAS INFORMED THAT THE ORDER HAD EXPIRED.

5. Under Colorado law, the burden is on the restrained person to seek to modify or terminate the “permanent” order. Therefore, you would not have been told the permanent order had expired, let alone repeatedly.

6. In any event, the time to testify that you called the Colorado court and was misled into believing that the 2008 Colorado order had expired was when you took the witness stand in your defense at trial. It is simply too late to try to relitigate your 2012 criminal conviction now, let alone in motions made before Judge Hess.

Regarding your threat to file a “RICO” suit in federal court arising out of the 2006 civil lawsuit and judgment as well as Cohen, Rice, Kory, the City Attorney, and the court’s roles (respectively) in your 2012 criminal prosecution as testifying witnesses, victims, prosecutors, and judge, all of that conduct is immune from civil liability under any theory, including but not limited to the RICO statute, and the way you explain it – as a part of a continuing criminal conspiracy to silence and crush you commencing in 2005 and continuing through your criminal conviction and sentence – is also barred by the four year RICO statute of limitations that begins to run from the first date you become aware of the injuries you alleged as damages in the suit (not from when you become aware of the fraud allegedly causing those damages. ( Rotella v. Wood 528 U.S. 549 (2000).)

In view of all of the foregoing, your legal and factual claims are nonsense, they relate to civil and criminal judgments that have been final for years, and they are simply more silly and transparent excuses to harass Leonard Cohen, his lawyers, your prosecutors, and various judges of the Los Angeles court.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli

Attorney-at-Law (ret.)

Crete, Greece

---Forwarded message---

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:13 PM
Subject: Fwd: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org

Hello IRS,

I would like to note that the Boulder Combined Court did send me another letter informing me that they could not give me legal advice with respect to item #6. I do not believe a State Court order (granted without jurisdiction in a matter I wasn't served) subverts IRS tax and corporate filing and reporting requirements. I would like a formal IRS opinion on this matter. I have also asked LA Superior Court to clarify the ambiguous judgment vis a vis IRS matters that have now arisen and due to the fact that Cohen believes he has no obligation to provide me with IRS required information. This issue will be litigated. It's fascinating that it is totally irrelevant that Boulder Combined Court advised me (and others) that this order expired on February 15, 2009. I cannot address the insane argument the prosecutor and my lawyers were having because I have no idea what they were talking about or why. I agreed to have this order become permanent. I asked the judge to make it permanent. However, the Court told me it expired so I knowingly and willfully violated nothing - regardless of Judge Vanderet's lies about me. There is no domestic violence order. Boulder Combined Court confirmed that. So, why was I prosecuted for violating a domestic violence order in California? LA Superior Court, including a Commissioner, have confirmed that this is indeed a domestic violence order. Leonard Cohen perjured himself over the statutory required dating/engagement relationship but that's cool, not crazy, and just run of the mill lies under oath. Not a problem for LA Confidential who attempted to rehabilitate him and his contradictory testimony with one of the most insane arguments I have ever heard in my life. It's fine that Cohen exposed himself to his female colleague. Not a problem if you're a celebrity with powerful and dangerous political allies in LA Confidential.

I intend to file a federal RICO suit and Cohen's attempt to subvert IRS reporting and filing requirements is at issue. So is LA Superior Court's attempt to aid and abet Cohen's theft and extort $10 million from me and exposing me to dangerous criminal stalkers like "Gianelli." The man is out of control. Does he have mafia connections as he likes to infer? The man is an absolute maniac.

All the best,

Kelley

BECAUSE THIS CRIMINAL STALKER IS MOONLIGHTING FOR SOMEONE OR NUMEROUS SOMEONES.

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:50 AM
Subject: Kelley Lynch email dated Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:22 PM
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>

Ms. Lynch,

You ask ‘Why would someone not representing Cohen go at this many people, do this type of research, argue this many legal positions?”

The reason fairly straightforward: I don’t like you.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli

Attorney-at-Law (ret.)

Crete, Greece