Saturday, April 11, 2015

Kelley Lynch's Email To CIA Re. The Criminal Stalker, Leonard Cohen's Fraud Domestic Violence TRO, Phil Spector, & LA Confidential


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Kelley Lynch email dated Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 10:43 AM
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, Shawn Jain <media@dcaclu.org>


Hi CIA,

What are the threats the Criminal Stalker is [talking] about?  Well, oddly enough they both actually involve CIA.  

Let's address the first one.  Steve Cooley was running around attempting to execute people using a medication you put dogs down with.   ACLU began addressing this publicly.  Here's a link to the ACLU and their public comments about that matter.  I was working on ACLU campaigns and we would familiarize ourselves with the issues.  Based on the situation with Todd Willingham, who appears to be innocent, I believe there should a complete moratorium.  Too many people are caught up in this system.  Barry Scheck/Innocence Project are now engaged in a debate the issue.  I have spoken to the public about this and they're against the death penalty in California.  They did not want the proposed bill enacted because it funneled millions to law enforcement.  That's the aspect of the bill they didn't like.  We also played a game at GCI.  Many, in fact.  Every morning.  Some might be questions like "What's your favorite disease and drink?"  Mine was always a vodka martini and weaponized anthrax.  Another game, I came up with, was to pretend you're running for President and elect/appoint various people to positions.  I ran on the "Wedding Party."  I thought Americans needed a break from all the heavy discussions and might like to vote on my wedding dress.  I thought Ron Burkle and I could get married in the Rose Garden.  I know him.  He's interested in politicians.  And, he has friends in politics.  I appointed my FBI and CIA directors.  I appointed Michael Ingrassia as FBI Director, my mother as Deputy FBI Director, and Robin Taggles as my CIA director.  What was my platform?  Cleaning up corruption in government. I thought I should start in Los Angele and ask my Attorney General to prosecute corrupt government actors (like Cooley) to fullest extent of the law.  I was very clear that the individual had to be prosecuted.  And, if convicted, I want my Attorney General to seek the death penalty for that individual.  I am convinced Phil Spector is innocent and received a life sentence.  The California Penal Code Section 118 contains this language:

128.  Every person who, by willful perjury or subornation of perjury
procures the conviction and execution of any innocent person, is
punishable by death or life imprisonment without possibility of
parole. The penalty shall be determined pursuant to Sections 190.3
and 190.4.
I think this may relate to Phil Spector's matter.  I don't think Cooley felt I actually threatened him.  I think he understood I have asked DOJ and FBI to investigate the Spector case - particularly reviewing the forensic evidence.

We are permitted to parody our government.  Captain Jack Horvath wrote and lied to the judge during my sentencing.  I was sentenced using domestic violence laws but the Colorado order is NOT domestic violence.  LA Superior Court attempted to extort money from me for "domestic violence" and I was required to participate in "domestic violence" programs.  Streeter used a quack (and Paulette and I have spoken to her) in an attempt to have me drugged and committed.  That quack is a domestic violence quack who testifies for the City and County.  She's testified at least 100 times on their behalf.  That's where her income comes from so she's not actually an expert witness.  She's more like an employee.  I intend to file a federal RICO suit that addresses this threat.  RICO has at least a four year statute.  The Criminal Stalker's harassing emails will not change that fact.  Horvath advised Vanderet that I simply started calling the DA in 2007.  That's a lie.  Investigator Brian Bennett rolled by my house in the winter of 2005 about Phil Spector's matter.  They received an "anonymous tip."  I filed a complaint re. Cohen's theft with their Major Fruad Unit (where Dixon and Jackson worked) against Leonard Cohen in 2006.  Horvath concealed that information.  



The threat involving my alleged prosecutor has to do with an email I sent DOJ and FBI.  That email served numerous purposes.  Again, I was researching matters.  This time they related to drone programs.  I had been reading Glenn Greenwald and Reprieve and started to become upset about the drone program.  I found the death of Abdulrahman Al-Awlaki upsetting.  And, I felt terrible for his grandparents.  I was also following Jeremy Scahill who I like quite a lot.  I anticipated watching his documentary, Dirty Wars.  To make a long story short, I watched Dirty Wars and, while I liked it, I felt it was one-sided.  Therefore, I began researching the drone program and disposition matrix from the opposing point of view.  I had based my conclusions on what other people felt.  And, while I usually watch Congressional hearings, I relied on other people's commentaries about Director John Brennan.  I did have a problem with the secrecy of the program.  Then, I started watching Director Brennan and realized that he's a honest and decent human being who has been demonized in the news media.  I changed my opinion about the drone program.  I reviewed Sharmapa's comments on how to react to 9/11 as a Buddhist.  I decided, and this purely my personal opinion, that the drone program corresponded to how Sharmapa felt governments had to handle the situation with respect to terrorism.  The cruise missile situation in Yemen was disturbing.  One thing I concluded is I have no details about anything.  I also concluded that I can never verify anything.  Finally, I thought about war and how I don't believe any war has been fought by exposing methods and means.  My ultimate conclusion is that drones are a weapon of war.  I have yet to hear one person complain about the Taliban or Al Qaeda being shot by a gun in war.  It seems as though it is the delivery method.  I do understand that.  The whole situation is alarming.  My teacher felt the gravest threat to this country was terrorism.  This is an enlightened man and I've seen him reveal many prophecies - including with respect to the space shuttle that crashed.  He told me (and others) that would happen two years before it did and pointed out South Texas on the map.  I asked him for a divination about terrorism.  He told me that intelligence, using the technology available and actual intelligence, should be able to uncover most of the plotting on the inside and outside of this country - to destroy this country.  However, he did mention potential war within the United States brought about by terrorism.  I take that seriously and that's precisely what I think.

In any event, I thought the DOJ and FBI might enjoy the drone Valentine card.  I've included that for CIA review.  I believe people are prosecuted for issues that are NOT threats in Los Angeles.  Coyote Shivers is one such person.  He put a facetious remark on his Twitter account.  Call LAPD if anyone notices his ex-wife stalking him.  This was evidently use against him in Court.   I find that obscene.  Perrette literally wrote a script about how to stalk someone, use a fraud restraining order, schmooze cops, and nail your ex.  And that's what she has done.  She has now evidently perjured herself and City Attorney Mike Feuer has not prosecuted her.  The identical situation occurred with Leonard Cohen although he acknowledged changing his tesitmony.  He was nailed lying about the "dating" relationship we never had.  Then, my alleged prosecutor had to rehab him.  The two of them engaged in the most absurd "discussion" I've ever heard.  He lied because I have stated that we were not ex-lovers.  We were not and sexual harassment and indecent exposure are not a dating relationship.  Streeter's name was used in a P.S. to DOJ and FBI.  There was no threat.  The woman retaliated.  I asked Detective Viramontes if she has psychiatric problems.  I also asked him to call her and ask if the real threat here is IRS and FBI and the fact that I asked for an investigation into her lies about me, IRS, federal tax matters, etc.  He assured me he would ask her.  He also advised me that Leonard Cohen did NOT "feel comfortable" with my requests for tax information IRS requires him to provide me.  

That's about it CIA.  That's why the Criminal Stalker copied in Investigator Frayeh and Vivienne Swanigan.  The man is a bald faced liar and moonlighting for someone.  In fact, I called Pleasant Hill Police prior to moving and the female cop immediately suspected that he was working for Cohen somehow.  Good instincts.  We discussed the fact that I was contacting FBI which I did.  I had a long discussion with FBI's Duty Agent about the situation.  

The Criminal Stalker is now studying manuals about LA Superior Court's classification programs.  Well, it's very simple - DV means domestic violence and LA Superior Court wrongfully modified the Colorado order.  I was told for years (as were others), by the Boulder Combined Court that this order expired on February 15, 2009.  I now have evidence explaining that situation which I will present to a federal court.  The Criminal evidently doesn't understand RICO statutes.

I personally believe Phil Spector will want to know who this Criminal is harassing me, Paulette Brandt, and others while copying in a detective from his case.  Gianelli is protecting LA Confidential.  That is very clear.

All the best,
Kelley


IMAGE PROVIDED FOR CIA REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY:

"When governments and individuals set a future course of action, their motivation or aim is the critical determinant to what is appropriate and morally correct. The seeking of revenge clearly is not acceptable in Buddhist terms. However, if a government or individual must take an action that has harmful effects but that is done for the purpose of preventing evil and benefiting the majority, this is acceptable."

How to React as a Buddhist to the September 11 Tragedy?

During the past two weeks as I have traveled to several Bodhi Path centers in the United States, many members have asked me to explain the horrible acts of the terrorists on September 11and to suggest a course of action from the Buddhist perspective. I offer the following thoughts for my disciples’ guidance.
The terrorists who brought about this senseless tragedy are afflicted by ignorance and consequently can be deceived by a blind faith in a belief system that distorts the true spirit of Islam. They do not have the wisdom and proper sense of judgement to determine what is right and wrong. Because of their ignorance and blind faith, people with evil intentions manipulated and misused them. Therefore, just as we should show compassion on the victims, we should also have compassion on the
terrorists due to their ignorance.
When governments and individuals set a future course of action, their motivation or aim is the critical determinant to what is appropriate and morally correct. The seeking of revenge clearly is not acceptable in Buddhist terms. However, if a government or individual must take an action that has harmful effects but that is done for the purpose of preventing evil and benefiting the majority, this is acceptable.
According to Buddha’s teachings on ethics, I believe there are four different combinations of aim/intention and action. Listed from the most evil to the most compassionate, they are:
1) Bad or evil aim-negative or hurtful action
2) Bad aim-benign or positive action
3) Good, realistic aim-destructive or harmful action
4) Good or pure aim-benevolent action
In order to counter terrorism, governments of the world and their
leaders must pursue this goal only with the aim of benefiting everyone, including the ignorant terrorists themselves. If purely benevolent acts are inadequate to achieve this goal, then there is no choice but to engage in narrowly targeted acts designed to root out the evil of the terrorists while inflicting the least amount of harm to the innocent.
This can be accomplished through the use of our wisdom and compassion which we find through logical analysis that is a part of human wisdom.
It is important not to make decisions based on our obscured emotions.
On a personal level, we should not dwell in our sadness or fear over this tragedy. Instead, we should use it as an inspiration to develop our own compassion. We should make wishing prayers for the victims but also expand our wishes to include all beings who have suffered throughout the world. This tragedy must inspire us to achieve a vast compassion for all beings.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 10:50 AM
Subject: Kelley Lynch email dated Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 10:43 AM
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>


Ms. Lynch,
  
(1) The City of Los Angeles denied your administrative claim in July of 2014 (if memory serves me). You had six months from that date (whenever that was) to file a lawsuit – i.e. until approximately February of 2015, but you failed to do so. The time to do anything with that administrative claim has now run out and the claim is moot.

(2) I am confident that Phillip Spector, who has been residing in a California State prison since his second degree murder conviction in 2009 and is in ill health, has more important things occupying his thoughts than your conspiracy theories, including whom I unilaterally chose to add to the cc filed on my emails. In the unlikely event that Mr. Spector “wants to know” why I cc whom I cc with my emails, he is free to contact me directly or through his representatives.

(3) What is “going on” is that you have been harping on the JABIS case type classification assigned by the Los Angeles Superior Court Clerk’s office to the court docket when the California registration of the 2008 civil harassment protective order was filed on May 27, 2011 using Judicial Council form DV600 (as sections 6400 et seq. and the California Rules of Court mandate), claiming – falsely- that the label “Domestic Violence” on the docket sheet “converted” the Colorado civil harassment order into a “domestic violence order”, thereby resulting in your 2012 criminal prosecution. I have demonstrated that this designation was entirely administrative in nature and was mandated by the CRC, rule  10.400 in connection with the  Judicial Branch Statistical Information System (JBSIS). In other words, you are fallaciously assigning a causal connection to two unrelated events. As per my practice, in view of your six-year habit of bombarding me (and the rest of the world) with your misguided legal theories through mass emailings (which are then posted on your blogs), I have set the record straight with the legal and factual truth of the matter. Since you have directly accused what you colorfully describe as “LA Confidential” – your shorthand for a corrupt District Attorney’s Office  and City Attorney’s Office – as being somehow responsible for what you see as a sinister “conversion” of a civil order into a domestic violence order – I am copying  Investigator Frayeh and Ms. Swanigan with my explanations to you, because as a result of their respective positions they have an interest in the subject matter and I have discussed you (and your threats to harm various public prosecutors) with both of them.

My choice of cc addressees is a UNILATERAL decision on my part, in which neither Investigator Frayeh nor Ms. Swanigan have any input. (Just as Kelley Lynch is free to, and does, decide to cc, for example the IRS, the DOJ, the CIA and many others with her emails.)

The views expressed in my emails are mine alone and have not been solicited by those persons who appear in the cc field.

It is typical Kelley Lynch that you are choosing to focus on the superficial (who is cc’d with my emails) rather than the substantive explanation I provide to you in the emails of why the “Domestic Violence” JABIS label appears in the court docket and why it has only administrative and data collection significance and has not impacted the administration of justice in your civil or criminal matters pending in the LA court system.

If it is answers you seek, I suggest you read my emails.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret)
Crete, Greece

---Forwarded message---

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Kelley Lynch email to the Department of Justice Criminal Division dated Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 7:12 PM
To: Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>
Cc: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>

Vivienne,

(1) What is going on here?  I filed a claim notifying the City that I was filing a lawsuit and you're constantly copied in on emails from the Criminal Stalker Gianelli.  My son responded, didn't he?  He's correct - two fruitcakes who are conspiring morning, noon, and night about me.  Thunder buddies is what Rutger said, right?  My son is not in "Workplace Violence" but figured out that two fruitcake thunder buddies are conspiring about me with you copied in.  He wasn't amused.

(2)Now, I do think Phil Spector is going to want to know why YOU and an investigator in his case are copied in by the Criminal Stalker.  I didn't knowingly and willfully violate a restraining order.  I was TOLD it expired by Boulder Combined Court,  Numerous people were.  There are serious problems with the fact that it's a domestic violence order.  I was at LA Superior Court today and spoke to many people.  There's a problem, Vivienne, and one of those problems is VAWA.  

But what would your involvement be?  I have a right to file a motion to vacate a fraud domestic violence order.  I have a right to address Cohen's lies and perjury.  That's why I filed a Motion for Terminating Sanctions with Judge Hess and provided evidence of perjury and fraud in documents submitted to him.  There is no statute for fraud upon the court.  Also, Courts maintain jurisdiction to clarify ambiguous judgments.  Your prosecutor lied and IRS continues to advise me that Leonard Cohen owes me tax documents.  They've also confirmed this for other people I've authorized to speak to them.

(3) What's up, Vivienne?  I don't want to see you copied in on emails.  I have nothing that I am interested in discussing with you.  I'm interested in filing a federal lawsuit and speaking with a federal judge.  That's my legal right, Vivienne.  Gianelli has no right to criminally harass all these residents of Los Angeles.  

Don't you think it would save the taxpayers money if you hit (or had in the fall of 2012 when he started harassing me with Streeter copied in) reply all and demanded that he cease and desist.  What would that cost the taxpayers?  $25?  I want to find out what someone in your position makes on an hourly basis because I think you could have composed that request in less than an hour.


Kelley Lynch

at