Kelley Lynch Addresses Some Of The Fraud, Etc. In Leonard Cohen's Response To Her Motion To Vacate

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:13 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane@caa.com, blourd@caa.com, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, info <info@kibi-edu.org>, "YesheRimpoche@aol.com" <bhakhatulku@yahoo.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao@nsa.gov, fsb@fsb.ru

Jeffrey,

Because the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and others, have been copied in on my emails since 2005,  I think it is best to address certain issues in Leonard Cohen's response to my motion to vacate 

I misappropriated nothing.  Leonard Cohen has intentionally and willfully disregarded all corporate books and records.  Corporate bank accounts are not Leonard Cohen's  He is arguing alter ego. 

I was not served the summons and complaint.  My hair was not blonde.  My eyes are not black.  I had no reason to evade service.  I didn't fail to answer.  It would be impossible without knowing what was alleged.  I don't think the Constitution says I should guess about the allegations raised in a complaint.  The default judgment wrongfully altered previously filed federal tax returns.  That would include with respect to substantial taxes paid with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC pursuant to K-1s issued by your client's personal tax lawyer. 

That's correct.  My son and I provided declarations.  We had no female co-occupant.  There are so many default judgments, and news media accounts of default judgments, that I have no idea how many there are.  I received notice about the November 2005 default and thought that was final.  I was home everyday.  My car was destroyed.  Greenberg's lawsuit wasn't served.  It was left outside of my door and I didn't pretend otherwise.  That has nothing to do with the LA Case.

No Jane Doe was served because she doesn't exist. 

I don't claim to have reported the allegations of Leonard Cohen's tax fraud.  I reported it on April 15, 2005 and thereafter.  That's correct. The only evidence re. an IRS response is Agent Sopko's email advising me to report Cohen's tax fraud to Agnt Tejeda.  I don't have substantiate the tax fraud.  I'm not the IRS.  I am explaining that the lawsuit is retaliation. 

I don't recall saying that the corporations were created for an improper tax purpose  I've said they are sham/shell corporations with no business purpose, no offices, no phone number, and two of them were inserted into the default judgment but were not named as parties to the lawsuit.  It sounds like Cohen, Greenberg, and Westin came up with some unbridled control theory while intentionally disregarding my ownership interest in, among other things, all Cohen intellectual property dating back to 1967.  I had the same deal Steven Machat had.  He's been clear:  Cohen stole from him and withheld commissions.  Steven and I are in agreement:  Cohen falsely accuses his representatives of ripping him off to breach contracts.  Now he has taken the position that I was not entitled to my commissioner on "Dear Heather" because he deposited those royalties into his personal account?  Please see the emails between us confirming that commission.  However, as I explained to Doug Davis - Cohen is saying this is not a commission.  He refuses to provide me with a 1099 for the year 2004.  The K-1s from LCI state that 1) I own 99.5% of LCI and 2) there was $0 income for 2003, 2004, and 2005.  That proves that the ledger is fraudulent and incoherent.  It is NOT an accounting.  It is a meaningless ledger with numbers and a handful of random items attached.

My fee for services as Cohen's personal manager was 15%.  I held that position since Marty Machat's death.  I didn't receive overpayments or misappropriate anything.  Cohen has made fraudulent misrepresentations to the court while willfully disregarding corporate books and records.  On March 23, 2012 he testified that I never stole from him.  He must not have been prepped. He also truthfully testified that we only had a business relationship.

Leonard Cohen and Robert Kory went into Steve Lindsey's office and advised him that Oliver Stone and I had sex.  We did not and one safely assume that Oliver is aware of that.  I believe this was meant to stir up a custody matter.  I also think my public defenders should have contacted Oliver Stone who has now been viciously slandered in a horrifying email about Rutger's "bloody stump."  I never said Cohen caused his accident and I cannot imagine why he was testifying about that.  By the way, Steve Lindsey asserted (in a declaration I have from the custody matter) that he called 911 so Cohen lied on the stand.  I never said I called.

I have a meritorious case and I want Agent Tejeda/IRS to take the witness stand.  He was going to take the stand in the 2012 show trial but Judge Vanderet wouldn't permit it.  He wouldn't permit me to have any witnesses including Rutger who is being relentlessly harassed/ 

Chad Knaak was correct:  I intend to hold Scott Edelman accountable.  I will address Kory's declaration privately with the IRS.  I will point out that GIanelli has now lied to the CIA about me.    He seems to be enjoying himself.  He has relentlessly targeted me, my sons, sister, elderly parents, and others since hearing from Michelle Rice in 2009.  He even approached me pretending to be a journalist and then began posting slanderous articles about me on his alleged blog.

I'm not interested in Leonard Cohen and have no interest in speaking to this man.  I am addressing fraud, perjury, concealment, misappropriation, and other criminal matters.  I was not in an intimate dating relationship with Cohen and the Boulder order was fraudulently registered in Los Angeles.  Furthermore, when a Colorado order is modified, the party has to be served.  I also happen to think I should have been served the May 25, 2011 fraud restraining order.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Kelley Lynch

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello IRS and FBI,

I have contacted Korn with respect to a number of issues Cohen's latest legal documents raise.  The IRS does not have a holding regarding the default judgment.  The default judgment wrongfully altered my previously filed federal tax returns.  Cohen refuses to rescind the illegal K-1s from LCI.  I am not a partner.  I am not arguing federal tax matters.  I explained the retaliation and Kory has now, once again, lied about the IRS.  I reported the tax fraud on April 15, 2005 after being offered various deals - including 50% community property.  See my lawyers' memo on that issue.  I did not start contacting Cohen after he heard I was reporting the tax fraud to the IRS.  I hired lawyers  I didn't fire my accountant, as Cohen testified.  After DiMascio & Berardo, I was represented by Mike Taitelman and Bert Deixler.

Cohen was advised to make arrangements to pick up his property on or around October 27, 2004.  He and/or Lorca Cohen were given permission to go into my office and take all his property.  My mother was present.  Nothing was moved to Santa Monica or my home.  I stored boxes and property for years, as a courtesy.  He never made arrangements to pick anything up. 

What color was my hair in August 2005?  What neighbor did the process server talk to? 

For the record, my family continues to be criminally harassed and stalked over this situation.  There is witness tampering with respect to Rutger, Ray, Karen, Paulette Brandt, and others, and my appellate attorney has been relentlessly targeted.  Gianelli works in tandem with Cohen's fan Walsh (who copied in Michelle Rice), Michelle Blaine, Kelly Green (of the Darwin Exception who HATES Bruce Cutler), and others.  The probation matter was clearly coordinated with this motion to vacate and the basis for it are Gianelil's emails to the prosecutor and Swanigan.  It demands an investigation.

Cohen testified that I never stole from him at the March 23, 2012 hearing.  He willfully disregarded corporate books and records and came up with some insane fictional narrative.  I believe that he coordinated the lawsuits with Westin and Greenberg.  Why wasn't Greenberg a party to the LA lawsuit? 

LA Superior Court has no jurisdiction over me in this matter, the 2012 trial, or the probation matter.

In any event, I want Korn to be clear about the fraud contained in the latest legal filings. 

Kelley

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:23 AM
Subject: Fwd:

To: Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane@caa.com, blourd@caa.com, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, info <info@kibi-edu.org>, "YesheRimpoche@aol.com" <bhakhatulku@yahoo.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao@nsa.gov, fsb@fsb.ru

Jeffrey,

Gianelli continues to harass and stalk me over Leonard Cohen.  Leonard Cohen has argued federal tax matters.  I brought them to the court's attention because, regardless of Kory's declaration, Cohen retaliated against me for reporting the allegations of criminal tax fraud to the IRS on April 15, 2005.  Agent Sopko flew into meet with me in March 2007 and, after that meeting, advised me to contact Agent Luis Tejeda. 

I would like to clarify this.  Robert Kory's letters defending his client are not official IRS positions.  There is no IRS holding re. LA Superior Court's default judgment although this was the manner in which this was presented to the jury at my 2012 show trial. 

The 2005 refund, that I discovered at my trial, has now been formally challenged with the IRS.  The same is true for the illegal LCI K-1s.  I am not a partner on LCI and Leonard Cohen is very clear in his declaration (supporting the default) that he is the sole owner.  When LCI sued me, I was the registered agent and the business address was my former PO Box in Los Angeles.  That is extremely problematic.

Leonard Cohen has taken the position that he would be prejudiced, should the default be vacated, because he amended his tax returns.  The default wrongfully alters my federal tax returns.  I would like to refer you to the corporate books and records of LCI, Blue Mist Touring, and Traditional Holdings.  I would also like to refer you to my Indemnity Agreement from Traditional Holdings.

The only legal argument I see on Cohen's part here has to do with my hair color.  This man had not seen me in nearly a year.  A photograph from the 1990s doesn't seem relevant.  The photograph of His Holiness and I, from 2007, also seems highly irrelevant.  I do think that Judge Hess, who evidently doesn't tolerate insanity, should speak to witnesses who saw me in the summer and fall of 2005 rather than guessing about what color my hair was.  He should be able to discern my eye color:  my eyes are blue; NOT black.  I don't wear contacts. 

No one at my house attempted to evade service.  However, Rutger, Ray, and my sister continue to be stalked and criminally harassed over Leonard Cohen and other matters.  The same is true for Paulette Brandt. 

Leonard Cohen's legal team has a tactic:  stone walling.  That permits lying lawyers to go into court and claim they are being harassed.  My family and I are the parties being criminally harassed.  In fact, the City Attorney instructed Gianelli to email me, communicate a message from them, and appeared to encourage this insanity.  That's a very serious matter since Gianelli appears to be engaged in a proxy war that involves Leonard Cohen, his fan Susanne Walsh, and Michelle Rice.  I have asked for your assistance with this matter. 

What I do in federal court is not Judge Hess' business.  That includes with respect to the fraud Boulder restraining order that I have repeatedly been told expired.  There was and is no domestic violence.  Judge Mayerson, who I was just in front of, should explain why Cohen testified that I never stole from him and we were in a purely business relationship.  The situation, with respect to Cohen's testimony, is farcical.  I have no idea why anyone would lie about IRS matters.  In any event, LA Superior Court has no jurisdiction over federal tax matters and yet they altered my previously filed federal tax returns. 

I am interested, of course, to know why the DA elected not to charge Leonard Cohen.  I think that is highly material and relevant. 

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:37 PM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

Be sure and inform Judge Hess that if he does not hear from your witnesses that you intend to have with you at the hearing that you intend to sue the Los Angeles Court in a “federal lawsuit”. Ha!

Bye for now, I just got a boarding call.

Kelley Lynch Email To Leonard Cohen's Lawyer Jeffrey Korn Re. Federal Tax Matters, Harassment, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:23 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane@caa.com, blourd@caa.com, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, info <info@kibi-edu.org>, "YesheRimpoche@aol.com" <bhakhatulku@yahoo.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao@nsa.gov, fsb@fsb.ru

Jeffrey,

Gianelli continues to harass and stalk me over Leonard Cohen.  Leonard Cohen has argued federal tax matters.  I brought them to the court's attention because, regardless of Kory's declaration, Cohen retaliated against me for reporting the allegations of criminal tax fraud to the IRS on April 15, 2005.  Agent Sopko flew into meet with me in March 2007 and, after that meeting, advised me to contact Agent Luis Tejeda. 

I would like to clarify this.  Robert Kory's letters defending his client are not official IRS positions.  There is no IRS holding re. LA Superior Court's default judgment although this was the manner in which this was presented to the jury at my 2012 show trial. 

The 2005 refund, that I discovered at my trial, has now been formally challenged with the IRS.  The same is true for the illegal LCI K-1s.  I am not a partner on LCI and Leonard Cohen is very clear in his declaration (supporting the default) that he is the sole owner.  When LCI sued me, I was the registered agent and the business address was my former PO Box in Los Angeles.  That is extremely problematic.

Leonard Cohen has taken the position that he would be prejudiced, should the default be vacated, because he amended his tax returns.  The default wrongfully alters my federal tax returns.  I would like to refer you to the corporate books and records of LCI, Blue Mist Touring, and Traditional Holdings.  I would also like to refer you to my Indemnity Agreement from Traditional Holdings.

The only legal argument I see on Cohen's part here has to do with my hair color.  This man had not seen me in nearly a year.  A photograph from the 1990s doesn't seem relevant.  The photograph of His Holiness and I, from 2007, also seems highly irrelevant.  I do think that Judge Hess, who evidently doesn't tolerate insanity, should speak to witnesses who saw me in the summer and fall of 2005 rather than guessing about what color my hair was.  He should be able to discern my eye color:  my eyes are blue; NOT black.  I don't wear contacts. 

No one at my house attempted to evade service.  However, Rutger, Ray, and my sister continue to be stalked and criminally harassed over Leonard Cohen and other matters.  The same is true for Paulette Brandt. 

Leonard Cohen's legal team has a tactic:  stone walling.  That permits lying lawyers to go into court and claim they are being harassed.  My family and I are the parties being criminally harassed.  In fact, the City Attorney instructed Gianelli to email me, communicate a message from them, and appeared to encourage this insanity.  That's a very serious matter since Gianelli appears to be engaged in a proxy war that involves Leonard Cohen, his fan Susanne Walsh, and Michelle Rice.  I have asked for your assistance with this matter. 

What I do in federal court is not Judge Hess' business.  That includes with respect to the fraud Boulder restraining order that I have repeatedly been told expired.  There was and is no domestic violence.  Judge Mayerson, who I was just in front of, should explain why Cohen testified that I never stole from him and we were in a purely business relationship.  The situation, with respect to Cohen's testimony, is farcical.  I have no idea why anyone would lie about IRS matters.  In any event, LA Superior Court has no jurisdiction over federal tax matters and yet they altered my previously filed federal tax returns. 

I am interested, of course, to know why the DA elected not to charge Leonard Cohen.  I think that is highly material and relevant. 

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:37 PM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

Be sure and inform Judge Hess that if he does not hear from your witnesses that you intend to have with you at the hearing that you intend to sue the Los Angeles Court in a “federal lawsuit”. Ha!

Bye for now, I just got a boarding call.

Visit Kelley Lynch Evidence Blog Re Probation Retaliation & Her Complaints To Various Parties Re Criminal Conduct

http://lynch-evidence-probation.blogspot.com/

Leonard Cohen's Testimony That Kelley Lynch Never Stole From Him

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:56 AM
Subject: Re:

To: Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, info <info@kibi-edu.org>, "YesheRimpoche@aol.com" <bhakhatulku@yahoo.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao@nsa.gov, fsb@fsb.ru

Hi IRS,

Cohen testified at the bail hearing that I never stole from him.  Why did the IRS give him the refund that I have now formally challenged?

Kelley

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Jeffrey,

Gianelli continues to harass me and has raised perjury as an issue.  I just appeared before Judge Samuel Mayerson.  That was also the bail judge in a "domestic violence" matter although the Boulder order although the Boulder order was unlawfully modified and I was never served the California order.

Cohen testified before Judge Mayerson that I never stole from him.  How does he reconcile that with the documents you've filed?  He also testified that we were in a purely business relationship.  His lame excuse for lying involved blaming me although I hadn't testified by that time. 

What version do you believe?  He also has one version of his Phil Spector gun story before Judge Vanderet; another that he emailed Streeter; and a third that the prosecutors in the Spector matter used.  Look at LA Superior Court's website for the DA's version of the Phil Spector gun story.  Mick Brown reviewed the Grand Jury transcripts and confirmed that Cohen's statements/testimony were used. 

This is all terribly confusing. 

Kelley Lynch

The Raven by Edgar Allan Poe

The Raven

By Edgar Allan Poe

Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary,

Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore—

    While I nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping,

As of some one gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door.

“’Tis some visiter,” I muttered, “tapping at my chamber door—

            Only this and nothing more.”

    Ah, distinctly I remember it was in the bleak December;

And each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor.

    Eagerly I wished the morrow;—vainly I had sought to borrow

    From my books surcease of sorrow—sorrow for the lost Lenore—

For the rare and radiant maiden whom the angels name Lenore—

            Nameless here for evermore.

    And the silken, sad, uncertain rustling of each purple curtain

Thrilled me—filled me with fantastic terrors never felt before;

    So that now, to still the beating of my heart, I stood repeating

    “’Tis some visiter entreating entrance at my chamber door—

Some late visiter entreating entrance at my chamber door;—

            This it is and nothing more.”

    Presently my soul grew stronger; hesitating then no longer,

“Sir,” said I, “or Madam, truly your forgiveness I implore;

    But the fact is I was napping, and so gently you came rapping,

    And so faintly you came tapping, tapping at my chamber door,

That I scarce was sure I heard you”—here I opened wide the door;—

            Darkness there and nothing more.

    Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing,

Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;

    But the silence was unbroken, and the stillness gave no token,

    And the only word there spoken was the whispered word, “Lenore?”

This I whispered, and an echo murmured back the word, “Lenore!”—

            Merely this and nothing more.

    Back into the chamber turning, all my soul within me burning,

Soon again I heard a tapping somewhat louder than before.

    “Surely,” said I, “surely that is something at my window lattice;

      Let me see, then, what thereat is, and this mystery explore—

Let my heart be still a moment and this mystery explore;—

            ’Tis the wind and nothing more!”

    Open here I flung the shutter, when, with many a flirt and flutter,

In there stepped a stately Raven of the saintly days of yore;

    Not the least obeisance made he; not a minute stopped or stayed he;

    But, with mien of lord or lady, perched above my chamber door—

Perched upon a bust of Pallas just above my chamber door—

            Perched, and sat, and nothing more.

Then this ebony bird beguiling my sad fancy into smiling,

By the grave and stern decorum of the countenance it wore,

“Though thy crest be shorn and shaven, thou,” I said, “art sure no craven,

Ghastly grim and ancient Raven wandering from the Nightly shore—

Tell me what thy lordly name is on the Night’s Plutonian shore!”

            Quoth the Raven “Nevermore.”

    Much I marvelled this ungainly fowl to hear discourse so plainly,

Though its answer little meaning—little relevancy bore;

    For we cannot help agreeing that no living human being

    Ever yet was blessed with seeing bird above his chamber door—

Bird or beast upon the sculptured bust above his chamber door,

            With such name as “Nevermore.”

    But the Raven, sitting lonely on the placid bust, spoke only

That one word, as if his soul in that one word he did outpour.

    Nothing farther then he uttered—not a feather then he fluttered—

    Till I scarcely more than muttered “Other friends have flown before—

On the morrow he will leave me, as my Hopes have flown before.”

            Then the bird said “Nevermore.”

    Startled at the stillness broken by reply so aptly spoken,

“Doubtless,” said I, “what it utters is its only stock and store

    Caught from some unhappy master whom unmerciful Disaster

    Followed fast and followed faster till his songs one burden bore—

Till the dirges of his Hope that melancholy burden bore

            Of ‘Never—nevermore’.”

    But the Raven still beguiling all my fancy into smiling,

Straight I wheeled a cushioned seat in front of bird, and bust and door;

    Then, upon the velvet sinking, I betook myself to linking

    Fancy unto fancy, thinking what this ominous bird of yore—

What this grim, ungainly, ghastly, gaunt, and ominous bird of yore

            Meant in croaking “Nevermore.”

    This I sat engaged in guessing, but no syllable expressing

To the fowl whose fiery eyes now burned into my bosom’s core;

    This and more I sat divining, with my head at ease reclining

    On the cushion’s velvet lining that the lamp-light gloated o’er,

But whose velvet-violet lining with the lamp-light gloating o’er,

            She shall press, ah, nevermore!

    Then, methought, the air grew denser, perfumed from an unseen censer

Swung by Seraphim whose foot-falls tinkled on the tufted floor.

    “Wretch,” I cried, “thy God hath lent thee—by these angels he hath sent thee

    Respite—respite and nepenthe from thy memories of Lenore;

Quaff, oh quaff this kind nepenthe and forget this lost Lenore!”

            Quoth the Raven “Nevermore.”

    “Prophet!” said I, “thing of evil!—prophet still, if bird or devil!—

Whether Tempter sent, or whether tempest tossed thee here ashore,

    Desolate yet all undaunted, on this desert land enchanted—

    On this home by Horror haunted—tell me truly, I implore—

Is there—is there balm in Gilead?—tell me—tell me, I implore!”

            Quoth the Raven “Nevermore.”

    “Prophet!” said I, “thing of evil!—prophet still, if bird or devil!

By that Heaven that bends above us—by that God we both adore—

    Tell this soul with sorrow laden if, within the distant Aidenn,

    It shall clasp a sainted maiden whom the angels name Lenore—

Clasp a rare and radiant maiden whom the angels name Lenore.”

            Quoth the Raven “Nevermore.”

    “Be that word our sign of parting, bird or fiend!” I shrieked, upstarting—

“Get thee back into the tempest and the Night’s Plutonian shore!

    Leave no black plume as a token of that lie thy soul hath spoken!

    Leave my loneliness unbroken!—quit the bust above my door!

Take thy beak from out my heart, and take thy form from off my door!”

            Quoth the Raven “Nevermore.”

    And the Raven, never flitting, still is sitting, still is sitting

On the pallid bust of Pallas just above my chamber door;

    And his eyes have all the seeming of a demon’s that is dreaming,

    And the lamp-light o’er him streaming throws his shadow on the floor;

And my soul from out that shadow that lies floating on the floor

            Shall be lifted—nevermore!

 

 

Rediscovering the Dark Splendor of Gustave Doré with Edgar Allan Poe

• by Allison Meier on January 9, 2014

An image from Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Raven” illustrated by Gustave Doré (all public domain images via the Library of Congress)

Next month the Musée d’Orsay in Paris is opening Gustave Doré (1832-1883): The Power of the Imagination, and it’s likely there will be a renewed focus on the dark romanticism of the 19th-century French artist. However, Gustave Doré’s illustrations have hardly disappeared, remaining popular interpretations of classics ranging from Milton’s Paradise Lost to Little Red Riding Hood. But some of his most haunting work was with Edgar Allan Poe.

The cover of Doré’s illustrated editor of Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Raven”

Completed in 1883, the 26 plates Doré illustrated for Poe’s poem “The Raven” were actually not published until after his death on January 23 of that year. Doré had been illustrating since he was 15-years-old, and while he also worked with painting and watercolors, he was most prolific with books. At one point, according to the Oxford Dictionary of Art and Artists, he was so productive that he was employing 40 wood engravers at once to translate his images into printable works. From his otherworldly landscapes for the world of King Arthur in the Idylls of the King, to the unsettling vistas of hell for Dante’s Inferno, to vivid visions for the Bible, each illustration had a sharp detail to it that was ecstatic and fantastic while rooted very much in the real.

Yet his work for Poe is a little different. There’s still that density of imagery and the roaming shadows, but it’s more somber than other works. According to Fantasy and Faith: The Art of Gustave Doré by Eric Zafran, Edmund C. Stedman wrote in the introduction to the edition that ”Doré proffers a series of variations upon the theme as he conceived it: ‘the enigma of death and the hallucinations of an inconsolable soul … ’ Plainly there was something in common between the working moods of Poe and Doré. Both resorted often to the elf-land of fantasy and romance.”

Below are some of the illustrations from “The Raven” from the 1884 edition published by Harper & Brothers, where skeletons lurk around poor Lenore and the shadow of the raven grows until it consumes the tortured narrator. You can view the whole book at the Library of Congress which has digitized the work, as brought to our attention by Boing Boing.




Gustave Doré (1832-1883): The Power of Imagination will be at the Musée d’Orsay (1 Rue de la Légion d’Honneur, Paris) from February 18 to May 11. 

http://hyperallergic.com/102457/rediscovering-the-dark-splendor-of-gustave-dore-with-edgar-allan-poe/
 

Leonard Cohen's Proxy War

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:34 PM
Subject: Fwd: Your constant claims to the FBI (including seven emails in the last 24 hours) that I am "harassing" your adult son Rutger and other family members
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao@nsa.gov, fsb@fsb.ru, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, info <info@kibi-edu.org>, "YesheRimpoche@aol.com" <bhakhatulku@yahoo.com>

Hello IRS,

I tend to doubt that a perusal of harassing emails to me, Rutger, Ray, Karen, David, my parents, Paulette, Francisco Suarez, etc. will prove anything other than the years worth of harassment and stalking we have been subjected to over matters related to Cohen's tax fraud and Phil Spector.

No false fraud complaint was filed with the IRS.  The reason I raised Leonard Cohen's tax fraud in my case history is because his lawsuit is retaliation over the fact that I reported the tax fraud to the Internal Revenue Service on April 15, 2005.  Also, my lawyers set forth the extraordinary penalties Leonard Cohen was facing.  He offered me 50% community property.  There were witnesses present:  my lawyers and accountant.  It was also addressed, by my lawyers, in writing and the IRS has that memorandum.  Kory wrote on May 24, 2005 explaining his generous settlement authority and advising me (Lindsey and Penick) that the IRS would demand answers to questions going back years.  I didn't argue federal tax matters.  Leonard Cohen now has. 

Cohen hadn't seen me in nearly a year and my hair wasn't blonde.  I wasn't served his lawsuit.  I have sent you evidence that my hair was brown.  Rutger was harassed by GIanelli over Chad Knaak.  He is being harassed all day today - at both his private and business email addresses. 

GIanelli has been harassing me relentlessly since he heard from Kory/Rice in 2009.  He works in tandem with Cohen's fan, Susanne Walsh, who frequently copies in Cohen's lawyer, Michelle RIce.  I wasn't served this lawsuit and the court has no jurisdiction over me.  None whatsoever.  If the judge doesn't vacate it, the matter will be appealed and the theft and wrongful altering of my federal tax returns will be addressed in a federal lawsuit.  Perhaps a federal will understand jurisdiction.

All the best,

Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: Your constant claims to the FBI (including seven emails in the last 24 hours) that I am "harassing" your adult son Rutger and other family members
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

A perusal of the below message string who took the time to see that Kelley Lynch initiated it (along with sending me 40 additional emails today and every day) might come to a different conclusion, Ms. Lynch. Nor did Leonard Cohen tender the issue of your false tax fraud complaint to the court in the context of the pending motion; YOU did that. In fact, the majority of your narrative is devoted to it.​

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

CEASE AND DESIST, GIANELLI. 

The IRS Has Said Nothing To Support Stephen Gianelli's Latest Harassing Email

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: Your constant claims to the FBI (including seven emails in the last 24 hours) that I am "harassing" your adult son Rutger and other family members
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>

Jeffrey,

GIanelli has been harassing me, my sons, sister, etc. all morning.  The IRS has not said, anywhere, that their case is closed or that they agree with Cohen.  Robert Kory doesn't work for or represent the IRS.  If you have any questions, let me know.  I will be at the hearing on the 17th and will speak directly to the judge.  I don't know you are arguing federal tax matters before LA Superior Court.

Kelley Lynch

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello IRS,

Rutger, my sister, and I have been harassed all morning by Gianelli - over the Cohen matter.  Robert Kory's letters defending his client are not IRS letters confirming anything.  The IRS personally advised me to file a fraud form re. the fraudulent refund and the illegal LCI K-1s.  I am addressing Brady materials re the retaliation probation matter (Swanigan continues to communicate with GIanelli) and the reason that the DA elected not to charge Cohen is an issue.  The judge already advised me that Streeter can be questioned over her lies throughout my trial.  That's her habit and pattern.  No one embezzled anything.  Leonard Cohen willfully concealed corporate books and records and his ledger is absurd.

Agent Tejeda has not advised me that I have burned bridges.  He said he would testify at future hearings.  For some reason, Vanderet prevented it.  I think the IRS had a chance to investigate and review all the evidence I gave them in 2005.  Agent Sopko fflew in to meet with me in 2007.  She then advised me to report Cohen's tax fraud to Agent Tejeda which I did. 

The refund and illegal K-1s have been challenged with the IRS.  I discovered the refund during my trial.  That's a huge issue now.  Leonard Cohen doesn't pay taxes and then defrauds the taxpayers of another approximately $700K while concealing evidence the IRS has.  He wants to benefit from his conduct also. 

Kelley

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:59 PM, STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:

Its all true, Ms. Lynch - every word.

Kory met with the IRS criminal division in response to your claim of tax fraud in 2008 and the issue was resolved to the satisfaction of the IRS at that time. As Mr. Kory stated in his declaration, there were no changes to his clients' returns taking a theft loss deduction for your +/-$9M embezzlement​ for the tax years in question, which Cohen did in 2005.

NOTE GIANELLI'S INTENTIONAL LIE.  I REPORTED COHEN'S TAX FRAUD TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ON APRIL 15, 2005 AND THEREAFTER.  I MET WITH AGENT SOPKO OF THE TREASURY IN MARCH 2007.  GIANELLI IS SIMPLY LYING THAT I REPORTED THE ALLEGATIONS RE. COHEN'S CRIMINAL TAX FRAUD IN 2008.   THE PERSONAL THAT EMBEZZLED IS LEONARD COHEN.  HE SIMPLY WITHHELD CORPORATE BOOKS AND RECORDS FROM LA SUPERIOR COURT AND HAS TAKEN THE LEGAL POSITION THAT HE IS THE ALTER EGO OF THESE CORPORATE FICTIONS.  EMPHASIS ON FICTION.  THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE OFFICES, LET ALONE A BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER.  

After more than eight years, I think the matter is settled.

And you burned your bridge to the IRS Criminal Division by going public with your allegations, complete with the name of the agent who was conducting the investigation, before the IRS even had a chance to investigate.

In the process you gave the target of the investigation a rare advantage: a heads up.

His lawyers were able to meet with the criminal division and nip the matter in the bud before it went any further.

The Vivienne Swanigan/City Attorney Lies File

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:59 PM
Subject: Fwd: Your constant claims to the FBI (including seven emails in the last 24 hours) that I am "harassing" your adult son Rutger and other family members
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, info <info@kibi-edu.org>, "YesheRimpoche@aol.com" <bhakhatulku@yahoo.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao@nsa.gov, fsb@fsb.ru

Hello DOJ,

Swanigan did NOT hit reply all, without realizing it, and copy in the FBI, my sister, and my son.  That's absurd.  The entire situation needs to be investigated.  Of course I respond.  My family has been relentlessly targeted as I recently discussed with Investigator Frayeh.  I specifically am asking the DOJ to investigate the City Attorney, this situation, the fraudulent use of domestic violence orders, lies about federal tax matters, etc. 

Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: Your constant claims to the FBI (including seven emails in the last 24 hours) that I am "harassing" your adult son Rutger and other family members
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

"Why did Swanigan copy the FBI?"

Because she hit "Reply-All" without realizing she was responding to anyone but me, or so she said in an email apologizing for copying you with her response to me, in pertinent part:

“Please be advised that it was not my intention to send an email to Kelly Lynch when I responded to you - I am not interested in communicating with her at all, particularly since I specifically asked Lynch not to email me and she has complied.  I did see that you had sent your email to a Washington Field Office and also DOJ or someone like that.  It just never occurred to me that you would send me an email with Ms. Lynch copied in, especially since you know that Lynch has a habit of hitting "Reply All" when she responds and - as we well know - she WILL respond. If I had realized that Ms. Lynch was copied in, I would have deleted her.  Unfortunately, I have been working very long hours lately as I have been working on a trial matter, I am really far behind in my email responses, I do not have time for extra emails right now, and I simply did not take the time to check all the cc people on your email.  Again, it was not intentional.  Nevertheless, I apologize for any problems my email may have caused you. 

“In the future, I will send all your emails directly to my "KELLY LYNCH DIATRIBE EMAILS" e-file, where Kelly's are already sent to linger until that far-off day when I have nothing else to do but read emails (although Ms. Lynch stopped emailing me completely after October 16th). That way, you may continue to send me emails, as you wish.

“Again, my apologies for copying in Ms. Lynch.”

(Apology email from Viviane Swanigan.)

Steven Gianelli Continues To Write Me With Deputy City Attorney Swanigan Copied In - As Well As My Sons

From: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:53 AM
Subject: Re: Your constant claims to the FBI (including seven emails in the last 24 hours) that I am "harassing" your adult son Rutger and other family members
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: blinddistribution <blinddistribution@gmail.com>, Steven Machat <smachat@gmail.com>, Deputy City Attorney Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>, John Penick <mr.synt4xerror@gmail.com>

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:32 PM
Subject: Fwd: Your constant claims to the FBI (including seven emails in the last 24 hours) that I am "harassing" your adult son Rutger and other family members
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>, smachat@gmail.com, mr.synt4xerror@gmail.com, Ray Lindsey <raymond.c.lindsey@gmail.com>, karen@mccourt.org

 BOTH OF MY SONS HAVE BEEN QUITE CLEAR WITH GIANELLI.  THEY ARE ALSO WITNESSES.  IN ANY EVENT, SWANIGAN DOESN'T SEEM TO MIND.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/157116027/Kelley-Lynch-Leonard-Cohen-IRS-Ray-Lawrence-Stephen-Gianelli-Etc

I Asked The CIty Attorney For Over A Year To Advise GIanelli To Stop Writing And Copying Me, My Familiy, Etc. - He Must Have Been Necessary, Helpful, & Wanted Until Swanigan Wrote Him On December 16, 2013

Date: Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:14 AM
Subject: Fwd: Your constant claims to the FBI (including seven emails in the last 24 hours) that I am "harassing" your adult son Rutger and other family members
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao@nsa.gov, fsb@fsb.ru

Hi FBI,

This is a critical piece of evidence.  Streeter and Swanigan could have, as I requested ad nauseum, immediately sent this to Gianelli.  They willfully and intentionally chose not to.  They have also concealed, from LA Superior Court, my calls to their office advising them I did not want to be copied in emails with Streeter or Swanigan.  It is particularly egregious because these people prosecuted, lied extensively about me, fabricated information about the IRS, misled jurors, elicited perjured testimony, were aligned with Cooley & Jackson, and my PD said:  They are attempting to sabotage the IRS, discredit you, and they don't want the Spector verdict overturned.  You should speak to that PD.

My probation violation is the City Attorney's affirmative defense and it is absolute retaliation.  It's pathetic.  People should be arrested for this unconscionable waste of taxpayer dollars.  Feuer is perpetuating this.  I would assume that their liability has played a deciding factor in their retaliation.

Why did they copy the FBI?  Why did Swanigan have the nerve to write me, my sister, son, and the FBI?  Read the trial transcript.  Streeter lied about the IRS, repeatedly and consistently.  And many other things.  Here's their theory:  Streeter received these emails from GIanelli (and my refutations) and did nothing for months.  Suddenly, she brought them to the attention of Swanigan.  Months later.  Then, government officials concluded that my email to the FBI and DOJ was meant to threaten Streeter.  Maybe you need to be on drugs to follow this insanity. 

When I asked Swanigan, before this email was sent, what she thought was going on with the FBI being copied in, she said something like she wasn't aware of that.  Something positively PSYCHOTIC.  This was in the courtroom.  I was shocked they would use Lawrence against me when they had my son and Paulette's declaration.  Do you know how I know that (regardless of the prosecutor's feigning otherwise): because it's attached to the email to Swanigan from June 2013 re. my new email account.  Talk to my son.  He's the one that advised me to start a new one.  He was aware of what was going on with Gianelli, Walsh, and Lawrence.  See his declaration.  He's a witness.  Rutger's a witness.  And the City Attorney directed a criminal to engage and harass me and communicate a message to me.  Do you see anything illegal about that?  She's also a smart ass - she doesn't want to poke the lion and she doesn't like it that she unwittingly caused me to respond to Gianelli . Who would believe that?  People in reality are in shock.  I guess LA Superior Court is used to and tolerates corruption.  What other conclusion could you make?  Don't bother assuming that anyone would ever be held accountable.  I think there's a snow ball's chance in hell of that ever happening. 

Why did Swanigan copy the FBI?  Well, we're going to find out. 

All the best,
Kelley

UTTERLY OUTRAGEOUS:  THIS WOMAN WRITES HIM AFTER OVER A YEAR OF HARSSMENT AND HAD ENCOURAGED HIM TO WRITE ME AND COMMUNICATE MESSAGES FROM THEIR OFFICE TO ME.  A MAN I DEFINITELY BELIEVE WAS ENGAGED IN CRIMINAL CONDUCT WITH ME, MEMBERS OF MY FAMILY, ETC.  GIANELLI.  

From: Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>
Date: Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:37 PM

Subject: Re: Your constant claims to the FBI (including seven emails in the last 24 hours) that I am "harassing" your adult son Rutger and other family members

To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Cc: wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, mr.synt4xerror@gmail.com, karen@softwheresolutions.com, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>, karen@mccourt.org, mpduke1@msn.com

Dear Mr. GIANELLI:

Please stop copying me on any and all emails to or regarding Kelly Lynch.  Your communications are unnecessary, unhelpful, and unwanted.

Thank you.

Vivienne A. Swanigan
Deputy City Attorney
Labor Relations Division

Why would Vivienne Swanigan direct Gianelli to continue harassing me and ask him to communicate a message from their office to me?

Subject: Fwd: Emails to Kelly Lynch
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
To: Deputy City Attorney Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>
CC: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>,

John Penick <mr.synt4xerror@gmail.com>,Ray Lindsey <raymond.c.lindsey@gmail.com>,karen <karen@mccourt.org>,wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>,Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>

Ms. Swanigan,

Here is an email wherein you recently expressly REQUESTED ME TO SEND several emails to Kelley Lynch clarifying that I have never met or communicated with Sandra Jo Streeter and am not in cahoots with her - which I subsequently did as requested, copy to you.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>
Date: Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:01 PM
Subject: Emails to Kelly Lynch
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>

Since you are still intent on "poking the lion", could you please send emails (several) to Kelly Lynch stating that you are not connected to Sandra Streeter, have never met her, and you are not involved with a conspiracy with her?  Because, unfortunately, your poking at Lynch and defending our prosecutor is making her focus more and more on Ms. Streeter and a delusional belief that Streeter and you are cohorts in a conspiracy against her.  

Also, could you please not give Lynch any further information about what we are doing/planning?  My intent in emailing you about the hearing was just to let you know what happened as a courtesy, not to give you more ammunition to throw at Lynch. I do not like the fact that I have unwittinglin fueled the fires of Kelly Lynch's imaginary Gianelli-Streeter conspiracy by giving you information about what happened at the hearging.  - Vivienne

*****************Confidentiality Notice *************************
This electronic message transmission contains information
from the Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney, which may be confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or the work product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the content of this information is prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message and any attachments without reading or saving in any manner.
********************************************************************